Rasgos antiheroicos

The process of selecting granular images from Sunless and testing in Korsakow by applying face, animal, crowd, and “zone” as keywords became an iterative process as I continued to return to Sunless in search of more clips to add to each of these clusters. When I returned to Sunless, it was more in the vein of the “bounty hunter” who searches for banality in the film. In these viewings, I searched for and listed all of the images of faces, crowds, animals, and “zone”, realising as I did so how littered Sunless is with repeated images that had gone unnoticed in my previous viewings (fig. 12). I realised that by searching, listing, and then editing out these items to be added to my lists of animals, faces, crowds, and “zone”, I was performing a condensed version of Bogost’s ontological project—to “draw attention to the countless things that litter our world unseen”—because I was drawing attention to some of the images that had gone unnoticed in my previous viewings (51).

Through this listing I was creating an “exploded view” of the face, animals, crowd, and “zone” images of Sunless, expanding each item into its multiple perspectives (Bogost 50). What I realised through this process of listing as drawing attention was the potential of the list to provide a way of noticing which attends to discrete items and then explodes them into multiple perspectives, a way of making which is granular and multiple. This type of listing that notices the discrete and the multiple enables a multililinear audiovisual practice which attends to the unnoticed and uses these discrete qualities to iteratively inform further noticing and making. This is a process I built upon when I made Sunny, Rainy, Foggy and Sometimes I See Palm Trees using my own footage.

For Sunny, Rainy, Foggy I filmed all of my footage using the Vine video app on my phone, so I started listing shortly after I had collected some of these videos in my travels around Europe. This listing process began by noting everything I noticed while I replayed a Vine until there was nothing else I could think of to list. Aqua, glimmering, light, shimmer, fish, movement, ripples, water, swim, shine, blue, and dance is one of these lists that describes a Vine I filmed when I noticed a school of fish swimming as I glanced over a pier in Barcelona (fig. 13). While I noticed the fish as I glanced, took out my phone and held my finger on the screen for the six-second length of a Vine video, my phone camera noticed light, colour, movement, and beyond. From this viewing and listing, I noticed the fish are less visible in the frame than the brightness of the sun pulsing, glimmering, and reflecting off the water. Further, as I was doing this listing while gathering, these listed qualities began to inform the images I continued to film.

While I could have used the focus, exposure, and zoom capabilities of a better camera to centrally frame the fish in a close-up, the automatic and somewhat uncontrollable affordances of my iPhone make it somewhat indifferent to what it sees. This indifference allows the Vine videos I collected for Sunny, Rainy, Foggy to function as lists which see what went unnoticed by me in a similar way to how Bogost describes Shore’s photographs as lists because they focus on things equally (48). This affinity between the lists in Shore’s photographs and my Vines for Sunny, Rainy, Foggy is the lack of focus on a particular item which would have diminished the image or video’s explosive quality. In Sunny, Rainy, Foggy I used these lists of qualities noticed to guide how I keyworded the project, where this fish clip was designated with “reflect” and “moves” as keywords. Sunny, Rainy, Foggy uses the list to explode each clip into its multiple visual qualities and, by doing this, allowed me to attend to unnoticed aspects caught by the indifference of my phone camera, paying attention to the world through my own guiding intelligence. I then used these lists as a way of designing the relations which take place in my K-film.

Following Sunny, Rainy, Foggy, in Sometimes I See Palm Trees I used the list to create sequences that became my clips, before I used the list to inform the keywords. These sequences in Sometimes I See Palm Trees are made up of multiple Vines and emerged through an iterative process of listing the qualities of each of my clips as I added raw footage to a folder on my computer. Generally, as new Vines were added, listing would reveal unnoticed visual qualities, qualities that appeared in my lists which I had not consciously seen in the moment of filming. As our brains tend to look for order, shapes, and patterns, I came to notice the horizontal lines that two streamers make through the sky when “horizontal lines” repeated in a list of qualities noticed. These repetitions of particular listed items became the process by which I started creating sequences from my raw Vines. In the case of horizontal lines, I noticed that the Vines of streamers in the sky, a shadow a beer makes on a blue table, the shadow of a step on a floral projection, the alternation between black and white on a flannel shirt, and venetian blinds all create horizontal lines. These became an edited sequence in Sometimes I See Palm Trees (fig. 14). This process of watching, listing, and editing together sequences from noticed resonances in my lists provided the process by which I made Sometimes I See Palm Trees.

After I had edited together some of these list-like sequences in the making of Sometimes I See Palm Trees two types of lists emerged: lists as collections of

things, and lists as studies of something. A sequence showing five different palm trees in five different locations I considered a collection of palm trees, whereas five different angles of the same palm tree was a study of a palm tree. While the sequences as studies of something attend to how a particular thing has multiple qualities, I found these different perspectives were largely staged by me while filming. Generally, I would film from a different angle as a way to frame a particular aspect of something in a more interesting way. I found the lists as collections of things more desirable, as they were less staged, using the indifference of the camera to simply notice something that then formed a visual resonance, or aesthetic moment, when seen in relation to the other Vines I had filmed. As I have already said, I was not noticing the horizontal lines the streamers make in the sky while filming, but only noticed this pattern through listing. I consider these sequence lists of Sometimes I See Palm Trees to be comparable to how faces, animals, and crowds accumulate in Sunless as things that repeat, yet it is only after watching Sunless numerous times and cataloguing it that we fully notice this abundance. In this way, Sunless is a precursor film to the “returnability” encouraged by my K-films.