Empirical and theoretical dens.
Data Density 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 −50 0 50 100 150 0 20 40 60 80 100 Q−Q plot Theoretical quantiles Empir ical quantiles 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Empirical and theoretical CDFs
CDF 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P−P plot Empir ical probabilities
Figure B.1: Normal distribution fit for displayed anger levels of the audience
Empirical and theoretical dens. Data Density 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 −50 0 50 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Q−Q plot Theoretical quantiles Empir ical quantiles 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Empirical and theoretical CDFs
Data CDF 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P−P plot Theoretical probabilities Empir ical probabilities
Figure B.2: Normal distribution fit for displayed happiness levels of the audience
Histogram and theoretical densities
engagement scores Density 0 2 4 6 8 10 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Normal 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 Q−Q plot Theoretical quantiles Empir ical quantiles Normal
Figure B.3: Normal distribution fit for engagement scores
Empirical and theoretical dens.
Data Density 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 20 40 60 80 0 1 2 3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Q−Q plot Theoretical quantiles Empir ical quantiles 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Empirical and theoretical CDFs
CDF 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P−P plot Empir ical probabilities
Figure B.4: Lognormal distribution fit for head, torso and hands average velocity of the audience
Empirical and theoretical dens. Data Density 0 2 4 6 8 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 10 20 30 02468 Q−Q plot Theoretical quantiles Empir ical quantiles 0 2 4 6 8 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Empirical and theoretical CDFs
Data CDF 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P−P plot Theoretical probabilities Empir ical probabilities
Figure B.5: Lognormal distribution fit for hands average velocity of the audience
Figures B.4 and B.5 show the distribution fits for body and hand average velocity of the audience. As seen in the plots the distributions mostly consist of zero-inflated data that occurred during the performance parts but also a few extreme values that mostly occurred during the non-performance parts but also due to sudden changes in the average velocity. This made it difficult to find a distribution that could fit well both low and high data points. However, the lognormal distribution was used in both GLMMs that gave us the best fit according to the Kolmogorv-Smirnov statistic.
Appendix C
Appendix C Study III Material
C.1
Performance Information
Choreography: Alexander Whitley Composer: Daniel Wohl
Video artist: Tal Rosner
Dramaturge: Sasha Milavic-Davies Costume: Merle Hesnel
Lighting: Jackie Shemesh Lead scientist: Hugh Mortimer
Figure C.1: Advertising pictures from the performance "8minutes" directed by Alexander Whitley
C.2
Ethical Approval
Queen Mary, University of London
Room W117
Queen’s Building
Queen Mary University of London
Mile End Road
London E1 4NS
Queen Mary Ethics of Research Committee
Hazel Covill
Research Ethics Administrator
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7882 7915
Email: [email protected]
c/o Prof. Pat Healey C.S. 410
School of Electronic Engineering
and Computer Science
Mile End
London 8th June 2017
To Whom It May Concern:
Re: QMREC1591 – Exploring Audience Behaviour during Contemporary Dance Performances
I can confirm that Lida Theodorou has completed a Research Ethics Questionnaire with regard to the above research.
The result of which was the conclusion that his proposed work does not present any ethical concerns; is extremely low risk; and thus does not require the scrutiny of the full Research Ethics Committee.
Yours faithfully
Mr Jack Biddle – Research Approvals Advisor Patron: Her Majesty the Queen
Incorporated by Royal Charter as Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London
C.3
Survey I: General evaluation of the piece
No1- General Evaluation of the Piece.pdf
27/07/2018 Survey No1: General Evaluation of the Piece
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdBbJ66yGjmkUJrjywd2DKu-GITUA_T2iCP5KhH8Q-lfsM0Rw/viewform 1/5
Survey No1: General Evaluation of the
Piece
Thank you very much for participating in our study. This is the first survey you will be asked to complete.
The questions are mostly relevant to the performance you saw tonight. This survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete.
If you have any further questions please get in touch with Lida Theodorou at:
Thank you!
* Required
Please indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree with the statements below by selecting the appropriate button. Please read each statement carefully before making your decision.
Strongly Agree Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Full name *
Your answer
No1-2.pdf
27/07/2018 Survey No1: General Evaluation of the Piece
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdBbJ66yGjmkUJrjywd2DKu-GITUA_T2iCP5KhH8Q-lfsM0Rw/viewform 3/5 Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I felt tired and uninterested *
I hardly noticed time passing during the session *
No1-3.pdf
27/07/2018 Survey No1: General Evaluation of the Piece
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdBbJ66yGjmkUJrjywd2DKu-GITUA_T2iCP5KhH8Q-lfsM0Rw/viewform 4/5 Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree
Strongly Disagree
---
Yes, I had some favourite parts
No, I equally liked/disliked all the performance Not sure
Yes, I found some parts boring
No, I equally liked/disliked all the performance Not sure
I found the performance boring *
Were there specific parts or elements of the performance that you liked the most? *
If yes, can you describe your favourite parts/elements in a few words? *
Your answer
Were there specific parts of the performance that made you feel bored or elements that you disliked? *
If yes, can you describe your least favourite parts/elements in a few words? *
No1-4.pdf
27/07/2018 Survey No1: General Evaluation of the Piece
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdBbJ66yGjmkUJrjywd2DKu-GITUA_T2iCP5KhH8Q-lfsM0Rw/viewform 5/5 Never submit passwords through Google Forms.
This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google. Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms
Please use the space below to leave any other comments you may have about the performance or your experience during it.
Your answer
SUBMIT