• No se han encontrado resultados

Vladan Joldžić1

Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade, Serbia Ana Batrićević2

Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade, Serbia Vera Stanković3

Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade, Serbia Nikola Paunović4

Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade, Serbia and PhD candidate, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law

OBJECTIVES

The paper highlights key problems of rural development in the context of economic and environmental crisis, with focus on rural areas in Serbia. It emphasizes the link between sustainable rural development and environmental protection, particularly in the fields of organic agriculture, small organic farming and agro-eco tourism. It analyses legislative and strategic documents regulating this issue on universal, European and national level, making suggestions to improve their application.

METHODOLOGY

Content analysis was applied with the purpose to define sustainable rural development and key problems that appear in this field - worldwide as well as in rural areas in Serbia. It was also applied to analyse the relation between the success and sustainability of rural development on one hand and the effective conservation of environment and its elements such as air, water and soil on the

1 PhD, Principle Research Fellow, e-mail: [email protected] 2 PhD, Research Fellow, e-mail: [email protected] 3 MsC, Research Assistant, e-mail: [email protected] 4 Research Intern, e-mail: [email protected]

other. Doctrinal legal research method was used to critically examine the provisions of legal strategic documents directly or indirectly related to sustainable rural development and environmental protection. Comparative legal research method was applied to explore the approaches to this issue in documents adopted on European level (by the European Union) as well as of those adopted by the United Nations

RESULTS

Obstacles for sustainable rural development include: uncultivated agricultural lands, soil pollution, insufficient irrigation or draining, agricultural lands fragmentation, poor infrastructure, inadequate tax policy, uncompleted restitutions, long probate proceedings and financially uncertain position of land- owners. Some of them have environmental impacts and can be resolved by suitable policy and legislation, strategic planning, environmental education and financial stimuli for green agriculture.

IMPLICATIONS

The paper has implications for legislators and policy makers in the areas such as: sustainable development, taxes, agriculture, green economy and environment protection to analyse more profoundly key problems of rural (as ecologically desirable) development and their linkage to nature conservation. When it comes to practice, it suggests which legal documents should be applied in order to achieve not only successful but also sustainable and environmentally acceptable development of rural areas.

ORIGINALITY VALUE

The paper contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between sustainable rural development and environment protection, emphasizing the possibility to preserve nature and increase incomes of rural communities through green agriculture, small farm production and eco-tourism. It also states that current legislative framework provides preconditions for resolving the issues that might appear within, suggesting key steps for its future implementation.

KEY WORDS

Sustainable development, rural development, agriculture, eco-tourism, environment protection, ecology, green economy

REFERENCES

1. Ashley, C., & Maxwell, S. (2001). Rethinking Rural Development. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 395-425.

2. Bogdanov, N. (2007). Mala ruralna domaćinstva u Srbiji i ruralna nepoljoprivredna ekonomija. Beograd: UNDP.

3. Briedenhann, J., & Wickens, E. (2004). Tourism routes as a tool for the economic development of rural areas—vibrant hope or impossible dream? Tourism Management, 25(1) 71–79,

4. Ellis, F., & Biggs, S. (2001). Evolving Themes in Rural Development 1950s-2000s. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 437-448.

5. European Commission, 2010. Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020 final. Retrieved from http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF

6. Janković, S. (2009). Evropska unija i ruralni razvoj Srbije. Beograd: Institut za primenu nauke u poljoprivredi.

7. Knickel, K., & Renting, H. (2000). Methodological and Conceptual Issues in the Study of Multifunctionality and Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 512-528. 8. Marsden, T., Banks, J., Renting, H., & Van der Ploeg, J.D. (2001). The Road Towards

Sustainable Rural Development: Issues of Theory, Policy and Research Practice. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3(2), 75-83.

9. National Sustainable Development Strategy, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 57/2008.

10. Pejanović, R. (2007). Dileme oko koncepta našeg agrarnog razvoja. Agroekonomika, 36(36), 6-24.

11. Pejanović, R. (2009). Razvojni problemi poljoprivrede Republike Srbije. Agroekonomika, 41-42(41-42), 5-23.

12. Pejanović, R. Vujović, S. (2008). Ruralni razvoj i agroturizam. Agroekonomika, 37- 38(37-38), 5-14.

13. Reardon, T., & Vosti, S. (1995). Links between Rural Poverty and the Environment in Developing Countries: Asset Categories and Investment Poverty. World Development, 23(9), 1495-1506.

14. Ristić, L. (2013). Strategijsko upravljanje održivim ruralnim razvojem u Republici Srbiji. Ekonomski horizonti, 15(3), 229-243.

15. Scheyvens, R. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism Management, 20(2), 245-249.

16. Strategy of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Republic of Serbia for the Period between 2014 and 2024, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 85/2014. 17. UN General Assembly. (2015).Transforming our World : the 2030 Agenda for

Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1, Retrieved from http://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html

18. Van der Ploeg, J.D., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., . . . Ventura, F. (2000). Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 391-408.

19. Vasilevska, Lj. (2010). Rural development and regional policy – conceptual framework. Facta Universitatis Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 8(3), 353-359.

20. Veselinović, J. (2009). Normativno regulisanje ruralnog razvoja kod nas i u uporednom pravu. Agroekonomika, 41-42(41-42), 53-68.

1.14. SMALL ENTERPRISES AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECO-

TOURISM AS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF

Documento similar