ANALISIS DE LAS POLITICAS CONTABLES Y SU
NIC 1 Presentación de Estados Financieros
Based on the finding of the present study, the following recommendations are considered.
1. The Secondary School Chemistry Curriculum should be renewed by NUT, STAN and NUC respectively without further delay. It should allow the use of students’ alternative conceptions for bridging exercise “step by step to lead the student to correct explanation starting from what they already believed.
2. Concept test for formative assessments should be developed for many classes (levels) in chemistry. If such a test used difficult conceptions as distracters (wrong answers) and if it is used as a pre-test and post-test for the same class, the resulting data are potentially useful for research.
3. Maps of chain of conceptual growth should be developed in chemistry by collecting a research and data on how conceptions evolved overtime and students should be led through it in a semester. The result would be a kind of atlas of students’ concept growth.
57
REFERENCES
Abraham, M.R. Williamson, V.M. and Westbrook, S.L. (1994). A Cross-Age Study of the Understanding Five concepts. Journal of research in science teaching, 3(2), 147-165
Anderson, B. (1990), Pupils’ Conceptions of Matter and its Transformation (Age 12-16), studies in science education. 18, 54-85.
Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A cognitive View, New York.
Halt, Reinhart and Winston.
Ayas, A. and Costu, B. (2002). Levels of understanding of the evaporation concepts at secondary stage. The first international education conference.
Changing needs Eastern Mediterranean University.
Baddeley, A.D. (1999). Essential human memory. Hove: psychology press.
Barker. V. and Miller. R. (2000). Students’ reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: what changing occurs during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International journal of science education, 22(11), 1171-1200
Bodner. G.M. (1991). I have found you an argument: the conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. Journal of chemical education, 61(5), 385-388.
Bradley J.D. and Brand, M., (1985). Stamping out misconceptions. Journal 0f chemical education, 62(4), p.318
Bunce, D.M., Gabel, D.L., and Samuel, J.V., (1991). Enhancing chemistry problem, solving achievement using problem categorization. Journal of research in science teaching, 28(6), 505-521.
Cassels, J.R.T and johnstone, A.H., (1984). The effect of language on students’
performance on multiple choice in chemistry. Journal of chemical education, 61(7), 613-615.
Coll, R.K. and Tailor, N., (2002). Mental models in chemistry. Senior chemistry students’ mental models of chemical bonding. Chemistry education:
Research and practice in Europe. 3(2), 175-184.
58
Coll, R.K and Treagust, D.F (2001). Leanrners’ Use of Analogy and Alternative Conceptions for Chemical Bonding . Australian science teachers’ journal 48(1), 24-32.
Coll, R.K. and Treagust, D.F. (2003). Investigation of Secondary School, Undergraduate and Graduate Learners’ Mental Model of Ionic Bonding.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(5), 464-486.
Calik, M., Ayas, A. and Ebenezer, J. V., (2005). A Review of Solution Chemistry Studies: Insight into Students’ Conceptions. Journal Science Education and Technology. 14(1), 29-50.
Dawson, C.J., (1978). Pupils’ Difficulties: What Can the Teacher Do? Education in Chemistry, 15. 120-121.
Driver, R., (1981). Pupils’ Alternative frame. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 93-101.
Driver, R., and Easley, J., (1978). Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concepts Development and Adolescent Science Studies. Studies In Science Education, 5, 61-84.
Duncan, I.M., and Johnstone, A.H., (1973). The Mole Concept. Education Chemistry, 10, 213-214.
Ebenezer, J.V., (1991). Students’ Conceptions of Solubility. A Teacher Researcher Collaborative Study, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of
British Columbia. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ebenezer, J.V., (2001). A Hypermedia Environment to Explore and Negotiate Students’ Conceptions. Animation of the Solution Process of Table Salt. A
Journal of Science Education and Technology. 10(1), 73-92.
Ebenezer J.V., and Gaskel, P.J., (1995). Rational Conceptual change in Solution Chemistry. Science Education. 79: 1,17.
Fensham, P., (1988). Development and Dilemmas in science Education. 5th edition London: Falmer.
Gabel, D.L., (1988). Use of the Particles Natural of Matter in Developing
Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 193-194.
Garnett, P.J. and Treagust, D.F., (1992). Conceptual Difficulty Experience By Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electric Circuits and
59
Oxidation Reduction Equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2), 121-142.
