C´ odigo fuente del algoritmo en 2D para proce- proce-sado de im´ agenes digitales

Martin Luther: Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has. Reason should be destroyed in all Christians.

Dawkins, op.cit.p.63: The genie of religious fanaticism is rampant in present-day America, and

the Founding Fathers would have been horrified.”

Barry Goldwater: The religious factions that are growing throughout the land are not using their clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100%.”

The ‘Day of Judgment’ is a given reality for the sober monotheist. On that day, “… none will bear the burden of another” — a theme Al’Qur’an repeatedly states. Assuming this is true, it describes the rather singular existence of the human ‘soul’; meaning the human entity, as a soul, exists without dissolution and is incapable of becoming a solvent or dwelling for another ‘soul’ or consciousness. This puts monotheism at odds with what passes as reality in the belief system of Hindus, Buddhists and sundry monist romantics.

For many of these, the final dissolution of consciousness (denial of the individuality and hence accountability) represents an ultimate state of forgetfulness or epitome of spiritual attainment vis-à-vis an absolute soul-annihilation by becoming one (i.e. re-uniting) with God permanently. After all, who can contemplate ‘self’ when it is re-dissolved in

‘divine essence’—whatever that is—or hopelessly lost when given to another in the adoration of romantic love or submitted via the cultic adoration of spiritual mediators?

The temporal mini-nirvana described in the last chapter is but a thumbnail reflection of this greater monist delusion, because a ‘loss of consciousness’ (of self, e.g. intoxication) is the goal for both. Such a mindset may also lead to the self-sacrifice of suicidal mania for the greater cause of the polity—one of Shaitan’s most successful ploys throughout

146 Enmeshment: No matter how one attempts to define this concept—and there are many attempts—it fundamentally represents the loss of personal expression of one’s true identity leading to retarded growth towards spiritual, emotional and intellectual maturity. In other words, the personality is stunted, left immature and helpless (dependent), being hindered by conflicts (enmeshments, entanglements) imposed either by self or others; usually the result of dysfunctional relations commanded by a tyrannical relative, and it may be multilayered as well as a learned characteristic need the individual subconsciously projects towards others. nirvana 1: (Hinduism and Buddhism) the beatitude that transcends the cycle of reincarnation; characterized by the extinction of desire and individual consciousness. 2: any place of complete bliss and delight and peace [syn: eden, paradise, heaven, promised land, Shangri-la]; Nirvana: In the Buddhist system of religion, the final emancipation of the soul from transmigration, and consequently a beatific enfranchisement from the evils of worldly existence, as by annihilation or absorption into the divine. Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

125 THE HANDS OF IBLIS - Omar Zaid., M.D.

history, and I am not referring to the noble deed of those who ‘fall on grenades’ to save their comrades or are brave enough to stand their ground in the face of impossible odds;

but rather, for examples, the monk who sets himself afire or the deluded wife who throws herself on the funeral pyre.

So much then, for the soul: But what of the body? This is quite a separate matter because the body can be possessed by entities other than the human soul to whom it is assigned, and any bomoh (Shaman) worth his or her unsavory salt knows this to be true. And if the body can be possessed, so can the mind be programmed and/or manipulated (conditioned) so that the soul loses the ‘self-control’ of its carnal sentience to either external thoughts and/or beings. I touched on this topic earlier:

26JULY 1963,MEMORANDUM FOR: DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE FROM: CIAINSPECTOR GENERAL:

“The concepts involved in manipulating behavior are found by many people both within and outside the Agency [CIA] to be distasteful and unethical. Nevertheless, there have been major accomplishments both in research and operational employment. Over the ten-year life of the program many additional avenues to the control of human behavior have been designated under the MKULTRA charter [later: Project MONARCH], including radiation, electro-shock, and harassment substances. Some activities raise questions of legality implicit in the original charter. A final phase of the testing places the rights and interests of US citizens in jeopardy.

Technical Services Division initiated a program for covert testing of materials on unwitting US citizens in 1955. TSD has pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the high sensitivity of the projects. Some files contained little or no data at all. There are just two individuals in TSD who have full knowledge of the MKULTRA program, and most of that knowledge is unrecorded. NB 108-113”

“A declassified CIA document dated 7 Jan 1953 describes the experimental creation of multiple personality in two 19-year old girls. “These subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can pass from a fully awake state to a deep H [hypnotic] controlled state by telephone, by receiving written matter, or by the use of code, signal, or words, and that control of those hypnotized can be passed from one individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been shown by experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for information purposes.” ¹⁴⁷

We might describe such a state as a temporal mini-hell reflecting the final loss of the soul’s empirically limited self-control. Such a mini-loss is an enmeshment (entrapment) whereby the will of one person is entangled with that of another. This overstepping the

147 See: Bluebird by Colin A. Ross, MD; Mind Controllers by Dr. Armen Victorian; and A Nation Betrayed by Carol Rutz;, Non lethality by John B Alexander, The Pentagon's Penguin, by Armen Victorian, Lobster Books, Jun. 1993; Brainwash, Dominic Streatfield, Thomas Dunn Books, 2007,

126 THE HANDS OF IBLIS - Omar Zaid., M.D.

bounds of natural authority in order to exercise power (coercion) over the estate of another is the essence of errant magick and politics universally, and errant politics is any exercise of political will not submitted to Shari’ah (i.e. God’s Law: spiritual, moral, and ethical). A clear example of the latter is Christian disobedience to the First Commandment as cited above resulting in democracy’s erstwhile impositions:

“…US tutelage stimulating the predilections of the Shi’ite population all across the region.

