• No se han encontrado resultados

Mayor accesibilidad a los servicios sanitarios.

Comprobación de los objetivos secundarios:

B. Mayor accesibilidad a los servicios sanitarios.

(vii) Salvage and subrogation reimbursements (Continued)

The Group may also have the right to pursue third parties for payment of some or all costs (for example, subrogation). Estimates of salvage recoveries are included as an allowance in the measurement of the insurance liability for claims, and salvage property is recognised in other assets when the liability is settled. The allowance is the amount that can reasonably be recovered from the disposal of the property.

Subrogation reimbursements are also considered as an allowance in the measurement of the insurance liability for claims and are recognised in other assets when the liability is settled. The allowance is the assessment of the amount that can be recovered from the action against the liable third party.

(c) Revenue recognition

(i) Insurance premium revenue

The revenue recognition policy relating to insurance contracts is set out under note 2 (b) above

(ii) Commissions

Commissions receivable are recognised as income in the period in which they are earned.

(iii) Interest income

Interest income is recognised on a time proportion basis that takes into account the effective yield on the asset. When a receivable is impaired, the Group reduces the carrying amount to its recoverable amount, being the estimated future cash flow discounted at the original effective interest rate of the instrument, and continues unwinding the discount as interest income.

(iv) Dividend income

Dividends are recognised as income in the period in which the right to receive payment is established.

(v) Rental income

Rental income is recognised as income in the period in which it is earned. All investment income is stated net of investment expenses.

(vi) Fee income

Fee income consists primarily of administration fees arising from services rendered in relation to the issue and management of deposit administration and investment contracts. Fees are recognised in the accounting period in which the services are rendered and are presented in the income statement within 'other income'.

(d) Investment contracts

The Group issues investment contracts without fixed terms (unit-linked) and investment contracts with fixed and guaranteed terms (fixed interest rate). The investment contracts include funds administered for a number of retirement benefit schemes.

Investment contracts without fixed terms are financial liabilities whose fair value is dependent on the fair value of underlying financial assets, and are designated at inception as at fair value through profit or loss. The Group designates these investment contracts to be measured at fair value through profit or loss because it eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (sometimes referred to as ‘an accounting mismatch’) that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases.

The best evidence of the fair value of these financial liabilities at initial recognition is the transaction price (i.e. the fair value received) unless the fair value of that instrument is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument or based on a valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable markets. When such evidence exists, the Group recognises profit at inception.

The fair value of financial liabilities for investment contracts without fixed terms is determined using the current unit values in which the contractual benefits are denominated.

Notes to The Financial Statements

Kenya • Uganda • South Sudan • Rwanda • DR Congo • Tanzania UAP HOLDINGS LIMITED 2013 Annual Report & Financial Statements www.uap-group.com

2 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)

(d) Investment contracts (Continued)

These unit values reflect the fair values of the financial assets contained within the Group's unitised investment funds linked to the financial liability. The fair value of the financial liabilities is obtained by multiplying the number of units attributed to each contract holder at the financial reporting date by the unit value for the same date.

For investment contracts with fixed and guaranteed terms, the amortised cost basis is used. In this case, the liability is initially measured at its fair value less transaction costs that are incremental and directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of the contract.

Subsequent measurement of investment contracts at amortised cost uses the effective interest method. This method requires the determination of an interest rate (the effective interest rate) that exactly discounts to the net carrying amount of the financial liability, the estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or, when appropriate, a shorter period if the holder has the option to redeem the instrument earlier than maturity.

The Group re-estimates at each reporting date the expected future cash flows and recalculates the carrying amount of the financial liability by computing the present value of estimated future cash flows using the financial liability’s original effective interest rate. Any adjustment is immediately recognised as income or expense in the income statement.

(e) Property and equipment

All categories of property and equipment are initially recorded at cost and subsequently stated at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance costs are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.

Depreciation is calculated using the straight line method to write down their cost to their residual values over their estimated useful lives, as follows:

- Motor vehicles – 5 years

- Computers & computer equipment – 3 years - Office equipment – 5 years

- Furniture & fittings – 8 years

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial reporting date. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its estimated recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.

Gains and losses on disposal of property and equipment are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount and are included in the income statement.

(f) Investment properties

Buildings, or part of a building, (freehold or held under a finance lease) and land (freehold or held under an operating lease) held for long term rental yields and/or capital appreciation and are not occupied by the Group are classified as investment property under non-current assets. Investment property is carried at fair value, representing open market value determined annually by external valuers. Properties under construction and development sites with projected use as Investment properties are valued at projected fair values taking into account current market conditions, outstanding investment costs and a risk loading according to the progress of the project. Changes in fair values are included in investment income in the income statement.

(g) Intangible assets

The Group's intangible assets relate to computer software and goodwill (note 2(v)).

Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the specific software. These costs are amortised over their estimated useful lives of three years.

Notes to The Financial Statements

www.uap-group.com www.uap-group.com

Kenya • Uganda • South Sudan • Rwanda • DR Congo • Tanzania UAP HOLDINGS LIMITED 2013 Annual Report & Financial Statements

2 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)

(g) Intangible assets (Continued)

Development costs that are directly associated with the production of identifiable and unique software products controlled by the Group, and that will probably generate economic benefits exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as intangible assets if:-

- It is technically feasible to complete the software product so that it will be available for use;

- Management intends to complete the software product and use or sell it;

- There is an ability to use or sell the software product; - It can be demonstrated how the software product will generate probable future economic benefits; - Adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and use or sell it are available; and,

- The expenditure attributable to the software product during its development can be reliably measured.

