CAPÍTULO 4: IMPLEMENTACIÓN Y PRUEBA
4.5 C ONCLUSIÓN
Long Bay, South Carolina experiences hypoxic and low dissolved oxygen events spanning hours to days that are unattributable to the typical formation mechanisms outlined by Diaz and Rosenberg (2008). Preliminary evidence showed increased concentrations of 222Rn in bottom waters during low DO events and an inverse
correlation between radon concentrations and DO levels, which suggests that SGD could play a critical role in hypoxia formation. McCoy et al. (2011) proposed a mechanism that wind patterns lead to limited cross-shelf mixing of warm, nearshore waters where inputs of SGD and terrestrially derived nutrients concentrate, increasing heterotrophic activity (Smith et al., 2010) and lowering DO. These authors were not able to definitively
determine whether the increased radon concentrations are indicative of increased SGD or decreased mixing. We hypothesized that radium isotopes would serve as additional tracers to delineate the effects of higher input rate versus lower output rate on observed radon concentrations and better understand the spatial and temporal variability of radium and DO dynamics, as well as development mechanisms of a hypoxic water mass.
Seasonal and time-series sampling of bottom waters during oxic and hypoxic conditions provided us with a comprehensive understanding of the inshore system. However, radium isotope activities during the 16-Aug-2012 hypoxic event could not be supported by the local beachface endmembers. We identified offshore groundwater sources (Moore
28
and Wilson, 2005; Moore, unpubl. data) with similar activity ratios of 228Ra/226Ra as our hypoxic samples. We calculated residence times using the offshore groundwater as endmembers and concluded that samples taken from 4-Aug through 14-Aug were of the same water mass, decaying in the nearshore and not mixing with lower activity water over a 10 day period. We also concluded that samples taken during the hypoxic event were of a different water mass than sampled in the previous weeks; minimum residence time calculations determined the hypoxic water mass was at least two weeks old. The significant differences in radium isotope activities during oxic and hypoxic conditions and the dissimilarity in calculated residence times suggest that a hypoxic water mass comprised largely of groundwater migrated inshore under the influence of certain physical conditions. After calculating the percentage of anoxic groundwater in each sampled water mass, we propose that hypoxic levels of dissolved oxygen in Long Bay may be independent of biological demand once offshore SGD occurs.
Future research should to be undertaken to identify if submarine groundwater discharge from the offshore wells is occurring under specific physical conditions, or is constantly occurring but normally mixing with lower activity waters. Once SGD drivers have been identified, we recommend further investigation into the physical conditions required to move the hypoxic water mass inshore, relatively undisturbed. Determining the extent of the hypoxic water mass in Long Bay will also add insight to movement capability. Not only do hypoxic conditions negatively affect aquatic life, but also can impact the local Grand Strand economy, thus adding increased importance to further investigation of hypoxia phenomena in Long Bay, South Carolina.
29 LITERATURE CITED
Apache Family Campground and Pier, 2013. <http://www.apachefamilycampground.
com/pier.php>
Back, W., Rosenshein, J. S., Seaber, P. R., eds., 1988. Hydrog. Geol. N. Amer. 0-2.
Broecker, W.S., 1963. A preliminary evaluation of uranium series inequilibrium as a tool for absolute age measurement on marine carbonates. J. Geophys. R. 68.9: 2817-2834.
Burnett, W. C., Dulaoiva, H., 2003. Estimating the dynamics of groundwater input to the coastal zone via continuous radon-222 measurements. J. Environ. Radioactiv.
69, 21-35.
Burnett, W.C., Aggarwal, P.K., Aureli, A., Bokuniewicz, H., Cable, J.E., Charette, M.A., Kontar, E., S. Krupa, S., Kulkarni, K.M., A. Loveless, A., Moore, W.S.,
Oberdorfer, J.A., Oliveira, J., Ozyurt, N., Povinec, P., Privitera, A.M.G., Rajar, R., Ramessur, R.T., Scholten, J., Stieglitz, T., Taniguchi, M., Turner, J.V., 2006.
Quantifying submarine groundwater discharge in the coastal zone via multiple methods. Sci. Total Environ. 367, 498–543.
Cable, J.E., Burnett, W.C., Chanton, J.P., Weatherly, G.L., 1996. Estimating
groundwater discharge into the northeastern Gulf of Mexico using Radon-222.
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 144, 591-604.
Capone, G., Slater, J.M., 1990. Interannual patters of watertable height and groundwater derived nitrate in near-shore sediments. Biochem. 10, 277-288.
