Capítulo 2: El diseño de accesorios y sus componentes
2.1 Materiales, estilos y colores en el diseño de accesorios sustentables
In this subsection, the data obtained using the tting of the Cg-Vg characteristic and Maserjian
Y -function (Figure 4.6) is compared to the results obtained with conventional methods such as the Berglund integral [28], the Terman method [29], the high-low method [30] and the full conductance method [8]. It is important to note here that these methods were only applied after the data extraction based on the tting the Cg-Vg and Maserjian Y -function was performed,
indicating that the extraction process was not biased by any preliminary analysis.
Figure 4.7(a) compares the band bending vs Vg obtained using the tting of the Cg-Vg and
Maserjian Y-function, the Terman method [29] and the Berglund integral [28]. While the data used with the Terman method is the same as that used for the tting (i.e.: Cg-Vg measured
at f = 1 MHz and T = -50◦C), the data used in the calculation of the Berglund integral is a
Cg-Vg characteristic measured at f = 200 Hz and T = 25◦C (not shown)5. Excellent agreement is
obtained between the tting method and the Terman method. However, a signicant discrepancy between the Berglund integral and the other methods is observed. For Vg going from 0.4 V to
-0.4 V, the Berglund integral indicates a less ecient band bending than the other methods. This could be attributed to the fact that the Dtrap response near the band edges could not be
frozen out at f = 1 MHz and T = -50◦C, leading to an overestimation of the band bending
eciency near the band edges with the methods relying on an estimate of the H-F Cg-Vg response
(i.e.: tting method and Terman method), consistent with [31]. For Vg > -0.4 V, the Berglund
integral severely overestimates the band bending eciency, suggesting that the f of 200 Hz is not suciently low to obtain a full response of the interface traps located near the middle of the In0.53Ga0.47As bandgap. This is in agreement with [7], where the use of a f as low as 40 Hz is
recommended to maximize the Dtrap response.
Figure 4.7(b) compares the Dtrap(E) prole obtained with the tting method to the proles
extracted with the Terman, high-low and full conductance methods. The excellent agreement
5The Cg-Vgcharacteristic is corrected for parasitic capacitance using the method reported in [17]. This method requires the measurement of a device with a long gate length and a device with a short gate length. The small gate area of the short gate-length device, the lowest f giving acceptable noise level was 200 Hz.
Figure 4.7: (a) Comparison of the band bending E-EV vs Vg prole obtained with the tting
of the Cg-Vg characteristic and Maserjian Y -function to the prole obtained with the Terman
method [29] and Berglund integral [28]. (b) Comparison of the trap density vs energy prole obtained with the tting method to the proles extracted from the Terman (the short dash curve shows the intrapolation of the Terman data), high-low [30] and full conductance [8] methods. Cox/q is indicated to highlight the limitation of the full conductance method. The grey shaded
4.5. Conclusion between the tting method and the Terman method is consistent with the analysis of the band bending shown in Figure 4.7(a). For E-EV going from 0.5 eV to 0.73 eV, it is clear that the
tting method and the Terman method underestimate Dtrap. The high-low and the conductance
methods, however, show reasonable agreement in this energy range, where Dtrap decreases from
5.8 × 1012 /cm2.eV to 4.2 × 1012 /cm2.eV. For E-E
V < 0.5 eV, the high-low method under-
estimates Dtrap as it suers from the same limitation as that observed in the analysis of the
Berglund integral [Figure 4.7(a)]. The conductance method also underestimates Dtrap in this
energy range. This underestimation is consistent with recent works [8, 31] reporting Dit un-
derestimation with the conductance method in the case of Dit values exceeding Cox/q. This is
the case in our devices since Cox/q = 4.75 × 1012 /cm2.eV and the tting method indicates a
mid-gap Dit feature peaking at 1.5 × 1013 /cm2.eV.
