MARCADORES MOLECULARES Y MAPAS DE LIGAMIENTO EN CEBADA

Index of Currency Market Turbulence

The index, I, is a weighted average of the rate of change of the exchange rate, Δe/e, and of

reserves, ΔR/R, with weights such that the two components of the index have equal sample

volatilities.

Where σeis the standard deviation of the rate of change of the exchange rate and σRis the

standard deviation of the rate of change of reserves. Since changes in the exchange rate enter with a positive weight and changes in reserves have a negative weight attached, readings of this index that were three standard deviations or more above the mean were cataloged as crises.

For countries in the sample that had hyperinflation, the construction of the index was modified. While a 100-percent devaluation may be traumatic for a country with low-to-moderate inflation, a devaluation of that magnitude is commonplace during hyperinflations. A single index for the countries that had hyperinflation episodes would miss sizable devaluations and reserve losses in the moderate inflation periods, since the historic mean is distorted by the high inflation episode. To avoid this, we divided the sample according to whether inflation in the previous six months was higher than 150 percent and then constructed an index for each subsample. Our cataloging of crises for the countries coincides fairly highly with our chronology of currency market disruptions. Eichengreen et al. (1996b) also include interest rates in this index; however,

our data on market-determined interest rates on developing countries does not span the entire sample.

The Indicators

Sources: International Financial Statistics (IFS), International Monetary Fund (IMF), various issues; Emerging Market Indicators, International Finance Corporation (IFC), various

issues; World Development Indicators, World Bank (WB), various issues. When data was missing from these sources, central-bank bulletins and other country-specific sources were used as supplements. Unless otherwise noted, we used 12-month percent changes.

1. M2 multiplier: The ratio of M2 (IFS lines 34 plus 35) to base money (IFS line 14).

2. Domestic credit/GDP: IFS line 52 divided by IFS line 64 to obtain domestic credit in real terms, which was then divided by IFS line 99b.p. (interpolated) to obtain the domestic credit/GDP ratio. Monthly real GDP was interpolated from annual data.

3. Real interest rate: Deposit rate (IFS line 60) deflated using consumer prices (IFS line 64). Monthly rates expressed in percentage points. In levels.

4. Lending-deposit rate ratio: IFS line 60p divided by IFS line 60 was used in lieu of

differential to ameliorate the distortions caused by the large percentage point spreads observed during high inflation. In levels.

5. Excess M1 balances: M1 (IFS line 34) deflated by consumer prices (IFS line 64) less an estimated demand for money. The demand for real balances is determined by real GDP (interpolated IFS line 99b.p), domestic consumer price inflation, and a time trend. Domestic inflation was used in lieu of nominal interest rates, as market-determined interest rates were not available during the entire sample for a number of countries; the time trend (which

can enter log-linearly, linearly, or exponentially) is motivated by its role as a proxy for financial innovation and/or currency substitution. In levels.

6. M2/reserves: IFS lines 34 plus 35 converted into dollars (using IFS line ae) divided by IFS line 1L.d.

7. Bank deposits: IFS line 24 plus 25 deflated by consumer prices (IFS line 64). 8. Exports: IFS line 70.

9. Imports: IFS line 71.

10. Terms of trade: The unit value of exports (IFS line 74) over the unit value of imports (IFS line 75). For those developing countries where import unit values (or import price indices) were not available, an index of prices of manufactured exports from industrial countries to developing countries was used.

11. The real exchange rate: The real exchange-rate index is derived from a nominal exchange-rate index, adjusted for relative consumer prices (IFS line 64). The measure is defined as the relative price of foreign goods (in domestic currency) to the price of domestic goods. The nominal exchange-rate index is a weighted average of the exchange rates of the 19 OECD countries with weights equal to the country trade shares with the OECD countries. Since not all real appreciations reflect disequilibrium phenomena, we focus on deviations of the real exchange rate from trend. The trend was specified as, alternatively, log, linear, and exponential; the best fit among these was selected on a country-by-country basis. In levels. 12. Reserves: IFS line 1L.d.

13. Real interest-rate differential: Interest rates in the domestic economy are compared with interest rates in the United States (Germany) if the domestic central bank pegs the currency to the

dollar (deutsche mark). The interest-rate differential is constructed as the difference between real rates for the domestic and foreign countries. Real rates are deposit rates (IFS line 60) deflated using consumer prices (IFS line 64).

14. Output: For most countries, the measure of output used is industrial production (IFS line 66). However, for some countries, (the commodity exporters) an index of out-put of primary

commodities is used (IFS lines 66aa) if industrial production is not available.