Direct costs include the software development, employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads. Other development expediture that do not meet these criteria are recognised as an expense as incurred. Development costs that have been expensed are not recognised as an asset in a subsequent period.

Computer software development costs recognised as assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives (not exceeding three years). Costs associated with maintaining computer software programmes are recognised as an expense as incurred.

(h) Impairment of non-financial assets

Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing

impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets other than goodwill that suffered an impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.

(i) Financial assets

Classification and measurement

The Group classifies its financial assets as subsequently measured at either amortised cost or fair value on the basis of both the Group's business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. A financial asset is measured at amortised cost if both of the following conditions are met:

a. the asset is held within a business model whose objec tive is to hold assets in order to collect contractual cash flows.

b. the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely

payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

The Group’s corporate bonds, government securities, receivables, mortgage loans, cash at bank and deposits with financial institutions are classified at amortised cost. The carrying values of various categories of Financial asset and Financial liabilities are shown in note 42.

All financial assets that do not meet the above criteria are measured at fair value. Equity investments for life business are classified at fair value through profit or loss. Equity investment for non life business are classified at fair value through other comprehensive income (note 24).

Recognition and de-recognition

Financial assets are recognised when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the asset. Initial recognition of financial asset is at fair value plus, for all financial assets except those carried at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or where the Group has transferred

substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

Notes to The Financial Statements

Kenya • Uganda • South Sudan • Rwanda • DR Congo • Tanzania UAP HOLDINGS LIMITED 2013 Annual Report & Financial Statements www.uap-group.com

2 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)

Financial assets (Continued)

Recognition and de-recognition (Continued)

Equity investments are carried at fair value. Gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of equity investments are recognised in other comprehensive income. When equity investments are derecognised, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in other comprehensive income are transferred to retained earnings. Dividends on equity instruments are recognised in the income statement when the Group's right to receive payment is established.

Fair values of quoted investments in active markets are based on current bid prices.

Fair values for unlisted equity securities are estimated using valuation techniques. These include the use of recent arm’s length transactions, discounted cash flow analysis and other valuation techniques commonly used by market participants.

(j) Impairment of financial assets Assets carried at amortised cost:

The Group assesses at each financial reporting date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets measured at amortised cost is impaired.

A financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after initial recognition of the asset (a ‘loss event’) and that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.

Objective evidence that a financial asset or group of assets is impaired includes observable data that comes to the attention of the Group about the following loss events:

a. significant financial difficulty of the borrower;

b. a breach of contract, such as default or delinquency in interest or principal repayments;

c. the Group granting to the borrower, for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficul ty, a concession that the Group would not otherwise consider;

d. it becoming probable that the borrower will enter bank ruptcy or other financial reorganisation;

e. the disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties; or

f. observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a group of financial assets since the initial recognition of those assets, although the decrease cannot yet be identified with the individual financial assets in the Group, including:

- adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers in the Group; or

- national or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on the assets in the Group

The estimated period between a loss occurring and its identification is determined by management for each identified portfolio.

The Group first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If the Group determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, it includes the asset in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assesses them for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.

If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on financial assets carried at amortised cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial instrument’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognised in the income statement. If a loan has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest rate determined under the contract. As a practical expedient, the Group may measure impairment on the basis of an instrument’s fair value using

an observable market price.

Notes to The Financial Statements

www.uap-group.com

Kenya • Uganda • South Sudan • Rwanda • DR Congo • Tanzania UAP HOLDINGS LIMITED 2013 Annual Report & Financial Statements

2 Summary of significant accounting policies (Continued)

(j) Impairment of financial assets (Continued) Assets carried at amortised cost: (Continued)

The calculation of the present value of the estimated future cash flows of a collateralised financial asset reflects the cash flows that may result from foreclosure less costs for obtaining and selling the collateral, whether or not foreclosure is probable.

For the purposes of a collective evaluation of impairment, financial assets are grouped on the basis of similar credit risk characteristics (i.e. on the basis of the Group's grading process that considers asset type, industry, geographical location, collateral type, past-due status and other relevant factors). Those characteristics are relevant to the estimation of future cash flows for groups of such assets by being indicative of the debtors’ ability to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the assets being evaluated.

Future cash flows in a group of financial assets that are collectively evaluated for impairment are estimated on the basis of the contractual cash flows of the assets in the Group and historical loss experience for assets with credit risk characteristics similar to those in the Group.

Historical loss experience is adjusted on the basis of current observable data to reflect the effects of current conditions that did not affect the period on which the historical loss experience is based and to remove the effects of conditions in the historical period that do not exist currently.

When a loan is uncollectible, it is written off against the related provision for loan impairment. Such loans are written off after all the necessary procedures have been completed and the amount of the loss has been determined. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off decrease the amount of the provision for loan impairment in the income statement.

If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised (such as an improvement in the debtor’s credit rating), the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed by adjusting the allowance account. The amount of the reversal is recognised in the income statement.

Loans that are either subject to collective impairment

assessment or individually significant and whose terms have been renegotiated are no longer considered to be past due but are treated as new loans. In subsequent years, the renegotiated terms apply in determining whether the asset is considered to be past due.

(k) Accounting for leases

Leases of property and equipment where the Group assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Assets acquired under finance leases are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the lower of their fair value and the estimated present value of the underlying lease payments. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance outstanding. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges,