1.5 Objetivos de la investigación
2.2.8 Monitoreo del depósito de relaves
Resources used
The economic analysis was based upon 102 patients over a three month follow up
period . The evaluation adopted the perspective of the health care system .All resource
items associated with the interventions , with post operative stay and community care
received over the follow-up period were identified , and the volumes of these resources
used by each patient were recorded .
The resources used fell into three broad categories:
1. Theatre costs - these consisted of capital equipment, theatre overheads including
2. Hotel costs - taking into account ward overheads and ward capital costs , length of
stay and post-operative consumables and morbidity .
3. Community costs - including visits to the GP , practice nurse and hospital out
patients, and home visits from the district nurse .
Valuation of resources
Once the volume of resources used by each patient had been calculated , the
opportunity cost of these resources (that is , the opportunity forgone to commit these
resources to some other alternative use) was measured in terms of the unit costs of
each resource item based on 1994/ 1995 market prices including (where chargeable)
value added tax (VAT). These unit costs were then applied to the resource volumes to
obtain a total cost per patient .Because the time from randomisation to follow-up was
only three months , it was necessary to apply a discount rate to costs However, the
costs of capital equipment were computed in present value terms , as described below.
All cost data are reported as mean values , differences in means and associated 95%
confidence intervals .
The cost of laser consumables was based on the usage of the SLT MD60
Neodymium : YAG contact laser with an estimated ten year lifespan (personal
communication Kontron Instruments , Watford , Herts., UK ) , and the MTRL 10 6
mm sapphire tipped probe . Fibres were used a maximum of three times , and tips a
maximum of 6 times .
The equivalent annual cost of the laser equipment was calculated by depreciating the
capital cost over a ten year period , and assuming an opportunity cost of 5% per
capital funds been invested in some other way .This ‘opportunity cost’ of the capital
cost is effectively the discount rate which is applied in all the economic evaluations
when costs or benefits are spread over time The cost of twice yearly servicing of the
laser has also been included .
Health service facilities used by the patients , capital costs of building space , and
overheads for both operating theatre facilities and ward or ‘hotel’ stay were valued
using costs generated by the ‘SAPPS’ (Speciality and Procedures Pricing System ) at
the Churchill Hospital. Included in these overheads for both ward and operating
theatre , were building and staff costs as well as a proportion of the costs for
portering , catering, training etc.; that is , all the facilities necessary to run the clinical
service These overheads were allocated to patients on the basis of length of stay or
theatre operating time . Theatre staff costs were attained using the mid-point on the
relevant salary scale with an additional 13% added for employers’ costs .
The costs of practice nurse attendance following discharge were obtained by assuming
a ten minute consultation with an F grade nurse , taking the mid point on the salary
scale, and the employers costs This is in accordance with the current practice of the
Oxfordshire Family Health Service Authority. The cost of a consultation with a general
practitioner was costed from government expenditure plans for 1992 /1993 as
documented in a Department of Health report, and updated to 1994/1995 prices using
the Health Specific Price Index .
The cost of retreating patients with a repeat prostatectomy was estimated using the
mean values for resource use in the relevant arm of the trial. It is assumed that the
variation about the mean in terms of resource use in each group is the same in retreated
Indirect costs such as loss of income borne by the patients were not an important
factor in this age group , supporting the decision to adopt a health care system
perspective in the economic evaluation .
Sensitivity Analysis
The cost of consumable equipment for contact laser prostatectomy may vary in the
future as may the recurrence of benign prostatic enlargement in both trial arms .A
sensitivity analysis has therefore been performed to examine the implications of making
different assumptions about laser consumable costs , and re-operation rates .
The mean difference in cost between laser and TURP plotted against varying laser re
operation rates , using different assumptions on TURP re-operation rate at one
year The mean difference in the cost between the two procedures was also plotted
against a percentage decrease in the cost of laser consumables (100% being the
current list price) . For each assumption of variation in laser consumable price , the
mean cost for the procedure was re-calculated from the initial stages of the financial
analysis .
Finally, the relationship between laser re-operation rate and mean difference in cost
between the two procedures was examined assuming a hospital stay of one night and
two district nurse visits This assumption allows for catheter removal at home if the
Chapter 3 -Results
Accurate data were available on 148 patients that were randomised ; losses prior to
randomisation being shown in table 1 .
Exclusion criteria Numbers
Previous prostate surgery 22 Known prostatic carcinoma 21
Refusal o f consent 5
Poor English / dementia 7
Other 21
Table 1 - Losses prior to randomisation
Losses included under the title ‘other’ included those with neurological conditions but
predominantly reflected a period when the laser was not available , or malfunctioned
requiring repair ,or when the trial co-ordinator was not available .
72 patients were treated with contact laser prostatectomy, while 76 received TURP.
The mean age in the TURP group was 70 years (standard deviation [SD] 8),
compared to 69 years (SD 8) in the laser group .