30
Charette, M.A., Allen, M.C., 2007. Precision groundwater sampling in coastal aquifers using a direct push shielded-screen well-point system. Ground Water Monit.
Rem. 26, 87-93.
Charette, M.A., Moore, W.S., Burnett, W.C., 2008. Uranium-and thorium-series nuclides as tracers of submarine groundwater discharge. Radioactivity in the Environment.
13, 155-191.
Diaz, R., Rosenberg, R., 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.
Annu. Rev. 33, 245-303.
Diaz, R., Rosenberg, R., 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science. 321, 926-929.
Durridge Company Inc., 2009. RAD7 Radon Detector User Manual. Bedford, MA.
Glenn, S., Arnone, R., Bergmann, T., Bissett, W. P., Crowley, M., Cullen, J., Schofield, O., 2004. Biogeochemical impact of summertime coastal upwelling on the New Jersey Shelf. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans. 109(C12).
Fleischer, R.L., 1983. Theory of alpha recoil effects on radon release and isotopic disequilibrium. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 47(4), 779-784.
Froelich, P.N., Klinkhammer, G.P., Bender, M.L., Luedtke, N.A., Heath, G.R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., Maynard, V., 1979. Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 43(7), 1075–1090.
31
Hwang, D.W., Kim, G., Lee, Y.W., Yang, H.S., 2005. Estimating submarine inputs of groundwater and nutrients to a coastal bay using radium isotopes. Mar. Chem., 96(1), 61-71.
Krest, J.M., Moore, W.S., Gardner, L.R., Morris, J.T., 2000. Marsh nutrient export supplied by groundwater discharge: Evidence from radium measurements. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 14(1), 167-176.
Krishnaswami, S., Graustein, W.C., Turekian, K.K., 1982. Radium, thorium and radio-active lead isotopes in groundwaters: application to the in situ determination of adsorption–desorption rate constants and retardation factors. Water Resour. Res.
18 (6), 1633–1675.
Lee, J., Kim, G., 2006. A simple and rapid method for analyzing radon in coastal and ground waters using a radon-in-air monitor. J. Environ. Radioactiv. 89(3), 219–
228.
Li, X., Hu, B.X., Burnett, W.C., Santos, I.R., Chanton, J.P., 2009. Submarine ground water discharge driven by tidal pumping in a heterogeneous aquifer.
Groundwater, 47(4), 558-568.
Libes, S., Kindelberger, S., 2010. Hypoxia in the nearshore coastal waters of South Carolina along the Grand Strand. In: Proceedings of the 2010 South Carolina Environmental Conference.
<http://www.sc-ec.org/images/Proceedings10/Libes%2032-4.pdf>
McCoy, C.A., Corbett, D.R., Cable, J.E., Spruill, R.K., 2007. Hydrogeological
characterization of southeast coastal plain aquifers and groundwater discharge to Onslow Bay, North Carolina (USA). J. Hydrol. 339(3), 159-171.
32
McCoy, C., Viso, R., Peterson, R.N., Libes, S., Lewis, B., Ledoux, J., Voulgaris, G., Smith, E., Sanger, D., 2011. Radon as an indicator of limited cross-shelf mixing of submarine groundwater discharge along an open ocean beach in the South Atlantic Bight during observed hypoxia. Cont. Shelf Res. 31, 1306-1307.
Moore, W.S., 1984. Radium isotope measurements using germanium detectors. Nucl.
Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res., Sect. B, 223(2), 407-411.
Moore, W.S., 1996. Large groundwater inputs to coastal waters revealed by Ra-226 enrichments. Nature 380, 612-614.
Moore, W.S., 1999. The subterranean estuary: a reaction zone of ground water and sea water. Mar. Chem. 65, 111-125.
Moore, W.S., 2000. Determining coastal mixing rates using radium isotopes. Cont. Shelf Res. 20(15).
Moore, W.S., 2010. The effect of submarine groundwater discharge on the ocean. Ann.
Rev. Mar. Sci. 2, 59-88.
Moore, W.D., Arnold, R., 1996. Measurement of 223Ra and 224Ra in coastal waters using a delayed coincidence counter. J. Geophys. Res., 101(C1), 1321-1329.
Moore, W.S., Kjerfve, B., Todd, J.F., 1998. Identification of rain‐freshened plumes in the coastal ocean using Ra isotopes and Si. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans (1978–
2012), 103(C4), 7709-7717.
Moore, W.S., Krest, J., Taylor, G., Roggenstein, E., Joye, S., Lee, R., 2002. Thermal evidence of water exchange through a coastal aquifer: Implications for nutrient fluxes. Geophys. Res. Let. 29(14), 49-1.