4.5 Conclusion
The xed oxide charges and interface/border traps present in the Al2O3/In0.53Ga0.47As MOS-
FETs presented in Chapter 3 were examined through the study of the full gate capacitance Cg-Vg
characteristic. The Cg-Vg characteristic was measured at a f of 1 MHz and a T of -50◦C in order
to approximate a true H-F response. The comparison of the measured Cg-Vg characteristic with
a theoretical (ideal) H-F characteristic yielded a N+of 1.2 × 1012/cm2along with an integrated
Dtrap across the In0.53Ga0.47As bandgap of 1.2 × 1013 /cm2.
The tting of the Cg-Vg characteristic and corresponding Maserjian Y -function yielded a
Dtrap(E) across the In0.53Ga0.47As energy gap and extending into the In0.53Ga0.47As conduction
band. This analysis revealed donor-like (+/0) traps within the In0.53Ga0.47As bandgap, with a
peak density of ∼ 1.5 × 1013 /cm2.eV and centered at 0.36 eV above the In0.53Ga0.47As E V. A
sharp increase in donor-like (+/0) trap density in the energy range of 0.1 eV to 0.2 eV above the In0.53Ga0.47As EV was also observed. The analysis also indicated acceptor-like (0/-) traps
located at energy levels aligned with the In0.53Ga0.47As conduction band, with a density of ∼
2.5 × 1013 /cm2.eV at 0.3 eV above the In0.53Ga0.47As EC. Although the tting could reveal
whether the observed traps were donors or acceptors, this method could not to discern whether these traps were interface traps, border traps, or a combination of both.
Finally, excellent agreement with the conventional Terman method was obtained. However, the comparison with the high-low and conductance methods highlighted a Dtrapunderestimation
near the In0.53Ga0.47As band edges. This issue may be addressed through the measurement and
Bibliography
[1] G. Brammertz, A. Alian, D.-C. Lin, M. Meuris, M. Caymax, and W. E. Wang, A Combined Interface and Border Trap Model for High-Mobility Substrate Metal- Oxide-Semiconductor Devices Applied to In0.53Ga0.47As and InP Capacitors, Electron
Devices, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 58, no. 11, p. 3890, Nov. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2011.2165725
[2] G. Brammertz, H.-C. Lin, M. Caymax, M. Meuris, M. Heyns, and M. Passlack, On the interface state density at In0.53Ga0.47As/oxide interfaces, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 95,
no. 20, p. 202109, Nov. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3267104 [3] N. Taoka, M. Yokoyama, S. Kim, R. Suzuki, R. Iida, S. Lee, T. Hoshii, W. Jevasuwan,
T. Maeda, T. Yasuda, O. Ichikawa, N. Fukuhara, M. Hata, M. Takenaka, and S. Takagi, Impact of Fermi level pinning inside conduction band on electron mobility of InxGa1-xAs MOSFETs and mobility enhancement by pinning modulation, in Electron
Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2011 IEEE International, 2011, p. 27.2.1. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131622
[4] E. J. Kim, L. Wang, P. M. Asbeck, K. C. Saraswat, and P. C. McIntyre, Border traps in Al2O3/In0.53Ga0.47As (100) gate stacks and their passivation by hydrogen anneals,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 1, p. 012906, Jan. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3281027
[5] Y. Yuan, L. Wang, B. Yu, B. Shin, J. Ahn, P. C. McIntyre, P. Asbeck, M. J. W. Rodwell, and Y. Taur, A Distributed Model for Border Traps in Al2O3-InGaAs MOS Devices,
Electron Device Letters, IEEE, vol. 32, no. 4, p. 485, Apr. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2011.2105241
[6] H.-P. Komsa and A. Pasquarello, Identication of defect levels at As/oxide interfaces through hybrid functionals, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 88, no. 7, p. 1436, Jul. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2011.03.081
[7] É. O'Connor, B. Brennan, V. Djara, K. Cherkaoui, S. Monaghan, S. B. Newcomb, R. Contreras, M. Milojevic, G. Hughes, M. E. Pemble, R. M. Wallace, and P. K. Hurley, A systematic study of (NH4)2S passivation (22%, 10%, 5%, or 1%) on the interface
properties of the Al2O3/In0.53Ga0.47As/InP system for n-type and p-type In0.53Ga0.47As
