ESTADOS DE PROYECTO

These so called world leaders and their puppet regimes have been sussed well and truly out, caught red handed with their hands in the till and blood on their hands. Hypocritical war criminals like Tony Blair, who converted to Catholicism in December 2007, and in my opinion, not because he did so due to any true beliefs, or that he had some kind of calling from God, though he‘d love to think we‘d believe that. No, he‘s done it solely so he can pathetically plead to the gullible masses and beg for forgiveness from his sheeple and fold, - that what he did when he decided to illegally go to war against Iraq, and stamp the seal of approval to exterminate hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children, - whose only crime was to be born there, [as how can these people on one hand tuck into bed their own children, and their children‘s children, settle them down all nice and snug, whilst proceeding to read them a bedtime story, or sing a lullaby, - and on the turn of the final page, read;―...and they all lived happily ever after‖, or sing; ―On hush upon mountain...‖, when on the very next day order the extermination of some other parents little children?], and that the reason he did it, was for all our sakes, not his, ours, - and to prevent terrorism on our streets and wipe-out the born and bred by the CIA - al-Qaeda.

The Masonic ‗safe pair of hands‘ of Sir John Chilcot of the Chilcot Inquiry, will amount to nothing, as on the surface, they, the so called opposition might moan and groan for the sake of the public circus, but deep down in the depths of their courts, they know their powerless to act, or should I say haven‘t the balls to act or prosecute a war criminal such as Tony Blair, unless of course someone like me was put in power, and that ain‘t ever gunna happen! Blair would boldly proclaim; ―...but Sir‘s, I‘m a Godly man, sincere in my faith and religion, you only have to see I have been in attendance with the Pope, Gods second in command, - what I did, was what I thought best,- I almost felt as if I was being directly instructed by the good lord himself‖.

And if Blair was ever haled unto the European courts in the Hague as a ‗war criminal‘, he‘d have a touch anyway, as those Judges there are in turn also Freemasons, so right from the start it would be a farce and amount to nothing other than lining the pockets of the legal fraternity with millions of more pounds of tax payers money.

Let‘s not forget Blair‘s at least a 32nd, though most likely a 33rd degree ‗Honorary Freemason‘, and for those who say a law was passed barring Prime Minister‘s from being a Freemason, or remaining so whilst still in office, - are talking out of their rear-end, as there‘s no law stipulating any such thing. And what‘s interesting to note, is that inside the actual ‗Cabinet Room‘ at number 10, at one end of the room there are two ornate pillars and the royal arch on prominent show and purposely designed this way as a matter of aesthetic symbolism as to what it‘s meant to really represent, - as it‘s quite a separate feature from the rest of the ceiling, so therefore nothing to do with being a necessary part of the building, i.e. required to support it, so is there to remind those whom are all seated around the cabinet table, ‗whose really in charge‘.

There are those who argue Winston Churchill resigned from Freemasonry when he was elected PM.

But this is also a load of bullshit, rumours where even put about that he fell-out with his lodge some years before around 1918, well you have to remember the Freemasons are a ‗secret society with secrets‘, so how the hell is anyone ever going to get to the truth of the matter, - and of course they know of this. You neither deny, nor admit you‘re one if by doing so is likely to cause detriment to the outcome. The proof is in the pudding for me, if Churchill, Bush, Obama, Blair, Brown or Cameron where not Freemasons, then there‘s no way they would have become either President, or Prime Minister in the first place, the only way you get to the forefront of politics in the Masonic USA, Britain or the rest of the world, is by being a Freemason in the first place!

In his autobiography, published by John Murray in London in 1941, A Picture of Life 1872 -1940, he states on page 188: ―... that month I was initiated as a Freemason at Studholme Lodge [No.1591]. While waiting for the ceremony I walked round and round Golden Square with Winston Churchill, another candidate ...‖ Within two months, on the 19th July 1901, Winston was passed to the second degree, and on the 5th March 1902 he became a Master Mason within nine months of joining the fraternity, with all three ceremonies being conducted in Studholme Lodge. ^[1]

In 1929 the New Welcome Masonic Lodge No. 5139, open inside the Palace of Westminster. At its founding membership was limited to Labour Party Members of Parliament, but its scope has since broadened. ^[2] The lodge is alleged to have influenced the outcome of the 1935 Parliamentary leadership elections. Its founding was reported in a number of national newspapers including the Daily Telegraph, and Sporting Life, and was created at the suggestion of the then Prince of Wales, afterwards King Edward VIII, who was concerned by the antagonism between Freemasonry and the British left, and the fact that a number of Labour MPs were blackballed when applying to join Masonic lodges. The New Welcome Lodge was intended to form a link between Freemasonry and the new governing party, and was open to Labour MPs and for employees of trade unions and the Labour party; its members included Labour‘s deputy leader Arthur Greenwood, and no doubt Unison‘s Trade union joint boss Tony Woodley.

What Blair will of course not mention, - is that he basically had no other alternative but to adhere to the

―Masonic/Illuminati‘s‖ instructions from the Bush administration-family, that are ―higher‖ ranking Freemasons than Blair, they may share the same ‗level of Masonic degree‘s‘, but the American led war following 9/11, had Blair up against the wall; ―A Mason should know how to obey those who are set over him, however inferior they may be in worldly rank; or condition‖, Macoy‘s Masonic Monitor, p. 14. –

―Disobedience and want of respect to Masonic superiors is an offence for which the transgressor subjects himself to punishment‖, Mackey‘s Masonic Jurisprudence, p. 511. ^[3]

―The first duty of the reader of this Synopsis is to obey the edicts of his Grand Lodge. Right or wrong, his very existence as a Mason hangs upon obedience to the powers immediately set above him. Failure in this must infallibly bring down expulsion, which, as a Masonic death, ends all. The one unpardonable crime in a Mason is contumacy or disobedience‖, Webb‘s Freemasons Monitor, p. 196.

―The first duty of every Mason is to obey the Mandate of the Master…The order must at once be obeyed; its character and its consequences may be matters of subsequent inquiry. The Masonic rule of obedience is like the nautical, imperative: Obey orders, even if you break owners‖, Mackey‘s Encyclopaedias of Freemasonry, page 525.

―You must conceal all crimes of your brother Masons...and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason be always sure to shield him...It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you're keeping your obligations‖, - Ronayne - Handbook of Masonry, page 183. ^[4] Blair‘s Lodge, even though of the premier league, is still not as powerful as the American branch of Freemasons, - so whenever an ‗order‘

comes from across the pond, like it did for Blair and Brown, and does for; Jake the Peg, with his extra Glegg, diddle-iddle-iddle, or whoever else is in power, - if the request is to fart, they‘ll fart, as they cannot say no even if they wanted to, end-off-period!

[1] <http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/winston-churchill-freemason-from-1901-1965/>.

[2] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Welcome_Lodge>.

[3] "Freemasonry Introduction: The F.·.W.·. Tracing Board." <http://freemasonrywatch.org/tracingboard.html>.

[4] "Masonic Secrets: The Secret Handshake, Secret Word, Secret <http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/secrets.html>.

Parliament entrenched with Freemasons

Paul Linford was a onetime lobbyist, and comes out with this gem of a story from the Axe Grinder

column in the Press Gazette, it shows the extent of how entrenched the Houses of Parliament are with Freemasonry: ―Fleet Street veteran Rob Gibson, has learnt the hard way about the dangers of email. ^[1]

The former Daily Express political editor and dedicated fund-raiser for journalist‘s charity the NPF now runs the highly regarded Gallery News at the House of Commons. Gibson sends out stories daily to a host of outlets, including MPs at Westminster. Unfortunately, Gibson sent out one email in error last week that was a little ‗too exclusive‘. To the great man‘s consternation, it contained the minutes of the latest meeting of his Masonic lodge. Now there‘s open government for you‖. ^[2]

Following words of Paul Linford: ―The extent of Masonry within the lobby - and the Palace of Westminster as a whole - was a constant source of mischievous speculation during my time there.