33
Moore, W.D., Reid D.F., 1973. Extraction of radium from natural waters using manganese-impregnated acrylic fibers. J. Geophys. Res. 73(36), 8880-8886.
Moore, W.S., Wilson, A.M., 2005. Advective flow through the upper continental shelf driven by storms, buoyancy, and submarine groundwater discharge. Earth Planet Sci. Let. 235.3: 564-576.
Mulligan, A.E., Charette, M.A., 2006. Intercomparison of submarine groundwater discharge estimates from a sandy unconfined aquifer. J. Hydrol. 327, 411-425.
Nixon, S.W., 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41, 199-219.
Peterson, R.N., Burnett, W.C., Taniguchi, M., Chen, J., Santos, I.R., Ishitobi, T., 2008.
Radon and radium isotope assessment of submarine groundwater discharge in the Yellow River delta, China. J. Geophys. Res. 113:C09021, 1-14.
Peterson, R.N., Burnett, W.C., Dimova, N., Santos, I.R., 2009. Comparison of
measurement methods for radium-226 on manganese-fiber. Limnol. Oceanogr.:
Methods. 7, 196-205.
Rabalais, N.N., Turner, R.E., Wiseman, W.J., 2002. Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia, a.k.a.
“The Dead Zone.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 235-263.
Santos, I.R., Eyre, B.D., Huettel, M., 2012. The driving forces of porewater and groundwater flow in permeable coastal sediments: A review. Est. Coast Shelf Sci. 98, 1-15.
Simmons, Jr., G.M., 1992. Importance of submarine groundwater discharge (SGWD) and seawater cycling to material flux across sediment/water interfaces in marine environments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 84, 173-184.
34
Smith, E.M., Buck, T., Lakish, B., 2010. Biological regulation in the formation of hypoxia. In: Proceedings of the 2010 South Carolina Environmental Conference.
Stringer, C.E., Burnett, W.C., 2004. Sample bottle design improvements for radon emanation analysis of natural waters. Health. Phys. 87(6), 642-646.
Swarzenski, P.W., 2007. Non-conservative behavior of select naturally-occurring radionuclides and metals in coastal waters. Thesis Dissertation (Ph. D.)--Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Swarzenski, P.W., 2000. Radium isotopes as sediment-water interface tracers: Indian River Lagoon, Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 00-482. U.S.
Department of the Interior.
Swarzenski, P.W., Reicha, C., Kroegera, K.D., Baskaran, M., 2007. Ra and Rn isotopes as natural tracers of submarine groundwater discharge in Tampa Bay, Florida.
Mar. Chem. 104(1–2), 69–84.
U.S. Geological Survey, 1999. The quality of our Nation's waters—Nutrients and pesticides: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1225, 82 p.
Valiela, I., Costa, J., Foreman, K., Teal, J. M., Howes, B., Aubrey, D., 1990. Transport of Groundwater-Borne Nutrients from Watersheds and their Effects on Coastal Waters. Biogep. 10(3), 177-197.
Viso, R., McCoy, C., Gayes, P.T., Quafisi, D., 2010. Geological controls on submarine groundwater discharge in Long Bay, South Carolina (U.S.A.). Cont. Shelf Res.
30, 335-341.
35
Wainright, S.C., Hopkinson, Jr., C.S., 1997. Effects of sediment resuspension on organic matter processing in coastal environments: a simulation model. J. Mar. Syst. 11, 353-368.
Wilson, A.M., 2005. Fresh and saline groundwater discharge to the ocean: A regional perspective. Water Resources Research, 41(2), W02016.
Younger, P.L., 1996. Submarine groundwater discharge. Nature 382, 121-122.
36 TABLES
Table 1. Radon and radium isotope half-lives and properties.
Isotope Half Life Property Ra-224 3.6 days Solid Ra-223 11.5 days Solid Ra-228 5.8 years Solid Ra-226 1600 years Solid
Rn-222 3.8 days Gas
Table 2. Apache Pier established sampling station information. Average and standard deviation from the mean for each station during oxic conditions. Distance offshore from neap mid-tide water line. N = number of bottom water radium samples taken at each station from April 2012 – April 2013.
Sta. Distance
37
Table 3. Along-pier radium isotope average activities and one standard deviation for each weekly/monthly sampling event, n=5-6.
