1. EL VALOR DE LOS PRINCIPIOS CONSTITUCIONALES DE LA TRIBUTACIÓN EN LA
1.2. P RINCIPIOS CONSTITUCIONALES DEL SISTEMA TRIBUTARIO
from one plaCe to
another – they are
enSlaved In theIr oWn
vIllaGeS
44.
iNDiA CONtiNuED
116 US Trafficking in Persons Report 2012”, India Country Narrative, pp. 184-185, US Department of State: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/192595.pdf 117 “US Trafficking in Persons Report 2013”, India Country Narrative, p195, US Department of State: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/210739.pdf 118 Ibid.
119 Observation (CEACR) – adopted 2011, published 101nd ILC session (2012), Forced Labour Convention, 19030, (No. 29): http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000
:13100:0::NO:13100:P13100_COMMENT_ID:3080704
120 Ibid.
121 Information from field based sources.
122 “India: Worst country in G20 to be a woman?”, (31 July 2012), BBC Radio Four: http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9741000/9741747.stm 123 United States Trafficking in Persons Report 2013, US Department of State, p195: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/210739.pdf
124 “India’s new surrogacy laws are only part of the equation”, (14 March 2013), Monash University, Dr Liz Bishop: http://monash.edu/news/show/indias-new-surrogacy-laws-
are-only-part-of-the-equation
migrants are droves of undocumented Bangladeshis who, as unskilled labourers, are not able to qualify for employment visas,116 and turn to illegal brokers to facilitate employment.
Sexual exploitation of Indian women, men and transgender people within India, both adults and children, is widespread.117 Commercial sexual exploitation takes place in specific
established areas but is also now much more dispersed into rural areas, transport hubs, roadside restaurants and houses in suburban areas, extensively using cell phones, making it harder to locate and tackle. Foreign women, largely from Nepal and Bangladesh, have been identified in situations of commercial sexual exploitation.118
In 2011, the ILO Committee of Experts “noted the Government [of India’s] indication in its 2008 Report that since the enactment of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 (BLSA), 287,555 bonded labourers had been identified, of whom 267,593 had been rehabilitated.”119
However, the ILO Committee of Experts also noted that “findings from research studies showed that bonded labour in agriculture and in industries like mining, brick kilns, silk and cotton production, and bidi making was likely to be affecting millions of workers across the country.”120 The ILO Committee of Experts has
urged India to undertake national bonded labour surveys. Also, the identification and rehabilitation noted by the ILO Experts happened a long time ago, and in many Indian States local officials are not currently encouraged or supported to find bonded labourers.121
The 2012 UNODC Global Report on Trafficking in Persons noted a “global dimension to the [trafficking] flows originating in South Asia.” Indian nationals who have migrated for work have found themselves in modern slavery – often involving recruitment intermediaries and debt bondage – around the world. They have been exploited in various industries including construction, mining, agriculture and hospitality, in manual labour and commercial sexual exploitation, as well as in private domestic work and as domestic staff at Indian diplomatic missions abroad.
notable aspects of the problem
The World Bank estimated in 2012 that 32.7% of Indians lived below the international poverty line of less than US$1.25/day (PPP). Poverty and India’s caste system are significant contributing factors to its modern slavery problem. Indians most vulnerable to modern slavery are those from the ‘lower’ castes (dalits), and the indigenous communities (adivasis), especially women and children. In surveys of violence and discrimination against women, India is consistently ranked poorly. The low status of women and severity and prevalence of domestic violence in society puts them at risk of modern slavery.122
‘Non-labour’ forms of modern slavery, including forced and servile marriage, fraudulent adoption and organ trafficking have been identified in India. Forced marriage is partly fuelled by sex-ratio disparity – those states with worst disparity import girls into servile marriages from poorer states.123 Commercial surrogacy is
legal in India and is an area of concern because of the potential for exploitation to occur, however no cases that would constitute modern slavery have been publicly verified, and surrogacy laws are in the process of being tightened.124
2. What IS the Government doInG about It?
The Government has taken some important steps to set up the infrastructure of a response to various forms of modern slavery. For example, if fully implemented, the social safety net provisions such as the Employment
Sexual exploItatIon of
IndIan Women, men and
tranSGender people
WIthIn IndIa, both
adultS and ChIldren,
IS WIdeSpread
45.