Neither secular Arab nationalism nor militant traditionalism appear as a match to a culture captivated [i.e. enmeshed] by martyrdom and its evocative religious symbols [icons].” ¹⁴⁸

“For as al-Ghazali repeatedly tells us, religious and worldly affairs are complementary and absolutely in separable.” ¹⁴⁹

What indeed is the difference between dying for Hussain’s legacy, Japan’s Emperor, Lady Liberty’s favors, or Chairman Mao’s appetite for socially engineered group psychosis?

In the sentient experience of the immature soul, the realm of feelings readily overwhelms reason and bends the will towards conformity of behavior and thought at the cost of truth.

Thus we romanticize the ‘sacrifice’ of lives thrown into ism-forays manufactured by our felonious leaders. Ostensibly, the substitution of delusion (lies) for reason (truth) is accomplished for two purposes:

(1) in order to ‘feel good or loved’ (emotional or carnal satiety), and (2) to preserve one’s livelihood (life, safety).

These primitive motivators were common to all hunter-gatherer communes long before Cain civilized Dravidia with his concept of religion in order to exercise power-politics while extracting their wealth, because, after Allah cursed him there was little else this father of brigands, murderers and professional liars could do:

“And when Cain had traveled over many countries, he, with his wife, built a city, named Nod, which is a place so called, and there he settled his abode; where also he had children.

However, he did not accept of his punishment in order to amend, but to increase his wickedness; for he only aimed to procure everything that was for his own bodily pleasure, though it obliged him to be injurious to his neighbors. He augmented his household substance with much wealth, by rapine and violence; he excited his acquaintance to procure

148 Dr. Hamid Ansari, op.cit.

149 Muddathir ‘Abd al-Rahim, “Al-Ghazali’s Political Thought: Its Nature and Contemporary Relevance,”

Al-Shajarah, Journal of The International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 2006, Vol ii, no 2.p. 154.

127 THE HANDS OF IBLIS - Omar Zaid., M.D.

pleasures and spoils of robbery, and became a great leader of men into wicked courses. He also introduced a change in that way of simplicity wherein men lived before; and was the author of measures and weights. And whereas they lived innocently and generously while they knew nothing of such arts, he changed the world into cunning craftiness. … Nay, even while Adam was alive, it came to pass that the posterity of Cain became exceedingly wicked, every one successively dying one after the other, more wicked than the former. They were intolerable in war and vehement in robberies; and if anyone were slow to murder people, yet was he bold in his profligate behavior, in acting unjustly, and doing injury for gain.”

- Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, AD 93

Sounds like Cain was the first Shylock. This testimony and the curse of Allah recorded in Genesis II implies theoretically that the overlords of Nod (lands ‘east of Eden’, i.e., east of the Euphrates; lands governed by civilizing children of Cain: i.e. today’s Iran / West Pakistan and beyond) eventually economized their devilry by using religious ideations to control the amma; manipulating their charges at instinctive levels of awareness in which man is not fully conscious, being little more than an animal (beast or Rousseau’s Noble hominid Savage). Eventually, societies such as Egypt, Greece and Rome managed the same feat while keeping the finer arts of virtue for their elite (Khassa)¹⁵⁰ who—like Cain and Sons Ltd.—leisurely extracted wealth from physically and metaphysically enslaved human cattle (those whom Jews call ‘goy’). Essentially, most governments have behaved in a similar fashion, more or less. This being the case, Mr. Dawkins’ research request is legitimate because religion readily becomes a tool of pilferage in the hand of unscrupulous ‘Masters of the Craft’ of Thelemic alchemy, and it is interesting to note that Freemasons have special Degrees of ritual devoted to Tubal-Cain.¹⁵¹

Wherever one looks, regardless of the nation or era, one finds the same pattern of traditionally sanctioned, sacrosanct mis-appropriations alongside its barbarian cousin, Organized Crime.¹⁵² They have always worked hand in glove throughout the course of

150 Khassa: people of distinction, the establishment; people of power and wealth: Mercantile enmeshment with Politicians and the Military. See: Amira El-Azhary Sonbol, op.cit.

