CAPÍTULO 1: FUNDAMENTACIÓN TEÓRICA
1.8 M ETODOLOGÍAS ESTUDIADAS PARA EL DESARROLLO E INGENIERÍA DE SOFTWARE
practitioners
I
nterview schedule: senior EHPs (involved in development).In each box the major question is in the top row. The following row contains prompts to ensure that pertinent data is collected.
Q1. Before the project what did you feel about the role of EHPs in licensed premises?
l Did you feel they had a role?
l What was the extent of that role?
l What were the main issues that brought EHP involvement?
l To what extent were events related to RIDDOR a part of this?
l Do you feel poor RIDDOR reporting prevented more EHP involvement?
Q2. What were your feelings about alcohol before this project?
l Prompts:
¢ Did you think alcohol use caused problems?
¢ Did you think there was a relationship between alcohol and violence?
¢ Did you think ARV was a problem?
¢ What kind of problem?
¢ In society (national legislation, policy, economics, culture)?
¢ In communities (local policy, economics, culture)?
¢ In your local area (local policy, economics, culture, work type and patterns, leisure)?
¢ In the NTE (all above)?
¢ Any specific times, locations, groups of people?
¢ Have you noticed any changes over time?
¢ Any additional problem in the NTE?
¢ Did you think licensed premises (policy, practice) had a role in ARV?
¢ Can you describe this?
Q3. To your knowledge, who should be responsible for regulating ARV in the licensed trade?
l Prompts:
¢ police
¢ fire and rescue
¢ Trading Standards
¢ licensing officers
¢ local councils
¢ (health and safety– don’t prompt if they don’t volunteer this)
¢ licensed premises staff/managers
¢ individuals?
l Does that reflect the national picture or do you think it varies locally?
Q4. To your knowledge did health and safety play a role in combating alcohol-induced violence and injury in licensed premises before this project began?
l If yes to above:
¢ Can you describe it?
¢ Did it involve interagency work with any other responsible bodies (authorities and licensed premises)?
¢ Can you describe that?
¢ Did you feel it was adequate?
¢ How did it impact on your organisation’s workload?
¢ Was that a national policy or did it very locally?
Q5. Can you describe the usual work of environmental health officers before the project?
l Prompts:
¢ in general
¢ in the retail sector
¢ in licensed premises.
Q6. Can you describe how you became involved in the project (AWLPI)?
l Prompts:
¢ What was your first contact with anyone about the project?
¢ Did you know anything about this type of work before?
¢ How was the project described to you?
¢ Why did you become involved?
¢ Were any colleagues involved?
¢ Could you envisage any barriers to implementing the project?
Q7. Can you describe what you did and who you worked with during development of the project interventions (audit, website, films)?
l Prompts:
¢ Initial development– can you tell me about your work in relation to the intervention development with Cardiff University?
¢ Were you involved enough?
¢ Can you describe any problems that arose during your involvement?
¢ Did you have sufficient impact on the development process?
¢ Would you make any changes to the developmental process?
Q8. After the audit had been completed can you tell me about its finalisation and production?
l Prompts:
¢ Were you consulted before the final go-ahead?
¢ If so, what happened during consultation?
¢ If any further changes were made were you informed?
APPENDIX 7
NIHR Journals Library www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk
146
Q9. Can you describe your reaction to the completed Audit and Guidance document?
l What did you think about the audit?
l What did you think about the form of the document?
l The timing of receipt?
l What was the document like to read?
l Would you make any changes to it?
l Did you feel it promised to have a use in preventing violence in licensed premises?
l What did you think was the EHPs’ reaction to the audit?
l Did you feel it was the role of EHPs to undertake such an audit?
l What do you feel were the most important part(s) of the audit in addressing factors associated with violence in licensed premises?
Q10. Can you describe EHPs’ reaction to the concept of the project?
l What did they think about it?
l Did responses vary?
l How did it meet perceptions of their roles?
Q11. Can you describe what you thought about the running of the training days?
l Was it easy to disseminate knowledge about it?
l How was the process of getting EHPs to attend?
l What did you think of the:
¢ organisation
¢ content
¢ timing?
l Have you received any feedback from EHPs who attended?
l How did you feel about your role in it? Enough? Too limited?
Q12. Can you describe general EHP reaction to the Audit and Guidance document?
l What did they think about the audit?
l What did they think about the form of the document?
l The timing of receipt?
l How did they find the document to read?
l Do you think they felt it was their role to undertake such an audit?
l Did responses vary?
Q13. Can you describe EHPs’ reaction to the website and films?
l What did they think about the website form and content?
l What did they think about the film content?
l What was is it like to use?
l Did they feel it was the role of EHPs to promote the website and films?
l What did you think was the EHPs’ reaction to the website and films?
l Did responses vary?
Q14. Looking back would you make any changes to the way the audit and/or website was developed or implemented?
Q15. How would you describe your organisation’s response to the project?
l Overall.
l LAs.
l Managers.
l EHPs.
Q16. What are your current thoughts about regulating alcohol and violence in licensed premises? Have there been any changes during your involvement in the project?
Q17. Is there anything else you think EHPs/health and safety could do to address factors in licensed premises affecting ARV?
APPENDIX 7
NIHR Journals Library www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk
148