CAPÍTULO II: EXPOSICIÓN ANALÍTICA DEL INFORME PROFESIONAL
2.4 ANTECEDENTES, MARCO TEORICO Y CONCEPTUAL DEL INFORME
2.4.3. MARCO CONCEPTUAL
In this thesis I have described the cloning of Xom, based on its homology with the homeobox-containing gene family. Xom contains a homeodomain and is therefore postulated to act as a DNA binding protein. The homeodomain of Xom is of an unusual class, marked by the presence of a threonine in position 47 of the homeodomain, in place of the more usual valine or isoleucine. In another member of this class this residue has been shown to be important in determining the DNA binding specificity of the
homeodomain. Hox 11, a. gene required for the development of the mouse spleen (Dear et a l , 1995), also contains a threonine at position 47 of the homeodomain. In H ox 11 this threonine causes the binding specificity of the homeodomain to change from 5 ’-TAAT-3’ to the more unusual 5 -TAAC-3' (Dear et a l, 1993). Similarly, the DNA binding activity of another member of this class. Bar H I, is also different from most other homeodomains (Kalionis and O'Farrell, 1993). It should be noted that the homeodomain of B arH l is
most related to the homeodomain of Xom. It is therefore possible that the DNA binding specificity of Xom is also changed. It is also interesting that the homeodomains o f other ventralising Xenopus homeobox genes have the threonine substitution at position 47 (Gawantka et a l, 1995; Schmidt et a l, 1996). It is unclear why the embryo has so many homeobox genes with a similar expression pattern, similar activity and with a threonine at position 47 of the homeodomain. Perhaps these genes act as a complex to bind a DNA. This may be why Xom has a rather weak ventralising activity. A prediction from these obsevations is that downstream genes of the ventralising homeobox genes will all contain a similar promoter sequence, possibly containing the TA AC motif.
8.2. The expression of Xom
Xom is expressed very early, probably with the onset of zygotic transcription. It is
important therefore to compare the expression of Xom with other genes that are expressed around this time, such as goosecoid and Xwnt-S, in order to place these genes into a potential regulatory hierarchy. It is known, for example, that the gene siamois is
expressed before goosecoid and Xwnt-8 (Lemaire et a l, 1995). RNAase protection data similar to that performed for Xom and BMP-4 (figure 6.8) would indicate position of
Xom in this chain.
In a similar fashion, the onset of transcription of the ventralising homeobox genes could be compared to reveal some clues to their function and to determine if a similar hierarchy exists amongst them. As yet, data on the onset of the transcription o f Vox
(Schmidt et a l, 1996) and pv-1 (M. Jamrich; personal communication) is unavailable, however reports that Xvent expression only commences at gastmla stages (Gawantka et a l , 1995), places its transcripton after that of Xom.
8.3. The induction of Xom
From the data presented in this thesis, the action of BMP-4 is central to the expression of
perturbations in BMP-4 signalling also perturb the expression pattern of Xom. This is of interest as the suggestion that BMP-4 performs an inductive function in the embryo is supported by a strong body of evidence. BMP-4 is expressed in the correct place at the correct time for its proposed ventralising role (Schmidt et a l, 1995). Its effects on
isolated tissue also have the postulated effects (Dale et a l, 1992; Jones et al., 1996; Jones
et al., 1992). Inhibition of the BMP pathway using either a truncated BMP receptor (for example see (Suzuki et a l, 1994)) or by using "natural" inhibitors such as noggin (Smith and Harland, 1992; Smith et a l, 1993) or chordin (Holley et ah, 1995; Sasai et a l, 1994) inhibit the formation of ventral tissue, with a compensatory increase in dorsal structures.
Xom expression is localised as soon as it is detectable by whole mount in situ hybridisation, and this localisation probably marks the ventral side of the embryo. Data using the truncated BMP receptor suggests that this expression is controlled by maternal BM P signalling. However it is unclear whether maternal levels of BMP-2 or BMP-4 are responsible for this induction. Experiments using antisense oligonucleotides to prevent translation from a maternal RNA such as BMP-2 or 4 may go some way to addressing the exact identity of the inducing molecule (see, for example, (Sasai et a l, 1995)), but would still leave the conundrum of how Xom is localised in the first place. It is possible that a maternal BMP is able to act throughout the margin of the embryo but is prevented from doing so on the dorsal side by the action of localised maternal noggin. Again experiments studying the change in Xom localisation when antisense oligonucleotides prevent
maternal noggin translation should address this. Another possibility is that cortical rotation not only establishes the dorsal side of the embryo; it also molecularly defines the ventral side. If this is true, Xom should be expressed throughout the embryo, at pre gas trulation stages of development, when cortical rotation is inhibited by ultra-violet irradiation of the vegetal pole.