epitaxial layers, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 109, no. 2, p. 024101, Jan. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3533959
Bibliography [8] K. Martens, C. O. Chui, G. Brammertz, B. De Jaeger, D. Kuzum, M. Meuris, M. M. Heyns, T. Krishnamohan, K. Saraswat, H. Maes, and G. Groeseneken, On the Correct Extraction of Interface Trap Density of MOS Devices With High-Mobility Semiconductor Substrates, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 55, no. 2, p. 547, Feb. 2008. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2007.912365
[9] A. Alian, C. Merckling, G. Brammertz, M. Meuris, M. Heyns, and K. D. Meyer, InGaAs MOS Transistors Fabricated through a Digital-Etch Gate-Recess Process and the Inuence of Forming Gas Anneal on Their Electrical Behavior, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 6, p. P310, Oct. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.001301jss
[10] A. Ali, H. Madan, S. Koveshnikov, S. Oktyabrsky, R. Kambhampati, T. Heeg, D. Schlom, and S. Datta, Small-Signal Response of Inversion Layers in High-Mobility In0.53Ga0.47As MOSFETs Made With Thin High-K Dielectrics, Electron Devices,
IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, no. 4, p. 742, Apr. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2010.2041855
[11] E. H. Nicollian and J. R. Brews, MOS Physics and Technology. New York: Wiley, 1982. [12] E. H. Nicollian and A. Goetzberger, The Si-SiO2 interface: Electrical properties as
determined by the metal-insulator-silicon conductance technique, Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. XLVI, no. 6, p. 1055, Jul. 1967. [Online]. Available: http://archive.org/details/bstj46-6-1055 [13] [Online]. Available: http://www.nd.edu/~gsnider/
[14] J. Maserjian, G. Petersson, and C. Svensson, Saturation capacitance of thin oxide MOS structures and the eective surface density of states of silicon, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 335, Apr. 1974. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(74)90125-7
[15] G. Ghibaudo, S. Bruyere, T. Devoivre, B. DeSalvo, and E. Vincent, Improved method for the oxide thickness extraction in MOS structures with ultrathin gate dielectrics, Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 152, May 2000. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/66.843630
[16] F. Lime, K. Oshima, M. Cassé, G. Ghibaudo, S. Cristoloveanu, B. Guillaumot, and H. Iwai, Carrier mobility in advanced CMOS devices with metal gate and HfO2 gate
dielectric, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 47, no. 10, p. 1617, Oct. 2003. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1101(03)00176-X
[17] K. Romanjek, F. Andrieu, T. Ernst, and G. Ghibaudo, Improved split C-V method for eective mobility extraction in sub-0.1-µm Si MOSFETs, Electron Device Letters, IEEE, vol. 25, no. 8, p. 583, Aug. 2004. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LED.2004.832786
[18] [Online]. Available: http://www.ioe.rssi.ru/SVA/NSM/Semicond/GaInAs
[19] W. Shockley and W. T. Read, Statistics of the Recombinations of Holes and Electrons, Phys. Rev., vol. 87, p. 835, Sep. 1952. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.87.835
[20] G. Brammertz, K. Martens, S. Sioncke, A. Delabie, M. Caymax, M. Meuris, and M. Heyns, Characteristic trapping lifetime and capacitance-voltage measurements of GaAs metal-oxide-semiconductor structures, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 91, no. 13, p. 133510, Sep. 2007. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2790787
[21] T. P. O'Regan and P. K. Hurley, Calculation of the capacitance-voltage characteristic of GaAs, In0.53Ga0.47As, and InAs metal-oxide-semiconductor structures, Applied
Physics Letters, vol. 99, no. 16, p. 163502, Oct. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3652699
[22] T. P. O'Regan, P. K. Hurley, B. Sorée, and M. V. Fischetti, Modeling the capacitance-voltage response of In0.53Ga0.47As metal-oxide-semiconductor structures:
