Obstáculos para el Ecuador

contraceptive consultations, 2008, <http://www.arhp. org/Publications-and-Resources/Clinical-Proceedings/ Breaking-the-Contraceptive-Barrier/System-Barriers>,

117. New Mexico Medical Review Association, Family Planning Waiver Evaluation: July 1, 1998–June 30, 2006, Albuquerque: New Mexico Human Services Department, 2006.

118. Texas Health and Human Services Commission,

Women’s Health Program Annual Report 2008: January 1, 2008–December 31, 2008, Austin: Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 2009.

119. RIte Care Research and Evaluation Project, unpub- lished data, 2005.

120. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Status of state action on the Medicaid expansion decision, 2014, <http:// kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-activity- around-expanding-medicaid-under-the-affordable- care-act/>, accessed Feb. 3, 2014.

121. Kenney GM et al., Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues: Opting in to the Medicaid Expansion Under the ACA: Who Are the Uninsured Adults Who Could Gain Health Insurance Coverage? Washington, DC: Urban Institute; and Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2012, <http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/412630-opting-in- medicaid.pdf>, accessed Dec. 28, 2013.


122. Special tabulations of data from references 120 and 121.

123. DHHS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, What are my preventive care benefits? no date, <https:// www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care- benefits/>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

124. Sommers BD and Epstein AM, Medicaid expansion— the soft underbelly of health care reform? New England Journal of Medicine, 2010, 363(22):2085–2087.

125. Pryor C and Cohen A, Consumers’ Experience in Massachusetts: Lessons for National Health Reform, Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2009, <http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress. com/2013/01/7976.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013. 126. Sonfield A, Implementing the Affordable Care Act: enrollment strategies and the U.S. family planning effort,

Guttmacher Policy Review, 2011, 14(4):20–25, <http://www. guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/14/4/gpr140420.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

127. DHHS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicaid data sources – general information, 2012, <https://www.cms.gov/MedicaidDataSourcesGenInfo/ 05_MdManCrPenRateandExpEnrll.asp>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

128. DHHS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicaid managed care enrollment as of December 31, 2010, no date, <https://www.cms.gov/Medicaid DataSourcesGenInfo/downloads/2010December31f.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

129. Claxton G et al., Employer Health Benefits: 2013 Annual Survey, 2013, Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser cdc.gov/preconception/planning.html>, accessed Dec. 27,

2013.

105. Kearney MS and Levine PB, Subsidized contracep- tion, fertility and sexual behavior, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009, 91(1):137–151.

106. Office of Medical Assistance Programs, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, 2010 SelectPlan for Women: Recipient Survey Analysis, Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, 2011.

107. Navigant Consulting, North Carolina Medicaid Be Smart Family Planning Waiver: Waiver Year Five Annual Report, Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.

108. Center for Health Services & Policy Research, Interim Evaluation of Project No. 11–00057/4 SC Family Planning Waiver: Expansion of Medicaid Benefits for Women Below 185% FPL (SFYs 1995–2005), Columbia: Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 2007. 109. Foster DG et al., Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed and subsequent unintended pregnan- cies, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 117(3):566–572. 110. Biggs MA et al., Cost-Benefit Analysis of the California Family PACT Program for Calendar Year 2007, San Francisco: Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, 2010, <http://bixbycenter.ucsf.edu/publica- tions/files/FamilyPACTCost-BenefitAnalysis2007_2010Apr. pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

111. Foster DG et al., Cost Benefits from the Provision of Specific Methods of Contraception in 2009, San Francisco, CA: Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, <http://bixbycenter.ucsf. edu/publications/files/Cost%20Benefits%20of%20 Contraception%202009.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013. 112. Yang Z and Gaydos LM, Reasons for and challenges of recent increases in teen birth rates: a study of family plan- ning service policies and demographic changes at the state level, Journal of Adolescent Health, 2010, 46(6):517–524. 113. Office of Family Health, Oregon Health Authority,

Family Planning Expansion Project: Project Evaluation Report for the Life of the Program 1999–2009, Portland: Oregon DHS Public Health, 2009.

114. Office of Policy Initiatives and Budget, Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, The Wisconsin Family Planning Waiver: Final Evaluation Report for 2003– 2007, 2008, <http://www.wistatedocuments.org/cdm/ singleitem/collection/p267601coll4/id/5752/rec/12>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

115. Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Services (UAMS), Evaluation of the Women’s Health Waiver, Little Rock, AR: UAMS, 2007. 116. Momany ET and Carter KD, Iowa Family Planning Demonstration Evaluation Final Report, Iowa City: University of Iowa Public Policy Center, 2011.

