TEMPORALIZACIÓN Semana
2.1 Trabajo Aeróbico
10 2 ,1119 ,209
1 , 045286 ,780
11S
2 ,289 50185 ,137
620+ 21
,07
2 19 2 ,05731 Marcll
1980Environmental Land Use for Tourism
In New Zealand , the high country zone , that i s , 9 5 0 metres
and above , involves 3� percent of the total land area and most of this is s t at e owned , with the majority o f it being
under some explicit form of protection , as national parks
or fore st reserv� s 2 1 5 . The ten national parks of New Zealand cover approximat ely 7 . 7 percent of the tot a l land
area 2 1 6- In a relat ively small country , with ten extensive I,ational parks s ituated in environmentally protected areas ,
a country whose tourist industry is largely depen dent on the attraction of these protect ed areas , the need for combined approach in planning and management between
environment a l planners and tOUI'ism planners must be
considered absolutely necessary and be given priority . As already ment ioned . the mult i-dimensional relationship between tourism and environmental land use is bas ically characterised by conflict and mutual dependance . Thi s sub-sect ion provides a n integrated planning model for the ha�onizat ion o f policies designed for tourism and
en.ironmental land use in New Zealand. Policy measu�s that
have already
�
en t aken in New Zealand will be incorporatedin the model . where appropriate .
2l S
P H C lAlcas, 'Natialal. Backgt10Und for 'lburism
and the
IhvirorDent: ' , DeparbQent of Landsand
Survey, Infonnati� Series No6 , We1.1.ingtal,
1978 , p. 12 .
21 &
L W
t'bCasld.ll
, 'Natialal. Parlcs in Centennial
Year' , Parl<sThe
diagram ( figure0 )
below provid e s an illustrative modelfor
an integrated approach to environmental land use related to tourism de�elopment .6
An Indicative for Environmental Land
Use
and and TourismStatement
of
LObjectives
Protection.Conservation
of bie-physical resourcesLand
useI
system
-h
Bic-physical ' resources :I
I Land
useI
types ,capa
bilities. potential .&
coost:re.intsProject
studies
andenvircnIEntal
�
assesSlllerIt
In
any managementand
planning exercise . the first step isto
s�ate the planning objectives as clearly as possibl e . In a two section planning exercise , suchaa
environ.entalconservation and tourism development , manage�ent and deve10p- ment obj ect ives may appear to be �.t i thetical
The
relationship between tourism and the natural environment , however , need not con f l ic t and in areas where con fl ict could occur , measures can best be t aken to reduce or pre vent suchan occurrence . The viabil ity o f the New Ze alan d tourist industry is almost ent i rely dependent upon the attractions
of
the scenic environment and the recreation resources they contain . In order to harmonise the relationship between tourism and the natural environment , the ob j e ct ive s o f environmental pre ser'vation and prote c t ion must n0t be subj ect to uncontro l l e d tourism deve lopment . The stated obj ectives of the Nat i onal Parks Act , 1 9 5 2 , No 5 4 are t o"preserve in perpetu i ty " areas of certain "scenery " of s uch
"distinct qua l i ty · or nnatura l feature s - so beau t i fu l o r unique that their "presel-vation" i s in the
"na tiona l
intere s ts " for thp b� r J a n d "enjoyment of the pub l i c " ,
,,;.G as far "as pos sib l e in their natural. s tate ".
Apart from the regu latory provisions contained in the 1 9 5 2 National Parks Act against the degradation o f national parks ' natural environment , there are other meas ures dE �igned for the prote ct ion of the environment in New Zealand . The Environmental Protection and Enhancement Procedures 21 7 , which came into e ffect on 1 March 1 9 7 4
u _
P H C l.JJcas , 'National &ckground
farTourism and
the Ihvircnuent ' . op.cit • • 1978 , p.15.provide tha� environmental impact reports must be prepared
for
al l major projects of government and all othar proj e ct s that requi� government approval o r funds . The Procedures also provide for public submis s ions on all propos a l s .The
Na tupeConsepvat ion Counci l
A c t , No 2 4 , 1 9 6 2 2 1 8establi5�ed the council as a central body for obtaining and co-ordinat ing the views of organ isation s , bodies and
persons interested in nature conserva-ti on .
