6. Estado del arte
6.1. Investigaciones internacionales
6.1.5. Percepción del impacto de la extensión de la jornada escolar
THE FOOL AS OUTCAST: THE W E L L OF THE SAINTS AND THE T1N-
What do they manage to impose on you? Words! Words which everyone can interpret in his own manner!
That's the way public opi n i o n is formed! And it's
a bad lookout for a man w h o finds himself labelled one day with one of these wo r d s which everyone re peats; for example, "madman," or "imbecile"1
In this chapter the figure or the outsider will be analysed both in terms of the fool who holds a precarious place in society and also as t h e observer of the community which defines him as external, inferior, and contaminating. Simultaneously the fool and the outsider will be observed as new instances of a literary tradition.
In The Well of the Saints there is a movement from the fringe of society where an old blind couple hav e been living happily in delusion, to the o p e n roads that promise more
dreams and another level of reality. In The Tinker's W e d
d ing. a younger vagrant couple mak e tentative moves to join the settled community by going through a religious marriage,
moved by the woman's desire for conformity and status. The 1
1 Pirandello, Henry IV. Act II, in T h r e e Plave. London, J M Dent and Sons, p. 127.
former movement occurs when the couple fail t o retain their place as village fools, and it becomes apparent that they do not share the villagers' eagerness to earn t h e i r bread with
hard labour. The latter attempt to join in is foiled when
the tink e r couple fail to produce the price of their inte
gration: half a sovereign and a tin can. In bot h cases the
movement towards the open road is not an idyllic elopement
as would be proper in comedy. Both couples h a v e no choice
but to leave as there is no place for them in the village, and they must search on the roads for a life in communion
with Nature, the harsh nurturer. The figure of the social
fool or the outsider is present in all of Syn g e ' s comedies,
and even in Deirdre of the Sorrows. It be c o m e s apparent
that Synge sees these characters as bearers of a different set of values poetry, freedom from social constraint, wor ship of Nature sharing some of the nobility of a beaten
race. It also becomes obvious that Irish so c i e t y does not
share this attitude towards the marginal and outsider as ex
pressed in Synge's plays. As they embody the life which for
him has all the appeal and mystique of a f u sion and identi fication w ith nature, he endows them with a h i g h e r order of
cognition, a wider awareness of the v iability of other
worlds, other rules, other values which should command re
spect. Synge's contribution in making the fri n g e s of soci
ety visible, was to give them a place and a voice, much in the same w a y that Hauptmann had given a place and voice to the German workers in The Weavers.
135
According to J ohnson the literary fool in Synge's plays can be characterized by three main points, the relationship to nature, irrationality and social status.2
The fool is closer to the movements and secrets of n a ture than other people, his instinctive response comes from
the unconscious. This particular sensitivity is socially
marked as irrationality and can be viewed in two socially
opposed ways. Positively this irrationality can be taken as
inspired and visionary, relating to the vision of the poet
or the enigma of the oracle. If viewed negatively, irra
tionality can be considered as madness. To all intents and
purposes the fool remains an outsider, relegated to the fringes of the community or kept carefully at bay.
In Shadow the characters who embody the folly of the outsider are the Tramp and Nora, they oppose the worldly wisdom of Dan Burke and Michael Dara, choosing instead a
life in community with nature. Although the Tramp knows the
roads, the glens and hills more closely than the others, he
is aware that his life involves serious risks. Patch Darcy,
the shepherd who knew h i s sheep and all the ways and secrets of the hills, was a strong, able man but the solitude, the gloomy climate and desolate landscape of Wicklow drove him into madness, and to his frightful end, of being eaten by
crows. Throughout the pla y the references to Patch create a
pervasive image that could well be equated with the image of the "Good Shepherd" and through his link with his simple
T o 1B Johnson, Synge, the Medieval and the Grotesque. 1982, chapter o n Folly, p. 118.
living also to the Pauline connection between the fool and
Christian values3 . For the outsider to renounce the values
of the community is an act of folly which is condemned be cause it undermines the principles w i t h which society sup
ports itself. As a matter of fact t h e close experience of
nature and its use in language as symbolic matter for poetic talk, is shared by the fool and the artist, the blind and the gifted Tramp.
