Tipos de aprendizaje

Hi all,

The IIM saga for me began today.

I was amongst the few to be a part of the first day first show at IIMA. Venue: IIMA KLMDC annexe.

Time: 9:00 AM Panel: 2 My profile:

Fresher B.Tech ICT (Information and Communication Technology), DA-IICT, Gandhinagar. CAT percentile : 99.97 %ile

Calls :BLACKI Case study:

There were 9 people in each panel (2 ladies in my panel). 4 moderators sitting in one corner each of the room and observing us. There was a round table with number tags indicating our positions. They first checked our admit cards and then collected our forms and the photocopies that they had asked for in the call letter. Thereafter, the general instructions for the case study were given - 5 minutes to read, 20 minutes to discuss and 5 minutes to summarise. Summary to be written in running format, not in points. We were given a write- up with the case, a pink page to note down our points and a ruled page to write the summary. In the end, all three of them were taken back.

The case:

Bharat had subscribed for a recently launched Tech magazine (launched in Dec. 2004). But I was asked to wait for 2 months before he could receive the first issue. Moreover, in Jan 2005 he was told that he would have to pay more for the magazine as the costs had increased. Bharat felt that this was unfair as he had already paid for the subscription and any prise rise thereafter should not affect him. He threatened to take the distributors to the court. The distributors are in a fix because if Bharat is paid a refund, other customers will ask for the same. Moreover there cannot be a double pricing policy. So what should distributors do? Very peaceful discussion. Everyone was able to speak whenever he/ she wanted. Not much digressing from the topic. But the points raised were also very general. None of the points was such that the group hooked on to it and discussed it for some time. In fact, with 5 minutes more to go, one of us almost brought an end to GD but saying that "in the end we have agreed that...". Fortunately, a new point came up (courtesy: yours truly) and the group could discuss further till the moderator asked us to stop.

The interview started within 10 minutes of the GD. I was the second person to be interviewed. And so I had no pre conceived notions of the panel. Went inside with butterflies in my stomach. But the panel soon made me comfortable. In the beginning, when they were stuck on one question, I thought that they were planning for a stress interview. But nope. They soon became very jovial. They were laughing all the time and therefore today, for the first time in an interview, I too smiled. Really, very cordial panel.

Four people. Sitting on one side of the round table. However, only 3 of them asked questions. The fourth one was sitting slightly further from the table, looking at me all the time, smiling and noting down something. Interviewers: P1, P2, P3

P1: Yes ___, what is Dhirubhai Ambani doing (me from Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of ICT) Me: Sir, ..(with an astonished look on my face)

P1: Yes, Yes, I know he is dead. (Bursts out into laughter. I too smile). P1: So what are his sons doing?

Me: Sir, they recently parted ways. P1: So whose side you are on?

P1: No, but I want to know that if the brothers declare tomorrow that all DA-IICT students have to declare

their allegiance towards one of them, whom will you choose?

Me: In that case, I would go with Mukesh because I find my personality more similar to his than Anil's. P1: And what makes you think so?

Me: Sir Anil is highly enthusiastic and dynamic. Mukesh is calm, patient, confident blah blah .. P1: So you are not dynamic?

Me: Sir, I believe in taking up one task at a time and doing it in the best possible manner.

(Here P3 chips in).

P3: You said Mukesh is cool, calm and so are you too. But cool these days also means dynamic. As you

people say "Cool dude". Which cool did you mean? (laughter all over).

Me: Sir, I meant Mukesh has a cool temperament.

(P2 looks at the mention of the prize I had won in an event called crossword. But thinks that it is something about the bookshop crossword. He asks me whether I am a member of the crossword. When I refuse and explain him about what crossword actually is, he again bursts into laughter. He laughed a lot during the interview)

Now comes P2. Tech guy. Asked me only academics. And never seemed to be convinced.

P2: You studied ICT? Did you specialize in anything? Me: Yes sir, CT.

P2: How does an analog telephone work?

Me: Didn't know exactly. But told him about the carbon resistance in the microphone changing due to

vibrations of the membrane when we speak, thereby changing the current in the wires. (I think that the

concept is correct but could not give a very technical explanation).