15. Stock returns: IFC global indices are used for all emerging markets; for industrial countries the quotes from the main boards are used. All stock prices are in US dollars.

16. GDP: Consolidated public-sector deficit as a share of GDP (World Development Indicators, various issues)

References Agénor, Pierre.; Bhandari, J.S. and Flood, Robert P. “Speculative Attacks and Models of

Balance-of-Payments Crises,” IMF Staff Papers, 1992, 39, pp. 357-94. American Banker, various issues.

Blanco, Herminio and Garber, Peter M. “Recurrent Devaluations and Speculative Attacks on the Mexican Peso,” Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94, pp. 148-66.

Calomiris, Charles W. and Gorton, Gary. “The Origins of Banking Panics: Models, Facts, and Bank Regulation,” in R.Glenn Hubbard, ed., Financial markets and financial crises. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 109-173.

Calvo, Guillermo A. “Varieties of Capital-Market Crises,” Mimeo, University of Maryland, College Park, 1995.

Calvo, Guillermo A, Leiderman, Leonardo and Reinhart, Carmen M. “Capital Inflows and Real Exchange Rate Appreciation: the Role of External Factors,” IMF Staff Papers, 1993, 40, pp. 108-51.

Calvo, Guillermo A., and Mendoza, Enrique. “Petty Crime and Cruel Punishment: Lessons from the Mexican Debacle,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 1996, 86, pp 170-75.

Calvo, Sara and Reinhart, Carmen M. “Capital Flows to Latin America: is there Evidence of Contagion Effects?”, in Guillermo A. Calvo, Morris Goldstein, and Eduard Hochreiter, eds., Private capital flows to emerging markets. Washington, DC: Institute for

International Economics, 1996, 151-71.

Caprio, Gerald, Jr. and Klingebiel, Daniela. “Bank Insolvency: Bad Luck, Bad Policy, or Bad Banking?” in Annual World Bank conference on development economics, Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1996, pp. 79-104.

Diaz-Alejandro, Carlos. “Good-Bye Financial Repression, Hello Financial Crash,” Journal of Development Economics, 1985, 19.

Diebold, Francis and Rudebusch, Glen. “Scoring the Leading Indicators”, Journal of Business, 1989, 62, pp. 369-91.

Dornbusch, Rudiger; Goldfajn, Ilan and Valdés, Rodrigo. “Currency Crises and Collapses,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995, 2, pp. 219-95.

developing countries,” Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.

Eichengreen, Barry, Rose, Andrew K. and Wyplosz, Charles, “Exchange Market Mayhem: the Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks,” Economic Policy, 1996a, 21 pp. 249-312.

Eichengreen, Barry, Rose, Andrew K. and Wyplosz, Charles, “Contagious Currency Crises,” CEPR Discussion Paper 1453, August 1996b.

Emerging Market Indicators, Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation, various issues.

Frankel, Jeffrey and Rose, Andrew K. “Exchange Rate Crises in Emerging Markets,” Journal of International Economics, 1996, 41, pp. 351-68.

Galbis, Vicente. “High Real Interest Rates Under Financial Liberalization: Is There a Problem?,” International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/93/7, 1993.

Goldfajn, Ilan and Valdés, Rodrigo. “Balance-of-Payments Crises and Capital Flows: the Role of Liquidity,” Mimeo, Massachussets Institute of Technology, 1995.

Gorton, Gary. “Banking Panics and Business Cycles,” Oxford Economic Papers, 1988, 40, pp. 751-81.

International Financial Statistics, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, various issues. Kaminsky, Graciela L. and Leiderman, Leonardo. “High Real Interest Rates in the Aftermath of

Disinflation: Is it a Lack of Credibility?” Journal of Development Economics 1998, 55, 191-214.

Kindelberger, Charles. Manias, panics, and crashes, New York, NY: Basic Books Inc., 1978. Krugman, Paul. “A Model of Balance-of-Payments Crises,” Journal of Money, Credit, and

Banking, 1979, 11, pp. 311-25.

McKinnon, Ronald.I. and Pill, Huw. “Credible Liberalizations and International Capital Flows: the Overborrowing Syndrome,” in Takatoshi Ito and Anne Krueger, eds., Financial deregulation and integration in East Asia, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 7- 42.

Miller, Victoria. “Central Bank Reactions to Banking Crises in Fixed Exchange Rate Regimes,” Mimeo, Université de Québec à Montréal, 1995.

Annual World Bank conference on development economics, Washington DC:World Bank, 1996, pp. 29-62.

