CAPÍTULO IV. Diagnóstico y análisis de la situación actual
4.1. Procedimientos realizados en el eje estratégico educación continua
4.1.4. Remuneración de los instructores externos
A wide range of techniques havebeendeveloped toquantify groundwater-surface
water interactions. The methods can be grouped into the following five categories:
1) directmeasurements of water flux, 2) heat tracermethods, 3) methods basedon
Darcy’sLaw,4)massbalanceapproaches,and5)modelingapproaches. Toachievethe
best representationoflocaland/or regionalstream-aquifer interactions, acombination
of small- and large-scalemethods isrecommended (Brodieet al., 2007;Kalbus etal.,
2006;Menci´oet al., 2014; Rosenberry and LaBaugh, 2008).
2.3.1 DirectMeasurementof Water Flux
Direct measurement of water flux across the stream-aquifer interface can be
accomplished using seepage meters or similar devices. Bag-type seepage meters
are most common and consist of a bottomless cylinder vented to an expandable
plastic bag (Kalbus et al., 2006). The cylinder is inserted into the streambed and
seepage rate ismeasured by calculating thechange in watervolume inthe bagover
a measured time interval. Although seepage meters are an inexpensive technique
for assessing water flux, thebag-type method canlead to inaccuraciesin measured
flux when water flowing over the bag causes it to become distorted (Brodie et al.,
2007). Therefore, numerous types of automatedseepage metershave been developed
to overcome issues related to the collection bags including heat pulse, ultra-sonic,
are useful for identifying groundwater recharge and discharge zones, the applicability
of such instruments instreams islow because of challengesencountered in obtaining
representativeaverageseepagefluxesduetotheinherentvariabilityinstreamdischarge
and hyporheic exchange flow. Additionally, numerousmeasurements arerequired to
effectively characterize flux alonga given stream reach (Menci´o etal., 2014).
2.3.2 HeatTracer Methods
Heat tracermethods can be used to quantify water fluxes at the stream-aquifer
interfaceandtodelineategroundwaterrechargeordischargezones(Menci´oetal.,2014).
Heat tracer methods are appealing because they necessitate little to no alteration
of the environment (Somers et al., 2016). Such methods utilize fiber-optic cables
or node-like temperature loggers installed in the water column to record stream
temperature(Somers et al., 2016). Stream temperatures varyon a daily andseasonal
basis, whereasthe temperatureofgroundwater remains relativelyconstantthroughout
the year if there is limited groundwater pumping and evapotranspiration (Anderson,
2005;Kalbus etal., 2006). Temperature monitoring in thestream and surrounding
sediments can therefore indicate gaining and losing stream reaches (groundwater
discharge and recharge zones, respectively). Furthermore, when combined with an
analytical or numerical solution forthe heat transport equation, heattracer methods
can be used toquantify seepage fluxes throughstreambed sediments (Brodie et al.,
2007; Somers et al., 2016). Information on the movement of heat also helps to
constrain the calibration of a groundwaterflow model by providing additional data
(Anderson, 2005). The use of temperature measurements in groundwater research
has beensporadic, butwith improvedtemperature sensors andnumerical codes, its
usefulnessinhydrogeologicalsettingsisbeginningtoberevealed. Forexample, Suetal.
environmental tracer inthe Russian River, Sonoma County, California. Somerset al.
(2016) used heattracer methodsand a deterministic numericalstream temperature
model (HFLUX) to quantify the groundwater contributions to the Quilcay River, and
to understand the interactionbetween groundwater and surfacewater in aproglacial
valleyof the CordilleraBlanca, Peru.
2.3.3 Particle Size Analysisand Hydraulic Tests
Methods basedon Darcy’sLaware themost commonlyusedtoinvestigate ground-
watermovementin terrestrialaquifers (Kalbusetal.,2006;Menci´oet al.,2014). These
methodsrequirepointmeasurementsofthecomponentsoftheDarcyequation(Eq.2.3)
includingthehydraulic conductivityofthe aquiferandthehydraulicgradientbetween
the stream and the aquifer (Menci´o etal., 2014; Rosenberry and LaBaugh, 2008).
Determining the hydraulicconductivity of aquifermaterial canbe accomplishedin
alaboratory settingby performing grain-size analysesof sedimentsamples. Hydraulic
conductivitycanbederived fromthegrain-sizedistributionofasedimentsampleusing
empirical relationsbetween grain sizeand permeabilitysuch as theHazen (1892) or
Kozeny(1927) and Carman (1956)(Kozeny-Carman) equations. However, empirical
methods have been found to produce poor estimates when compared to measured
valuesfor several reasons the primary beingthat each equation ismost applicable for
the type of sediment used to derive it (Bradbury and Muldoon, 1990; Rosas et al.,
2014;Sahu and Saha, 2016).
Hydraulic conductivity can alsobe estimated from measurements of flow rate and
headinapermeameterfilledwithaquifersedimentsundersteady-state(constanthead)
or transient (falling head) conditions(Kalbus et al., 2006). Although permeameter
testsareeffectiveat determiningrelative differencesin hydraulicconductivitybetween
when comparedto valuesmeasured in situ. This islikely because sediment grains are
rearrangedwhenpackedintothepermeameterandlarge-scalefeaturessuchasfractures
and bedding arenot captured at the scale of thepermeameter sample(Bradbury and
Muldoon, 1990).
Alternatively, hydraulic conductivity can be determined by performing pumping,
slug,orbailtestsinawell. Duringapumpingtest,waterisabstracted fromawellata
constantrateanddrawdown(thechangeinhydraulicheadfromsomeinitialstateinan
aquifer)ismeasuredasafunctionoftime. Duringaslugorbailtest,aknownvolumeof
water isdisplacedor removed fromthe well,and as the waterlevel recovers,hydraulic
head is measured as a function of time (Kalbus et al., 2006). Several researchers
(Cardiffetal., 2011;Fox,2004;Hunt etal.,2001; Hunt,2003;KolletandZlotnik,2003;
Lough and Hunt, 2006; Nyholm et al., 2002, 2003; Poulsen et al., 2011) have used
such techniques in a rangeof hydrogeological settingsto estimateaquifer hydraulic
conductivity and to determine degree of stream-aquifer connectivity. Several of these
authors have made significant contributions to our understanding of groundwater-
surface water interactions by improving the applicability of established analytical
modelsandbyhighlighting someimportantfindingsfuture researchersshouldconsider.
For example, Poulsen et al. (2011) found that an important component inparameter
estimation bypumpingtestanalysisforunconfined aquiferswhenthe drainageprocess
is delayed is the use of a model that accounts for time-varying drainage from the
vadose zone (such as the models of Mishra and Neuman (2010) and Malama et al.
(2011)). KolletandZlotnik(2003)discoveredthatstreambedandaquiferheterogeneity
isthemajor cause fortheinconsistencies inparameter andstreamdepletion estimates.
LoughandHunt (2006)foundthatpumpingtestsmustbecarriedoutforasufficiently
longperiod oftime to allowleakage fromthe streamto have asignificant influence on
The other component of Darcy’s Lawrequired for the determinationof water flux
in the subsurface isthe hydraulicgradientbetween the streamand theaquifer. Deter-
mining the hydraulicgradient isusually accomplishedby measuring andcomparing
the waterlevel in wells andpiezometers installed in the fluvial plain to those installed
in thestream. Piezometers,with pressure transducers installed in them,provide point
measurementsof hydraulic headand have becomea standard method to determine
hydraulic head. The vertical and horizontal components of groundwater flow can be
determinedfromdifferencesinhydraulicheadbetweenindividualpiezometersinstalled
inclusters and at various depths(Kalbus etal., 2006). It has been shown that more
thanone piezometer or piezometer cluster isneeded forparameter estimation and for
evaluatingstreamdepletionrate(Kalbus etal.,2006;KolletandZlotnik,2003;Menci´o
et al., 2014). Baxter et al. (2003) proposed a new method for installing numerous
mini-piezometers in gravel and cobble streambeds to measure hydraulic head and
to estimate streambed hydraulic conductivity. Hydraulic potentiomanometer mea-
surements provideanadditional technique for measuring the vertical hydraulic-head
gradient beneath a surface water body and for estimating hydraulic conductivities
(Rosenberry and LaBaugh,2008). Lamontagne etal. (2014) successfully used adrive
point and manometersystem to measure pressure gradientsand estimate infiltration
through a riverbed ina semi-arid river basin insoutheastern Australia.
2.3.4 MassBalance Approaches
Mass balance methodologies have been developedbased onthe assumption that
anychange in the propertiesof surface water, or anygainor loss ofsurface water, can
be relatedto awater source, and,thus, the groundwatercomponent can beidentified
(Kalbus et al.,2006; Menci´o etal., 2014; Rosenberry and LaBaugh,2008). Method-
and solute tracer techniques. Theincremental streamflow method involves measuring
streamflow discharge at successive cross-sections during low flow conditions, and
associatingany change instreamflow to groundwater recharge ordischarge (Kalbus
et al., 2006). Thehydrograph separation technique has been the most widelyused of
the mass balance approaches due to the accessibility of data and involves separating
a stream hydrograph into its distinct runoff components, and then assuming that
baseflowsignifies groundwaterdischarge into the stream. Severalresearchers (Nyholm
etal., 2003; Rugel etal., 2012; Weberand Perry, 2006)have successfully used hydro-
graph separationto estimate streamflow depletion in vastlydifferent hydrogeological
environments. Hydrologicaltracers canbeusedto characterizewaterdynamics within
awatershedorstreamreachbydeterminingmixingandflowpaths,residencetime,and
inputs andoutputs within asystem (Rosenberry andLaBaugh, 2008). Environmental
tracer techniques utilize concentrations of isotopic and geochemical tracers, whereas
solute tracermethodsinvolve injecting a known amount of aconservative tracerinto
a stream or well. It has been noted that acombination of hydrologic data and tracer
tests produce the most reliable results(Kalbus etal., 2006; Menci´oet al., 2014).