• No se han encontrado resultados

6. ANÁLISIS DEL PROGRAMA Y PAPEL DEL TRABAJO SOCIAL

6.2 El papel de los/as profesionales

Review the “Comparability Matches Rubrics” …if you agree, do nothing

…if there is a discrepancy, please note it on the “Comparability Matches Rubric Review” template (see at-a-glance example of template below)

Standard Domain Current Number and Percent of Matches Adjusted Number and Percent of Matches Comparable Adjustments (Yes/No) Other Comments Administrative Practices Personnel Qualifications Professional Development FINALLY…..

Please send your “Technical Review Discrepancies” template and your “Comparability Matches Rubric Review” template to Lesli or Nan by the end of the day Wednesday, March 27, 2013

If we do not hear from you we will assume that you are in agreement with the crosswalk that was completed by OIR.

~Reaching for the Stars Alignment~

Star Level Criteria OK Programs with

Comparability National Comparability Star 1+ Criteria

All staff access to licensing requirements None None

Annual staff evaluations and individualized professional development plan

EduCare, EC Program NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC

Employee handbook EC Program NAEYC, NAC, NECPA

Facility registered as a direct care organization with OK PD Registry

EC Program None

Staff counted in staff: child ratio enrolled in OK PD

Registry EC Program None

Director-2 college credits or 30 hours of PD every 12

months of employment EC Program NECPA

Staff-2 college credits or 20 hours of PD every 12 months of employment

EC Program NECPA, Head Start (15 hours)

Director and staff have an annual PD plan EC Program NAEYC, Head Start, NECPA

1 staff for every 20 children must work toward Master

Teacher qualifications EC Program, EduCare NAEYC, Head Start, NECPA Staff working toward Master Teacher qualifications are

trained in OK’s Early Learning Guidelines (ELG) EC Program Head Start, NIEER Weekly lesson plans for all age groups of children EC Program NAC

Children read to at least 15 minutes/day EC Program, Pre-K NAEYC, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC

Space arranged and equipped in 6 well-defined interest areas

EC Program, Pre-K NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC Outdoor environment utilized daily for physical

activity (weather permitting)

EC Program, Pre-K NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC TV or screen time not used for children younger than

age 2 EC Program, Pre-K NAEYC, NECPA, NAFCC

Established and maintains a system for sharing and communicating with families on happenings, activities and issues…

EduCare, EC Program,

Parents As Teachers NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC

Families welcome at all times None NAEYC, Head Start,

NAC, NECPA, NAFCC Provide resource area (includes books, pamphlets, and

articles) EC Program None

Two family meetings w/guest speakers or special

Two methods of keeping families informed (bulletin board, handbook, newsletter, email/listserv, website)

EduCare, EC Program, Parents As Teachers

NAEYC, Head Start, NECPA, NAFCC Families participate in program and policy

development through board involvement, planning meetings, or questionnaires

EduCare, EC Program NAEYC, Head Start

Licensing requirements available to families None None

Annual health and safety checklists for both indoor and outdoor spaces

EC Program Head Start, NECPA,

NAFCC Annual survey of parents and staff of program

effectiveness

EduCare, EC Program, Parents As Teachers

NAEYC, Head Start, NECPA

Annual equipment inventory conducted EC Program Head Start, NECPA,

NAFCC 2 Star Criteria

Policy and procedure manual on-site for staff, including mission or vision statement, organizations structure, code of professional conduct and discipline philosophy

EC Program NAEYC, NAC, NECPA

Annual two staff meetings conducted to discuss quality EC Program NAEYC, Head Start, NECPA

Master teachers must be employed on site on full-time basis and trained in ELG

EC Program Head Start, NIEER Master teacher meet one of following: child care

competency certificate; CDA or CCP Credential; Certificate of mastery in child development or ECE from accredited OK college; 30 college credit hours with 15 hours in child development or ECE from accredited college; four year degree with 6 college credits in child development or ECE ;two or four year degree from accredited college/university in child development or ECE; a valid teaching certificate in ECE from OK SDE; current level 3 or higher on OK ECE PD Ladder

EC Program, Pre-K,

EduCare NAEYC, Head Start, NECPA, NIEER

Master teacher required per every 30 children EC Program None Director qualify as master teacher if licensed capacity

minus school age children is 30 or less EC Program NAEYC, NECPA

Daily schedules balanced and allows children time to

complete tasks EC Program, Pre-K NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC Space and equipment to support eight interest areas;

minimum of two learning areas are available outdoors

EC Program, Pre-K NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC Uses OK ELG as a resource for lesson and curriculum

planning

EC Program Head Start, NIEER Staff participate in physical activity with children at

least once/daily EC Program None

Parent conferences held twice/year with written report EduCare, Parents As

Teachers, EC Program NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC Maintains current list of available community resources

and assist connecting families with resources

EduCare, Parents As Teachers, EC Program

NAEYC, Head Start, NAC, NECPA, NAFCC Assessed within the first year of receiving a 2 star status EC Program None

using approved assessment tool

Program has written plan for meeting goals that includes PD and Educational needs of staff as well as facility policies and procedures

EduCare, Parents As Teacher

NAEYC, Head Start

Staff participate in program evaluation and established

~Comparability Matches Rubric~ OK and National Program Standards

Reaching for the Stars OK Pre-K NIEER

Criteria by Standard Area # of

matches % matching Comparable (Yes or No) # of matches % matching Comparable (Yes or No) # of matches % matching Comparable (Yes/No)

Administrative Practices (7

potential matches)

4/7

57.1% Yes

1/7

14.2%

No

1/7

14.2%

No

Personnel Practices (3 potential

matches)

0/3

0%

No

0/3

0%

No

2/3

66.7%

Yes

Professional Development ( 3

potential matches)

1/1* 100%

Yes

0/3

0%

No

1/3

33.3%

No

Learning Environment (13 potential

matches)

2/11**

18.2% No

5/13 38.5%

No

0/13

0%

No

Family Engagement (12 potential

matches)

7/12 58.3% Yes

0/12 0%

No

0/12

0%

No

Program Evaluation (4 potential

matches)

2/4

50.0% Yes

0/4

0%

No

0/4

0%

No

Health & Safety (16 potential

matches)

6/16 37.5% No

2/16 12.5%

No

0/16

0%

No

Child Health (10 potential matches)

0/10 0%

No

0/10 0%

No

1/10

10.0%

No

Nutrition (12 potential matches)

0/12 0%

No

0/12 0%

No

0/12

0%

No

Services to Children with

Disabilities (11 potential matches)

0/11

0%

No

4/11 33.3%

No

0/11

0%

No

Community Partnerships (2

potential matches)

1/2

50%

Yes

0/2

0%

No

0/2

0%

No

Mental Health (5 potential

matches)

0/5

0%

No

1/5

20%

No

0/5

0%

No

Transportation (2 potential

ERSEA (11 potential matches)

0/11 0%

No

0/11 0%

No

0/11

0%

No

OK Parents As Teachers OK Child Care Licensing Head Start

Criteria by Standard Area # of

matches % matching Comparable (Yes or No) # of matches % matching Comparable (Yes or No) # of matches % matching Comparable (Yes or No)

Administrative Practices (7

potential matches)

0/7

0%

No

0/7

0%

No

2/7

28.6%

No

Personnel Practices (3 potential

matches)

0/3

0%

No

1/3

33.3%

No

3/3

100%

Yes

Professional Development ( 3

potential matches)

0/3

0%

No

0/3

0%

No

2/3

66.7%

Yes

Learning Environment (13 potential

matches)

0/13

0%

No

7/13 53.8%

Yes

7/13

53.8%

Yes

Family Engagement (12 potential

matches)

1/12 8.3%

No

3/12 25%

No

9/11*** 81.8%

Yes

Program Evaluation (4 potential

matches)

3/4

75.0% Yes

0/4

0%

No

4/4

100%

Yes

Health & Safety (16 potential

matches)

0/16 0%

No

14/16 87.5%

Yes

9/16

56.3%

Yes

Child Health (10 potential matches)

2/10 20.0% No

4/10 40.0%

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

Nutrition (12 potential matches)

0/12 0%

No

6/12 50.0%

Yes

6/12

50.0%

Yes

Services to Children with

Disabilities (11 potential matches)

0/11

0%

No

2/11 18.2%

No

7/11

63.6%

Yes

Community Partnerships (2

potential matches)

0/2 0/2

0%

No

1/2

50.0%

Yes

1/2

50.0%

Yes

Mental Health (5 potential

matches)

0/5

0%

No

1/5

20.0%

No

3/5

60.0%

Yes

Transportation (2 potential

matches)

0/2

0%

No

2/2

100%

Yes

0/2

0%

No