• No se han encontrado resultados

Alteraciones óseas de la articulación.

3. TRATAMIENTO ESTADíSTICO

3.1. Proceso de datos.

 Comparisons over time between investments in innovation related activities and innovation outputs reveal a fall during the downturn, with the exception of some business and management practices. However, innovative businesses performed better during the crisis.

 New-to-market (novel) innovation and new-to-firm (imitation) innovation are important for business performance and growth.

This implies that effective policies to nurture innovation promote business performance even during adverse economic circumstances.

 The employment of specific skills (such as product design, software development and engineering and applied sciences) generally shows a positive relationship with innovation performance during the survey period 2008 to 2010 and there is some indication that the more highly specialised of the skills (e.g. engineering and applied sciences) are distinctive drivers of innovation (not just a demand derived from innovation led by other factors).

This implies that specialised skills take-up is a legitimate feature of innovation policies both for the ability to absorb technology and external knowledge and as sources of creativity and innovation.

 Design-related as well as Science & Technology (S&T) related skills are significantly associated with innovation, and design-related skills are important for services innovation.

This implies that design is important for successful innovation and balanced policy mix should include consideration of design, both in-house and outsourced design skills and across all business sectors.

 Business performance during the downturn period was also positively correlated with innovation carried out as mixed modes (bundles of

complementary activities, for example, training, management practices and intellectual property protection) and especially with modes that feature specialised skills, although the direction of causation cannot be readily inferred in one survey sample.

This implies that monolithic policies that isolate one element in the innovation system, e.g. R&D, may not meet the spectrum of innovation relevant activities and their strategic combinations.

 Regression models for growth in sales and employment during 2008 to 2010 show a significant correlation with a mode of wider innovation that features management changes. Other research by the authors (Frenz and Lambert,

2012) reports a positive link between business growth and the take up of management standards such as ISO9001, supported by accreditation.

This implies role for encouraging improved management practices as part of innovation policy e.g. through accredited management standards.

References

AHRC and Design Council (2012). Measuring the Role and Value of Design,

http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/Insight/Research/Measuring-the-value- and-role-of-design/.

Alvarez, R, Benavente, JM, &Crespi, G (2010) Economic crisis and organisational change in developing countries: evidence from Chile. International Journal of

Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 3: 67–87.

Archibugi, D, Filippetti, A and Frenz, M (2013a) Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy, 42: 303-314.

Archibugi, D, Filippetti, A and Frenz, M (2013b) The impact of the economic crisis on innovation: evidence from Europe, Technological Forecasting and Social

Change, 80: 1,247-1,260.

Awano, G, Franklin, F, Haskel, J and Zafeira-Kastrinaki, Z (2010), Investing in Innovation, NESTA.

Battisti, G and Stoneman, P (2010) How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between

Technological and Organizational Innovations, British Journal of Management, 21: 187-206.

Crespi, G, Criscuolo, C and Haskel, J (2007) Information technology, organisational change and productivity growth: evidence from UK firms. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, CEPDP, 783.

Dosi. G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, Research

Policy 11: 147-162.

Freeman, C and Louca, F, (2001) As Times Goes By: From the Industrial Revolution

to the Information Revolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Frenz, M and Ietto-Gillies, G (2009) The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge. Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey, Research Policy 38: 1,125-1,135.

Frenz, M and Lambert, R (2009) Exploring Non-technological and Mixed Modes of Innovation Across Countries, Chapter 2 in Innovation in Firms: A Microeconomic

Perspective. OECD, Paris.

Frenz, M and Lambert, R (2011) Connected innovation: An international comparative study that identifies mixed modes of innovation, Birkbeck, Research Centre for

Frenz, M and Lambert, R (2012) Innovation Dynamics and the Role of the

Infrastructure, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Occasional Paper No. 3.

Filippetti, A and Archibugi, D (2010) Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems of Innovation, structure, and demand, Research Policy, 40: 179–192.

Gallouj, F and Windrum, P (2009). Services and services innovation. Journal of

Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 141–148.

Kanerva, M and Hollanders, H (2009).The Impact of the Economic Crisis on

Innovation Analysis based on the Innobarometer 2009 survey, Innovation.

Report for the European Commission.

Kitching, J, Blackburn, R, Smallbone, D and Dixon, S (2009) Business Strategies

and Performance during Difficult Economic Conditions, Report for the UK

Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.

Kline, SJ and Rosenberg, N (1986) An overview of innovation, in R Landau and N Rosenberg (eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for

Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 275–305.

Leiponen, A and Drejer, I (2007) What exactly are technological regimes? Intra- industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities. Research

Policy, 36(1),221-1,238.

Robson, S and Achur, J (2012) First Findings from the UK Innovation Survey 2011. Report published by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, May 2012.

Robson, S and Kenchatt, M (2010) First findings from the UK Innovation Survey 2009. Economic & Labour Market Review, 4: 28–35.

Schumpeter (1911 translated 1934) The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Swann, GP (2010) The Economic Rationale for a National Design Policy. BIS Occasional paper, 2.

Tether, B (2005a). A Literature Review on Skills and Innovation: How Does

Successful Innovation Impact on the Demand for Skills and How Do Skills Drive

Innovation? Department of Trade and Industry.

Tether, B (2005b) The Role of Design in Business Performance. ESRC Centre for

Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester.

Tether, B (2006) Design in Innovation: Coming Out from the Shadow of R&D, Department of Trade and Industry.

Toner, P (2011) Workforce Skills and Innovation: An Overview of Major Themes in

the Literature OECD Education Working Paper Series. Paris.

Utterback, JM, Vedin, BA, Alvarez, E, Ekman, S, Sanderson, SW, Tether, B and Verganti, R (2007) Design-inspired Innovation. World Scientific.

Annex A Data and methodology

Annex A first discusses the UK Innovation Surveys (UKIS). In particular, we discuss the latest UKIS2011, extensively used in the report, and compare the characteristics of UKIS2011 with that of the panel of around 900 enterprises that responded to all four waves of the survey. In the final section we discuss the methods used to analyse the data: basic descriptive statistics, regressions and factor analysis.