DIARIOS DE CAMPO
3. MARCO REFERENCIAL
3.1. Marco de antecedentes
3.1.5 El taller como potenciador de la lectura y la escritura
A mixed-reality based guidance system usually consists of the following major components:
pre-operative images or models, intra-operative images, tool tracking system, image processing
programs, and visualization programs (see Figure 1.11).
1.8.1
Pre-operative Images
Pre-operative images and models are mostly used for diagnosis and surgery planning. They
can also be integrated into the intra-operative guidance system to provide high quality im-
ages as enhancement to the intra-operative images. Pre-operatively defined models can also
provide useful information that may be difficult to obtain or to produce during the operation, such as planned surgical path, clearly defined target position, annotations of surrounding tis-
sues, and customized fusion and visualization of multiple images. However, the limitation of
pre-operative images is that they may not present the true intra-operative patient state. Many
factors differentiate pre-operative images from their intra-operative counterparts, such as dif- ferent imaging modalities, different scanning positions or poses, deformed tissues, surgical tool presence, and changes in lesions or surrounding tissues. Image registration techniques are
commonly required for using pre-operative images during the surgery.
1.8.2
Intra-operative Images
Intra-operative images show the true state of a patient during the surgery. They can be the
same or different imaging modalities as the pre-operative images. The importance of having intra-operative images is that they can show not only the anatomy and motion of the patient, but
also the surgical tools and the interaction between the tools and the tissues. The latter cannot
be found in the pre-operative images. However, it is a general requirement that the procedure
of obtaining an intra-operative image should not significantly interfere with the OR workflow.
Waiting half an hour or maybe even ten minutes to get an image is usually not acceptable in the
OR. Furthermore, in beating heart interventions, it is also important to show the real time heart
motion. Inside a beating heart, some tissues, such as valve leaflets, can move rapidly, requiring
high temporal resolution of the imaging modality, which means the scanning process for one
1.8.3
Tool Tracking Systems
Tool tracking systems continuously track the position and orientation of the surgical tools and
send the updated information to the guidance system. Common choices of tracking systems are
optical tracking, visual tracking, magnetic tracking, and image based tracking. Optical tracking
systems usually use two cameras to locate the positions of infrared-emitting or retro-reflective
markers, usually spheres, and compute the positions and orientations of the tracked tool based
on the markers positions. The accuracy is generally excellent, in many cases better than one
millimeter. However, the line-of-sight is a common limitation for optical tracking, implying
that the markers should not be blocked from the camera by any objects at any time for the
tracker to be able to work. Visual tracking is similar to optical tracking, but it uses geometric
patterns attached to the tools for tracking. It is cheaper and can be more scalable than optical
tracking, but it also has the occlusion issue and the general accuracy is not determined yet.
Magnetic tracking systems employ a field generator to generate a magnetic field and sensor
coils placed in the tracking area induce different voltages according to the varying magnetic fields, which can be used to calculate the position and orientation of the sensors. A major ad-
vantage of magnetic tracking is that it does not have the “line-of-sight” constraint. Sensor coils
can be placed anywhere inside a human body and will operate as long as they are within the
sensitive volume of the field generator. However, metal tools may greatly affect the tracking ac- curacy, although medical grade stainless steel and titanium are claimed to be non-problematic.
Also, the general accuracy of magnetic tracking is worse than optical tracking. Image based
tracking doesn’t rely on any external devices other than the imaging devices themselves, and
the position and orientation of the tool is calculated based on the tools appearance in the im-
ages. It is a good option when the other three techniques are not applicable, but accuracy of
1.8.4
Image Processing Techniques
Image processing programs act as the linkage between pre-operative images/models, the intra- operative image, and visualization programs. They are used to bring all the useful information
together from available images, either pre-operative or intra-operative, and make them more
salient and easier to interpret for the surgeons. For example, locating and dynamically updating
the position of the surgical target, if possible, often receive the most attention in any image
guidance systems; marking the regions that may cause potential danger if the tool accidently
gets into is helpful for improving the overall safety of the procedure; and incorporating high
quality pre-operative image to the system can help the surgeon to better interpret the anatomy,
when intra-operative images have relatively low quality.
In terms of processing techniques, segmentation, registration, and image filtering including
regularization, enhancing, feature extraction, and thresholding are the most commonly used.
Segmentationusually forms the basis for generating anatomical and/or functional models, locating surgical targets, and quantitative measurements within the area of interest. For med-
ical purposes, the segmentation results are usually expected to be highly accurate (≤1mm).
However, this level of accuracy is often very hard to achieve. Many segmentation approaches
that give satisfactory results are then very computationally intensive, which limits the oppor-
tunity of using them intra-operatively. Thus, most of the segmentation work is still performed
pre-operatively, which also allows review and correction by the clinician.
Registration is the key component for linking multiple images together, especially for
aligning pre-operative images to intra-operative images. Many factors can lead to variations
between pre-operative and intra-operative images, such as tissue deformation, changes in le-
sions, inter-modality intensity distribution differences, and different coordinate system used by the imaging systems. In most cases, these factors are combined in various ways, so the choice
of using either rigid or non-rigid registration and the selection of a similarity metric depend
on applications. The factors to be considered are the differences in image presentation, com- putational efficiency of the approach versus requirement of the efficiency of the application,
general accuracy of the approach versus tolerance of registration error of the application, ex-
tra time and efforts required for implementing a certain approach versus estimated benefits of using this approach.
Image filtersare commonly used in the pre-processing step before segmentation or regis-
tration. They can smooth or sharpen images, enhance contrast, and detect geometrical features,
etc. In some cases, a well chosen filter can be the difference between success and failure. His- togram matching, for example, may greatly improve the performance of mono-modality regis-
tration. Such steps are often referred to as engineering tricks as they are not always reported in
publications.
1.8.5
Visualization
Visualization platforms obtain data from the image processing programs and the tool tracking
systems and display them on the screen. There are many different ways of visualizing an image or a virtual model, such as maximum intensity projection, volume rendering of the whole
image, showing orthogonal slices, rendering a model as polygon or surfaces with shading, and
overlaying/fusing images together. It is not always necessary to show everything that the image processing programs can provide on the screen. Actually, in many situation, showing too much
is as bad as showing too little. The optimal choice of what to visualize at each certain stage
during the procedure needs careful studies. A general criterion is that the visualization should
ease the mental workload of the surgeons but not add to workload.