Propuestas Generales

You are thinking of some Gann numbers or maybe you noticed some numbers in some ancient book and you wondered if they were squares.

Add them and reduce to a single digit. Is it a square?

If it does not add to a 1, 4, 9, or 7, you know it is not

because earlier we saw that the first nine squares have the single digit values of 1, 4, 9, 7, 7, 9, 4, 1, and 9 and the rest of the natural squares repeat that nine-number sequence.

I also told you I would reveal how I made a calculation while in

bed one night. The problem was by no means a simple one.

I wanted to know on what odd square I would end up on if I went out one square and up one 22.5 angle each time, going around the Square of Nine chart.

Certainly not on 1089 or the square of 33.

Give it a try before I give the answer.

I will give you the first two numbers which you can check on the Square of Nine chart. Going out one square and to the next angle from our starting point which is the line the odd angles are on (315

degree angle) we find that it is 10. Going out another square and up to the next angle we find ourselves on 28.

Now close your eyes and see if you can do the rest.

Got it?

You will end up at 1225 or the square of 35.

How did I do it?

Since the angles are 22.5 degrees each then there are 16 angles in the 360 degree circle.

To go from 1 to 10 is a gain of:

1x9

To go from 10 to 28 the gain is:

2x9

The PATTERN was already forming.

Since there are 16 angles then the answer is 1x9 plus 2x9 plus 3x9 up through 16x9.

From my triangular work I knew that the triangle of 16 was 136.

I merely multiplied 9x136 in my head and added the 1 in the center and got 1224 plus 1 equals 1225.

I knew that the answer would end up on the line from where I started so the answer would have to be an odd square. Since 1089 is the square of 33 I figured that 1225 was probably the square of 35 since I was looking for something with an SDV of 1 for reasons you should know by now.

I got up the next morning and checked it on the calculator and was right.

I was not surprized since 1225 is a number found in Masonic work and Gann was a Mason. It is also a TELEOIS.

But the TELEOIS is for another day.

And then you will know the rest of the story!

PS-The number I mentioned near the beginning of this material, 9776, is not a triangular number. It has a single digit value of 2 and in order to be triangular it would have to be a 1, 3, 6 or 9.

Since triangular numbers are hard to recognize and I have found no way to find their "root" then this SDV method provides at least one way of knowing when a number is not triangular.

PPS-In the forward to this series, I discussed the various

PATTERNS that are sought by speculators in the market. It should be noted that those PATTERNS sometime work. But they often fail or fade away.

But the PATTERNS I have described in the single digit numbering system have never failed. They were the same in the days of the ancients, in Gann and Elliott's day and they will be so in the future. The PATTERNS are "Never Beyond Nine."

B B oo o ok k IX I X

Ga G an n n n a an nd d F F ib i bo on n a a cc c ci i

C C ha h a pt p te e r r 1 1 -A - Ar rt ti ic c le l e i in n G Ga an nn n a a nd n d E El ll li io o tt t t W Wa av ve e M Ma ag ga a zi z in ne e

(As noted in my preface I wrote an article for Gann and Elliott Wave Magazine (now called Traders World). I was one of the charter subscribers to the magazine having sent in my subscription fee before the first issue came out.

The article appeared in Volume 1, Number 3, the

November/December 1988 issue. It was entitled by the publisher "The Gann Side of Fibonacci Numbers."

For those of you who have not read it the article is reproduced here and serves as an introduction to this book.)

Forty-four is a Fibonacci number. Sixty-seven and one half degrees is a Fibonacci number. Two hundred and sixty-six is a Fibonacci number. Three hundred and sixty degrees is a Fibonacci number.

For those few of you who have never heard of Fibonacci numbers I can see you saying, "So what?"

For those of you who have "read" about the Fibonacci numbers, I can see you doing a double take.

For those of you who are supposed to be Fibonacci experts, I can see your eyeballs rolled back and clicking in your head and your feet up in the air as in a Mutt and Jeff cartoon. The cartoon has a big balloon which read, "He's got it. He's got it! By Gann, he's got it!"

Those who have read about Fibonacci are saying "What's this Gann stuff? I thought Fibonacci had to do with Elliott waves."

It does. But there is also a Gann side to the Fibonacci

phenomenon, sometimes apparent, but often not. It is quite possible that the Gann relationship to Fibonacci has been explored, but if so, I have seen little evidence of it.

I am talking about such things as:

(1) The master numbers.

(2) The angles.

(3) The signs and seasons.

(4) The signs and degrees.

(5) The stone of Simon.

(6) The eighth square.

(7) The death zone and the circle.

(8) The wanderings and the pyramid.

(9) The Great Cycle of Enoch.

We could add more but that's plenty for our purposes now. Let's investigate the phenomenon of Fibonacci with the above nine items with what I call simple observational arithmetic.

I say that because persons who write on Elliott, Gann and other math wizards are used to writing in mathematical terms not always understood by the average person.

Like many of you I had a little algebra and geometry in high school and a little algebra in college, but my field for 20 years was journalism. And when you don't have many reasons for using algebra and geometry over the years, it becomes hazy.

Books have been written on the markets by mathematicians showing the mathematical formulas behind certain systems. But they seem to be targeted for other mathematicians and those persons working with computers.

Those books are probably very good for those who understand the formulas. But one gentleman well known in the markets and considered a market genius in his own right said he didn't understand the books at all.

So the methods I use might seem very elementary to those with a higher learning of math. If so, I ask them to bear along with those of us of lesser mathematical background as we explore the nine topics above in simple observational arithmetic.

In addition to not being a mathematician, I'm not an astrologer, astronomer or a Mason either. I've read a few books on such and see some links with the Gann material, but that doesn't make me an expert.

As I said before, my field was journalism, and I'm no expert in