The expression pattern of Xom seems to be almost identical with that o f BMP-4. This, together with the observation that BMP-4 can induce Xom in an immediate early
fashion, strengthens the argument that Xom is a transcriptional response to BMP-4 activity. However there are regions where the later expression of the two genes do not overlap. BMP-4 is in the heart region of the embryo and Xom is not; Xom is in the tailbud and BMP-4 is not. The tailbud expression is intriguing, suggesting that another mechanism, not dependent on BMP-4 signalling, is responsible for expression here. Alternatively, the levels of BMP-4 in the tailbud may be too low to be detected by the whole mount in situ hybridisation procedure.
8.4. The Function of Xom
The presence of a homeobox in the sequence of Xom suggests that it can act as a
transcription factor. An acidic domain N-terminal to the homeodomain and a proline-rich domain on the C-terminal side suggest that Xom is able to act as a transcriptional
activator (Ma and Ptashne, 1987; Mermod et a i, 1989). The identity o f target genes of
Xom is unknown, and it would be of interest to screen for possible downstream responses o f Xom.
Further clues on the function of Xom may be gained from the using a "dominant negative" approach to interfere the activity of Xom. One possible method that can be used is a procedure developed for the homeobox gene, Mix-1 (P. Mead and L. Zon;
unpublished observations). Here an interfering allele of Mix-1 was constructed by mutating a residue in the homeodomain. This allele bocks the activity of Mix-1. The effects of a similar construct made for Xom could be compared to the effects o f the dominant negative BMP receptor to provide more information on the activity of Xom.
References
Akimura, H., and Saigo, K. (1991).
DNA binding acivity of the B arH l homeodomain o fDrosophila. In “Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.”, Vol. 25, pp. 29-30.
Amaya, E., Musci, T. J., and Kirschner, M. W. (1991).
Expression o f a dominant negative mutant o f the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell66, 257-270.
Amaya, E., Musci, T. J., and Kirschner, M. W. (1993).
FGF signalling in the early specification of mesoderm in Xenopus. Development118,
477-487.Ang, S.-L., and Rossant, J. (1994).
HNF-36 is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development. C e ll.Arora, K., Dai, H., Kazuko, S. G., Jamal, J., O'Connor, M. B., Letsou, A., and Warrior,
R. (1995).
The Drosophila schunnuri gene acts in the Dpp/TGF-6 signalling pathway and encodes a transcription factor homologous to the human M BP family. Cell81,
718-790.Asashima, M., Nakano, H., Uchiyama, H., Sugino, H., Nakamura, T., Eto, Y., Ejima, D.,
Nishimatsu, S.-I., Ueno, N., and Konishita, K. (1991).
Presence of activin(erythroid differentiation factor) in unfertilised eggs and blastulae of Xenopus laevis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88, 6511-6514.
Badiani, P., Corbella, P., Kioussis, D., Marvel, J., and Weston, K. (1994).
Dominant interfering alleles define a role for c-Myb in T-cell development. Genes Dev. 8, 770- 782.Basilico, C., and Moscatelli, D. (1992).
The FGF family of growth factors and oncogenes.Beddington, R. S. P. (1992).
Transgenic mutagenesis in the mouse.Trends. Genet. 8,
345- 347.Beddington, R. S. P., Rashbass, P., and Wilson,
V.(1992). Brachyury-a.
gene required for mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis.Development 112 suppL,
157-165.Bellmann, R., and Werr, W. (1992).
Zm hoxla, the product of a novel maize homeobox gene, interacts with theShrunken 26bp feedback
control element.EMBO J. 11,
3367- 3374.Berridge, M. J., Downs, C. P., and Hanley, M. R. (1989).
