Metodología de solución para proteger los derechos de autor.
2.1 Técnicas utilizadas para proteger imágenes.
The Warwick Institute for Employment Research Ethical Approval for Research
procedure was followed (see Appendix 16). Informed consent of participants was
secured by providing the intended participants with a comprehensive explanation of
what was involved in the research and his or her rights, such as to withdraw from the
activity at any time and to have privacy and confidentiality protected. In addition,
participants were provided with an information sheet with the researcher’s name and
contact details, and information on what participation involved, time required, and
usage of information. Informed consent was secured in writing before interviews, after
participants had been given information about the research and had time to consider
the implications of granting consent (see Appendix 17).
Data were handled with due attention paid to security and anonymity. As soon as
possible after the interviews were over, the recording was passed onto an encryption
software (Truecrypt vault) and deleted from the recording machine. All other
information from participants, such as resumes, was also held in a Truecrypt vault.
Emails were kept under secure passwords. Online diaries were protected with a
password only known by participants. The only people having access to the diaries
were each participant, the researcher, and web administrators assigned by
Warwick/IER. Hard copy diaries were held by participants during data collection.
handed to the researcher, it was made sure it was located in a safe place. At the same
time, diaries do not have names, rather codes (the codes are kept in a Truecrypt vault).
The constructivist approach based on narrative and joint reflection can lead to a
potential blurring between the domains of research and intervention. This posits an
ethical dilemma since the researcher may get involved in a situation where her role is
confused. This was approached with an ethic of care (Bimrose and Barnes, 2007;
Richardson, 2005), in which the research can be of benefit to the participants
(Haverkamp, 2005). When required, participants were provided with sources of
relevant information, and encouraged to explore their needs further with suitable
professionals. On a few occasions, participants asked my opinion about their careers. I
explained to them that this was not my role, but that we could have an informal
conversation about this once data collection was over. In these conversations, I mainly
discussed with them my knowledge of the labour market and challenges other people
in their positions were also experiencing. Most participants asked me to send the thesis
or other publication materials as they were very interested in reading about the
findings.
In accordance with an ethics of care, many participants commented that the research
process had been useful to them. For example, from the beginning, many participants
were excited about the diary writing request. They thought it would be a way to force
them to organise the process and deepen their reflections. In fact, Giddens (1991)
suggests that in modernity, reflexivity of the self is continuous, and that individuals
are asked to self-interrogate themselves in terms of what is happening regularly. One
participant had actually tried to keep a diary of his transition before but could not
enforce him to do something he had already wanted to do. Another participant
commented about her reflexivity:
“I am a very reflexive person, I have been doing therapy for many
years and I think all the time. But it is more like I think constantly and I
lose myself with lots of ideas, but it is not like getting to reflect and
think strategically. And this study forces you to think strategically. I
mean, drawing your networks makes you think strategically, who you
are contacting and why, in whom you are leveraging and why. So, it is
good, you learn, you learn about yourself.” (Participant 18, Follow-up
interview)
Related to learning, another participant said:
“I thought it was a very good experience, a really good experience. It
should be a type of exercise one ought to do, right? I mean, every now
and then say ‘let’s see, I stop for a second and I write how I feel, how I
see myself, what I learnt…’ I mean, then you read it and it is like you
start seeing lots of things that you don’t in other ways.” (Participant 26,
Follow-up interview)
Participants who did not write in the diaries were apologetic and said that the weekly
assignment was very hard for them but they enjoyed the interviews and were eager to
have more. One of them actually insisted in having an interview during the diary
keeping period (and so he had three interviews in total), also to feel that in this way he
was complying with the request.
As it is suggested in the previous quotes, the data collection techniques affected the
commented after the first interview that he was now more attentive to his transition
process.
“Today, after the interview, I felt very eager to find out what my place
in this organisation is and what my expectations are in this moment of
my life. The day was like all others, but my perspective was more acute
towards what I do and how I relate, in the context of ‘what I want’.”
(Participant 20, Diary)
This same participant wrote on the diary that reading what he had written over the
months helped him realise his situation and triggered further actions:
“If I revise what I do, what I wrote, what I have to do tomorrow and in
the next few weeks, I clearly rediscover that my responsibilities in this
organisation are of a lower hierarchy than what I have as a goal for this
time in my professional life. Now, with this clear vision, I need to
consider: I either accept what I have or I look for what I want. We’ll
see.” (Participant 20, Diary)
Another participant commented:
“I’ve been doing an analysis of what I sent you, right? And there is a
common word in most of them: anxiety. And I thought ‘this is
something to reflect about’. Amazing. I swear I had not realised about
the issue until I wrote it on paper and read it and I said: ‘this is
something to work on’.” (Participant 23, Follow-up interview)
This level of reflexivity and moments of awareness may have affected the results as
the research process may have encouraged participants to be more reflective than the
aware that they reflect the transition process of a group of Argentinean MBA
graduates who had become particularly reflexive as a consequence of participating in
this study. This limits generalisation but nevertheless introduces important factors and
their links.