8. DISEÑO METODOLOGICO PRELIMINAR
9.7. SIMULACIÓN DEL MODELO Y ANALISIS DE RESULTADOS
2D 2-dimensional
3D 3-dimensional
Ab Antibody
BAC Bacterial Artificial Chromosome
Bp Base pair
BrdU 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine
BSA Bovine Serum Albumine
CCD Charge-Coupled Device
CENP-A,-B,-C Centromeric Proteins -A,-B,-C
ChIP Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
cm centimeter
CT Chromosome Territory
DAPI 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
Dig Digoxigenine
DNMT DNA Methyl Transferase
d H2O de-ionized water
dd H2O ultrapure water
DMEM Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
DNA Deoxyribo-Nucleic Acid
Dnase Deoxyribo-nuclease
DOP-PCR Degenerate Oligonucleotid Primer-Polymerase Chain Reaction
dUTP deoxyuridine-triphosphate
EDTA Ethylendiamintetraacetat
EtOH Ethanol
EZH Enhancer of Zeste
FA Formaldehyde
FCS Fetal Calf Serum
FISH Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
FITC Fluorescein-isothiocyanat
HAT Histone Acetyl Transferase
HDAC Histone Deacetylase
h.c.a. highly cross adsorbed
HEPES N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazin-N’-2-ethanesulfonic acid
HFb Human Fibroblasts
HMT Histone Methyl-Transferase
HSA Homo Sapiens Autosome
HOX Homeobox genes
HP-1 Heterochromatin Protein-1
IF Immunofluorescence
kb kilobase
LINE/SINE Long/Short Interspersed Nuclear Element
MCF-7 Mammary Carcinoma Fibroblasts
MEF Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts
Mb Megabase
ON Over Night
PBS Phosphate-Buffered Saline
PEV Position Effect Variegation
PcG Polycomb Group
PSF Point Spread Function
RAC Radial Autocorrelation Function
RNA Ribonucleic Acid
RPMI cell culture medium (Roswell Park Memorial Institute)
Rpm Rotations per minute
RT Room Temperature
SAM S-Adenosyl-Methionine
SET1/SET2 Proteins containing a SET-domain
SSC Sodium chloride Sodium Citrate
SUV 39 Suppressor of Variegation
Tris Tri(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane Triton X-100 Octylphenoldecaethylenglycolether Tween 20 Polyoxyethylensorbitanmonolaurat
Xa/Xi active X-chromosome/inactivated X-chromosome
wt wildtype
Xic X inactivation centre
9 Table of Figures
Figures
Fig. 1 Structural features of the IC-CT model -4-
Fig. 2 The packing of DNA and nucleosomes to higher chromatin folding levels -6-
Fig. 3 Lysine methylation sites on histones H3 and H4 -13- Fig. 4 Histone methyltransferases and their substrates -13- Fig. 5 Partitioning of chromatin by histone lysine methylation -14-
Fig. 6 A schematic representation of the HP1 protein -17-
Fig. 7 Transmission images of DLD-1 cells -31- Fig. 8 BACs and paints of HSA #12 tested on metaphase spreads -41-
Fig. 9 Peptide competition assay: “normal” antibody pattern -44-
Fig. 10 Peptide competition assay: incubation with specific peptides -44- Fig. 11 Peptide competition assay: incubation with similar peptides -45- Fig. 12 Point spread function measured on the Leica SP2 -56-
Fig. 13 The impact of deconvolution on image restoration -59-
Fig. 14 H3K27me3 staining before and after deconolution (magnification) -60-
Fig. 15 Deconvolution facilitates threshold-setting -61- Fig. 16 Test for the consistency of co-localization analysis over a range of thresholds -62-
Fig. 17 Results of co-localization analysis delineated in a scatterplot -65- Fig. 18 Path in Image J to calculate Manders coefficients out of two channels -66- Fig. 19 Histone lysine methylation patterns of H3K4me3, H3K9me1 and H4K20me1
together with centromeres -70-
Fig. 20 Histone lysine methylation patterns of H3K9me3, H3K27me3 and H4K20me3
together with centromeres -72-
Fig. 21 Quantitative overlap-assessment of centromeres and different histone
lysine methylation sites -73- Fig. 22 Spatial relation between different histone lysine methylation sites and nascent RNA -75-
Fig. 23 3D reconstructions of H4K20me3 staining patterns incycling and quiescentcells -76-
Fig. 24 Comparison of different lysine methylation sites in cycling and quiescent cells
by RAC analysis -77- Fig. 25 Comparison of differently methylated histone sites by double immunostaining -80- Fig. 26 Distinct nuclear zones formed by histone methylation sites -82-
Fig. 27 Cell viability in the presence of different Chaetocin concentrations -84- Fig. 28 Replication labeling in control and Chaetocin treated cells -85-
__________________________________________________________
Fig. 29 Comparison of tubulin, B23, SC-35 and H3K9me3 anibody staining in untreated
cells and three days after Chaetocin incubation -86- Fig. 30 Confocal mid-sections of a HFb nucleus three days after Chaetocin treatment
and in control cells -87-
Fig. 31 H3K9me3 and DAPI pattern formation changes in HFbs but not in the cancer
cell-lines MCF-7 and DLD-1 -89- Fig. 32 Distribution of HP1-alpha in HFbs, DLD-1 and MCF-7 cells before and
after Chaetocin treatment -91-
Fig. 33 No reorganization of chromatin occurs after Chaetocin rescue -93- Fig. 34 3D-reconstruction of objects with a size of 500 and 1000 voxel -94- Fig. 35 Evaluation of H3K9me3 pattern size in HFbs before and after Chaetocin application -95-
Fig. 36 Evaluation of H3K9me3 pattern size in MCF-7 cells before and after Chaetocin
application -96-
Fig. 37 Evaluation of H3K9me3 pattern size in DLD-1 cells before and after Chaetocin
application -97-
Fig. 38 Ideogramms of human chromosomes HSA #18, 19 -98- Fig. 39 Immuno-FISH delineating H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 together withHSA #18 and 19 -99- Fig. 40 Immuno-FISH delineating H3K4me3 together withHSA #18 and 19 -100-
Fig. 41 Linescan through a X-chromosome territory -101-
Fig. 42 Ideogramms of human chromosomes HSA #12 and X -102- Fig. 43 Immuno-FISH of gene-rich/poor DNA segments of HSA #12 with H3K4me3 and of
highly expressed/repressed genes of HSA #12 with H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 -104-
Fig. 44 Immuno-FISH delineating X-territories and X-specific genes together with H3K27me3 -106- Fig. 45 The interexperimental differences of histone methylation sites -123-
Tables
Table 1 Properties of different types of chromatin -7/8- Table 2 Flow chart of different approaches for a new immuno-FISH protocol -48-
Table 3 Parameters for Zeiss LSM 410 -53/54- Table 4 Parameters for Leica SP2 -54- Table 5 General parameters for Huygens deconvolution program -57/58-
Table 6 Flow chart of the evaluation procedure after Chaetocin treatment -69-