Neural and Developmental actions of Lithium: a unifying hypothesis.Cell 5 9 ,
411-419.Blumberg, B., Wrigbt, C. V. E., De Robertis, E. M., and Cbo, K. W. Y. (1991)
Organizer-specific homeobox genes in Xenopus laevis embryos.
Science
253, 194- 196.Bollag, R. J., Siegfried, Z., Cebra-Tbomas, J. A., Garvey, N., Davison, E. M., and Silver,
L. M. (1994).
An ancient family of embryonically expressed mouse gene sharing a conserved potein m otif with the T locus.Nature Genetics
7, 383-389.Boterenbrood, E. C., and Nieuwkoop, P. D. (1973). Wilhelm Roux’ Arch EntwMech Org.
173,319-332.
Brown, E. E., Denegre, J. M., and Danilcbik, M. W. (1993).
Deep cytoplasmic rearrangements in ventralised XgMopwj embryos.Dev. Biol. 160,
148-156.Burgess, W. H., and Maciag, T. (1989).
The heparin-binding (fibroblast) growth factor family of proteins.Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58,
575-606.Biirglin, T. (1993)
The Homeodomain phylum.In
“A Guidebook to Homeoboxes” (D. Dubole, Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Busa, W. B., and Gimlich, R. L. (1989).
Lithium-induced teratogenesis in frog embryos prevented by a polyphosphoinositide cycle intermediate or a diacylglycerol analog.Dev Biol
132,315-24.
Cascio, S., and Garden, J. B. (1987).
The initiation of new gene transcription duringXenopus gastrulation requires immediately preceding protein synthesis. Development
100,
297-305.Chakrabarti, A., Matthews, G., Colman, A., and Dale, L. (1992).
Secretory and inductive properties of Drosophila wingless protein in Xenopus oocytes and embryos.Development
115,
355-369.Che, K. W. Y., Blumberg, B., Steinbeisser, H., and De Robertis,
E.M. (1991).
Molecular nature of Spemann’s organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 61, 1111-1120.Cbomczynski, P. (1993).
A reagent for the single step isolation of RNA, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. BioTechniques15,
532-537.Christian, J. L., McMahon, J. A., McMahon, A. P., and Moon, R. T. (1991).
Xwnt-8, aXenopus W nt-l/int-1-related gene responsive to mesoderm-inducing factors, may play a role in ventral mesodermal patterning during embryogenesis. Development 111, 1045-1055.
Christian, J. L., and Moon, R. T. (1993).
Interactions between Xwnt-8 and Spemann organizer signaling pathways generate dorsoventral pattern in the embryonic mesoderm o f Genes Dev. 7,13-28.Clements, J. H., Fettes, P., Knochel, S., Lef, J., and Knochel, W. (1995). Bone
morphogenetic protein 2 in the early development of Xenopus laevis. Mech. Dev. 52, 357-370.
Conlon, F. L., Barth, K. S., and Robertson, E. J. (1991).
A novel retrovirally induced embryonic lethal mutation in the mouse: assessment of the developmental fate of embryonic stem cells homozygous for the 413.d pro viral integration. Development111,
969-981.Conlon, F. L., Lyons, K. M., Takaesu, N., Barth, K. S., Kispert, A., Herrmann, B., and
Robertson, E. J. (1994).
A primary requirement for nodal in the formation and maintenance of the primitive streak in the mouse. Development120,
1919-1928.Cooke, J., and Smith, J. C. (1987).
The midblastula cell cycle transition and the character of mesoderm in u.v.-induced nonaxial Xenopus development. Development99,
197-210.Cooke, J., Smith, J. C., Smith, E. J., and Yaqoob, M. (1987).
The organization o f mesodermal pattern in Xenopus laevis: experiments using a Xenopus mesoderm- inducing factor. Development101,
893-908.Cornell, R. A., and Kimelman, D. (1994).
Activin-mediated mesoderm induction requires FGF. Development120,
453-462.Cornell, R. A., Musci, T. J., and Kimelman, D. (1995).
FGF is a prospective competence factor for early activin-type signals in Xenopus mesoderm induction. Development121,
2429-2437.Crompton, M. R., Bartlett, T. J., MacGregor, A. D., Manfioletti, G., Buratti, E.,
Giancotti, V., and Goodwin, G. H. (1992).