Charge quantization and nonparabolic corrections, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 21, p. 213514, May 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3436645
[23] A. Diligenti and M. Stagi, Tunnelling in aluminium/aluminium-oxide/palladium junctions: hydrogen-induced variations, Electronics Letters, vol. 19, no. 18, p. 717, Jul. 1983. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:19830488
[24] V. Djara, K. Cherkaoui, M. Schmidt, Y. Y. Gomeniuk, E. O'Connor, I. Povey, D. O'Connell, S. Monaghan, M. E. Pemble, and P. Hurley, Study of interface and oxide defects in high-k/In0.53Ga0.47As n-MOSFETs, in Ultimate Integration on Silicon
(ULIS), 2012 13th International Conference on, Mar. 2012, p. 29. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ULIS.2012.6193349
[25] B. Shin, J. R. Weber, R. D. Long, P. K. Hurley, C. G. V. de Walle, and P. C. McIntyre, Origin and passivation of xed charge in atomic layer deposited aluminum oxide gate insulators on chemically treated InGaAs substrates, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, no. 15, p. 152908, Apr. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3399776
Bibliography [26] R. D. Long, B. Shin, S. Monaghan, K. Cherkaoui, J. Cagnon, S. Stemmer, P. C. McIntyre, and P. K. Hurley, Charged Defect Quantication in Pt/Al2O3/In0.53Ga0.47As/InP MOS
Capacitors, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 158, no. 5, p. G103, Mar. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/1.3545799
[27] D. Varghese, Y. Xuan, Y. Q. Wu, T. Shen, P. Ye, and M. Alam, Multi-probe interface characterization of In0.65Ga0.35As/Al2O3 MOSFET, in Electron Devices
Meeting, 2008. IEDM 2008. IEEE International, 2008, p. 1. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2008.4796699
[28] C. N. Berglund, Surface states at steam-grown silicon-silicon dioxide interfaces, Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 701, Oct. 1966. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/T-ED.1966.15827
[29] L. M. Terman, An investigation of surface states at a silicon/silicon oxide interface employing metal-oxide-silicon diodes, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 285, Sep. 1962. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(62)90111-9
[30] R. Castagné and A. Vapaille, Description of the SiO2/Si interface properties by means of
very low frequency MOS capacitance measurements, Surface Science, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 157, Nov. 1971. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(71)90092-6 [31] R. Engel-Herbert, Y. Hwang, and S. Stemmer, Comparison of methods to quantify interface
trap densities at dielectric/III-V semiconductor interfaces, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 108, no. 12, p. 124101, Dec. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3520431
Investigation of Border Traps and
Mobility
5.1 Introduction
InGaAs and related compound semiconductors have become serious candidates for replacing strained Si in future complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) device applications due to their remarkable electron mobility [1]. The standard method for extracting the eective mobility (µef f) in a metal-oxide-semiconductor eld-eect transistor (MOSFET) relies on a
gate-to-channel split capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurement combined with a measurement of the drain current (Id) vs gate voltage (Vg) characteristic in direct current (DC) [2]. While
this method enables highly accurate µef f extraction on SiO2/Si MOSFETs, its accuracy when
applied to emerging high-k/InGaAs devices, with relatively high density of interface traps (Dit)
and density of border traps (Dbt), becomes questionable. In an attempt to address this issue,
we investigated the use of an alternative method based on the inversion-charge pumping (ICP) and pulsed Id-Vg measurements, rst proposed by Kerber et al. for Si based MOSFETs in [3],
for the µef f extraction of surface-channel Al2O3/In0.53Ga0.47As MOSFETs.