125 “India official: it’s not slavery” (10 March 2011), CNN Freedom Project: http://thecnnfreedomproject.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/10/india-official-its-not-slavery/ 126 The Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, Child Line India: http://www.childlineindia.org.in/CP-CR-Downloads/Bonded%20Labour%20System%20(Abolition)%20
Act%201976%20and%20Rules.pdf
127 “Human Rights Worker Hospitalized as Brick Kiln Owner and Henchmen Attack Rescued Slaves During Police Raid” (13 June 2013), Free The Slaves blog: http://ftsblog.
net/2013/06/13/human-rights-worker-hospitalized-as-brick-kiln-owner-and-henchmen-attack-rescued-slaves-during-police-raid/
128 “US Trafficking in Persons Report 2013”, India Country Narrative, p195, US Department of State: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/210739.pdf 129 Information from field based sources.
Guarantee could be a best practice to be followed by other countries. However, considering the power and resources of the Indian Government, the Government has not fulfilled its duty to protect its citizens. Until recently, the response to human trafficking focused almost exclusively on the sexual exploitation of women and children, and other forms of human trafficking including those affecting men were barely recognised. National leaders tend not to recognise the violent criminality of bonded labour and instead see it as a vestige of poverty.125
India has ratified a number of key Conventions relevant to modern slavery. However, India is one of the few remaining countries in the world not to have ratified the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention. While not always slavery, these so called “worst forms” of child labour covered by this Convention, occurs on a significant scale in India and are deeply connected to the modern slavery issue. India’s
Right to Education – whereby the authorities are required to ensure all children of school going age are in school – is important, as is the Integrated Child Protection Scheme, which is making a difference in some areas. There have been efforts in many places to enforce child labour laws. India has not ratified the Domestic Work Convention.
Until recently, Indian legislation on modern slavery was complicated and confused. However, following amendments to the Penal Code in April 2013, section 370 Penal Code criminalises all forms of human trafficking in accordance with the definition taken from the UN Trafficking Protocol. The definition used in the amended Penal Code appears broad enough, at least on paper, to include most if not all forms of forced labour, bonded labour and forced marriage (as bonded labour and forced marriage are covered within the meaning of the term ‘slavery like practice’). However, it remains to be seen if the Penal Code will be used in this way.
Bonded labour has been criminalised in India, under the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act 1976 (BLSA)126 for close to three decades. However, enforcement has been sporadic and weak. The Act declares
that bonded labour is abolished as of 25 October 1975, and that bonded labourers were relieved of their obligation to repay their bonded debt. However, in 2013, bonded labour continues to be prevalent and NGOs report having insufficient resources to empower communities to shed the burden of forced labour.
Human rights defenders have also been targeted for anti-slavery work: one NGO reported an attack on their workers, as well as victims and officials while in process of assisting bonded labourers to leave the workplace where they had been held in slavery.127 Penalties under this
law are low, set at a maximum of three years imprisonment, compared to ten years under the recent human trafficking amendments to the Penal Code.
NGOs have stated that enforcement of laws criminalising modern slavery is inconsistent, and the complicity or interference of government officials has been widely reported.128 As a result national and state level
responses are not benefitting those in slavery as much as they should, due to complicity of local officials and their avoidance of conflict with locally powerful slaveholders and traffickers. The justice system is very slow generally, so victims have little or no confidence in its capacity to deliver a result.129 NGOs have also reported
a focus on the trafficking of women and children, particularly for sexual exploitation, and less willingness on the part of government and law enforcement to deal with the exploitation of adult males, or to address the far more locally prevalent forms of debt bondage or bonded labour.
INDIA Ratified
Slavery Convention Yes
Supplementary Slavery Convention Yes
UN Trafficking Protocol Yes
Forced Labour Convention Yes
Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention No CRC Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children Yes
Domestic Work Convention No