Correspondents were frequently baffled to find the chairs in the Lobby Room rearranged with one facing the wrong way - a seating arrangement consistent with the Masonic initiation ritual in which the candidate sits blindfolded with his back to the room. On one memorable occasion, a notorious wind-up merchant in the regional lobby put out a spoof tannoy for; ‗the Secretary of the Press Gallery Freemason‘s Lodge‘ - such a body does exist. It was answered by a very well-known Sunday newspaper political editor, who maintained he was simply curious as to who was on the other end of the line‖.

David Cameron used House of Commons facilities to host an event for the Freemasons, documents cover dining facilities in the Palace of Westminster that were hired by members of parliament to host events for outside organisations revealed these facts. ^[3] The Tory leader hosted a tea event for the West Oxfordshire Lady Freemasons on 28th October 2008. The records show that the event was held in dining room C and 14 people were expected. The documents released the 4th February 2010 cover the period from 1st April 2004 to 30th September 2009.

[1] "Paul Linford: January 2006." <http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2006_01_01_archive.html>.

[2] "Shaphan: The Press Gallery's Masonic Lodge(s)." <http://shaphan.typepad.com/blog/2006/05/the_press_galle.html>.

[3] <http://thatthebonesyouhavecrushedmaythrill.blogspot.com/2010/02/watch-out-for-lady-masons-david.html>.

The Hutton Inquiry Sham!

Dr David Christopher Kelly, CMG [14 May 1944–17 July 2003], was an employee of the UK‘s Ministry of Defence [MoD], as an expert in biological warfare and a former United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq. Kelly‘s discussion with BBC Radio4 Today Programme journalist Andrew Gilligan about the British government‘s dossier on ‗weapons of mass destruction‘ [WMD] in Iraq inadvertently caused a major political scandal. ^[1] He‘s dead body was found just days after appearing before the ‗Parliamentary committee‘ charged with investigating the scandal. Many people soon tried to distance themselves from his death, including the BBC and the MoD, and goes without saying Dr Kelly‘s family felt very unhappy with the way he had been treated.

The Hutton Inquiry, a public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding his death, ruled that he had committed suicide, - and that Kelly had not in fact said some of the things attributed to him by Gilligan. ^[2] The following day, on the 28th January 2004, the entire front page of The Independent newspaper was covered with a single word in giant letters: WHITEWASH.

The government had commissioned the dossier as an element of the preparation for what later became the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Although not responsible for writing any part of the dossier, - Kelly‘s experience of weapons inspections led to him being asked to proofread sections of the draft dossier on the history of inspections. Kelly was unhappy with some of the claims in the draft, particularly a claim, originating from August 2002, ^[3] that Iraq was capable of firing biological and chemical weapons within 45 minutes of an order to use them [simply known as the 45 minute claim

[4]. Kelly‘s colleagues queried the inclusion of the claim but their superiors were satisfied when they took it up with MI6 through the Joint Intelligence Committee.

On the morning of 17th July 2003, Kelly was working as usual at home in Oxfordshire. Publicity given to his public appearance two days before had led many of his friends to send him supportive e-mails, to which he was responding. One of the e-mails he‘d sent that day was to New York Times journalist Judith Miller, who had used Kelly as a source in a book on bioterrorism, to whom Kelly

mentioned; ―...Many dark actors playing games‖. He also received an e-mail from his superiors at the MOD asking for more details of his contact with journalists. ^[5]

At about 3pm, Kelly told his wife he was going for a walk, as he did every day, and appears to have gone directly to an area of woodlands known as Harrowdown Hill around a mile away from his home, and where he allegedly swallowed up to 29 tablets of co-proxamol painkillers. He then allegedly cut his left wrist with a knife he had owned since his youth. When Kelly didn‘t return home, his wife reported him missing shortly after midnight that same night, and he was found dead early the next morning.

The government immediately announced that Lord Hutton would lead the judicial Hutton Inquiry into the events leading up to the death. The BBC shortly afterwards confirmed that Kelly had indeed been the single source for Andrew Gilligan's report.

