The authors declare no competing financial interests. 16
17
1. Duvick, D.N. in The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops, edited by J.G. Coors & S. Pandey (ASA, CSSA, Madison, 18
WI.1999), pp. 19–29. 19
2. Birchler, J.A., Yao, H., Chudalayandi, S., Vaiman, D. & Veitia, R.A. Heterosis. Plant Cell 22, 2105–2112 (2010). 20
3. Ray, D.K., Mueller, N.D., West, P.C. & Foley, J.A. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. 21
PLoS ONE 8, e66428 (2013). 22
4. FAOSTAT. Statistical databases and datasets of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at
23
http://faostat.fao.org/ (Rome, 2017). 24
5. Longin, C.F.H. et al. Hybrid wheat: Quantitative genetic parameters and consequences for the design of breeding programs. 25
Theor Appl Genet 126, 2791–2801 (2013). 26
6. Longin, C.F.H., Reif, J.C. & Würschum, T. Long-term perspective of hybrid versus line breeding in wheat based on 27
quantitative genetic theory. Theor Appl Genet 127, 1635–1641 (2014). 28
7. Whitford, R. et al. Hybrid breeding in wheat: Technologies to improve hybrid wheat seed production. J Exp Bot 64, 5411– 29
5428 (2013). 30
8. Mühleisen, J., Piepho, H.-P., Maurer, H.P., Longin, C.F.H. & Reif, J.C. Yield stability of hybrids versus lines in wheat, barley, 31
and triticale. Theor Appl Genet 127, 309–316 (2014). 32
9. Davenport, C.B. Degenaration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28, 454–455 (1908). 33
10. Bruce, A.B. The mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32, 627–628 (1910). 34
11. Keeble, F. & Pellew, C. The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of
35
Genetics 1, 47–56 (1910). 36
12. Jones, D.F. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2, 466–479 (1917). 37
13. East, E.M. Heterosis. Genetics 21, 375–397 (1936). 38
14. Hull, F.H. Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn. Agronomy Journal 37, 134–145 (1945). 39
15. Crow, J.F. Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33, 477–487 (1948). 40
16. Richey, F.D. Mock-dominance and hybrid vigor. Science 96, 280–281 (1942). 41
17. Schnell, F.W. & Cockerham, C.C. Multiplicative vs. arbitrary gene action in heterosis. Genetics 131, 461–469 (1992). 42
18. Schnable, P.S. & Springer, N.M. Progress Toward Understanding Heterosis in Crop Plants. Annu Rev Plant Bio 64, 71–88 43
(2013). 44
19. Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. (Longman, Essex, England, 1996). 45
20. Melchinger, A.E. in International Crop Science I, edited by D.R. Buxton, et al. (CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, 1993), pp. 621– 46
628. 47
21. Melchinger, A.E. & Gumber, R.K. in Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants, edited by K.R. Lamkey & J.E. Staub 48
(CSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998), pp. 29–44. 49
22. Beck, D.L., Vasal, S.K. & Crossa, J. Heterosis and combining ability among subtropical and temperate intermediate-maturity 50
maize germplasm. Crop Sci 31, 68–73 (1991). 51
12
23. Vasal, S.K. et al. Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT's tropical late white maize germplasm. Maydica 37, 217–223 1
(1992). 2
24. Vasal, S.K., Srinivasan, G., Crossa, J. & Beck, D.L. Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT's subtropical and temperate 3
early maturity maize germplasm. Crop Sci 32, 884–890 (1992). 4
25. Ron Parra, J. & Hallauer, A.R. in Plant Breeding Reviews (John Wiley & Sons, Inc1996), pp. 165–187. 5
26. Reif, J.C. et al. Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theor Appl Genet 107, 947–957 (2003). 6
27. Boeven, P.H.G., Longin, C.F.H. & Würschum, T. A unified framework for hybrid breeding and the establishment of heterotic 7
groups in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 129, 1231–1245 (2016). 8
28. Moll, R.H., Longquist, J.H., Fortuna, J.V. & Johnson E.C. The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics
9
52, 139–144 (1965). 10
29. Jiang, Y., Schmidt, R.H., Zhao, Y. & Reif, J.C. A tailored quantitative genetic framework reveals the important role of epistatic 11
effects for grain yield heterosis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Nat Genet (2017). 12
30. Lynch, M. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45, 622–629 (1991). 13
31. Mohamed, S.A. & Pirchner, F. Relationships between genetic distance and dominance and epistatic effects in line-crosses 14
of mice. J Anim Breed Genet 115, 313–321 (1998). 15
32. Aspi, J. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana. Heredity 84, 273– 16
282 (2000). 17
33. Harlan, J.R. & Wet, J.M.J. de. Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20, 509–517 (1971). 18
34. Unterseer, S. et al. A comprehensive study of the genomic differentiation between temperate Dent and Flint maize. Genome
19
Biol 17 (2016). 20
35. Maccaferri, M., Sanguineti, M.C., Noli, E. & Tuberosa, R. Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a 21
durum wheat elite collection. Mol Breeding 15, 271–290 (2005). 22
36. van Inghelandt, D., Reif, J.C., Dhillon, B.S., Flament, P. & Melchinger, A.E. Extent and genome-wide distribution of linkage 23
disequilibrium in commercial maize germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 123, 11–20 (2011). 24
37. Zhao, Y. et al. Genome-based establishment of a high-yielding heterotic pattern for hybrid wheat breeding. P Natl Acad Sci
25
USA 112, 15624–15629 (2015). 26
38. Charcosset, A. & Essioux, L. The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at 27
marker loci. Theor Appl Genet 89, 336–343 (1994). 28
39. Melchinger, A.E. in The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops, edited by J.G. Coors & S. Pandey (ASA, CSSA, 29
Madison, WI.1999), pp. 99–118. 30
40. Habier, D., Fernando, R.L., Kizilkaya, K. & Garrick, D.J. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC
31
Bioinformatics 12, 186 (2011). 32
41. Zhao, Y., Zeng, J., Fernando, R. & Reif, J.C. Genomic prediction of hybrid wheat performance. Crop Sci 53, 802–810 (2013). 33
42. Charcosset, A., Lefort-Buson, M. & Gallais, A. Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. A theoretical 34
computation. Theor Appl Genet 81, 571–575 (1991). 35
43. Bernardo, R. Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor Appl Genet 83, 36
628–634 (1992). 37
44. Reif, J.C. et al. Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci
38
43, 1275–1282 (2003). 39
45. Corbellini, M., Perenzin, M., Accerbi, M., Vaccino, P. & Borghi, B. Genetic diversity in bread wheat, as revealed by coefficient 40
of parentage and molecular markers, and its relationship to hybrid performance. Euphytica 123, 273–285 (2002). 41
46. Dreisigacker, S. et al. Hybrid performance and heterosis in spring bread wheat, and their relations to SSR-based genetic 42
distances and coefficients of parentage. Euphytica 144, 51–59 (2005). 43
47. Zhang, J.F., Abdelraheem, A. & Wu, J.X. Heterosis, combining ability and genetic effect, and relationship with genetic 44
distance based on a diallel of hybrids from five diverse Gossypium barbadense cotton genotypes. Euphytica 213, 208 (2017). 45
48. van Heerwaarden, J., Hufford, M.B. & Ross-Ibarra, J. Historical genomics of North American maize. P Natl Acad Sci USA
46
109, 12420–12425 (2012). 47
48