• No se han encontrado resultados

Recent  findings  on  MIR163  led  to  the  hypothesis  that  plant  miRNAs  may  be  de  novo  created  by  inverted   duplication  of  its  targets  and  subsequent  evolutionary  drift  to  lead  to  functional  miRNAs  in  their  present   form  (Allen  et  al.,  2004).  My  results  given  above  imply  that  duplication  of  miRNAs  also  involves  at  least   part   of   the   promoters.   Thus   far   it   has   not   been   shown   whether   the   initial   formation   of   miRNAs   by   a   mechanism  involving  inverted  duplication  also  involves  duplication  of  parts  of  the  promoters  and  to  what   extent   promoter   elements   and   regions   are   retained   between   the   target   gene   promoter   and   the                                                                                                                            

respective    

  Figure  2.13  

Sequence  similarities  within  the  promoter  regions  of  MIR163  and  its  target  genes.    

The  light  blue  horizontal  bars  represent  upstream  sequences.  The  dark  blue  bars  at  the  right  end  of  light  blue  bars  indicates   the  50-­‐UTR  of  target  genes  or  50  ends  of  pri-­‐miR163  which  is  not  part  of  the  microRNA  precursor.  The  red  horizontal  bars   represent  the  identified  TATA  box.  Colored  bars  represent  conserved  regions  detected.  The  peaks  represent  the  number  of   hits  per  nucleotide  normalized  by  the  number  of  total  hits  per  sequence,  which  were  calculated  50  times  by  MotifSampler.   A  peak  is  plotted  in  red  when  the  height  of  the  peak  is  >50%.  

 

miRNA  promoter  (Allen  et  al.,  2004).  In  order  to  answer  these  questions  I  aligned  the  pri-­‐miRNA163  plus   1000bp  of  promoter  sequence  to  the  respective  UTRs  and  promoter  sequences  from  the  miR163  target   genes,  At1g66690,  At1g66700,  At1g66720  and  At3g44860  (Figure  2.13).  Numerous  conserved  regions  as   well  as  conserved  short  sequence  motifs  are  present  between  the  5’  upstream  sequences  of  MIR163  and   its  target  genes.  Beside  the  conserved  transcribed  region  additional  conserved  regions  located  within  the   promoter  have  been  detected.  The  region  depicted  in  red  (Figure  2.13)  harbours  the  TATA  box  consensus   sequence  which  can  be  found  in  all  target  genes  as  well  as  for  MIR163.  Our  findings  on  the  localisation  of   the  TATA  box  are  consistent  with  recent  results  published  by  (Xie  et  al.,  2005).  Many  additional  promoter   regions  which  are  shared  between  the  target  genes  and  MIR163  have  been  detected  (Figure  2.13).  These   regions  have  supposedly  been  retained  since  the  initial  inverted  duplication  event  during  the  formation  of   MIR163.   Thus   they   most   likely   represent   functionally   important   regions   which   might   be   important   for   correct  transcriptional  regulation  of  MIR163  as  well  as  the  target  genes.  However,  further  experiments   are  needed  to  elucidate  the  functionality  of  these  motifs.  

 

In  contrast  to  MIR163,  there  weren’t  any  significant  motifs  for  MIR161  and  its  target  genes,  although  the   stem  loop  of  MIR161  has  also  been  shown  to  have  a  similarity  to  its  target  genes  (Allen  et  al.,  2004).  The   same  promoter  analysis  I  was  performed  for  non-­‐conserved  miRNA  multigene  families  MIR157,  MIR158,   MIR165  and  their  corresponding  targets  as  listed  in  ASRP  Database  (Gustafson  et  al.,  2005).  The  results   are   included   in   our   website.   No   significant   sequence   similarities   were   detected   by   DiAlign   for   MIR157,   MIR158   and   MIR165   and   their   targets,   respectively.     I   then   compared   the   similarity   of   the   promoter   regions  of  non-­‐conserved  miRNA  families  with  those  of  all  miRNA  families,  non-­‐conserved  miRNA  families   and   their   targets.   I   used   the   similarity   of   the   promoter   regions   of   all   miRNA   families   and   random   promoter  regions  as  the  control  group.  The  similarity  of  the  promoter  regions  of  non-­‐conserved  families  is   considerably   higher   than   other   groups   (Figure   2.14),   which   is   supportive   of   our   hypothesis   that   the   duplication  of  non-­‐conserved  miRNAs  had  included  the  promoter  regions  of  miRNAs.  

Figure   2.14  

Compare   the   alignability   of   the   promoter   regions   of   non-­‐conserved   miRNA   families   with   those   of   all   miRNA  families,  non-­‐conserved  miRNA  families  and  their  targets.  

 

The  role  of  miRNAs  as  a  part  of  gene  regulatory  machinery  has  been  demonstrated  by  recent  intensive   research   (Bartel,   2004;   Baulcombe,   2005).   However,   the   transcriptional   regulation   of   miRNA   genes   themselves  has  not  been  the  subject  of  extensive  research.  My  analysis,  which  detected  similarities  within   the   precursor   as   well   as   the   conserved   regions   within   the   promoter   sequences,   provides   additional   evidence   to   support   the   inverted   duplication   model   for   plant   microRNA   evolution.   In   addition,   the   detected   conserved   miRNA   upstream   motifs   represent   prime   candidates   to   study   the   regulation   of  

Arabidopsis   MIR157,   158,   163,   165,   405   and   447.   These   finding   suggests   that   the   initial   inverted  

duplication  event,  which  had  created  miRNA  from  its  targets,  has  included  the  promoter  region  of  target   genes.   For   expanded   miRNA   families   regulatory   diversification   through   modulation   of   cis   regulatory   elements  might  be  a  mechanism  leading  to  fixation  of  sequence  redundant  miRNA  genes.  In  analogy  to   duplicated  protein-­‐coding  genes  (Hurles,  2004)  promoter  elements  seem  to  be  shared  within  paralogous   MIR   genes.   This   permits   to   sketch   a   powerful   in   silico   approach   which   might   be   considered   for   the   experimental  and  in  silico  analysis  of  microRNA  promoters.    

This   chapter   mainly   focus   on   miRNA   genes.   The   topics   include   finding   miRNA   genes   on   a   genome   and   promoter  analysis  of  miRNA  genes  and  their  targets.  In  the  next  chapter,  I  will  present  another  kind  of   small  RNAs,  viral  derived  small  RNAs  (vsRNAs).  

Reference  

 

Allen,   E.,   Xie,   Z.,   Gustafson,   A.M.,   Sung,   G.H.,   Spatafora,   J.W.,   and   Carrington,   J.C.   (2004).   Evolution   of   microRNA   genes   by   inverted   duplication   of   target   gene   sequences   in   Arabidopsis   thaliana.   Nat   Genet   36,   1282-­‐1290.  

Axtell,  M.J.,  Snyder,  J.A.,  and  Bartel,  D.P.  (2007).  Common  functions  for  diverse  small  RNAs  of  land  plants.  Plant   Cell  19,  1750-­‐1769.  

Bartel,  D.P.  (2004).  MicroRNAs:  genomics,  biogenesis,  mechanism,  and  function.  Cell  116,  281-­‐297.   Baulcombe,  D.  (2005).  RNA  silencing.  Trends  Biochem  Sci  30,  290-­‐293.  

Bonnet,   E.,   Wuyts,   J.,   Rouze,   P.,   and   Van   de   Peer,   Y.   (2004).   Detection   of   91   potential   conserved   plant   microRNAs  in  Arabidopsis  thaliana  and  Oryza  sativa  identifies  important  target  genes.  Proc  Natl  Acad  Sci  U  S  A  

101,  11511-­‐11516.  

Borchert,  G.M.,  Lanier,  W.,  and  Davidson,  B.L.  (2006).  RNA  polymerase  III  transcribes  human  microRNAs.  Nat   Struct  Mol  Biol  13,  1097-­‐1101.  

Chaudhury,   A.   (2005).   Plant   genetics:   hothead   healer   and   extragenomic   information.   Nature   437,   E1;   discussion  E2.  

Griffiths-­‐Jones,  S.  (2004).  The  microRNA  Registry.  Nucleic  Acids  Res  32,  D109-­‐111.  

Gustafson,   A.M.,   Allen,   E.,   Givan,   S.,   Smith,   D.,   Carrington,   J.C.,   and   Kasschau,   K.D.   (2005).   ASRP:   the   Arabidopsis  Small  RNA  Project  Database.  Nucleic  Acids  Res  33,  D637-­‐640.  

Haberer,  G.,  Hindemitt,  T.,  Meyers,  B.C.,  and  Mayer,  K.F.  (2004).  Transcriptional  similarities,  dissimilarities,  and   conservation  of  cis-­‐elements  in  duplicated  genes  of  Arabidopsis.  Plant  Physiol  136,  3009-­‐3022.  

Hindemitt,   T.,   and   Mayer,   K.F.   (2005).   CREDO:   a   web-­‐based   tool   for   computational   detection   of   conserved   sequence  motifs  in  noncoding  sequences.  Bioinformatics  21,  4304-­‐4306.  

Hurles,  M.  (2004).  Gene  duplication:  the  genomic  trade  in  spare  parts.  PLoS  Biol  2,  E206.  

Jones-­‐Rhoades,   M.W.,   and   Bartel,   D.P.   (2004).   Computational   identification   of   plant   microRNAs   and   their   targets,  including  a  stress-­‐induced  miRNA.  Mol  Cell  14,  787-­‐799.  

Kurihara,  Y.,  and  Watanabe,  Y.  (2004).  Arabidopsis  micro-­‐RNA  biogenesis  through  Dicer-­‐like  1  protein  functions.   Proc  Natl  Acad  Sci  U  S  A  101,  12753-­‐12758.  

Lee,  Y.,  Kim,  M.,  Han,  J.,  Yeom,  K.H.,  Lee,  S.,  Baek,  S.H.,  and  Kim,  V.N.  (2004).  MicroRNA  genes  are  transcribed   by  RNA  polymerase  II.  EMBO  J  23,  4051-­‐4060.  

Li,   W.X.,   Oono,   Y.,   Zhu,   J.,   He,   X.J.,   Wu,   J.M.,   Iida,   K.,   Lu,   X.Y.,   Cui,   X.,   Jin,   H.,   and   Zhu,   J.K.   (2008).   The   Arabidopsis   NFYA5   transcription   factor   is   regulated   transcriptionally   and   posttranscriptionally   to   promote   drought  resistance.  Plant  Cell  20,  2238-­‐2251.  

Llave,  C.,  Xie,  Z.,  Kasschau,  K.D.,  and  Carrington,  J.C.  (2002).  Cleavage  of  Scarecrow-­‐like  mRNA  targets  directed   by  a  class  of  Arabidopsis  miRNA.  Science  297,  2053-­‐2056.  

Lolle,   S.J.,   Victor,   J.L.,   Young,   J.M.,   and   Pruitt,   R.E.   (2005).   Genome-­‐wide   non-­‐mendelian   inheritance   of   extra-­‐genomic  information  in  Arabidopsis.  Nature  434,  505-­‐509.  

Documento similar