PROSPECTIVA EN COLOMBIA
6.2 PRESENTE DE SAHAGÚN
Questions by Category
A. Authorizing Legislation and Statutory Citation
1. What legislation authorized the alert system? What is the statutory citation, if any?
B. Reason for Developing Alert System
1. What was the impetus for developing an alert system for missing adults (i.e., media attention, governor’s direction, legislative action, other)?
C. Administration of the Alert System
1. Name the entity or entities that have the responsibility for administering the missing adult alert system (e.g., state police, state department of safety, missing person’s clearinghouse, other).
D. Target Population
1. Who is the target population for the missing adult alert system (e.g., age, disability type, other)?
E. Process for Activating an Alert
1. Which entities may take a report of a missing person (e.g., law enforcement (specify whom), missing person clearinghouse, other)? Is there a standard intake form? If so, can you provide a copy of this form?
2. Which individual is authorized to make the report of the missing individual (e.g., spouses, parents, caretakers, legal guardians)?
3. What are the criteria for issuing an alert? 4. Which entity issues the alert?
5. If the alert criteria are met, is the entity required to issue the alert (mandatory) or is issuing the alert at the discretion of that entity (voluntary)?
6. Is there a waiting period requirement in order to issue an alert?
7. To whom is the alert issued (e.g., law enforcement, media, state government agencies, and/or the public, etc.) and how are these alerts issued?
8. Does the entity coordinate with the state department of transportation about placing information about the alert on an electronic sign on the highway?
9. What are law enforcement, media, and/or the public expected to do when they receive the alert? For example, are law enforcement agencies in a particular area asked to search for the missing individual and/or lookout for a car that the individual is believed to be driving?
10. If the alert is issued to the public, how can they inform appropriate officials that the missing individual has been located?
11. For how long may an alert be issued?
F. Association with AMBER Alert
The U.S. Congress is interested in understanding the relationship between the missing adult alert system and the state’s AMBER Alert system for missing children. Please describe the relationship, if any, between these two alert systems, including:
1. Are both alert systems administered by the same agency?
2. Do both types of alerts use the same process described above, including the same technology? If not, how is the alert system for missing adults different than the AMBER Alert system?
Questions by Category
G. Interstate Coordination
The U.S. Congress is interested in learning about how your state’s missing adult alert system coordinates alerts with other states when a person is believed to have crossed state lines. Please describe the procedures, if any, for coordinating alerts across state lines:
1. Does your state have a process for informing other states that a missing adult for whom an alert has been issued in your state may be located in another state? If so, please describe this process (include information such as the number of times the state has requested an alert to be issued, states coordinated with, circumstances for issuing the alert, outcomes of these missing persons cases)?
2. Can your state issue an alert on behalf of a missing adult who is a resident of another state, but believed to be in your state? If so, please describe this process (include information such as the number of times an alert has been issued in your state on behalf of another state, states coordinated with, circumstances for issuing the alert, outcomes of these missing persons cases)?
H. Program Costs
1. What were the costs, if any, associated with implementing the alert system? Please provide a dollar value for the most recent fiscal year available. Specify whether the fiscal year is federal (i.e., October 1 through September 30) or state (indicate the start and end dates for the state fiscal year).
2. What are the costs associated with ongoing administration of the alert system? Please provide a dollar value for the most recent fiscal year available.
3. If possible, please specify what the ongoing administrative costs are associated with (e.g., technology, labor, other)? Please provide a dollar value for each.
I. Use of Alert System
The U.S. Congress is also interested in the extent to which the missing adult alert systems have been utilized and the extent to which data is available on outcomes from use of the system.
1. In which month and year was the alert system implemented?
2. How many alerts have been issued since the system was started and through the most recent date available? 3. How many were recovered alive? Deceased?
4. In how many cases did an alert aid in the recovery of an individual, regardless of whether the person was recovered alive or deceased?
5. In cases where the individual was recovered due to the alert, which entity located that individual? How far was the individual from his/her residence or last known location?
6. In how many cases was the missing individual believed to have: Alzheimer’s disease or other forms of dementia? Other mental impairments? If the missing individuals did not have Alzheimer’s disease/dementia or mental impairments, what was the reason they were believed to be vulnerable?
7. In how many cases was the missing individual believed to be driving?
J. Other
1. Does the state require law enforcement agencies to add information about missing adults (for whom an alert has been issued) to the FBI National Crime Information System’s Missing Person File or to any state missing persons database?
2. Does the state provide education and training to law enforcement or other stakeholders (e.g., radio and TV broadcasters, department of transportation officials, etc.) about the alert system? If so, which entity provides this training, and for whom is the training provided? What type of training is provided?