Un “nuevo territorio” para la “nueva” gestión de la población

Please note that Harvard’s course evaluations are administered entirely online; the example below represents the same interface a student would see when completing an evaluation.

General Questions, page 1 [ COURSE NAME ]

Thank you for taking the time to complete your course evaluations.

Your responses are confidential. Course-wide summary data and individual responses are provided to instructors and teaching fellows after final grades have been submitted to the Registrar. Instructors and teaching fellows are not able to link an individual student to any specific response or comment.

Your comments and responses matter. Course evaluation by students is one method of improving the quality of teaching and learning at Harvard. Instructors and teaching fellows take your feedback seriously and read all the comments you provide.

Please evaluate your courses and instructors as you would expect your own work to be evaluated. Be thorough, respectful, and constructive. Comments on personal appearance or personal characteristics are not appropriate.

Question 1

• Evaluate the course overall.

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent

• What were the strengths of this course? Please be specific and use concrete examples where possible.

• How could this course be improved? Please use concrete examples where possible and provide constructive suggestions.

Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends

₇₇

Question 2

• Evaluate the following:

• Course materials (readings, audio-visual materials, textbooks, lab manuals, website, etc.)

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Add Comments?

• Assignments (exams, essays, problem sets, language homework, etc.)

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Add Comments?

• Feedback you received on work you produced in this course

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Add Comments?

• Section component of the course

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends

₇₈

Course Evaluations

General Questions, page 2 [ COURSE NAME ]

Please evaluate your courses and instructors as you would expect your own work to be evaluated. Be thorough, respectful, and constructive. Comments on personal appearance or personal characteristics are not appropriate.

Question 3

• What did this course require of you?

• On average, how many hours per week did you spend on coursework outside of class?

< 3 3 - 6 7 - 10 11 - 14 > 14

• How difficult did you find this course?

very easy easy moderate difficult very difficult

• In your opinion, what preparation or background is necessary to take this course?

Question 4

• What was/were your reason(s) for enrolling in this course? (Please check all that apply)

• Elective

• Concentration or Department Requirement

• Secondary Field or Language Citation Requirement • Undergraduate Core or General Education Requirement

Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends

₇₉

• Expository Writing Requirement

• Foreign Language Requirement • Pre-Med Requirement

Question 5

• Would you recommend this course?

• How strongly would you recommend this course to your peers? definitely not recommend unlikely to recommend recommend with reservations likely to recommend recommend with enthusiasm

• What would you like to tell future students about this class?

Question 6

• What did you take away from your experience in this course? • What did you learn? How did this course change you?

Course Evaluations

Questions about the Instructor [ COURSE NAME ]

Please evaluate your courses and instructors as you would expect your own work to be evaluated. Be thorough, respectful, and constructive. Comments on personal appearance or personal characteristics are not appropriate.

Evaluate [ Instructor Name ]

Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends

₈₀

• Evaluate your Instructor overall.

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent

• Evaluate your Instructor on the following:

• Gives effective lectures or presentations, if applicable

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Is accessible outside of class (including after class, office hours, e-mail, etc.)

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Generates enthusiasm for the subject matter

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• If this course was conducted in a lecture format with the involvement of section leaders, one or more of the following questions may not be applicable.

• Facilitates discussion and encourages participation

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Gives useful feedback on assignments

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends

₈₁

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Please comment on this person's teaching.

Course Evaluations

Questions about the Section Leader [ COURSE NAME ]

Please evaluate your courses and instructors as you would expect your own work to be evaluated. Be thorough, respectful, and constructive. Comments on personal appearance or personal characteristics are not appropriate.

Evaluate [ Section Leader Name ]

No personally identifiable information will be made available to your Section Leader(s).

• Evaluate your Section Leader overall.

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent

• Evaluate your Section Leader on the following:

• Gives effective lectures or presentations, if applicable

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Facilitates discussion and encourages participation

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends

₈₂

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Generates enthusiasm for the subject matter

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Gives useful feedback on assignments

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

• Returns assignments in a timely fashion

unsatisfactory fair good very good excellent not applicable

Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends

₈₃

Appendix B.3

In document “El Estado a tu lado” y “la recuperación del Estado para la ciudadanía” en el Ecuador 2007-2015. Una mirada al dispositivo y su discurso (página 36-40)