Identification of a novel vertebrate homeobox gene expressed in haematopoietic cells. N u cl Acids Res.20,
5661-5667.Cunliffe, V., and Smith, J. C. (1992).
Ectopic mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos caused by widespread expression of a Brachyury homologue. Nature358,
427-30.Dale, L., Howes, G., Price, B. M., and Smith, J. C. (1992).
Bone morphogenetic protein4:
a ventralizing factor in early Xenopus development. Development115,
573-85.Dale, L., Matthews, G., and Colman, A. (1993).
Secretion and mesoderm-inducing activity of the TGF-beta related domain of Xenopus V g l. EMBO J.12,
4471-4480.Dale, L., Matthews, G., Tahe, L., and Colman, A. (1989).
Developmental expression o f the protein product of V g l, a localized maternal mRNA in the frog Xenopus laevis.EMBO J. 8, 1057-65.
Dale, L., and Slack, J. M. (1987a).
Fate map for the 32-cell stage of Xenopus laevis.Development
99,
527-51.Dale, L., and Slack, J. M. (1987h).
Regional specification within the mesoderm of early embryos of Xenopus laevis. Development100,
279-95.Dale, L., Smith, J. C., and Slack, J. M. W. (1985).
Mesoderm induction in Xenopus lævis : a quantitative study using a cell lineage label and tissue-specific antibodies.J.Em bryol exp. Morph.
89,
289-312.Danilchik, M. V., and Denegre, J. M. (1991).
Deep cytoplasmic rearrangements during early development in Xenopus laevis. Development111,
845-856.Dear, T. N., Colledge, W. H., Carlton, M. B. L., Lavenir,
I.,Larson, T., Smith, A. J. H.,
Warren, A. J., Evans, M. J., Sofroniew, M. V., and Rabhits, T. H. (1995).
TheH o x ll gene is essential for cell survival during spleen development. Development
121,
2909-2915.Dear, T. N., Sanchez-Garcia,
I.,and Rabhitts, T. H. (1993).
The Hox11
gene encodes a DNA-binding nuclear transcription factor belonging to a distinct family of homeobox genes. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. USA90,
4431-4435.Denegre, J. M., and Danilchik, M. W. (1993).
Deep cytoplasmic rearrangements in axis respecified embryos. Dev. Biol.160,
157-164.Dohrmann, C. E., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., Thomsen, G. H., Fields, A., Woolf, T. M.,
and Melton, D. A. (1993).
Expression of activin mRNA during early development in Xenopus laevis. Dev. B io l157,
474-483.Dreiver, W., Stemple, D., Schier, A., and Solnica-Krezel, L. (1994).
Zebrafish: genetic tools for studying vertebrate development. Trends Genets.10,
152-159.Dubois, C. M., Laprise,
Blanchette, F., Gentry, L. E., and Leduc, R. (1995).
Processing o f Transforming Growth Factor 61 precursor by Human furin convertase.J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10618-10624.Eagleson, G., and Harris, W. (1989).
Mapping of presumptive brain regions in the neural plate o f Xenopus laevis. J. Neurobiol.2 1 ,
427-440.Elinson, R. P., and Palecek, J. (1993).
Independence of two microtubule sysytems in fertilised frog eggs: the sperm aster and the vegetal parallel array. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol.202,
224-232.Elinson, R. P., and Pasceri, P. (1989).
Two UV-sensitive targets in dorsoanterior specification of frog embryos. Development106,
511-518.Elinson, R. P., and Rowning, B. (1988).
A transient array of parallel microtubules in frog eggs. Potential tracks for a cytoplasmic rotation that specifies the dorso-ventral axis.Dev. Biol.
128,
185-197.Elisha, Z., Havin, L., Ringel, I., and Yisraeli, J. K. (1995).
Vg-1 RNA binding protein mediates the association of Vg-1 RNA with microtubules in Xenopus oocytes. EMBO. J. 14,5109-5114.Fainsod,
A.,Steinbeisser, H., and De Robertis,
E. M . (1995). On the function o f BMP-4 in patterning the marginal zone of the Xenopus embryo. EMBO J. 13, 5015-5025.Ferguson, E. L., and Anderson, K. V. (1992a).