Mishra, Deepak. “Political Determinants of Currency Crises: Theory and Evidence,” Mimeo, University of Maryland, College Park, 1997.

New York Times, various issues.

Obstfeld, Maurice. “The Logic of Currency Crises,” Cahiers Economiques et Monetaires, Bank of France, 1994, 43, pp. 189-213.

Obstfeld, Maurice. “Models of Currency Crises with Self-fulfilling Features,” NBER Working Paper 5285, 1995.

Reinhart, Carmen M. and Reinhart, Vincent, R. “Forecasting Turning Points in Canada,” Mimeo, International Monetary Fund, 1996.

Reinhart, Carmen M., and Végh, Carlos A. “Do Exchange Rate-Based Inflation Stabilizations Sow the Seeds of their Own Destruction?.” Mimeo, International Monetary Fund, 1996. Stock, James H., and Watson, Mark W. “New Indices of Coincident and Leading Economic

Indicators,” NBER macroeconomics annual, 1989, pp. 351-93.

Stoker, James. “Intermediation and the Business Cycle under a Specie Standard: the Role of the Gold Standard in English Financial Crises, 1790-1850.” Mimeo, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1994.

Sundararajan, V. and Baliño, Tomas. “Issues in Recent Banking Crises,” in V. Sundararajan and Tomas Baliño, eds., Banking crises: cases and issues. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 1991, pp.1-57.

Velasco, Andres. “Financial and Balance-of-Payments Crises,” Journal of Development Economics, 1987, 27, pp.263-83.

Wall Street Journal, various issues.

Footnotes

1. See Maurice Obstfeld (1994 and 1995) and Calvo (1995).

2. See Carmen M. Reinhart and Carlos A.Végh (1996) for a review of this literature and the empirical

regularities.

3. The construction of the index is described in the data Appendix. The dates of the crises appear in

Appendix Table 1, the level of the index and key events around the crises dates are reported in working

paper version of this paper, Graciela L. Kaminsky and Reinhart (1996).

4. Bank stocks could be an indicator, but in many of the developing countries an important share of the

banks are not traded publicly.

5. If the peak month for the banking crisis is not known, we list the midpoint of that year as the date.

6. The real exchange rate is used, as high inflation countries will typically have larger nominal

devaluations.

7. M2 to reserves captures to what extent the liabilities of the banking system are backed by

international reserves. In the event of a currency crisis, individuals may rush to convert their domestic

currency deposits into foreign currency, so that this ratio captures the ability of the central bank to meet

those demands (Calvo and Mendoza ,1996).

8. An increase in the real exchange rate index denotes a depreciation.

9. Detailed definitions of all the variables and their sources are provided in the data Appendix.

10. See Appendix Tables 1 and 2 for a detailed indication of any missing data around crisis dates.

11. See Galbis (1993).

12. See Sundararajan and Baliño (1991).

13. For example, in the boom period leading up to the 1981 Argentine banking crisis, stock returns (in

U.S. dollars) were as high as 813 percent during the 12 months ending May 1979; by May 1981, the

12-month capital loss was 60 percent. The crash in asset values is cited in most case studies as an

outright fraud, in many of the crises in our sample a substantial portion of banks and finance companies

were considerably overexposed to real estate.

14. See, for instance, James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson (1989), Francis Diebold and Glen Rudebusch

(1989), and Reinhart and Vincent R. Reinhart (1996).

15. An 18- and 12-month window were also used; the results are available from the authors.

16. The definition of noise-to-signal ratio used throughout is best illustrated by considering the following

two-by-two matrix:

Crisis occurs in the following 24 months

No crisis occurs in the following 24 months

Indicator issues a signal A B Indicators does not issue a

signal

C D

If a variable signals and a crisis occurs in the following 24 months (counted in cell A) the signal is

considered accurate. If a variable signals and no crisis occurs in that time frame (counted in cell B), the

signal is said to be a false alarm or noise. Hence, a perfect indicator would only have entries in cells in A

and D. More generally, the noise-to-signal ratio for any indicator is given by the number of entries in

[B/(B+D)]/[A/(A+C)]. Hence, it is the ratio of false signals to all possible bad signals divided by the ratio

of good signals to all possible good signals. An extremely noisy indicator would have few entries in A

and D, many in B.

17. For a discussion of the evolving nature of crises see the working paper, Kaminsky and Reinhart

(1996).

18. These are reported for each crisis in column 17 of the Appendix tables.

19. See Eichengreen, Rose, and Wyplosz (1995) and Krugman (1996).