In Shadow, both Nora and the Tr a m p lay stress on the better life they can possibly find on the roads as compared
to one under the solitude of a lonely glen. Even at this
moment the threats of desolation a n d loneliness are made very real (the Tramp claims to have been the last to see Patch Darcy alive, who died in a way tha t is so much feared- to go mad on the hills and die alone, half-eaten by ani
mals) . Synge connects the desolation of the climate and of
the landscape to the high rate of lunacy in Irish society.4 Nonetheless, he keeps throughout his plays and prose, a very
positive vision of the fool/ outsider. He sees the outsider
not as a worthless dropout, but as someone with a character similar to the artist, enjoying sound good health and in
possession of a lively good humour. T h e two fool characters
in Shadow. Patch and the Tramp are healthy fearless men,
with the revered gift of the gab. In some way they keep the
higher expectations that cannot be m e t in life close to the
3 T O'B Johnson, p. 115.
4 See reference to social origin of the t r a m p and the conditions of the peasants in the glens in chapter t h ree on Shadow.
137
village, grazing sheep in the low mists of the glens and valleys.
The experience of the "clay and worms" reality out of which Synge expected to create new, living art is also the one chosen by the poetic, solitary fool, the Tramp in Shadow as well as by the Douls.
THE W ELL OF THE SAINTS
When Synge claims that all art is collaboration he is acknowledging the influence and importance of his contact with the peasants and islanders who provided him with a wealth of stories, themes, similes and the fluid m e d i u m of a
versatile language. In the notebooks of his many journeys
through Ireland he held a vast collection of them e s that
would find their way into plays. There are also non-Irish
sources of 'collaboration' from which Synge drew his themes.
There are two main sources for The Well of the S a i n t s . One, "The Woman of Sligo", which covers part of the first act only, and a French "pre- Molière farce", La Moral i t é de 1' Aveugle et le Boiteux as Synge mentioned to Yeats and to his friend Mackenna.
"The Woman of Sligo"
The story of the widow from Sligo was a legend told to Synge in Aran by several people and concerns the miraculous cure of a blind child at a well near the church of Ceathair
Aluinn (The Four Beautiful Persons) in Aranmor. Reference
13«
and is quoted in The Aran Islands.5 The mother of a blind
boy has a dream in which she sees the well on the island
which would cure her son. The following morning she sets
out for the island, and on arrival inquires about the well but refuses further help as she can follow the signs as she
saw them in her dream. Once near the well she bathes the
child's eyes and he is cured. Blissfully, the first thing
he observes are some flowers, "Mother, look at the beautiful
flowers!". With this exulting exclamation, the story ends.
This story has the elements of a particular kind of
pre-Christian Irish legend, the immran, or the journey
across the sea. These are always journeys to the Other
World, where creatures live oblivious of suffering, the pas
sage of time or decay of physical beauty. Some of the most
famous of these journeys to Tir-na-nOg (the Land of Promise) such as The Wanderings of Oisin, The Voyage of Bran, all
deal with this imaginary happy world. According to H R
Patch the Irish are particularly good at creating this image
of otherworldly happiness in their legends. If, as Anthony
Roche points out, this journey to another world is one of the undercurrents of the play, there exist two distinct un
dercurrents in it. The play is brought out of the pagan
context of the previous legends into an undetermined Chris tian time, to be presented as an ironic reversal of the more
Christian theme of the holy intervention of a saint.6 In
5 In CW II. 56-7.
In 'The two World« of Synge 'a Thg. W g U of the Sajntg in Ifcg ggnrgg 9i If1th Literary. Revival, ed by Ronald Schleifer, Dublin, Wolfhound Press, 1979, chp. 3, pp. 28-38.
139
this particular case the island is not the place towards which one goes to live in everlasting bliss, but where other
people come to seek to be cured. This makes it an isle of
wonder for the inhabitants themselves as it provides them
with material for storytelling. But in Synge's retelling it
is also the place where their hard struggle is endured.
In the play, the island of the curative waters has been
taken from its previous mythological realm. The water is
now drawn from a well sanctified by the four saints's graves
that lie by it. Cripples will not travel across the waters
to reach the cure; this will now be administered by a Saint to those who are allowed to contemplate God's creation, and
for His greater praise. The contented old couple who en
dured their blindness so patiently were found deserving of God's special grace by the community, and will be cured:
Timmy [officiously] They are holy father, they do be always sitting here at the crossing of the roads, asking a bit of copper from them that do pass, or stripping rushes for lights, and they not mournful at all, but talking out straight with a full voice, and making game with them that likes it.
