3. Antecedentes referidos al problema
3.1 Plan renova ecuador (refrigeradoras)
Though theoretically there is no strict requirement on the size of each time step when fully implicit scheme is applied for time discretization, it is still important to choose appropriate size of time-step, otherwise the computation could be vulnerable in terms of divergence and instability. Generally, the time-step size should be in the same order as the smallest characteristic time ∆tc: ∆tc = min ∆L U , ρ∆L2 Γ (3.10)
Here, U is the characteristic velocity, ∆L is the averaged mesh size, Γ is the dissipation term. The criterion of ∆t ≤ 50∆tc can be used for limiting the
Another practical guideline is the Courant number which is defined as:
Co = |~v|∆t
l (3.11)
Here, ~v, l are both the characteristic velocity and length respectively. If it is based on mesh size,~v is estimated velocity, l is the averaged mesh size, the Courant number should not excess 100; If it is based on geometric size of the flow field,~v is estimated averaged velocity of the whole flow field, l is the characteristic size of the geometric model, the Courant number should be in the range of 100−500 [48].
According to Eqn. (3.11), when the Courant number has been set, time- step size is proportional to the mesh size since the average characteristic- velocity in given physical model is fixed5. It means that the time-step size
is supposed to be larger for coarser mesh size, and smaller for denser mesh size. By striking a balance between the risk of divergence (and/or instability) and computation time, a right time step must be chosen between these two extreme cases.
The choice of time-step size is also highly dependent on the specific physical object and the turbulence level of the phenomena. Referring to the latest unsteady simulations of large Francis turbine [11], the range of time- step size is between 1/60 to 1/200 of runner rotation. In each time step, the convergence criterion is that the residuals of all the variables reach below 10−5. After the calculation of one time-step finished, the computational mesh of the runner will turn to a new circumferential position according to the rotating speed. Thus, the computation for another time-step will be started. Moving
5
Generally, the average characteristic-velocity is chosen as the average value of the max- imum velocity and minimum velocity
meshes are adopted for the runner domain. The runner rotation speed is 75r/min(ω= 7.854 rad/s), the time-step sizes of 0.008s, 0.004sand 0.002s
corresponding to 1/100, 1/200 and 1/400 of runner rotation (i.e. the sliding angles of interfaces are 3.6◦, 1.8◦ and 0.9◦ respectively) have been compared in order to obtain the proper time-step size fine enough to predict the dominant frequencies of pressure fluctuations in the prototype of Francis turbine.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920 0 500 1000 1500 2000
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Runner Time-Step: 0.002s Frequency (Hz) P r e s s u r e ( P a ) (a) Runner: F F T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Draft tube Time-Step: 0.002s Frequency (Hz) P r e s s u r e ( P a ) Strongest: 0.36Hz (b) Draft-tube: F F T
Figure 3.17: Pressure fluctuations against frequency recorded at (a) Runner; (b) Draft-tube; (Size of time-step: 0.002 s; Guide-vane opening: 16◦; Case with the guide-plate;)
There is no significant difference in FFT results by using these three different time-step size. The extremely low-frequency component has been captured in all cases as the strongest frequency, only their values are slightly different. As shown in Figure 4.19, the strongest frequency for case with time- step size of 0.008 s is 0.336 Hz, while for case with time-step size of 0.004 s
and 0.002sare 0.306Hzand 0.36Hz, referring to Figure 3.19 and Figure 3.17 respectively. By comparing the results of 0.004 s and 0.008 s, it is noticeable that smaller time-step size can capture more high-frequency fluctuations, e.g., the peak at 12.5 Hz is captured as a strong signal for the time-step size of
90 95 100 105 110 115 120 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Runner Time-Step: 0.008s P r e ssu r e ( kP a ) Time (s) (a) Runner: P−T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Runner Time-Step: 0.008s P r e s s u r e ( k P a ) Frequency(Hz) (b) Runner: F F T 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Draft tube Time-Step: 0.008s P r e ssu r e ( kP a ) Time (s) (c) Draft-tube: P−T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121314151617181920 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: draft tube Time-Step: 0.008s Frequency(Hz) P r e s s u r e ( k P a ) Strongest: 0.336Hz (d) Draft-tube: F F T 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Guide vane Time-Step: 0.008s P r e ssu r e ( kP a ) Time (s) (e) Guide-vane: P−T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Guide vane Time-Step: 0.008s Frequency (Hz) P r e s s u r e ( k P a ) Strongest: 0.336Hz (f) Guide-vane: F F T
Figure 3.18: P −T result: Pressure fluctuations against time recorded at (a) Runner; (c) Draft-tube; (e) Guide-vane; F F T result: Pressure fluctuations against frequency recorded at (b) Runner; (d) Draft-tube; (f) Guide-vane (Size of time-step: 0.008 s; Guide-vane opening: 16◦; Case with the guide-plate;)
707172737475767778798081828384858687 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Runner Time-Step: 0.004s P r e ssu r e ( kP a ) Time (s) (a) Runner: P−T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Runner Time-Step: 0.004s Frequency (Hz) P r e s s u r e ( k P a ) Strongest: 0.306Hz (b) Runner: F F T 70717273747576777879808182838485868788 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: draft tube Time-Step: 0.004s P r e ssu r e ( kP a ) Time (s) (c) Draft-tube: P−T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: draft tube Time-Step: 0.004s Frequency (Hz) P r e s s u r e ( k P a ) Strongest: 0.306Hz (d) Draft-tube: F F T 707172737475767778798081828384858687 560 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600 605 610 615 620 625 630 635 640 645 650
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Guide vane Time-Step: 0.004s P r e ssu r e ( kP a ) Time (s) (e) Guide-vane: P−T 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
W ith guide plate Guide-vane opening: 16
o Point position: Guide vane Time-Step: 0.004s Frequency (Hz) P r e s s u r e ( k P a ) Strongest: 0.306Hz (f) Guide-vane: F F T
Figure 3.19: P −T result: Pressure fluctuations against time recorded at (a) Runner; (c) Draft-tube; (e) Guide-vane; F F T result: Pressure fluctuations against frequency recorded at (b) Runner; (d) Draft-tube; (f) Guide-vane (Size of time-step: 0.004 s; Guide-vane opening: 16◦; Case with the guide-plate;)
0.004 Hz, while not showing in the case with the time-step size of 0.008 s
nor the case with the time-step size of 0.002 s. However, the finer time-step size will exponentially increase the computational time and require finer grid size. According to the analysis on the results, there is no necessity to choose the finest time-step size (0.002 s) unless we aim at looking for high-frequency fluctuations.
In this study, low-frequency pressure fluctuations are the main target. In the case with guide vane opening of 16◦, low-frequency pressure fluctuation signal is very strong, allowing us to use the time step of 0.008 s. While for the case with guide vane opening of 35◦, the time step of 0.004 s is adopted to obtain wider spectrum of pressure fluctuations.