Decapentaplegic acts as a morphogen to organize dorso-ventral pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Cell7 1 ,
451-461.Ferguson, E. L., and Anderson, K. V. (1992b).
Localized enhancement and repression of the TGF-b family member decapentplegic, is necessary for dorso-ventral pattern formation in the Drosophila embryo. Development114,
583-597.François,
V.,and Bier,
E. (1995). Xenopus chordin m d Drosophila short gastrulationencode homologous proteins functioning in dorsal-ventral axis formation. Cell
80,
19-20.
François, V., Solloway, M., O'Neill, J. W., Emery, J., and Bier, E. (1994).
Dorso-ventral patterning o f the Drosophila embryo depends on a putative negative growth factor encoded by the short gastrulation gene. Genes Dev. 8, 2602-2616.Furukubo-Tokunaga, K., Müller, M., Affolter, M., Pick, L., Kloter, U., and Gehring, W.
J. (1992). In vivo analysis of the helix-tum-helix motif of ih tfu s h i tarazuhomeodomain of Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 6, 2165-2176.
Gawantka, V., Delius, H., Hirschfeld, K., Blumenstock, C., and Niehrs, C. (1995).
Antagonizing the Spemann organizer: the role of the homeobox gene Xvent-1. EMBO J.
14,
6268-6279.Gehring, W. J., Qian, Y. Q., Billiter, M., Furukubo-Tokunaga, K., Schier, A. F.,
Resendez-Perez, D., Affolter, M., Otting, G., and Wüthrich, K. (1994).
Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell 78, 211-223.Gimlich, R. L. (1986).
Acquisition of developmental autonomy in the equatorial region o f the Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol115,
340-52.Gimlich, R. L., and Gerhart, J. C. (1984).
Early cellular interactions promote embryonic axis formation in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol.104,
117-130.Gont, L. K., Fainsod, A., Kim, S.-H., and De Robertis, E. M. (1996).
Overexpression of the Homeobox gene Xnot-2 leads to notochord formation in Xenopus. Dev. Biol.174,
Gont, L. K., Steinbeisser, H., Blumberg, B., and De Robertis,
E.M. (1993).
Tail formation as a continuation of gastrulation: the multiple cell populations o f theXenopus tailbud derive from the late blastopore lip. Development
119,
991-1004.Gotoh,
Y.,Masuyama, N., Suzuki,
A.,Ueno, N., and Nishida,
E. (1995). Involvement of the M AP kinase cascade in Xenopus mesoderm induction. EMBO J. 14, 2491-2498.Graff, J. M., Thies, R. S., Song, J. J., Celeste,
A.J., and Melton, D.
A.(1994).
Studies with a Xenopus BMP receptor suggest that ventral mesoderm-inducing signals override dorsal signals in vivo. Cell79,
169-179.Gray, S., Szymanski, P., and Levine, M. (1994).
Short range repression permits enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev. 8.Green, J. B. A., Howes, G., Symes, K., Cooke, J., and Smith, J. C. (1990).
The biological effects of XTC-MIF: quantitative comparison with Xenopus bFGF. Development108,
229-38.Green, J. B. A., New, H. V., and Smith, J. C. (1992).
Responses of embryonic Xenopus cells to activin and FGF are separated by multiple dose thresholds and correspond to distinct axes of the mesoderm. Cell7 1 ,
731-9.Green, J. B. A., and Smith, J. C. (1990).
Graded changes in dose of a Xenopus activin A homologue elicit stepwise transitions in embryonic cell fate [see conunents]. Nature347,
391-4.Green, J. B. A., Smith, J. C., and Gerhart, J. C. (1994).
Slow emergence of amultithreshold response to activin requires cell-contact-dependent sharpening but not prepattem. Development
120,
2271-2278.Greider, N. C., Nellen, D., Burke, R., Basler, K., and Affolter, M. (1995).
Schunurri is required for Drosophila Dpp signalling and encodes a zinc finger protein similar to the mammalian transcription factor PRDU-BFl. Cell8 1 ,
791-800.Grunz, H., and Tacke, L. (1986).
The inducing capacity of the presumptive endoderm o fXenopus laevis studied by transfilter experiments. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol.