2. FASE I INICIAL
2.2 D ESCRIPCIÓN GENERAL DE LOS R IESGOS N ATURALES EN LAS I SLAS C ANARIAS
2.2.3 Riesgo de inundación
2.2.3.2 Riesgos, Planes y legislación
two
eUbsequent p81'104&
During the first per10d
(JUne
to
(J'uly)
tho "loweat " averageenvi
rolll'Delltal
terJlleraturea werefound
tocorrespond to
"the
lowest" milkvield ( 23. 2
kg.Gl'OlJp
I) ,
the "highest " averagetenveraturoB
to the " lntermed
iate" vleld
( 24.. 2 kg. GroUp II) ,
and tho
"medium"teq>8reture
tothe
"highest" yleld ( 25 kg. Group .m).
Theopposite
wa etrue o� fat oontent ,
Group1 glv1ng the
higheetdal1,
yield
( 744 g. ) fol.lowed bV Group]l( 722 g. ) and Group iii
(6ga
g.)
.In
the 2nd pe
riod
(J�
to August) , 1t has been
stated,
continuous
grazing had
an untavourabl eetreot
on milk:rat
ma1nly
dueto "high
max1mumtenu>eraturee" , and in the
3rd per10d
( Augustto september)
housing b¥ dB¥
was found
to lower milk yield, eince hlgh
rnax1nn.u!1torrperaturee no
- 144 -
loneer occ�d. whUe housing by night increaaed both
mUk
yield and f'at, conten
t
" It i8 remarked
� the author toot" MUch
cows should. thererore.
be
protected h-om extremes ortCflt)eraturee
(
mnx1mum
in SUlIIner and m1n1nI1min
early 8W1IDeror
nut�)t:
In
this
Uporiment ot Harlessatroospherlc
tentJel'8tuztefJ have notbean mentioned
andthe "highest" ,
"low8st"
and
" intermediate" terlllerat
Ul'e8 ere vague terms.It heG been stated that
GroUp·I was
subjec
ted to
24 hours g1'8z1ng end consequently
to the
"lowest" envil'ODrlJl!fttaltelt1>eratures.
It
has not been mentioned whether � ahel terwas prov1ded to protect the animals
from sudden w
ea
ther
changes which alone, apart
f'rom
lo
w tenperature, might haveaffeoted production.
Moreover the 71el48 �m1lk
andbut
tel'-rat
8.l'8 notsuf'f'lciently d1
rterent
to show aDlmBl"ked
effec
tat
ten;>eratura andthis
d1fterenoein
production might be due to gro",
d1f'terencee.
'rhe best 1r87that
the
exper1ment could be done 1I8S ( 1 ) ftrsU¥ tooheck
the produc tion ot tho an1mBls 1n41vldually as well as a
S1'OUp un
de
r unitorm oontU. tlo
nsat
management and then( 2 )
t o subj ect
the
th:ree groupsot
an1mBl B t o the three tI'eatmenteseeing
thatall
the an1m8ls were ad
e�uate1J
ted acoordingto l ive
welght and production
and that other oon41tionsexoepting the variations 01' environmental t�eratures were
slrn1J.ar as
t
ar
aa l)Osalble.In
the secondperiod ot
this
obsenatlon the high rr1flX1nun ter.t>eraturo8 to whichthe ocnre
were�oeed
during continuous
day and
nightgrazing
had an unf'ayourebleeffect on
the milk fat
oontent. Theettect
ot
tfJrl'perntureon the butter-tat peroe
n
tage w1ll be dealt with later.Cont1nu1ne the oXpcrimont during w1nter ( Deoeniler - Febru.al7)
1Iarlass kept six Blaak Pied Lowland oows in 8 heated
b7l'8
at
six
d1tterenttemperatures.
It haa been stated that thehighest
m1lk yieldswere usually
fO\Dld atmec11um byre
- 14.-5 -
o 0 0 0 0 0
t emperatures -
16
C
{ 61 Fl , 15 C ( 5g
P)
and 100 ( 50
P) ;o 0 0
0
high tarqperuturea - 24
C ( 75 F) and 20
0(68 F) ,
and low o 0tOOl>el'stures -
6
C ( 43 PI)
- lowered milk �e1d. It hasbeen stated that the Beme was true of total fat, but low
b�e teq>eraturcs inoreased the tat pel'Centage. It was observed that "the IOOEf& eat1Bf'� otory
teltl>eratures tor
botho mille a1l(1 rnt perf'ormencc, therefore, ranged
between
10 Co 0 0
( 50 F) and 16 C ( 61 F). "
According to H8.l'lsSB the opt1rJllm range
at
environmental te1Jl)eratUl'8 to
r
max1mum product ion atm1lk
lqo 0 0
between
60 Ii' and 60 P' and
tenperatures aa low ae 43 F gavethe lowest yield. This
�pear8
to be cont1'ad1cto� to theresults obtained by Dice who tound thnt the
t�eratures
o 0
between 23 snd 53 P did not attect the ,
milk
y1eld �reolablJ.The
nwnber
of en1mals used by Harless - one tor eaoh tl'8at� - was very small � whether theen1mal e
were reversedhils
notbeen
mentioned.
