4.12 IMPACTO SOCIAL
4.12.2 Salud y seguridad ocupacional
Description: Filmmaker #1 is a mid-career videographer from the West Coast who collaborated with three other filmmaking staff (Editor, Composer, Producer) to create a minimal-budget documentary about a controversial artist. The production team spent four years developing and shooting the film, which has traveled the film festival circuit, winning awards at three festivals. Film type: Full-length feature documentary
Contextual materials identified: website, social media, film festival materials
Case #2
Description: Filmmaker #2 is an overseas, later-career filmmaker who has had documentaries screened in U.S. festivals. Their most recent film was a short that screened globally at festivals from 2016-2018. They have had a successful series of films and tend to screen at better-known festivals; in that sense, they bring a more international, veteran perspective to film projects. Film type: short documentary
Contextual materials identified: website, Facebook, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #3
Description: Filmmaker #3 is a mid-career filmmaker based in California. They are primarily into animation but recently created a documentary that screened online and featured their grandfather’s story. Their perspective differs from the other filmmakers in the study in that the types of technologies they have used for filmmaking in the past relate primarily to fiction film and animated shorts.
Film type: short animated documentary
Contextual materials identified: website, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #4
Description: Filmmaker #4, an early-career filmmaker based in Toronto, Canada, recently screened a short documentary film on the film festival circuit that focused on the lives of artists with cerebral palsy. Their film project emerged from a film school project and came together fairly rapidly in 2016, premiering in 2018 and getting nominated for awards at the Miami Film festival.
Film type: short documentary
Contextual materials identified: filmmaker website, Facebook, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #5
Description: Filmmaker #5 is part of a two-person team that originates from North Carolina. The team shares shooting, editing, and other production tasks, and works with external partners for sound design and color tech. Both mid-career professional filmmakers, they have been active since the early 2000s. A recent documentary film screened this year on PBS; their work has garnered several awards since being screened at over twenty festivals.
Film type: Feature documentary
Contextual materials identified: filmmaker website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #6
Description: Filmmaker #6 is based in the Midwest and most recently launched a film about an underground wrestling organization, with a particular focus on the story of a wrestler’s life in the post-industrial Pacific Northwest. The filmmaker works in both fiction and documentary
filmmaking and works as a programming official at a major documentary film festival. Their experience screening and programming documentaries provided a unique lens on the digital documentary landscape, as they have a sense of the wide range of documentaries currently produced.
Film type: Feature documentary
Contextual materials identified: filmmaker website, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #7
Description: Filmmaker #7 is a late-career filmmaker from the West Coast of the U.S. As a veteran fiction filmmaker with a specialized interest in fine art photography, they have produced and screened dozens of films or TV shows in a wide range of genres. Their recent short film, which was the result of a collaboration with a wide range of technical and filmmaking talent while being produced with only a minimal budget, celebrated the activists who promoted the preservation of a river site near San Diego. The filmmaker did not attend film school but discovered documentary production through other artistic pursuits.
Film type: Short documentary
Case #8
Description: Filmmaker #8 is also a late-career, well-established videographer and documentary producer who began their career making films with 16mm film stock after attending film school. As such, their perspective encompasses the transition from film to digital production and
distribution methods. Their current projects include both “reality” tv shows, animated features, and educational/documentary productions. In addition, the filmmaker serves as a mentor to younger filmmakers and is interested in supporting community-building in the industry. Film type: Feature documentary
Contextual materials identified: Amazon distribution, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #9
Description: Filmmaker #9 collaborates with one production partner (videographer) on artist- profile documentaries, among other projects. A mid-career filmmaker who has also worked as a print journalist, they have developed several small-scale, independent features that have been screened at documentary festivals. Their films explore the lives of creative artists and musicians and have won Emmy Awards as well as several film festival awards.
Film type: Short documentary
Contextual materials identified: website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #10
Description: Filmmaker #10 works as a consultant on the distribution side of the documentary filmmaking industry, providing technical assistance and post-production services to nonfiction filmmakers and production companies. Their work in distribution has led to involvement in post-
production and distribution roles for a wide range of projects, from small-scale, micro-budget documentaries to theatrically-released, feature-length productions. Not a film-school graduate, they earned an MS in digital media and have gained key technical skills by working in various roles within the industry.
Film type: N/A (not an active producer/videographer) Contextual materials identified: N/A
Case #11
Description: Filmmaker #11 is an international filmmaker, now based in NYC, whose works have been distributed and screened in the U.S., at festivals and online. Relatively early-career, they have primarily worked in fiction filmmaking but have recently produced and screened a personal documentary about a beloved family member. The filmmaker attended film school in NYC and dabbled in a wide range of filmmaking styles, from comedy to short fiction pieces. Their recent documentary has won many festival awards and is now widely available via commercial streaming/download sites.
Film type: Short documentary
Contextual materials identified: website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #12
Description: Filmmaker #12 is a solo artist and the only respondent who is also a full-time professor of filmmaking. A mid-career filmmaker from the Southeast, their documentary shorts have been screened widely and won awards at festivals; films focus on portraits of interesting, quirky individuals she encounters while traveling (“small folks,” as they describe it). They
describe their filmmaking journey as one that is learned on the job, mostly a solo venture but sometimes collaborative depending on the project.
Film type: Short documentary
Contextual materials identified: website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #13
Description: Filmmaker #13 is an early-career documentary filmmaker based on the West Coast who recently completed their first feature-length documentary about the condition of stuttering. The film has completed its festival circuit run and will be distributed commercially in the near future. As a relatively new documentarian, they have much to say about the process of learning to develop and distribute films in the digital era.
Film type: Feature documentary
Contextual materials identified: website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube/Vimeo
Case #14
Description: Filmmaker #14 is a recent PhD candidate who developed an interactive
documentary in collaboration with the Red Cross. Their dissertation work focused on both the theory and practice of interactive documentaries and has been recognized by a wide range of institutions and awards. #14 provides critical context and commentary about the history and development of the i-docs sub-genre.
Film type: interactive, web-based documentary
REFERENCES
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. (2007). The Digital Dilemma. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. (2012). The Digital Dilemma II.
Almeida, A., & Alvelos, H. (2010b). An Interactive Documentary Manifesto. In R. Aylett, M. Y. Lim, S. Louchart, P. Petta, & M. Riedl (Eds.), Interactive Storytelling (pp. 123–128). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16638-9_16
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (2012). Space Data and Information Transfer Systems - Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Retrieved 03/15/2020 from https://www.iso.org/standard/56510.html
Aufderheide, P. (2015). Interactive Documentaries: Navigation and Design. Journal of Film and Video, 67(3), 69–78. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/593949/summary
Barwick, J., Dearnley, J., & Muir, A. (2011). Playing Games with Cultural Heritage: A Comparative Case Study Analysis of the Current Status of Digital Game Preservation.
Games and Culture, Vol. 6, pp. 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010391092 Besser, H. (2013). Archiving Aggregates of Individually Created Digital Content: Lessons from
Archiving the Occupy Movement. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, Vol. 42. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2013-0005
Brand, B. (2012). Artist as Archivist in the Digital Transition. The Moving Image: The Journal of the Association of Moving Image Archivists, 12(1), 92–95.
https://doi.org/10.5749/movingimage.12.1.0092
Bonn, M., Kendall, L., & McDonough, J. (2016). Preserving intangible heritage: Defining a research agenda. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
53(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301009
Bordwell, D. (2013). Pandora’s Digital Box: Films, Files, and the Future of Movies. Irvington Way Institute Press.
Boutard, G. (2015). Towards mixed methods digital curation: facing specific adaptation in the artistic domain. Archives Des Sciences / Editees Par La Societe de Physique et D’histoire Naturelle de Geneve, 15(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9218-0
Boutard, G. (2016a). Co-construction of meaning, creative processes and digital curation.
Journal of Documentation, Vol. 72, pp. 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/jdoc-09-2015- 0121
Boutard, G. (2016b). Co-construction of meaning, creative processes and digital curation: The transmission of music with live electronics. Journal of Documentation, 72(4), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0121
Carletti, L. (2016). Participatory Heritage: Scaffolding Citizen Scholarship. International Information & Library Review, 48(3), 196–203.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1205367
Carta, G. (2017). Metadata and video games emulation: an effective bond to achieve authentic preservation? Records Management Journal, 27(2), 192–204.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-10-2016-0037
Center for Research Libraries (2020). TRAC Metrics. Retrieved 3/15/2020 at
https://www.crl.edu/archiving-preservation/digital-archives/metrics-assessing-and- certifying/trac
Cohen D, Crabtree B. "Qualitative Research Guidelines Project." July 2006. http://www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html
Connaway, L. S., & Powell, R. R. (2010). Basic Research Methods for Librarians, Fifth Edition. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ii8Y6GPMudkC
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2012). Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS). Retrieved 03/15/2020 from
https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf.
Crisp, V. (2015). Film Distribution in the Digital Age: Pirates and Professionals. Retrieved from https://market.android.com/details?id=book-zJ6FCwAAQBAJ
Deazley, R., & Stobo, V. (2013). Archives and Copyright: Risk and Reform. CREATe Working. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74404026.pdf
Dekker, A. (2013). Enjoying the gap: comparing contemporary documentation strategies.
