• No se han encontrado resultados

Modelo del Sistema Interfuncional Integrado de la Competitividad en Destinos Turísticos

0. Introducción

0.2. Justificación

0.4.5. Marco teórico

0.4.5.5 Modelo del Sistema Interfuncional Integrado de la Competitividad en Destinos Turísticos

by a l l s t a t e s w ith reasonable regard t o t h e i n t e r e s t s o f <^ther s t a t e s in t h e i r e x r c i s e o f t h e freedom o f th e high

seas.

A r t i c l e s 4 and 5 on th e N a t i o n a l i t y o f ships was th e conse­ quence o f th e on-go ing " f l a g debate" concerning th e q u e stio n o f th e use o f th e s o - c a l l e d " f l a g s o f convenience" or "cheap f l a g s " by shipowners from t r a d i t i o n a l m a ritim e c o u n t r i e s ( m o s t l y t h e U.S. and Greece) who r e g i s t e r e d t h e i r ships in o t h e r c o u n t r ie s -namely L ib e ­ ria,Panam a,Berm uda- in o rd e r t o avoid high t a x a t i o n , s t r i n g e n t la b o u r l e g i s l a t i o n and high ship c o n s tu c tio n requirem ents l a i d down

in t h e i r own c o u n t r i e s . The opponents o f t h i s system were a b le to

in c lu d e p r o v is io n s on a requirem ent o f a "genuine l i n k " between

f l a g and f l a g s t a t e . A r t i c l e 5 ( 1 ) s t a t e s :

Each s t a t e s h a ll f i x th e c o n d it io n s f o r th e g ra n t o f i t s n a t i o n a l i t y t o s h i p s , f o r th e r e g i s t r a t i o n o f ships in

i t s t e r r i t o r y , a n d f o r th e r i g h t t o f l y i t s f l a g . Ships

have t h e n a t i o n a l i t y o f th e s ta e whose f l a g th e y are

e n t i t l e d t o f l y . There must e x i s t a genuine l i n k between

t h e s t a t e and th e s h ip ; in p a r t i c u l a r , th e s t a t e must e f f e c t i v e l y e x e r c is e i t s j u r i s d i c t i o n and c o n tr o l in admi­ n i s t r a t i v e , t e c h n i c a l and s o c ia l m a tte rs over ships f l y i n g i t s f l a g .

A d e f i n i t i o n o f t h e C o n t in e n ta l S h e lf was pro vid ed by t h e 1958 Con­ v e n tio n \ ^ i c h a ls o gave e x c lu s iv e r i g h t s t o c o a s ta l s t a t e s over th e e x p l o r a t i o n and e x p l o i t a t i o n o f a l l resources on t h e S h e l f . A r t i c l e 2 g ives c o a s ta l s t a t e s th e f o l l o w i n g r i g h t s : i . The c o a s ta l s t a t e e x e r c is e s over t h e c o n t i n e n t a l s h e l f sovereign r i g h t s f o r th e purpose o f e x p lo r in g i t and e x p l o i t i n g i t s n a t u r a l re s o u rc e s . i i . The r i g h t s r e f e r r e d t o in p a r a . i o f t h i s A r t i c l e are

e x c lu s iv e in t h e sense t h a t i f t h e c o a s ta l s t a t e does not

Documento similar