Griffiths, A.K.,(1994). A Critical Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Chemistry Misconceptions. In Schmidt, H-J., proceedings of the 1994
International Symposium problem Solving and Misconceptions in Chemistry And Physics. The International Council of Association for Science
Education publications,70-99.
Harrison, A.G. and Treagust, D.F., (2000). Learning About Atoms, Molecules and Chemical Bonds: Case Study of Multiple- Model Used in Grade II
Chemistry. Science Education. 84, 352-381.
Jimoh, A.T., (2002). ”Misconception of Physical Chemistry Concepts Held by Chemistry Students in Nigeria Colleges of Education “ The Nigeria Teachers today. 10(1), 101-108.
Johnstone, A.H., (1980). Chemical Education Research: Facts Findings and Consequences’. Chemical Society Review, 9(3), 365-380.
Johnstone, A.H., (1983). Macro and Micro Chemistry. School Science Review 64(277), 377-379.
Johnstone, A.H., (1991). Why Science is Difficulty to Learn? “Things are Seldom What They seem”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83.
Johnstone, A.H., (2000). Teaching of Chemistry Logical or Psychological?
Chemistry Educational Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 9-15.
Johnstone, A.H. and Kellet, N.C., (1980). Learning Difficulties in School Science Towards a working Hypothesis. European Journal of Science Education 2(2), 175-181.
Johnstone, A.H. and Selepeng, G., (2001). A Language Problem Re-visited.
Chemistry Education : research and Practice in Europe (CERAPIE), 2(1), 19-29.
Kellett, N.C., (1978). Studies on the Perception of Organic Chemistry Structure Ph.D thesis, University of Glasgow.
Stavy, W.R (1995). Learning Science in School (Hillsdale, NJ: Research informing Practice: Lawrence Erlbaum) 131-154.
60
Su, W.Y. (1991). A study of students learning through lecture based on information processing theory, Ph.D thesis, university of Glasgow.
Taber, T.S. (2000). Chemistry Lessons for Universities: A review constructivists ideas. University Chemistry Education. 4, 26-35.
Taber, K.S. (2002), Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: Prevention Diagnosis and cure. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K.S. and Coll, R.K. (2003). Bonding in: J.K (2003). Bonding in: J.K.
Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D.F. Treagust and J.H Van Driel (Eds).
Chemical Education: Toward research-based practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Taylor, N. and Coll, R.K. (1976). The use of analogy in the teaching of solubility To pre-service primary teacher. Australian science teachers’ Journal. 43(4), 58-64.
Thompson, U and Soyibo, S. (2002). The Nigeria Journal of educational studies and research. 9(2), 53-56.
Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate Students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
Treagust, D.F., Chittleborough, G., and Mamiala, T.L. (2003). The role of Submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations, international journal of science education 25: 1353-13558.
Trumper, R. (1995). Students’ motivational traits in science: a cross-Age study.
British educational research journal, 21(4), 505-515.
Vallerand, R.J. and Bossonette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, Extrinsic and Amotivational Styles Predictors of behavior: a prospective study. Journal of personality.
60, 599-620.
Ward, R. and Bonder, G. (1993). How lecture can undermine the motivation Of our students. Journal of Chemical Educational, 70(3), 198-199.
White, R. (1977). Model of cognitive processes, research in science education. 7, 25-32.
61
APPENDIX I
USMANU DANFODIYO UNIVERSITY SOKOTO FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND EXTENTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
QUESTIONNIARE FOR STUDENTS
We are students of Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, in the Faculty of Education and extension services, department of science and vocational Education.
We are carrying out a research project on the topic “Difficult concepts in chemistry and their effect in the academic achievements of students in secondary schools within Sokoto metropolis.
We hope you will kindly give us your cooperation by given your free and un-bias opinion.
Please indicate your opinion by putting a tick [√ ] where applicable. All information obtained will be kept with utmost confidentiality, thanks.
62
SECTION A (Socio-demographic characteristics) AGE RANGE
11-14 years [ ], 15-18 years [ ], 19-22 years [ ] GENDER
Male [ ] Female [ ]
CLASS
S. S 1 [ ], S. S 2 [ ] S. S 3 [ ] SECTION B (concepts perceived difficult)
Please tick [√] appropriately according to your understanding and in
concordance to how and if you perceive the following chemistry concepts difficult in their respective Likart-scale.