ANEXO II para el ejercicio fiscal 2014 del Acuerdo de Coordinación para el establecimiento del Sistema de Protección Social en Salud, correspondiente al Estado de Aguascalientes
PARA AMPLIACIÓN DE PROYECCIÓN DE COBERTURA
Language acquisition processes can only be observed through the window of particular activities performed by particular interlocutors. The effects of two main factors in our research design (time/cycle and activity type) could first of all be tested in the quantitative macro-study (section 4) by two rather successful measures of lexical richness and variety, viz. Guiraud's index and Theoretical Vocabulary. Primary concepts in the analysis were the number of types (lemmas) and the number of tokens used by a language learner in a specific language activity. A time effect was observed for the group of learners as a whole, which implies that a general increase in lexical richness was found. The activity type turned out to be an influential factor. Free conversation allowed room for topic variation, and thus for lexical variety, whereas film retelling was more restricted by the stimulus events in the film shown.
Moreover, at the level of particular word class categories, it was found that our learners used words from a wide range of word class categories. The word class distribution appeared to be strongly influenced by activity. This highly adaptive behaviour of our language learners seems to be typical of adult language acquisition.
The quantitative macro-study, presented in section 4, was complemented and supported by two more qualitatively oriented in-depth studies of specific lexical domains, belonging to different word class categories, i.e. function words (pronouns) and content words (nouns) respectively. Section 5 focused upon word formation processes, section 6 upon upon pronominal reference to persons. Again, effects of time (cycle), activity type, and source/target language were found in these two substudies.
In the word-formation study, we found a creative and innovative target language oriented use of compounding and circumscription as learner strategies for filling lexical gaps (including derivation). Evidence of source language influence was found as well in particular informant specific circumscriptions (N + prep + N) and left-oriented compounds.
In the pronoun study, a greater relative share of second person pronouns was evidenced in conversations, in comparison to film retellings. Moreover, linguistic properties of the target pronoun system were shown to be more influential determiners of acquisition than differences between the source and target pronoun systems.
Our language learners' strategies for filling lexical gaps proved to be highly task dependent. Pronominal reference to entities resulted in an overextended use of word forms already available rather than in lexical innovations;
the overextended terms, as a rule, were the unmarked terms of the linguistic subsystem in question. However, nominal reference to entities resulted in an opposite pattern: lexical innovations in terms of both composition and circumscription could be evidenced in abundance.
7.2. In prospect
From the patterns discussed above, a rather complex picture of the acquisition process emerges, where different factors cooperate and interact to determine order of acquisition, preference of lexical items, and organization of learner strategies. Furthermore, it may well be the case that the relative weight of the determining factors is different for different linguistic domains and for different stages in a learner's acquisition career. However, there are tendencies in our results to suggest a 'default' hierarchy of main factors determining the linguistic performance of a second language learner, namely:
time (cycle)
TL properties > > SL properties activity type
The default character of this hierarchy means that a search for explanations for the learner's linguistic performance should proceed from left to right rather than the other way around, unless there are clear indications to the contrary. This means, in effect, that, as a rule, source language properties become a potentially valuable explanatory factor only when the other factors in the hierarchy above have failed to apply.
The obvious importance of data derived from adult language learners rather than children is that cognitive development and language development are no longer indissolubly interwoven. Therefore, adult data form a crucial touchstone for claims about universal principles in language acquisition. Of course, universality has not yet been confirmed by data concerning children's acquisition of English as a first language. In fact, different kinds of demands can be made in the qualification of 'universality'. In our study on (pro)nominal reference to entities, many developmental characteristics were evidenced that are independent of a specific target language, source language, and age. A combination of these requirements obviously provides the strongest indicators for universal principles of language acquisition.
References
Allwood, J. (ed.) (1988), Feedback in adult language acquisition. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
Becker, A., M. Caroll & A. Kelly (eds.) (1988), Reference to space. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
Bhardwaj, M., R. Dietrich & C. Noyau (eds.) (1988), Temporality. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
Bremer, K., P. Breeder, C. Roberts, M. Simonot & M. Vasseur (eds.) (1988), Ways of achieving understanding: communicating to learn in a second language. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
Broeder, P., J. Coenen, G. Extra, R. van Hout & R. Zerrouk (1986), Ontwikkelingen in het Nederlandstalige lexicon bij anderstalige volwassenen: een macro- en micro- perspectief. In: J. Creten, G. Geerts & K. Jaspaert (eds.) (1986), Werk-in-uitvoering. Momentopname van de sociolinguistiek in Belgie en Nederland. Leuven: ACCO, 39- 57.
Broeder, P., G. Extra & R. van Hout (1987), Measuring lexical richness and variety in second language use. Polyglot 8, 1-16 (Special issue on lexicon edited by Paul Meara)
Broeder, P., G. Extra, R. van Hout, S. Stromqvist & K. Voionmaa (eds.) (1988), Processes in the developing lexicon. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
Carroll, J. (1964), Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Clark, E. (1981), Lexical innovations: how children learn to create new words. In: W.
Deutsch (ed.), The child's construction of language. London: Academic Press, 299- 328.
Clark, E. 1983, Convention and contrast in acquiring the lexicon. In: Th. Seller & W. Wannenmacher (eds.). Concept development and the development of word meaning. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 67-89. Coenen, J. (1988), The acquisition of Dutch. In: Klein & Perdue (1988), 178-233.
Coenen, J. & R. van Hout (1987), Word order phenomena in second language acquisition of Dutch. In: F. Beukema & P. Coopmans (eds.). Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987, Dordrecht: Foris, 41-50.
Dulay, H., M. Burt & S. Krashen (1982), Language Two Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House. Els, Th. van, Th. Bongaerts, G. Extra, Ch. van Os & A. Janssen-van Dieten (1984), Applied
linguistics and the learning and teaching of foreign languages. London: Edward Arnold.
Geerts, G., W. Haeseryn, J. de Rooij & M. van den Toom (1984), Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Hatch, E. (ed.) (1978), Second language acquisition: A book of readings. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Hatch, E. (1983), Psycholinguistics: a second language perspective. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Head, F. (1978), Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In: J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, Stanford University Press, 151-211.
Helmond, K. van & M. van Vugt (1984), On the transferability of nominal compounds. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 8, 5-34.
Henderson, T. (1985), Who are we, anyway? A study of personal pronoun systems. Linguistische Berichte 98, 300-309.
Hughes, A. (1979), Aspects of a Spanish adult's acquisition of English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4, 49-65.
Ingram, D. (1978), Typology and universals of personal pronouns. In: J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, Stanford University Press, 213-247.
Johansson, S. (1978), Studies in error gravity. Native reactions to errors produced by Swedish learners of English. Göteborg (Göteborg Studies in English 44).
Jong, E., de (1979), Spreektaal. Woordfrequenties in gesproken Nederlands. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.
Kleijn, P. de & E. Nieuwborg (1983), Basiswoordenboek Nederlands. Leuven: Wolters Noordhoff.
Klein, W. & C. Perdue (eds.) (1988), Utterance structure. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
Kotsinas, U. (1983), On the acquisition of vocabulary in immigrant Swedish. In: H. Ringbom (ed.), Psycholinguistics and foreign language learning Aebo: Aebo Akademi.
Laufer, B. (1986), Possible changes in attitude towards vocabulary acquisition research. International Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 69-75.
Levenston, E. (1979), Second language acquisition: issues and problems. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4,147-160.
Maratsos, P. (1979), Learning how and when to use pronouns and determiners. In: P. Fletcher & P. Garman (eds.), Language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. Meara, P. (1980), Vocabulary acquisition: a neglected aspect of language learning.
Language Learning and Linguistics Abstracts 13, 221-264.
Meara, P. (ed.) (1983), Vocabulary in a second language. Volume 1. London (Specialised bibliography 3, Centre for information on Language Teaching and Research).
Meara, P. (ed.) (1987), Vocabulary in a second language. Volume 2. London (Specialised bibliography 4, Centre for information on Language Teaching and Research).
Menard, N. (1983), Mesure de la richesse lexicale. Gén?eve, Paris: Slatkine/Champion. Mühlhaüsler, P. (1986), Pidgin and Creole linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Perdue, C. (ed.) (1984), Second language acquisition by adult immigrants. A field manual. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Politzer, R. (1978), Errors of English speakers of German as perceived and evaluated by German natives. Modern Language Journal 62, 253-261.
Richards, B. (1987), Type/token ratios: what do they really tell us? Journal of Child Language 14, 201-209.
Ritchie, W. (1978), Second language acquisition research. New York: Academic Press. Schumann, J., M. Sokolik & P. Master (1987), The experimental creation of a pidgin
language, (Internal publication UCLA).
Selkirk, E. (1982), The syntax of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Vermeer, A. (1986), Tempo en struktuur van tweede-taalverwerving bij Turkse en Marokkaanse kinderen. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tilburg.
Villiers, J. De & P. De Villiers (1978), Language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Wanner, E. & L. Gleitman (eds.) (1982), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Wiesemann, U. (ed.) (1986), Pronominal systems. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.