• No se han encontrado resultados

The concept of reperfusion injury has been clearly demonstrated in many experimental stud- ies, although even in those studies data are not fully consistent.8,24,25,31,42 In contrast, in clinical

myocardial infarction, the importance of reperfusion injury has not been established. In fact, clinical studies with anti-inflammatory drugs,11,13 Na+/H+ exchange inhibitors,9 glucose-insulin-

potassium,12,43,44 and adenosine10,45 so far led to inconclusive results. This in mind, one might

raise the question that possibly treatment in clinical practice is too late to reduce reperfusion injury or that there is no (relevant) reperfusion injury in humans, and thus no clinical benefit of decreasing such injury. Similarly, the PARI-MI study did not reveal a clear benefit, and no dose-relation, even though higher dosages were studied than in the pre-clinical studies, in which ITF-1697 was shown to be beneficial. The main reason for discrepancy between animal and human findings would be the different pathophysiologic context in which the drug was tested, leaving open the hypothesis that the drug might have beneficial effects in different pathophysiological settings, more appropriate for the drug activity.

Acknowledgments

Chapt

er 8

referenCes

1. Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1413-9.

2. The GUSTO IIb angioplasty substudy investigators. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1621-8.

3. Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1949-56.

4. Simoons ML, Serruys PW, van den Brand M, et al. Early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction : limitation of infarct size and improved survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:717-28.

5. Braunwald E, Kloner RA. Myocardial reperfusion: a double-edged sword? J Clin Invest 1985;76:1713-9.

6. Ambrosio G, Weisman HF, Mannisi JA, Becker LC. Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration of postischemic blood flow. Circulation 1989;80:1846-61. 7. Matsumura K, Jeremy RW, Schaper JS, Becker LC. Progression of myocardial necrosis during reper-

fusion of ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1998;97:795-804.

8. Kloner RA. Does reperfusion injury exist in humans? J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:537-45.

9. Zeymer U, Suryapranata H, Monassier JP, et al. The Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor eniporide as an adjunct

to early reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1644i-50i. 10. Mahaffey KW, Puma JA, Barbagelata NA, et al. Adenosine as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for

acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1711-20.

11. Baran KW, Nguyen M, McKendall GR, et al. Double blind, randomized trial of an anti-C18 antibody in conjunction with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. LIMIT AMI study. Circulation 2001;104:2778-83.

12. Díaz R, Paolasso EA, Piegas LS, et al. Metabolic modulation of acute myocardial infarction: The ECLA glucose-insulin-potassium pilot trial.Circulation 1998;98:2227-34.

13. Faxon DP, Gibbons RJ, Chronos NAF, et al. The effect of blockade of the CD11/CD18 integrin recep- tor on infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty: the results of the HALT-MI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1199-204.

14. Di Pierro F, d’Atri G, Marcucci F, Leoni F. Use of type I and IV hypersensitivity responses to define the immunopharmacological profile of drugs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1997;37:91-6.

15. Rao AK, Pratt C, Berke A, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial-phase I: hemorrhagic manifestations and changes in plasma fibrinogen and the fibrinolytic system in patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1-11. 16. TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial: phase I findings. N Engl J

Med 1985;312:932-6.

17. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI Frame Count: A quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation 1996;93:879-88.

18. Hof van ‘t AWJ, Liem A, Suryapranata H, et al. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfu- sion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:2302-6.

19. Willems GM, Visser MP, Krill MT, Hermens WT. Quantitative analysis of plasma enzyme levels based upon simultaneous determination of different enzymes. Cardiovasc Res 1982;16:120-31.

20. Dissmann R, Linderer T, Schroder R. Estimation of enzymatic infarct size: direct comparison of the marker enzymes creatine kinase and alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase. Am Heart J. 1998;135:1-9.

22. Simon R, Wittes RE, Ellenberg SS. Randomized phase II clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 1985;69:1375-81.

23. Hasdai D, Behar S, Wallentin L, et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin; the Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1190-201

24. Frangiogiannis NG, Smith CW, Entman ML. The inflammatory response in myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 2002;53:31-47.

25. Hansen PR. Role of neutrophils in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Circulation 1995;91:1872-85.

26. Engler RL, Schmid-Schonbein GW, Pavelec RS. Leucocyte capillary plugging in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in the dog. Am J Pathol 1983;111:98-111.

27. Reffelmann T, Kloner RA. The ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon: basic science and clinical correlates. Heart 2002;87:162-8.

28. Reffelmann T, Hale SL, Li G, Kloner RA. Relationship between no reflow and infarct size as influenced by the duration of ischemia and reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002;282:H766-H72. 29. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of the ‘no reflow’ phenomenon; predictor

of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996;93:223-8.

30. Reimer KA, Jennings RB, Cobb FR, et al. Animal models for protecting ischemic myocardium: results of the NHLBI Cooperative Study. Comparison of unconscious and conscious dog models. Circ Res 1985;56:651-65.

31. Wang QD, Pernow J, Sjoquist PO, Ryden L. Pharmacological possibilities for protection against myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovascular Res 2002;55:25-37.

32. Yellon DM, Baxter GF. Sodium-hydrogen exchange in myocardial reperfusion injury. Lancet 2000;356:522-3.

33. Yellon DM, Baxter GF, Garcia-Dorado D, et al. Ischemic preconditioning: present position and future directions. Cardiovascular Res 1998;37:21-33.

34. Haider AW, Andreotti F, Hackett DR, et al. Early spontaneous intermittent myocardial reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction is associated with augmented thrombogenic activity and less myocardial damage. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:662-7.

35. Topol EJ, Yadav JS. Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Circulation 2000;101:570-80.

36. Tanaka A, Kawarabayashi T, Nishibori Y, et al. No-reflow phenomenon and lesion morphology in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;105:2148-52.

37. Henriques JPS, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal emboliza- tion during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1112-7. 38. Piana RN, Paik GY, Moscucci M, et al. Incidence and treatment of ‘no-reflow’ after percutaneous

coronary intervention. Circulation 1994;89:2514-8.

39. Mickelson JK, Ali MN, Kleiman NS, et al. Chimeric 7E3 Fab (ReoPro) decreases detectable CD11b on neutrophils from patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:97-106. 40. Simon DI, Xu H, Ortlepp S, et al. 7E3 monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycopro-

tein IIb/IIIa cross-reacts with the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 and blocks adhesion to fibrinogen and ICAM-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:528-35.

41. Peter K, Schwarz M, Conradt C, et al. Heparin inhibits ligand binding to the leukocyte integrin MAC-1 (CD11b/CD18). Circulation 1999;100:1533-9.

42. Dhalla NS, Elmoselhi AB, Hata T, Makino N. Status of myocardial antioxidants in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovascular Res 2000;47:446-56.

43. Fath-Ordoubadi F, Beatt KJ. Glucose-insulin-potassium therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction: an overview of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Circulation 1997;96:1152-6.

Chapt

er 8

44. Janinger JL, Cheng JWM. Glucose-insulin-potassium solution for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Pharmacother 2002;36:1080-4.

45. Ross A, Gibbons R, Kloner RA, et al. Acute myocardial infarction study with adenosine (AMISTAD II). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39(2 Suppl):338.

Chapter 9

results of the first CliniCal

Documento similar