Even breeddifference
might be a retrponslble t(�ctor torthis
difference 1nwitzel and Helzer , JJ.n1verslt� ot WisconSin, tladlson, stud1ed
t
he effectof
teq,erature on p roduction.They co�nred during two w1nt ers, two herds, each
ot 17
Holato1n-:trleslana, one kept in an insulated etcU barn and the
other
1n
an open pen barn. Menn outside teJll>eratureeo
0
were 40. a
:m1. �. 8 F
reapectlTely during thetwo
periodso
nnd in the sta1l barn the t�orature was 46-66 F. I
t
was stated that1n
the first 7ear ot the e�er1ment milk product1on in nal ther barn varied I'll th ohanges or terrq>erature but 1n thecold
open barn itaveraged 7. 4,G
less than 1n1bewarm
1naulate4 born..Dur1ne
the seoond year when the cowswere
distributed at random. the 1)roduot1on ot F. 0 .. M. '.Yen the
same1n
thewarm
and the cold bfl�
( 237)
Sinha and Minnet carried out obsGrYatlons at
- 146 -
milking
butraloes 1n order to ascertain whether alIl' relation shipexists between mdlk
yield and cooling ot the bo� b� daily wetting of the bo� surface. Fifteen buttaloee8-10 years were oelected so ae '0 obtain a group ot animal s
as near as possible to their maximal yield, Which 1s u8U8ll7
at about 90 days after calTing. Pour sets of obserYatlons were made over consecutive periods
ot
t en da7a each 4Ur1ng t� and June when the da1� oil' t8l'fl>el'6tures T81'led fromo 0
71
-
113 F.
DUring
thetiret
period the animels were splashed wlth bucketful s ot water tor five mlnu:t.es morning and evening every dfl¥ two hours betore m1llt1ng.
Bod¥
temperatures ot
tho en1mals were reoorded inmed1s:t.el7 betoreand
one-halt
hour after eplaehlng. During thesecond p
erlod
no splashing was dono. During the thlrd p erlod "the animals were d1T1ded
into
two sub-groups - one ot which was given dal1� �lash1ng and the othor none, their average duration ot lactation at this time being 106.2 and105. 6
�s r8s.peotlvel1 During the tourth period splashing wastoll
owed. Airterru:>eratures, relative hum1dlty, bo� tenl)e:ratUl'e Tariatlons,
the fall s in bo4y tenp eraturo after splashing and the oorresponcU.ng average milk yields were recorded every
roo
mingand
eYen1ng� The bo� t8nl>eratures after aplaahingo 0
dl'Opped b�
1
to4 P.
'l'he m1l1t �olds during aplaah1ng periods were ooopered al temateJ.y
with the 71elds during the pr80etU.ng and rollow1ng non-splash1ng per10ds ( this omitted the etrectof
stage or laotation on production) and al so the �ieldB o� the Bub-groUp 1 were compared with those ot the sub-groUp11
and the differenoes were stat1stically ennl1'sed. Data preoentod show that the ¥ie�da or theanimals when splashed were greater than when not splashed and in eve�
08e8
the dltterencea were h1g� slgn1t1c
ant. This experiment bears out the
�ortance at � wett1ng of cattl e during vexwy hot weather In tropical countries.- 147 -
When this is not pI-actloed as a da� routine the' milk yield deoI-eaees. AS hae
been
de
alt l'11th elsewhere the heatdissipation or tho cattle
becomes
ditrloul
t when the air ot� ereture ri ses above
70
P or eo, normal p�alologlcalt'Unctions or
theanimal
are disturbed; the b� tenpel'Bturerises and the m1lk production sutter&
The effeotiveness ot artificial oooling ot the dalr.y COW8 In overcom1ng the depressing cffecto which the lone continued periods of hot waather havo �on milk production
( 238)
was reported tram Georgia F-"qler1mental Station.
In
thisexperiment tho covs wero art1tioleJ.ly oooled b;r covering them during the day with light 11Ilal1n oloths
kapt
lJI)i3t to Bt1nal1- ate co
olingby
evaporation. It was found that oontinued hotweather
(
temperature no t mentioned)
\ms the inportant factorin depressing the milk
y1elds
end art1flc1al cooling wasdecidedly effective 1n oao1ng the situation end � bad effects