Saint [to Martin Doul and Mary Doul]. It's a hard
life you've had not seeing sun or moon, or the holy priests itself praying to the Lord, but it's the like of you that do be brave in a bad time will make a fine use of the gift of sight the
Almighty God will bring to you to-day. (CW III,
89)
For Synge true art should bear the characteristics of
an original style. This would issue from a combination of
the notion of a particular time, locality and authorship. This particular item, the origin of the curing waters, has
140
ticular sense of locality, as it would bring to the mind of
the audience associations with the stories of current ac
counts of miracles at the particular well mentioned to Synge in Aran, and to the pre-Christian legends of magic Other
Worlds where misery would be washed away. Once the sense of
locality is produced and identification is made, Synge will
subvert the rules just as the “moralité joyeuse' of his
source did, by presenting a totally different set of values from those usually found in a recognizable conventional
structure. As it will become clear, it is not just this
pattern of expectation for the cure of the old couple that will be overturned, but also that of the morality play.
La Moralité deTAYeugle et te Boiteux
The second major source is the medieval French morality La Moralité de -LJAyeagle et Is Pp iteux, which synge read during his courses with Petit de Julleville on medieval
French theatre, at the Sorbonne. He mentions in a letter to
Mackenna that the original inspiration for Well was a "pre-
Moliére farce". This obscure reference to the source is
quite meaningful and worth analysing in order to perceive what is relevant in Synge's conception of comedy.
He calls this old play farce and not morality, which it
is by name and structure. The structure of the morality was
a traditional medieval form which was of little interest to
Synge. As the morality is a piece of devotional indoctrina
tion, it goes against his ideal of art which he thinks
should not 'serve a purpose'. What therefore is of interest
141
by the use to which it is put: to use the morality form to
tell an anti-morality story. By locating it in time as pre-
Moliére, Synge is pointing to the type of comic to be ex pected: not the comedy of manners, nor the sarcasm of farce, but the medieval grotesque.7
In this play the comic rings the note of the grotesque, provokes laughter that is part and parcel of the medieval type of life, without the indoctrination of the traditional
morality play. If one agrees with Saddlemyer, King and
Johnson about the relevant part that the grotesque element plays in Synge's aesthetics, one has to bear in mind that it is not a grotesque of the Romantic literary tradition, but rather that of the medieval social tradition, as it was still an accepted part of popular festive expression.
La Vigne's La Moralité de 1'Aveugle et le Boiteux was a sort of farcical sequel to his Mystère de Saint M a r t i n , both probably drawn from a long anonymous 'mystère* on the life of
that saint. This long piece was edited in Synge's time and
it is possible that he may also have read it. André de La
Vigne split the play in two, one morality, the life of the saint, and one farce, the inopportune cure of two beggars, a blind man and a cripple, which comes at the end of the
anonymous text. Synge picked up this last portion of the
story for his own play, the farce in morality form. It is
never the experimentation in form that appeals to Synge.
In this apparent conformism, the challenge brought in by the
142
r endering of such new thoughts in conventional trappings al ways comes as a surprise.
This play raises a few controversial questions even for
m o d e r n commentators. For contemporaries of Synge the play
was verging on blasphemy, the Saint was after all a Protes
tant. Religious and nationalist criticism was met at the
o t h e r extreme by claims that it was moving away from the
"tendencies of modern life and thought". Here the attack
was for leaving rationalism, "intellectual progressivism"8 .
For modern critics, the choice of Martin Doul to remain blind, to refuse the reality we all have to endure is prob lematic, seeming to be inconsistent with the principles of
truth Synge has always defended for himself. W. Thornton
summarises the disagreement of critics such as Alan Price, Donna Gestenberger and Robin Skelton by first stating their
comm o n theme for the play - the relationship between
imagination and reality - in Thornton's terms "some idea they are trying to vindicate, and the reality they are faced
with". As Alan Price finds Synge a nihilist, he praises the
n i h i l i s m in the play and finds its escapism agrees with the supposed meaninglessness of life for the Douls and for
Synge. To Gestenberger the development of the play is out
of kee p i n g with the philosophical pattern of other plays. She see s it as a choice between two lies, and therefore in consistent with what she thinks are Synge's beliefs as
stated in other parts of his work. She also infers that
1 4 3
Synge supports the final choice of the Douls, which for her is disappointing.9
Here Thornton offers his insight: for him the play is saying that the Douls can base their life on illusion and
untruth. The fact t h a t Synge sanctions this is only an in
ference by the reader. Synge is exploring, not advocating
what he shows us. Skelton's view of Synge as an existen
tialist finds the Do u l s have every right to their dreams and sees their departure as a victory.10
All these c ritics see the play in its incapacity to
square with their o w n ideological expectations. The fact
that it has been upsetting critics who try to defend Synge