Policy Research Brief, No. 26, 2011, <https://sphhs.gwu. edu/departments/healthpolicy/DHP_Publications/pub_ uploads/dhpPublication_13AFEE26-5056-9D20-3D34798 61216C7E4.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

141. Wood S et al., Scope of family planning services avail- able in Federally Qualified Health Centers, Contraception, 2014, 89(2):85–90.

142. Gold RB, The role of family planning centers as gateways to health coverage and care, Guttmacher Policy Review, 2011, 14(2):15–19, <http://www.guttmacher.org/ pubs/gpr/14/2/gpr140215.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013. 143. Gold RB, Strengthening the safety net: pathways for collaboration between community health centers and family planning programs, Guttmacher Policy Review, 2011, 14(4):14–18, <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/14/4/ gpr140414.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

144. Hasstedt K, Title X funding chart, unpublished memo, Washington, DC: Guttmacher Institute, 2013.

145. Finer LB and Philbin JM, Sexual initiation, contra- ceptive use, and pregnancy among young adolescents,

Pediatrics, 2013, 131(5):1–6.

146. Krailo MD and Pike MC, Estimation of the distribu- tion of age at natural menopause from prevalence data,

American Journal of Epidemiology, 1983, 117(3):356–361. 147. Kato I et al., Prospective study of factors influenc- ing the onset of natural menopause, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998, 51(12):1271–1276.

148. Sozou PD and Hartshorne GM, Time to pregnancy: a computational method for using the duration of non- conception for predicting conception, PLoS One, 2012, 7(10):e46544

149. Leridon H, Human Fertility: The Basic Components,

Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.

150. Bongaarts J, A framework for analyzing the proxi- mate determinants of fertility, Population and Development Review, 1978, 4(1):105–132.

Family Foundation; and Chicago, IL: Health Research & Educational Trust, 2013, < http://kaiserfamilyfoundation. files.wordpress.com/2013/08/8465-employer-health- benefits-20132.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

130. Gold RB and Sonfield A, Working Successfully with Health Plans: An Imperative for Family Planning Centers, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2012, <http://www.guttmacher. org/pubs/health-plans.pdf>, accessed Oct. 17, 2013. 131. Sommers B et al., Understanding participation rates in Medicaid: implications for the Affordable Care Act, ASPE Issue Brief, Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, 2012, <http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/ reports/2012/MedicaidTakeup/ib.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

132. Gold R, Back to center stage: ACA decision gives new significance to Medicaid family planning expansions,

Guttmacher Policy Review, 2012, 15(4):7–12, <http://www. guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/15/4/gpr150413.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

133. Executive Office of Health and Human Services, Massachusetts Department of Public Health family plan- ning program data, no date, <http://www.mass.gov/ eohhs/gov/departments/dph/programs/community- health/primarycare-healthaccess/family-planning/ -local-and-national-family-planning-data-sources.html>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.


134. Sonfield A et al., Cost Pressures on Title X Family Planning Grantees, FY 2001–2004, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2006, <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/ 2006/08/01/CPTX.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013. 135. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Medicaid: states made multiple program changes, and beneficiaries generally reported access comparable to private insurance,

Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 2012, <http://www.gao.gov/assets/650/649788.pdf>, accessed Sept. 19, 2013.

136. Decker S, Two-thirds of primary care physicians accepted new Medicaid patients in 2011–12: a baseline to measure future acceptance rates, Health Affairs, 2013, 32(7):1183–1187.

137. Long S, Physicians may need more than higher reim- bursements to expand Medicaid participation: findings from Washington State, Health Affairs, 2013, 32(9):1560–1567. 138. Cunningham P, Physician reimbursement and participation in Medicaid, presentation at the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission, Washington, DC, Sept. 23, 2010, <http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/ 1157/1157.pdf>, accessed Dec. 27, 2013.

139. Rosenbaum S et al., Assessing and Addressing Legal Barriers to the Clinical Integration of Community Health Centers and Other Community Providers, New York: Commonwealth Fund, 2010.

140. Gold RB et al., A natural fit: collaborations between

Moving Forward: Family Planning in the Era of Health Reform is available online at www.guttmacher.org. To obtain additional print copies please contact [email protected].

©2014 Guttmacher Institute, a not-for-profit corporation advancing sexual and reproductive health worldwide through research, policy analysis and public education. All rights, including translation into other languages, are reserved under the Universal Copyright Convention, the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and the Inter- and Pan American Copyright Conventions (Mexico City and Buenos Aires). Rights to translate information contained in this report may be waived.

ISBN number: 978-1-934387-17-7

Suggested citation: Sonfield A, Hasstedt K and Gold RB,

Moving Forward: Family Planning in the Era of Health Reform, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2014.

Guttmacher Institute 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor New York, NY 10038 Telephone: 212-248-1111 Fax: 212-248-1951

Email: [email protected]

1301 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036

www.guttmacher.org