Preserving and Exhibiting Media Art: Challenges and Perspectives, 150–169.
Dinmore, S. (2014). The real online: database documentary in the knowledge space. Journal of Media Practice, 15(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2014.960765 Dixon, L. J. (2015). The influence of the World Wide Web on documentary form, distribution,
and audience relations: the cases of Sin by Silence and This is Not a Conspiracy Theory. Retrieved from https://utexas-ir.tdl.org/handle/2152/31664
Doane, M. A. (2002). The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Retrieved from https://market.android.com/details?id=book-_RaoHSs1kcMC
Dovey, J., & Rose, M. (2013). “This Great Mapping of Ourselves”: New Documentary Forms Online. The Documentary Film Book, pp. 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349- 92625-1_41
Fallon, K. (2013). Archives analog and digital: Errol Morris and documentary film in the digital age. Screening: Journal of the International Society of Neonatal Screening, 54(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjs067
Fauconnier, S., & Frommé, R. (2004). Capturing Unstable Media. Archives & Museum Informatics, 2. Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c48d/e0d440b9a05e5e4d88c62752cf41277118ca.pdf Fossati, G. (2009). From Grain to Pixel: The Archival Life of Film in Transition. Retrieved from
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=f0XRBAajCkMC
Giannachi, G. (2015). Documenting the user experience. Open Research Exeter. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10871/18428
Gifreu-Castells, A. (2014). Mapping Trends in Interactive Non-fiction through the Lenses of Interactive Documentary. Interactive Storytelling, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-12337-0_16
Hancock, D. (2015, March 27). The final push to global digital cinema conversion. Retrieved September 1, 2019, from IHS Markit website: https://technology.ihs.com/527960/the- final-push-to-global-digital-cinema-conversion
Haskins, E. (2007). Between Archive and Participation: Public Memory in a Digital Age.
Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940601086794 Hight, C. (2008). The field of digital documentary: a challenge to documentary theorists. Studies
in Documentary Film, 2(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1386/sdf.2.1.3_2
Hight, C., & Harindranath, R. (2014). Documentary as sense-making. Studies in Documentary Film, 8(3), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2014.964950
Besser, H. (n.d.). Archiving Aggregates of Individually Created Digital Content: Lessons from Archiving the Occupy Movement. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, ISSN (Online) 2195-2965, ISSN (Print) 2195-2957, DOI: Https://doi. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/pdtc.2013.42.issue-1/pdtc-2013-0005/pdtc-2013- 0005.xml
Innocenti, P. (2012). Preventing Digital Casualties: An Interdisciplinary Research for Preserving Digital Art. Leonardo, 45(5), 472–473. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00448
Innocenti, P. (2012). Bridging the gap in digital art preservation: interdisciplinary reflections on authenticity, longevity and potential collaborations. Retrieved
from:http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/29784/1/Innocenti%20-
%20Bridging%20the%20gap%20in%20digital%20art%20preservation.pdf
International Research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems (InterPARES). Accessed 01/01/2018 at http://www.interpares.org
Jain, R. (2003). Experiential computing. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, p. 48. https://doi.org/10.1145/792704.792729
Juhasz, A. (2014). Ceding the Activist Digital Documentary. In K. Nash, C. Hight, & C.
Summerhayes (Eds.), New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses (pp. 33–49). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310491_3
Kalafatoğlu, Ş. (2016). Opportunities and Innovations Introduced by Digital Age in Documentary Films. Retrieved from
http://earsiv.odu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11489/530
Knight, J. (2012). Archiving, Distribution, And Experimental Moving Image Histories. The Moving Image: The Journal of the Association of Moving Image Archivists, 12(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.5749/movingimage.12.1.0065
La Barre, K., & de Novais Cordeiro, R. I. (2016) Film retrieval on the web: sharing, naming, access and discovery. Managing Digital Cultural Objects, pp. 199–218.
https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301539.010
Lee, C. A. (2007). Taking context seriously: A framework for contextual information in digital collections. UNC SILS TR-2007-04. Retrieved from
http://jasper.ils.unc.edu/sites/default/files/general/research/TR_2007_04.pdf
Lee, C. A. (2011). A framework for contextual information in digital collections. Journal of Documentation, 67(1), 95–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111105470
Lee, C. A., Capra, R., Clemens, R., & Sheble, L. (2008). I Know it’s important, but what am I looking at? Strategies for Using Blog Content to Contextualize YouTube Videos. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/42494470/CalLee-SAA- ResearchPaper-2008.pdf
Lee, C. A., & Tibbo, H. R. (2008). Capturing the moment: Strategies for selection and collection of web-based resources to document important social phenomena. Archiving: Final Program and Proceedings. IS & T’s Archiving Conference, 2008(1), 300–305. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ist/ac/2008/00002008/00000001/art00060 Lee, J. H., Clarke, R. I., & Perti, A. (2015). Empirical evaluation of metadata for video games
and interactive media. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,66(12), 2609–2625. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23357
Lenk, S. (2014). Archives and Their Film Collection in a Digital World; or, What Futures for the Analog Print? The Moving Image: The Journal of the Association of Moving Image Archivists, 14(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5749/movingimage.14.2.0100
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=2oA9aWlNeooC
Lozano-Hemmer, R. (2015). Best Practices for Conservation of Media Art from an Artist’s Perspective. Retrieved 3/15/2020 from https://github.com/antimodular/Best-practices-for- conservation-of-media-art
Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=G-4EyYR-QgMC
Manovich, L. (2011). There is only software. Doing Cultural Studies: the story of the Sony Walkman, 136-138.
Marçal, H. P. (2012). Embracing transience and subjectivity in the conservation of complex contemporary artworks: contributions from ethnographic and psychological paradigms. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Retrieved from http://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/8467 Marchionini, G., & Others. (2009). VidArch. Preserving Video Objects and Context, Final
Report. Online report. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
http://sils.unc.edu/research/publications/reports/TR-2009-01.pdf (accessed 20 Sept 2017). McCammon, B. (2017). Semi-structured interviews. Design Research Techniques. Retrieved
from http://designresearchtechniques.com/casestudies/semi-structured-interviews/ Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and
implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research: L-z; index (Vol. 1). Sage.
Molloy, L. (2014). Digital curation skills in the performing arts – an investigation of practitioner awareness and knowledge of digital object management and preservation. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 10(1), 7–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2014.912496
Nash, K., Hight, C., & Summerhayes, C. (2014). New Documentary Ecologies: Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses. Retrieved from
https://market.android.com/details?id=book-qqUAAwAAQBAJ
National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA). 2018. Levels of Digital Preservation. Retrieved 03/15/2020 from https://ndsa.org/publications/levels-of-digital-preservation/
Newman, J. (2011). (Not) Playing Games: Player-Produced Walkthroughs as Archival
Documents of Digital Gameplay. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 109– 127. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.206
Newman, J. (2011). Sustaining community archives. Comma, 2011(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2011.1.08
Nichols, B. (1991). Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=Jq2cS7qARd8C
Nichols, B. (2017). Introduction to Documentary, Third Edition. Retrieved from https://market.android.com/details?id=book-auc6DgAAQBAJ
Ocak, E. (2014). New Media Documentary: Playing with Documentary Film within the Database Logic and Culture. A Digital Janus, 255.
O’Flynn, S. (2012). Documentary’s metamorphic form: Webdoc, interactive, transmedia, participatory and beyond. Studies in Documentary Film, 6(2), 141–157.
https://doi.org/10.1386/sdf.6.2.141_1
O’Flynn, S. (2015). Designed Experiences in Interactive Documentaries. Contemporary Documentary. Retrieved from
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ePSoCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT120& dq=Designed+Experiences+Interactive+Documentaries+O%27Flynn&ots=Ti_W4Reh_U &sig=BvWHEU7g4rHzX5ghaQW25T9zXbg
Parikka, J. (2013). What is media archaeology? John Wiley & Sons. Pickard, A. J. (2013). Research methods in information. Facet publishing.
Pietrobruno, S. (2013). YouTube and the social archiving of intangible heritage. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1259–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812469598
Raijmakers, B., Gaver, W. and Bishay, J. (2006). "Design documentaries: inspiring design research through documentary film." In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, pp. 229-238. ACM.
Rascaroli, L., Young, G., & Monahan, B. (2014). Amateur Filmmaking: The Home Movie, the Archive, the Web. Retrieved from https://market.android.com/details?id=book-
oVbOAgAAQBAJ
Ray, J. M. (2014). Research Data Management: Practical Strategies for Information Professionals. Retrieved from
Rinehart, R. (2007). The Media Art Notation System: Documenting and Preserving
Digital/Media Art. Leonardo, 40(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2007.40.2.181 Rogers, A. (2012). “You Don’t So Much Watch It As Download It”: Conceptualizations of
Digital Spectatorship. Film History, 24(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.2979/filmhistory.24.2.221
Rollason-Cass, S., & Reed, S. (2015). Living Movements, Living Archives: Selecting and Archiving Web Content During Times of Social Unrest. New Review of Information