3 VENTAJAS Y/O DESVENTAJAS DE LA CONVERGENCIA DE LOS
3.2 VENTAJAS
aa paesia acaberula, i
n
ci
aa, Blechnum andB.
I t ha s alr
e
ady
been not ed that vegetative spread appears tob
e
a significant charact eristic of the indi genous species of and of most of the indigenoussward-forming
species.
A f'urther reason for the apparent aggressiveness of theae
species would appear to be the widespread deforestation
that
amounts to the creationon
a largJ scale of a habitat :Juitable for them.(
This ha a be en referre:i to by Cockayne( 1 928 : 1 88) ) .
The
pioneerspeci es
in
the
regenerative process DllSt b elight-demanding,
or at least light-tolerant, and able to tolerate the drier conditions of the open. Unless they are extremely adaptable, such species wil l no t tend to be of DllCh importance as subordinat es within the climaxforest . f
l
uvia
ti
leoccurs as
a forest subordinai:e, butthis speci
e
s appears 1x>have
a more limit ed distribution in pa sturethan most of the other species discussed in this section
)
. Conversely,the subordinat e species
of
the forestwill
nottend
to be of much importance aa pioneersin
the open, except in shady and/or ahel tered pl
ace
s, orin
the relat
ivel
y wet and clou
dy
climat es ofhighc
altitudes. Elsewhere, they
wi 11
be more likely to enter the successiononly
in the shelt er of the hardi er pi
one
ers.The
le
sserimportance
of phanerophyti
c(
but notfern)
weeds onsoil t
ypes 122 and 1 2J•
v.ould appear to be due tothe fact that
species of this lite-form that are suited 1x> life in the open are still onlyin the process of moving on w these soils .
( 3)
NCfi-PASTURE129
condi tion, and in the areas tha t are definit ely under human control, the watercourses and str
e
am bedsof
th
e s tudy area appear to be characterized by a fairly open non-phanerophy tic vegetatio�In
view of the instability
of
the
soil, it is probable that the vegeta tionof this habitat has always bee
n
of this type .It
is the onlyt;y.po
of
non-pas ture vegeta ti.on in which introduced non-pbanerophytic species may establish themselve
s freely
and persist.Wi th the exception of wa tercours es and s tream beds
(and
thepossibl e e:�eception of areas that are subj eot to heavy g:ra.aing by wild animals
)
, the general vegeta tive tendency on tne non-�oland within the study area
that is
not at pr esent occupied by indigenousf
ore
st, is towardsthe regeneration of
thatforest.
Even
where idle or unused land isfar from
th
e nearest indigenousc<»J11Iilnity, the tendency may be observed. On the roadsides
of
theintensively-farmed Kairanga Plain may be seen scattered apecimer.a
or clumps
of such
specie
sas Pteridium
lalehl en.beckia ArundDk.akahc),
australis, andum.
In general, the introduced species do not p ersist in the non
pa sture vegetation, once succession towards forest geis
UDder
way. This would appear to be largely a matter of life-form, togeth
er
wi th a t endency for most of the introduced s2ecies involved to b e l ightdemanding rather than
shade-tolerant. If
land adjacent to p1sturo or crop land ia
cleared and abandoned, introduced non-phaneropbytea
may be coDIJlOn enough in the early
s
tages of
successi
on.
As ha sbeen
shown,
a scatt eringof
introdu
ced non-phanerophytic species(particularly those with
wind-borne fruits)
may even befound
indamged
f
or
estat some
distance from occupied land. When the succession proceed
sto
the phanerophytic stages,the role
of
the introduced species changes. The introducednon
-phanerophytes do no t appear to surviv
e the ear
lie
st phanerophytio stage.(
This isconfirmed by the observations of
Croker ( 1 953 : 1 4-1 5) ) .
1.30
that Ulex
and
may be im};X)rtanta
t the fir
stphe.nerop
hy
tic stage, and may be vetry persis tent in places where fewdisseiJ.Iinules of indigenous species are available.
