CAPÍTULO III. MARCO LEGAL
3.5 PRINCIPIOS DE CONTABILIDAD INTEGRADA
The second tension relates to SATs ongoing difficulties with lack of engagement by their own students, and a desire to find ways to address this. They repeatedly use the term ‘boredom’ to describe the experience of their students, particularly during their lectures. The word boredom was inferred to mean a lack of student engagement, a condition which the SATs would like to allieviate. Boredom issues are often repressed anger, born of frustration and a lack of being unable to control one’s own circumstances, which in turn leads to stress. Not unsurprisingly, given the low priority and mixed attitudes towards learning about Adult Education while in New
Zealand, these teachers themselves felt bored and disengaged from the course of study to which they were assigned by external stakeholders. They say they found parts of the Adult Education segment of the ISTE “boring”, echoing the sentiments of their own students. Such a sentiment would create tension as well for the NZT, as for any teacher whose students appear to be, and/or report being bored.
The role of the teacher in student engagement (or lack thereof) intersects with what the participants describe as ‘student behaviour’. The way the teacher engages with their learners helps set the tone for the ensuing learning experiences. By the nature of the imbalance of power between the learner and the teacher, who is usually also the learner’s assessor, the relationship is at once complex and demanding for any teacher. The difficult dance of nurturing a desire to learn, providing instruction, and indicating the behaviours expected of expert learners in the particular educational context, superimposed with varied cultural expectations and behaviours, is not one mastered easily. The added dimension of whether or not the student is an adult or a younger person can create further tension in supporting learners. Overlaid with these issues can be differing cultural views of the roles of the teacher, and these compound the tensions for both the learner and the teacher.
The roles of the teacher in the Saudi Arabian context are decidedly different to that in Aotearoa New Zealand. The teaching roles echo Arab religious, cultural and educational traditions, which vary significantly from a modern Western worldview. Based on their prior experience as students, SATs are likely to see the teacher as the expert who tells them what they
are required to know. The heart of the Arab teaching approach is that the teacher is the fount of knowledge who imparts received wisdom to students, who should not question their superiors. As one participant stated, “the teaching standard in Saudi Arabia and Arab countries [is] the teacher says, and the students just do. As being said in English – ‘spoonfeeding’”. Or in the words of this research study’s translator, “basically the New Zealand student knows how to do his own research; the Arabic student they make him memorize everything so will be problem at the end” (personal communication 11 August 2009). This kind of rote learning without understanding is “too often practised in Islam and across Asia … [although] there is no consistent support for rote learning” (Feng et al., 2009, p. 162).
Culture shock may provide one of explanation for the visiting SATs description of themselves as being bored during the Adult Education segment of their ISTE. While being immersed in the foreign life of Christchurch each individual’s experience would be different, possibly including some aspects of the U-‐curve continuum from culture surprise, to culture stress, to irritation and culture fatigue caused by stimulus overload, followed by culture shock (Lysgaard, 1955). Boredom may be present in any of these stages, and could be one of many factors
affecting their well-‐being and attitude to ISTE.
Adult learners are often more focused on achieving their learning goals than younger students. Time is a more precious commodity to an adult learner. They bring with them more life experience and prior knowledge, which can be used to support the creating of new knowledge and making meaning of the content related to a topic. These realities offer an opportunity for exposing SATs to new ways to manage the learning environment, and overcoming some of the boredom issues that learners experience. Good practices for responding to student behaviours that are not conducive to learning, and ways to address lack of student engagement, are often discovered through the modelling by the NZT. However, if the SAT is not well disposed to the advanced knowledge and experience of the NZT and/or cannot make sense of their teaching approaches, this may thwart the possibilities of improving their own practice and create tension and perhaps boredom. The learner – in this case each adult SAT -‐ needs to be open to fresh teaching approaches, and also able to embrace what can appear to be alien notions.
Cultural differences lead to very different views on the way the learner/teacher relationship is played out. In this case study the NZT had very little prior knowledge of the Arab view of the roles of the teacher, which are notably dissimilar to a Western one. The SATs, who may have only experienced educational life in all-‐male Arab settings, hail from ten different all-‐ male technical institutes in which they face often reluctant Saudi Arabian students, who must
attend lectures and may only leave school when parental permission is granted. Inevitably the interpretation on how best to respond to disengaged student behaviour and boredom issues will be worlds apart for a NZT who models a teaching approach which seeks to consult and engage with learners. The NZT would challenge previous views of the roles of the teacher. It would open up in the minds of the SATs another way to relate to their students used to rote learning
approaches. This may be welcomed by an Arab SAT or create tension. Either way, experiencing a different model of the roles of the teacher would create in the SATs a dilemma about whether or not to embrace new teaching approaches, particularly when they return to their home country.
The picture of the teacher’s roles in the Middle Eastern context is complex. “The three main methods of socialisation in Arab society are verbal methods, punishment and very little room for experimentation” (Walker, 2004, p. 436). These methods live alongside and are
intertwined with cultural and religious influences. An Islamic worldview sees aims and objectives of education in the context of the relationship between God, Man and Nature, as described and unanimously accepted by Muslim scholars at the First World Conference on Muslim Education held in Makkah in 1977:
Education should aim at the balanced growth of the total personality of Man through the training of Man’s spirit, his intellect, the rational self, feelings and bodily senses. Education should
therefore cater for the growth of man in all its aspects, spiritual, intellectual, imaginative, physical, scientific, linguistic, both individually and collectively, and motivate all these aspects towards goodness and the attainment of perfection (Ashraf, 1985, p. 26).
The complexity of Islamic and Arab worldviews of the teacher/learner relationship are a challenge for an NZT with a very different view of education. Many Western educational
approaches are likely to be alien to those raised in a Middle Eastern educational context that favours a more deductive approach. A Western approach to learning involves asking students to think and express themselves independently of the teacher and promotes meta-‐cognitive skills and social constructivist approaches (such as small group co-‐operative learning and social constructivist theory). This poses a challenge to those immersed in a culture that accepts a different power distance, which Hofstede describes as “the extent to which the less powerful members of organisations and institutions accept and expect that power is distributed unevenly” (Hofstede, 2001, p. xix-‐xx). Smith discovered when teaching staff in the UAE that “the influence of power distance can affect interactions within a group, especially small-‐group activities” (2007, p. 168). Some participants may feel uncomfortable talking openly with someone they deem to be higher or lower in the institutional hierarchy than themselves (L. Smith, 2007, p. 168). If the NZT were to consult students about their learning preferences and using small group teaching approaches to learning, then this may be seen as an affront to power distance perceptions and
may reinforce tensions for Arab SATs. However, despite the dilemma they may pose for
international students, Western approaches to the roles of the teacher offer an opportunity for the ISTE to discuss the value of teaching activities that may lead to reduced boredom issues and greater student engagement.