151 Jude 1: 10 ‘But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves. Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.’…

Creating the illusion of divine sanction demonstrates absolute power over God’s pen-ultimate material:

mankind. Materialism is a form of monism. Upper Degree Freemasons (28th to 33rd degrees) call the management of the masses visavis this monist illusion the ‘Royal Art’ or ‘Craft’. - oz

See: Trinity, The Metamotphosis of Myth, by Omar Zaid, Pen Press Pub., Brighton England, Sept. 2007

152 See:

128 THE HANDS OF IBLIS - Omar Zaid., M.D.

man’s pseudo-linear procession along avenues of damnation, and indeed, Brother Khaldun was right: they are natural born siblings of man’s disobedience to Divine Law (the worst of all offspring); for if men do not serve Allah they will serve themselves in this manner under the suggestive guidance of Lucifer, and, as Al’Qur’an states: ‘God makes these thoroughfares both attractive and smooth’. This is the chosen way of unrepentant mankind and hence, one of the pre-eminent symbols (icons) of Freemasonry is the Jolly Roger (pirate flag). Indeed, many privateers were, in fact, Freemasons.

While the people of Iblis leave such a readable trail, Allah’s methodology never changes, which is why history repeats itself in cycles and spirals of villainy and heroism:

“They took flight from the truth because of their arrogance in the land and their plotting of evil … can they expect anything else but the Sunnah (way of dealing) of the people of old? So no change will you find in Allah’s Sunnah, and no turning off will you find in Allah’s Sunnah.” [Sura 35: 43]

And for those of you who doubt the conspiracy thesis, the “plotting of evil” can only mean conspiracy. No need then for long winded dialogues or didactics about the stark statements of this sura. Best keep your powder dry and at least try to stop your leaders from committing the same foolishness, which is why the Prophet said that the ‘Kingdom of Allah is under the shadow of the sword’, or something to that effect [I can’t seem to remember the exact hadith … good thing they’re written down]. Dr. Sayeed has this to say:

“The recent despotic and military regimes in the Arab world … are awfully beset with shameless class arrogance and social stratification. The power elite consisting of the military class has formed the apex of society. It not only enjoys absolute power, but appropriates the entire national wealth for itself … as a consequence, the military and technological modernization in the Middle-East made regimes more oppressive and unbearable, and the

“Corruption and organized crime: Lessons from history,” Margaret E. Beare Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol 28, No. 2, pp. 155-72

These histories describe the informal khassite economy (black market) that competes with the formal economy of the khassa. However, members of the formal khassa do hide wealth in this venue as well. - oz

129 THE HANDS OF IBLIS - Omar Zaid., M.D.

regime of power more unruly and fraudulent. The coercion blended with instability made life ever more miserable.” - Dr. S.M.A. Sayeed, op.cit. pp. 162, 163.

I might add to the last statement: ‘except for the khassa’—that is, ‘until they visit the grave’. It is clear to the sober observer that any alliance these sad creatures of Iblissian ethics make is for the appropriation of weapons to be used against their own populace in the event of inevitable uprising. Jordan’s King [a Freemason] gave ample evidence of this against Palestinians, as have the Syrians, Yemenites and Kuwaities. These khassite vermin are no different than the rabbinical Jews whom the following passage describes:

“A party of the People of the Book threw away the Book of Allah behind their backs, as if it had been something they did not know! They followed what the Satans recited over Solomon’s Kingdom.

Solomon did not disbelieve, but Satans disbelieved teaching men magic, and such things as came down at Babylon to the angels Harut and Marut. But neither of these taught anyone such things without saying: ‘We are only for trial; so do not blaspheme.” [Al’Qur’an, II: 101-2]

‘What the Satans recited’ has come down to us as the Talmud and most especially the Kabala. And what Harut and Marut taught will also be discussed in some detail in later chapters, as these recitations are the core of Illuminati doctrines, Sexual Magick, Sorcery, and Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Roots of the Conspiracy and Justification for traditional Anti-Semitism:

“To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all the Jews, for if the goys knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.” Talmud, Book of Libbre David, 37 [Goy means unclean]

“A Jew may rob a Goy, he may cheat him over a bill … The son of Noah, who would steal a farthing ought to be put to death, but an Israelite is allowed to do injury to a goy; where it is written, Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor, is not said, Thou shalt not do injury to a goy … A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew, but a Jew is not forbidden to do all this to a goy … If a goy killed a goy or a Jew he is responsible, but if a Jew killed a goy he is not responsible ... Every goy who studies Talmud and every Jew who helps him ought to die … The property of the goys is like a thing without a master … The decisions of the Talmud are the words of the Living God. Jehovah himself asks the opinion of earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven. Jehovah himself in heaven studies the Talmud, standing: he has such respect for that book … the Jewish nation is the only nation selected by God, all others are contemptible … all property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which consequently is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples … an orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other nations … if it were profitable for himself or for the interest of Jews in general, he ought to act against morality.”

[All quotes taken from the Talmud, references upon request. - oz]

130 THE HANDS OF IBLIS - Omar Zaid., M.D.