Date Ra-223 (dpm/L) xsRa-224 (dpm/L) Ra-226 (dpm/L)
38
Table 4. Radium isotope and physical parameter analysis r-values from time-series sampling of bottom water at Station 6 on 7-May, 19-Jul, 4-Aug, 14-Aug, and 16-Aug;
n=57, p<0.001, (n=51 for temperature).
xsRa-224 Ra-223 Ra-226
DO (mg/L) 0.816 0.887 0.894
DO Saturation (%) 0.878 0.787 0.894 Salinity (‰) 0.799 0.801 0.792 Temperature (⁰C) 0.871 0.857 0.871
*excludes 17-May-2012 time-series sampling event
Table 5. Percentage of groundwater composition (%), residence time (days) from 223Ra and 224Raxs, observed average dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/L), and calculated dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/L) for samples taken on 4-, 7-, 14-, and 16-Aug-2012. 16-Aug 47.92±10.21 17.17±3.73 13.97±1.25 3.27±0.66 3.27
39 FIGURES
Figure 1. Map of Long Bay, South Carolina. Star represents approximate location of Apache Pier (33⁰45’41” N, 78⁰46’47” W). Inset shows aerial photograph of Apache Pier.
40
Figure 2. Aerial photograph of Apache Pier in Long Bay, SC. Numbers on pier show approximate locations of sampling stations.
41
Figure 3. Bottom water physical parameter averages for each sampling station during oxic weekly/monthly sampling efforts. Error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
42
Figure 4. Radon and radium isotope averages (dpm/L) for each sampling station during oxic weekly/monthly sampling efforts. Error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
Figure 5. Seasonal radon and radium isotope activities (dpm/L) per station during oxic sampling conditions.
43
Seasonal radon and radium isotope activities (dpm/L) per station during oxic Seasonal radon and radium isotope activities (dpm/L) per station during oxic
Figure 6. Linear correlation plot of (A)
226Ra (dpm/L) with oxygen saturation (%) of bottom water at Apache Pier during five time-series sampling events at Station 6. R
44
Linear correlation plot of (A) 224Raxs (dpm/L), (B) 223Ra (dpm/L), and (C) Ra (dpm/L) with oxygen saturation (%) of bottom water at Apache Pier during five
series sampling events at Station 6. R2 =0.619, 0.771, 0.799, respectively (n=57).
Ra (dpm/L), and (C) Ra (dpm/L) with oxygen saturation (%) of bottom water at Apache Pier during five
=0.619, 0.771, 0.799, respectively (n=57).
45
Figure 7. Average radium isotope average activities (dpm/L) during oxic and hypoxic conditions. Error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
46
Figure 8. Bottom water oxygen saturation (%) and radon activity (dpm/L).
Measurements at 30-minute intervals from 13-Aug-2012 through 21-Aug-2012.
R2=0.492, n=407, p<0.001. Data from the continuous monitoring station located on the end of Apache Pier.
47
Figure 9. Vertical water column profile of radium isotope activities (dpm/L), dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/L), and temperature (⁰C) taken at Station 6 on 17-Aug-2012.
48
Figure 10. Average radium isotope activities (dpm/L) from five beachface groundwater sampling events and bottom water hypoxic event. Error bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
49
Figure 11. Ra-228 and 226Ra (dpm/L) activity ratios from ten offshore wells (Moore and Wilson, 2005; Moore, unpubl. data) and 16-Aug-2012 hypoxic samples.
50
Figure 12. Ra-228 and 226Ra activity ratios from Well A, Well LW, Well R, and 16-Aug-2012 hypoxic samples. R2=0.919, n=53, p<0.001.
51
Figure 13. Wind data from 1-Jul-2012 through 19-Aug-2012. Wind speed (m/s) and direction taken from the weather station on Apache Pier.
52
Figure 14. Residence time (days) of 4-Aug, 7-Aug, 14-Aug (shown in black), and hypoxic 16-Aug (shown in red) samples based on percentage of groundwater (%gw) and
223Ra activities (dpm/L). R2=0.999, n=3, p<0.001 for 4-, 7-, and 14-Aug-2012.
53
Figure 15. Residence time (days) of 4-Aug, 7-Aug, 14-Aug (shown in black), and hypoxic 16-Aug (shown in red) samples based on percentage of groundwater (%gw) and
224Raxs activities (dpm/L). R2=0.998, n=3, p<0.001 for 4-, 7-, and 14-Aug-2012.
54
Figure 16. Observed and calculated dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg/L) for 4-, 7-, 14-, and 16-Aug-2012. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean.
Values above the marked bars represent average percent composition of groundwater used for calculated concentrations.