The Hutton [sham of an] Inquiry, reported on the 28th January 2004 that Kelly had committed suicide. Freemason Lord Falconer, the former flatmate of Freemason Tony Blair, handpicked Freemason Lord Hutton for this inquiry. Lord Hutton wrote: - ―I am satisfied that none of the persons whose decisions and actions I later describe ever contemplated that Kelly might take his own life. I am further satisfied that none of those persons was at fault in not contemplating that Kelly might take his own life. Whatever pressures and strains Kelly was subjected to by the decisions and actions taken in the weeks before his death, I am satisfied that no one realised or should have realised that those pressures and strains might drive him to take his own life or contribute to his decision to do so‖.

Hutton controversially concluded that the MoD were obliged to make Kelly‘s identity known once he came forward as a potential source, and had not acted in a deceitfully and treacherous manner.

However, Hutton criticised the MoD for not alerting Kelly to the fact that his name had become known to the press.

During the inquiry, British ambassador David Broucher reported a conversation with Kelly at a Geneva meeting in February 2003. Broucher recalled that Kelly said he had assured his Iraqi sources that there would be no war if they co-operated, and that a war would put him in an ambiguous moral position. Broucher had asked Kelly what would happen if Iraq were invaded, and Kelly had replied;

―I will probably be found dead in the woods‖. Broucher then quoted from an email he had sent just after Kelly‘s death: ―I did not think much of this at the time, taking it to be a hint that the Iraqis might try to take revenge against him, something that did not seem at all fanciful then. I now see that he may have been thinking on rather different lines‖.

Though according to an entry in one of Kelly‘s diaries, as related by his daughter Rachel to the inquiry, the meeting actually took place on the 18th February 2002, a whole year earlier than that alleged by David Broucher, so any such references to Resolution 1441 could not have taken place, as it hadn‘t even been passed, as that didn‘t happen until the 8th November 2002, and as such it could not have been a source of hostility by the Iraqis.

Although suicide was officially accepted as the cause of death, some medical experts have raised doubts, suggesting that the evidence does not back this up. The most detailed objection was provided in a letter from three medical doctors published in The Guardian, reinforced by support from two other senior physicians in a later letter to the same newspaper. These doctors argued that the autopsy finding of a transected ulnar artery could not have caused a degree of blood loss that would kill someone, particularly when outside in the cold [where vasoconstriction would slow blood loss].

Further, this conflicted with the minimal amount of blood found at the scene. They also contended that the amount of co-proxamol found was only about a third of what would normally be fatal. Nor was he seen to have left the house with any bottled water or other liquid which would have been essential to assist in the consumption of the pills.

Dr. Rouse, a British epidemiologist wrote to the British Medical Journal pointing out that the act of committing suicide by severing wrist arteries is an extremely rare occurrence in a 59-year-old man with no previous psychiatric history, - nobody else died from that cause during the year. ^[6]

Little blood lost - Dave Bartlett and Vanessa Hunt, the two paramedics who were called to the scene of Kelly‘s death, have said that in their opinion there wasn‘t enough blood at the location to justify the belief that he died from blood loss. Bartlett and Hunt told the Guardian that they saw a small amount of blood on plants near Kelly‘s body and a patch of blood the size of a coin on his trousers. They said they would expect to find several pints of blood at the scene of a suicide

involving an arterial cut.

However, two of Britain‘s top forensic pathologists, [no doubt Freemasons], Chris Milroy and Guy Rutty dismissed the paramedics claim‘s, saying it is hard to judge blood loss from the scene of a death, as some blood may have seeped into the ground. Milroy also told the Guardian that Kelly‘s heart condition may have made it hard for him to sustain any significant degree of blood loss. So what‘s Milroy saying, Kelly did lose a lot of blood or he didn‘t?

I personally had a very serious accident and lost in excess of 5 pints of blood. I just lay down on

I personally had a very serious accident and lost in excess of 5 pints of blood. I just lay down on