I t i s an advisory body on scient ific and techn i cal aspe�ts
of na
ture
conservat ion and has powers to inquire into the�ffects
of any proposed public workswiThin
the meaning ofthe
1 9 2 8 Pub L i c Wo r k s A c t ,and
in any private or other work so n
pla
ces o f scenic or s c ientific intereST or of spe c i f i crecreat ional value , o r o n any aspect of nature conservation .
The
Queen ElizabethI T
NaTional Trust21 • is also anOTher body established by legislat ion to ensure that tiufficient open space is provide d . The Trust also acts a s aco-ordinating l ink between land protection and recreational responsibi l i t ie s of the various agencies concerned .
Th e numerous protection and �ontrol measures for the
natural environment are designed to safeguard these natural resources against public misuse and at the same t ime
• 1ft
21.
'1'h8 Natuzoe
C01IBBl"Uation Council Act, No 21, 1962.New Zealand StattItes,
1962 ,
�
Printer,We1li:ngt-cn. 1963,
P H C Lucas,
'Nzrt:iaIal
Background far Tourismand the
DtvircnInent ' , op.cit . , 1978, p.15.preserve them for publ.ic enjoyment . These measures ensure that no natural resource development tak�s place unl.e ss compatible with the conservation val.ues o f the area .
The
effects o f these control measures o n the tourist industry have on occasion been frustrating and on other occasions ensured that tourist companies wishing to develop these resources provide plans tha t are environmentally compatible with the natural charactec of the are a , before permi s s ion isgranted.
The Environmental Impact Report on the �evel.opmentor
Facilities Area , Home Bay , Lake Waika�emoana , UreweraNational
Park 2 • • is an example of a plan that provides fora
tourist
accommodation style compatible with the natural.environment . The main objectives for the deve lopment of the Lake Waikaremoana 3rea were to provide limited informal ,
first
class accommodat ion and other facilities to meet therequirement s of visitors to the park, to enable Hew Zealanders to travel and enjoy their own "try in accordance with government policy , by pl.acing th�
facilities wit�L� the means of the average New Zealander ,
with
part icular emphas is on family type accommodat ion . Inthis environmental impact repor t , the Tourist Hotel Corporation L nd the Urewera National.
ParJc BoarG.
the twodevel.opment agents , endeavoured to provide a plan for
compat ible land use by putting emphasi s on the enjoyment and
2 2 .
The �ai
Ure;oera liirtialal. Parte Boaro and
protection o f the scenic values an d quality of t h e national
park and not allowing the very development they attract to destroy them . In this instance . the proposed plan was
approved .
There
are other instances in which tourist compa�y proposals to develop certain recreational resources within scenic areas face strong opposition froffi government advisory bodiesand
from the publ i c . One case is the proposal made by the Mount Cook and Southern Lakes Tourist Company Limited t o develop the Rastus Burn Basin i n ��e Remarkabl e s Range into an alternati'lfe !>Ki-field to Coronet Peak , Which was�xperiencing vis itor pressure on i t s capacity . A management
study
team was set up , composed mainly of offi cials of the Department of Lands and Sur vey . The study was to investigate the physical resources , soci�l and current land use so thatthe
development proposals put forwar::l: by the company to theLand-Settlement Board co\.!ld be decided upon . The terms of reference � 2 1 of th .. "" _,,agement study team provided for a
study
of :the �ho ls area of the Remarkables Range
fo�
the purposeB of asaeBsing the pote ntial of � hiB reBoupce for scenic. conservation. pe cpe� tion and tou�iB t UBes; t o ppovid� for a�equate 49greeof pro t e ction of land rec�upces in conjL n c t i o n yi t h appropriate l e v e l s o f pub l ic u s e a n d enjo y men t i n t erms o f t h e caraci ty o f t he a r e a . an
d
a ba lance Yith the recre ationa Z opportuni t i e s in the surrounding d i s t ri c t .
Although there were some indiv icual subr.i s s ions s uppo�ting
the
company ' s proposal , several intere s t groups such as the Remarkables Protection Committee .the
New Zea land AlpineClub ,
the Southland Tramping C l ub ( Inc . ) , dnd the Otago Tramping and Mount aineering C l ub opposed theprc)"' os a l s
onthe ;rounds o f environmental and conservation prote c t ion .
The
management s t udy group was equa l l y unsympath,,·;: i c to the �ropo�alsof
the company . Some recommendati � n sof
themanagement
st udy grou
p state2 2 2 :( � J
No recreation or t o u ri s tde v � < JpmenT
a t � ra�t ingl arge numbers of peop le s hou ld be p e l', d t te d if
i t yo u ld e i t her reduce the effectiveness of the
desirab l e
Boil
and Yat e r conservat i on objec tives or endanger vu l n e rab l e botan i ca l and geo logica l areas or i n t roduce unsympa the t i c artifici a l componen ts i n t o spec tacu lar and highl!! apprec i a t ed naZ;k:'a l s cenic . • . .2 2 2
( b ) CUl'l' B1 t l' (!Cl' mtion a l aati v i ty i s 8 /X> l'adi c, w i d e l'an gin g , l.ow i n t en s i ty an d n o t d etl'i m m ta l t o t h e a re th et i c 0 1' s o i l an d w a t er con s el'vat i on va lu es in t h e a l pi n e l' egion.
(c) Any comm e!'cia l. s k i - fi eZd d ev elo pn en t pl'opos a t in t h e a l fin e al' mB wi Z Z l' «{u i l' e fUl'th el' i n v es tigat i on and l' es earch, but
th e t mm aSS QJS £'B that on l.y th " h eadwa t 81' o f th e Po o l an s ( ri g h t bran ah) cl' e ek i s 8uit a b l e fol' t h i s p.lrp08 e.
The management study group argued that the roading propos e d
b y t h e company would b e environmentally des tructive and would des troy the aesthetic appeal of the northel'f: f l ank o f
the Remarkables Range . S uch d e struction could be avoided !>y developing the Doolan Creek s ite . The company . on che other h and , con s idered the Dool ar. Creek as an unacceptable alternative because of roading cost factors . The company argued that the northern f lank o f the Remarkables Range had no special aesthetic appeal and tbat the a l t elnative reading to Doolan Creek would cost tbree times more than that proposed to Rastus Burn Basin 2 2 ' .
The conflict between development and con se L�ation is large ly
due to the narrow interpretat ion of the regulat ions d e s igned
for environmental protect ion and land use for commerc ial
purposes. The National Parks Act , however , allows for a rapport between con servation obj ect ives and the visit or industry's obj e c t i ve s . In the above-me n tioned con f l i c t of
interest , the -_and- Se t t lement Board took a de � i s ion t o a l l ow
the deve lopment of the Rastus Basin into a ski-field by the
co�pany, but this was an instance in which nationa l park pol icy and land use regu l at ions were interpre t e d to aid the development of the tourist industry .
Ski-fie l d resources are mainly located in the New ZeaLr"j national parks . In t h i s regard , the ski inC-lstry is � c.L'ge ly dependent upon its cont inuing access to rhese re sourc e s .
Skiing itsel f is not environmentally Q c s t ruct ive as other activi tie s such as mining , carried O'lt in national parks .
The environme n t al impact concern about ski -field deve lopment
is mai,.ly related to infra-structural impact on the natural �nvironment . This would include the effect s of roading on
the soil drainage system, flora and fauna destruction and distortion of the aesthet i c appearance of the natural landscape . Such impact can , however , be minimised through sen s it ive planning and rigid control on roading method s .
Roading can be restricted to areas where environmental damage is tolerable to a certain degree.
Another factor to consider in favour of allowing the ski