(
The same applies to the introducedarbo
reus and offici.Da
lis along the lower reaches of the ri.vers)
. However, the totalnumber
of introducedphanerop
hy
tic species involved is Vf!Jr'Y anall. �"'Uriher, the speciesthat are available are ess entially nano
phan
erophy
tic rather thanmacrophanerophyti c (with the notable exception r'£ Pinus
ra.diata,
which is referred to later) . Even a pioneer indigenous
shrub
like is sufficiently tal l-growing to be able, toa
large extent, to overtop the introduced species and shade them out , and they are cert
ainly hardly able to survive the de'Wiiopment of thesmall-tre e layers ( characterized b y the mature forms of such species as ramiflorus
and
let a lone t:P,..; t ':If the layer charact eri zed by Beilachmiedia tawa.It is possible, of course, tha t shade-tolerant introduced species might be able to persis
t
as subordinates in regeneratingforest.
However, they have yet to ent er the study area.
(
Even the fewi
ntroduced speaies that have been referred to asen
tering damaged undergrowth in standing indigenous forest, namely the shrubby Solanumand the herbaceous .Arotium minus
and
Tradescantia flumin ensia, rarely occur tar from the forest margin).Tlus ,
in general, thein
troduced species would appearat
presentto be imp:>rtant only
in
the earliest stages of succession in non-pastur e vegeta tion. I:Prever, the role of Pinus
radiate. is of
interest. This species is of widespread occurrence, even it not numericallyimportant, in the successional non-pasture vegetation of the st11dy area,
and
maybe
expected to be very persis tent. Although it resembles moat of the other introduced phanerophytes that occur in the non-pasture vegetation, in being more or leas light-de:aanding, it differs from them in being capable of BLlch ta
ll
er growth. Fairl
y open successionalvegetation appears to be necessary for the germina
t
ionand establishment
131
survive the increasing competit
io
n for light as succession prooee da.By the time tha t the shrubs ar e being affected by competiti
o
n from the indigenous species, the fast-growing plants
ofPinus
radiatahave owrtopped the successional veg
e
tatio
n.(
Thus, "Northlander"( 1 94.3: 5)
has spoken of Ulex b eing overgrown and killedby
indigenous
s
pecies in1 0
to1 5
years. This couldhardly
blppen toPimls radiate. , which, according to Yeat�s
( 1 948 : 89 ) ,
may increase in height by three or four feet a yearafter
the first year or two).
Where only scatt ered
seeds reach a non-pastur
e area while it is at a suitable stage for the entry ofPinua radiate., i solated treea
may be expected, and this is usually the case in the non-pasture vege tation of the s tudy area, except where such vegetation ia closeto a Pinus radia ta plantation.
( In
the latter case, because larger .numbers of seeds are aviilable, the indigenous successional vegetation rray be replaced by a Pinus forest. Such a replacement
has
beenrecorded by "Northlander"
(1 943 :4) .
Further, aspredict ed
by Cockayne( 1 928 : }58) , i
t has been happening on a large scal e on the Volcanio .P lateau of the No
rthIsland,
where large Pinus plantations adjoinlarge areas of successional
vegetation) .
The fateof
isolated trees of Pinus radiate. when the regenera tingindigenous
vegetation aroundthem at las t aohiews the forest
climx
remainsto be
seen.(
According to Croker( 1 95} : 20) , it
takes about 80 yearsto
develop a climaxforest dom.i.na ted by Beilschmiedia
(4)
CONCWSION(
i)
General'fhe paper by C»cka.yne, Simps
on
, and Sco tt-Thom.son( 1 932) which
may be regarded as the princi pal contribu
t
ionto
the knowledge
ot the relationships between the introduced and the indigenous plant species of New Z ealand,tends to
place the emphasison
the incompa t ibility of the two floras. The same approach is used in thes
ubsequen
t paper by .Allan(1 9}6) ,
and imeed this is made clear in132
due to the fac t that ooth papers are concerned with refuting earlier a llegations of the innate " superiority" of the introduced species. However, Co ckayne1 Simpson, end Scott-Thomson
( 1 9.32: 1 5-1 8, 43 )
have claimed that there are " certain funiamental differences" between thetwo
floras in thematters
of life-formand
ha.bi ta t-preterence. Essentially, the posi ti on as described in their paper is that the exo tica are mostlyannua
l speci es,and
the indigenous plants largely woody or semiwoody evergre en perennials; wi th the expectable resultthat the exotica tend to be restricted to the ground laid bare in the process of settlement, and can only b;)ld their
ground
thereif
the regeneration of the indigenous woody vegetation is prevented.