P2: What is the EMF of the battery used at the exchange?(Before that I had mentioned about the central

batter exchanges).

Me: High because they supply power to several subscribers.

P2: You said that there is the variable carbon resistance between the two wires connecting the handset and

the battery. So I should get a spark when I short the two wires. But I don't

Me: (Clueless here)

P2: Ok. How does a call reach from here to Timbaktoo.

Me: Told about the exchanges, trunk lines. regional exchanges. etc. P2: How many exchanges are there in India? Any guess?

Me: No idea. But may be around 200 in each state. So around 5000. (Totally clueless here too). P2: Ok. you have studied networks?

Me: Yes sir.

p2: Tell me, what network topology will a telephone network be? Me: Mesh topology.

P2: Heard about tree topology? (I think the mesh answer was wrong. Tree was the correct answer). Me: Explained it.

P2: Network topology of BSNL? Me: No idea.

P1 is back into action.

P1: You never felt curious?

Me: (Kya bolta? Dekhte raha unhe).

P2 back to acads.

P2: You seem to be good at probability. (Asks me a probability question.) Me: I gave the answer. He wasn't convinced.

Me: I told them about the spectrum auctions and the policy of maintaining a minimum and maximum

number of operators in a circle.

P1: Why is there a minimum limit? Me: For competition.

P1: Why maximum limit?

Me: Too much market segmentation. Problems in spectrum allocation as spectrum is limited.

P1: Number of cellular operators in Gujarat (Here, due to one of my answers there was again a round of

laughter. I used that time to count the number of operators).

Me: 2 CDMA. 4 GSM. P1: Name them. Me: Named.

P1: Why CDMA and not GSM?

Me: Explained the difference between the two. P1: Why only two for CDMA?

Me: told them..

P1: Which countries use CDMA? Which use GSM? Me: Answered.

Passes the baton to P3.

P3: Tell me about your other interests. Me: Sir, reading and writing.

P3: What do you write?

Me: Articles for college magazine, daily diary, blog. P3: What was the last article in the magazine? Me: About my experience with CAT.

P3: Why would anyone want to read that? Me: blah blah.

P3: What did you write? Me: Told.

P3: When did you update your blog? Last blog?

Me: Told. Also told them about a bloggers community in our institute.

P3 jokes that we should check his blog there and then to see if I was telling the truth.

P3: Why blog? Why not just talk with people in your institute?

Me: Blog without borders. Interaction with people from far off places and all that stuff (seemed convinced). P3: Looked at one of my certificates and asked me about that event.

Me: Answered.

At that point, our college festival "Synapse" came into picture. So P2 asked me about actual meaning of synapse.

I gave them the definition (the connection between nerve fibres) and told them that is all I know. P1 again chips in.

P1: Do you watch movies? Me: No.

P1: Why?

Me: I am slightly impatient (haha. Earlier, in one of the answers I had said that I am patient. thank God they

P1: Last movie? Me: Terminal.

P3 is back.

P3: Which book did you read last?

Me: (last book I read was Fountainhead but after reading PG threads, didn't have the guts to tell that to the

panel as I am not that well-versed with Rand's philosophy). Told them about Kiran Bedi's book that I am currently reading.

P3: Why that book?

Me: Told them that I prefer biographies. P3: Why not Gandhi, Nehru's autobiographies? Me: Read Gandhi's. Nehru's could not complete. P3: A few general questions about jails.

P3: Ok, take your chocolate and you can go. Me: Thank you.

So, this was all. No Why MBA? Tell me About yourself? Do you want to ask us something? Strengths and weaknesses? None of these.

Lasted for about 30 minutes. In fact never realised that I was in for 30 minutes. I though they hadn't asked me anything. So when they said "one last question", I was surprised. It was only after I was out that I came to know that mine was one of the "long" interviews.

Was quite happy after the interview, though later, on analysis, I found nothing special about my interview. Did not give good answers to some questions. But most of the time, it all seemed to me like a casual chit-chat. We all were laughing a lot. It was much better than all the mocks that I had given. The panel was very good. Whatever might be the outcome, I enjoyed the process.

Next is K on 21st at Mumbai. All the best to all.

Cheers, Vivek