Requisito V. Requerimientos de Seguridad Industrial Aplica SI =
V.3. No fumar en las instalaciones de Petróleos Mexicanos u Organismos Subsidiarios, independientemente de que existan o no letreros
V.9.4. Otorgar las facilidades necesarias a efecto de que se realicen las investigaciones de incidentes/accidentes A S 1.5%
It would be inaccurate and misleading to suggest that Sharia law is the law of Saudi Arabia. While this is, to large extent, correct, it does not reflect the exact content of Saudi law since the scope of Saudi law is wider than Sharia law; in other words, Saudi law consists of rules of Islamic origin, as well as laws and regulations of foreign origin, which are adapted so that they do not conflict with Sharia. Perhaps the most precise account of the Saudi legal system is given by Vogel who describes it as having two categories of rules: one founded in Islamic law and the other a category of ‘man-made’ law (positive law).128 Vogel further notes that while the former is ‘fundamental and dominant’, the latter
is ‘subordinate’.129
Remarkably, the BLG 1992 lacks clear mention of legislation as a source of law in Saudi Arabia. Nonetheless, the regulator’s entitlement to enact laws and the binding characteristic of state legislation can be inferred from the BLG 1992. For example, the Law clearly recognises the jurisdiction of Legislative (Regulatory) Authority to introduce new laws130 and additionally charges the King, as head of state, with the duty to oversee the
127 Section 1 of the Royal Order No. (A/20) dated 30/11/2014. The recent Royal Order was based on the
Board of Senior Ulama Decision No. 236, dated 4 February 2010.
128 F E Vogel, ‘Islamic Governance in the Gulf: A Framework for Analysis, Comparison, and Prediction’ in
G Sick and L Potter (ed), The Persian Gulf at the Millennium: Essays in Politics, Economy, Security, and
Religion (London, Macmillan Press Ltd 1997) 275–276.
129 Ibid
19
implementation of state laws.131 Furthermore, courts are statutorily required to apply ‘laws
not in conflict with the Qur’an and the Sunnah’.132 Although legislation as a source of law
is not explicitly recognised, the Saudi legislature, through the use of Islamic principle of public interest (al-maslaha al-mursalah), has the right, recognised by Sharia, to pass laws and regulations to meet the needs of modern society.133 The public interest as a basis of
law-making is established by the BLG 1992,134 so long as the exercise of legislation
produces laws that fall within the Sharia framework.135 In fact, the flexible nature of
Islamic law, which includes the general principle that ‘all things not specifically prohibited are allowed’, clears the way for the codification of foreign legal ideas in Saudi Arabia.136 It
should again be stressed that the legitimate exercise of legislation on the basis of public interest is only valid for ‘supplementing’, but not ‘contradicting’ Sharia,137 an important
consideration that will be taken into account later when examining the feasibility of reforming the Saudi law of directors’ duties by way of legal transplantation.138
It is unquestionable that the economic development of the Kingdom has been a major contributing factor to legal change and reform.139 As the government’s revenues from oil
products rose and the Saudi economy began to develop, the Saudi rulers attempted to harmonise Islamic rules with economic, social and industrial growth, by producing a body of statutory laws to deal with a vast range of areas, such as constitutional and criminal matters, judiciary and human rights, health and education, and commerce and finance.140 It
is worth mentioning that French law inspired most laws introduced during the early period of Saudi legal reform.141 This influence was attributable to the fact that the drafting of those
laws was done by Egyptian legal experts who followed the French legal tradition. As they worked in close collaboration with Saudi scholars who also received their legal education from schools of law in France, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon,142 it is easy to see the logic
behind the influence of French law over the content of many Saudi laws, including those
131 See article 55 of the BLG 1992. 132 See article 48 of the BLG 1992. 133 See Ansary (n 119) 5.
134 See article 67 of the BLG 1992. 135 Ansary (n 119) 5.
136 Hanson (n 52) 289.
137 R Aba-Namay, ‘The New Saudi Representative Assembly’ (1998) 5 Islamic L & Soc’y 235, 236 – 237. 138 This issue will be further discussed in Chapter 6 in this thesis.
139 See Sfeir (n 124) 733–734; Hanson (n 52) 272.
140 The first piece of legislation enacted in the history of Saudi Arabia was the CCL1931. The list of primary
laws as well as main secondary statutes issued by the Council of Ministers are on the website of Beureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers <www.boe.gov.sa.>
141 Hanson (n 52) 288.
142 Ibid 288–289. Legal systems of aforementioned Arab countries are influenced by French civil law
20
that fall within the area of commercial law. This is exemplified by the CCL 1931143 and the
CL 1965,144 which are largely inspired by French law. Hence, it has become common to
describe Saudi law, at least in relation to its commercial law, as a French-based legal system.145 However, this does not mean that Saudi lawmakers were confined to following
the French civil legal system and were reluctant to adopt legal ideas found in other legal systems. For example, Saudi benefits from the Anglo-American model and experiences in respect of the reform of capital market law and corporate governance regulation. According to Beach, who had a direct hand in shaping the content of the CML 2003, the law includes rules based upon existing securities laws from US, European, Asian and Middle Eastern sources.146 Recently, the MOCI, which has participated with the CMA in
preparing the new CGRs 2017, clearly stated that many foreign and international documents and reports in respect of corporate governance (e.g., the UK Corporate Governance Code) had been drawn on while preparing the new draft of the CGRs.147