In terms of the benefits of the proposed regulatory package, for the purposes of the CBA we took a
largely qualitative approach due to inherent difficulties in estimating the potential scale and exact
value of benefits. The impacts of the responsible lending proposals are covered in the FCA’s CBA.
Our analysis, based on the information we obtained from lenders, brokers and customers, as well as
based on economic insights in to the market suggests that, for the ESIS:
■
as a result of the proposed regulations relating to disclosure of information via the ESIS, there
may be benefits from the improved provision of information to consumers, enabling them to
make better-informed decisions about borrowing. This could also drive greater competition in
the market if consumers use the information to seek out and compare products. However,
there were some reservations as to how much this would benefit consumers due to
behavioural biases in the market, the currently level of availability of information and the fact
66
FLA estimates that approximately 84% of the second charge lending market is covered by ‘large lenders’ as defined in this
analysis.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Before change in
regulation After change in regulation
P
ropor
tion of
pr
e-
ch
an
ge
re
ve
nu
e
Large lenders
Profit Costs Revenue
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Before change in
regulation After change in regulation
Smaller lenders
Profit Loss Costs Revenue
“The amount of time and
efforts to meet FCA
requirements outweighs the
profitability if you are smaller.”
Lender
“We would be
concerned about
anything from a
regulatory point of
view that puts greater
relative burden on us
than larger firms.”
that the limited customers we interviewed suggested that they had already received helpful
and understandable information.
For other areas, our analysis suggests that:
■
there could be a potential lowering of costs to consumers if they enter arrears as a result of
cost reflective arrears charges. Although the majority of respondents indicated that they
already have systems in place to demonstrate that charges are cost reflective, the more
prescriptive proposed regulations than those already in place should help to ensure that the
benefits are realised for all customers;
■
arrears management processes under the FCA’s proposed regulations would also benefit the
large proportion of customers going in to arrears by ensuring that greater forbearance
measures are taken than observed in the market at present. The proposed regulations should
benefit customers by ensuring that those in arrears are supported and helped to manage this
effectively before any potential repossession action is taken and/or high arrears charges
incurred. Further benefits will also arise from cost savings to borrowers from reduced direct
debit reprocessing changes and proposed requirements to improve the sharing of information
between first and second charge lenders at the point of commencing litigation action. Our
quantification suggests that these may be small: in the region of £30 per loan67
. This is low
given the existing practices of lenders in relation to direct debit payments and the very small
proportion of repossessions compared to total loans;
■
charges disclosure may improve not only the provision of information to borrowers, but also
competition in charges;
■
there may be improved transparency on post contractual fees resulting in customers being
able to make better informed decisions. However, the balance between those customers that
may pay higher and lower Early Redemption Charges (ERCs) when they are calculated based
on costs is unclear and will depend on the extent to which lenders choose to levy ERCs going
forward;
■
the knowledge and competency proposal for sales staff, specifically the Level 3 qualification
requirements, coupled with the proposed move to advised (and execution only) sales for
second charge firms may improve the quality of information and advice given to potential
borrowers to help them better understand the product being offered, its risks and the potential
alternatives. This, along with the suitability tests and responsible lending regulations are likely
to help mitigate the risk of customers suffering detriment from taking out second charge loans
where this is not appropriate for them;
■
the proposed requirement for lenders to take reasonable steps to ensure payments are made
directly to previous creditors (e.g. by making cheques payable to them) where debts are being
consolidated may yield some benefits by ensuring that the money is used for the intended
purpose, counteracting behavioural biases that may result in borrowers making poor choices,
and helping to facilitate payments being made promptly without further costs being incurred.
However, evidence suggests that the majority of lenders already adopt this practice;
■
more information-rich advertisements as a result of the proposed advertising requirements
may allow more information up front to be gathered by the consumer to improve their decision
making. However, much of the evidence suggests that much of the business now originates
from price comparison websites. It is therefore unlikely that traditional advertising regulation
will have a large impact on the majority of consumers; and
■
the data reporting requirements should help to support the realisation of benefits from the
other proposed regulations by increasing compliance and ensuring that the FCA is able to
effectively monitor firms’ behaviour and market outcomes to ensure that the regulation is fit
for purpose.
8.4
Potential impacts on competition of the proposed regulatory