(
In cormection with this last point, they haveobserved
that theexotica are aided by the grazing and browsing ani.rm.ls that were absent from the original indigenous vegetation
)
.A s far as lite-form is concerned, the " fundamental
dif'ferenoe"
is to some ext ent based on ovex-genere.lization. Actually,according
to Allan( 1 940: 1 0)
and
Cockayne(1 928 : 1 28-38) ,
treesand
shrubs comprise about1 Cl,%
of the introduced flora,semi-abruba
about�'
perennial t erres trial herbs about4%,
anmals abouty"', and
others))&,
whereaa the corresponding figures for the indigenous vascular species of thelowlands
ahd
lower hills are approximately3�, 4%,
4&�, �� and 1 6%.
(In
the latt er case, ferns account for more than a fifth of thecombined va lue for semi-shrubs and perennial terrestrial herbs
)
. Itis true that the introduced flora may at any rat e be regarded as predominantly herbaceous, even if not "for the most part
annu
als" . Further, the result sof
the pr esent study suggest that only afew
ofthe introduced woody species are of any numerical inq:ortance. . However, except in the case
of
the annuals, the diff erences in life-formclassification are hazdly suffici ently clear-cut to be described aa
"fundamental" . Further, al though the indigenous flora rmy have
evolved in the absence of grazing
and
brows
ingmamna.
ls1 it is evident, both from previous work that ha s b een cit edand
from the findings of133
of this environma:1.ta.l factor.
'ro some extent the idea of a definit e dis tinction between the
t110 floras is valid, in that most of the introduced species are economic species or weeds of long struruiing, that i s, are species of crop or pasture land, while a large proportion
of
the L�genous floracomprises forest species. T his distinc tion i
s
perhaps m::>st applicableto the vegetative erttremes, namely frequ ently-tilled
land and
non-pasture. However, it is evident from the results of the present work
that there is a considerabl e overlap betwe en the indigenous
and
introduced floras in the ma tt ers of lif e-form and habitat, and tbl.t this is most noticeable in the areas of unploughable pasture.(In
fact, this overlap may b e int erred from observations made by prnious workers. Ev en Cocka;yne, S impaon, and scott-Thomson( 1 932) ,
whilestressing "fundamental differences" , have reco
gni
zed that "mixed"communi ties may occur,
in
which thein
troduced and indigenous speciesoocupy equal positions, and indeed have given some examples
)
. For this reason, the neutral term " interaction" is prefera.ble to " compet ition" in adi
scussion of the relationshi ps between the two tloraa.(
ii)
Ne ed for J.rurther WorkThe present work can on
ly
be regarded as a preliminary study ot the subj
ect of intera ction. It would be very muchenhanced
by further investigations along at leas t two lines.The first of these "WOu ld
be
a practioal determination of o.bangea in the vegetation of the study area, through the repetition of the fi eld work, and in particular of the sampling surve,ys, after a lapse of time. I t has been noted ear li er that thesampling
surveys werecarried ou t in
1 9�,
the. t is, a t about the time when the aerial topdressing ofunploughab le
pa stures with artificial fertili zers became a normal pra ctice in th
e NJmB.i\'S.tu dis trict.In view of the known eff ects of the topdres sing ot unploughe.ble
(
in conjunction, where necesary, w1 th aerial oversowin
g,and
possibly
(
Matthew& and Maclean(1 957 : 257) )
the aerial dis tribution of herbicides)
,will t end to bring about an increase in the pro p>rtion of higher
producing pasture species in the sward,
and
a consequent decJrease in the pro];Crtion of lONer-producing and weed species, including indige-nous spec
i
es. However, this developnent implies heavier stocking, and mre intensive s t0ck contro l , which in turn involves adequatesubdivision. The IIDre difficult the country, the more difficult will this be, even allowing for the di stribution of fencing material by air. In effect, aerial f'a.nni.ng may be expected to inerease the degree
of
human
cxmtrol over the vegetation in areas of unplougha.ble pasture,but limiting factors will stil
l
apply.Another possible change of some interest concems the distribution
of certain important shrubby weeds, notably
tha t nre
at
present more impl)rtant at lower altitudes. Since thesespeci es appear to be spreading into the higher-a
l
titude areas,and
since there doea not appear to be any environmental barrier, they D'IAY eventually be of equal importance at higher a lti tudes . On the other hand , the more int ensive pasture managanent just referred to, possibly in combination with biological control, may result in a considerable reduc tion in the significa..."lce as we eds of these s pe cies.
The other debirable l ine of investiga