• No se han encontrado resultados

8. Teoría que relaciona el esfuerzo y la recompensa.

2.2.1 Planteamiento tradicional sobre el estrés laboral

2.2.1.2 Las vivencias del estrés a lo largo del tiempo.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington DC.

Astington, J.W. and Jenkins, J.M. (1995). Theory of mind and social understanding.

Cognition and Emotion 9, 151-165.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?

Journal of Autism and Developmental disorders 18, 379-402.

Başkent, D., van Rij, J., Ng, Z.Y., Free, R. and Hendriks, P. (2013). Perception of spectrally degraded reflexives and pronouns by children. Jounal of the Acoustical Society of America 5 (134), 1844-3852.

Bittner, D. and Kuehnast, M. (2011). Comprehension of intersentential pronouns in child German and child Bulgarian. First Language 32 (1-2), 176-204.

Bol, G.W. and Kasparian, K. (2009). The production of pronouns in Dutch children with developmental language disorders: A comparison between children with SLI, hearing impairment and Down’s syndrome. Clinical linguistics and phonetics 23, 631-646.

Chapman, S. (2011). Pragmatics. New York: Palgrave Modern Linguistics.

Chiat, S. (1982). If I were you and you were me: The analysis of pronouns in a pronoun- reversing child. Journal of Child Language 9, 359-79.

Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., and van der Lely, H.K.J. (2008). Narrative discourse in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 38(1), 28-40.

Comrie, B. (1997). Pragmatic binding: Demonstratives as anaphors in Dutch. In: Juge, M.L en Moxley, J.L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 50-61. Berkeley, CA.

Creemers, E. and Schaeffer, J. (2015). Grammatical and pragmatic properties of the DP in children with specific language impairment (SLI) and in children with high functioning autism (HFA). Linguistics in the Netherlands 32, 16-32.

Dahlgren, S. and Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (2008). Referential communication in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 12, 335-348.

Dale, P.S. and Crain-Thoreson, C. (1993). Pronoun reversals: Who, when, and why? Journal

of Child Language 20, 571-89.

Eigsti, I.M., de Marchena, A.B., Schuh, J.M and Kelley, E. (2011). Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

5(2), 681–691.

Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure. The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford Linguistics.

Evans, K. and Demuth, K. (2012). Individual differences in pronoun reversal: Evidence from two longitudinal case studies. Journal of child language 39, 162-191.

Fein, D.A. (2011). The neuropsychology of autism. Oxford University Press Inc.

Frith, U. and Snowling, M. (1983). Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1, 329–342.

Ghaziuddin, M. and Mountain-Kimchi, K. (2004). Defining the intellectual profile of asperger syndrome: Comparison with high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34, 279-284.

Goldstein, G., Minshew, N. and Siegel D. (1994). Age differences in academic achievement in high-functioning autistic individuals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental

Neuropsychology 16, 671–68.

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P. and Morgan, J.L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58.

Happé, F.G.E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition 48(2), 101-119.

Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J. en van den Toorn, M.C. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst: 2 Dl. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.

Hendriks, P., Koster, C. and Hoeks, J.C.J. (2014). Referential choice across the lifespan: Why children and elderly adults produce ambigious pronouns. Language, cognition and neuroscience 29(4), 391-407.

Kaiser, E. and Trueswell, J. (2004). The referential properties of Dutch pronouns and demonstratives. Is saliency enough? In: Meier, M en Weisberger, M. (eds.), Proceedings of

the Conference sub 8 Sinn und Bedeutung, 137-149. Arbeitspapier Nr. 177, FB

Sprachwissenschaft. Konstanz, Germany: Universität Konstanz.

Kaiser, E. (2011). On the relation between coherence relations and anaphoric demonstratives in German. In: Reich, I. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 15, 337-351. Saarbrücken, Duitsland: Saarland University Press.

Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In: Perry Almog, J. en Wettstein, H. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481-563. Oxford university press.

Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.

Kertz, L., Kehler, A. and Elman, J. (2006). Grammatical and Coherence-Based Factors in Pronoun Interpretation. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver.

Kuehnast, M. (2007). Production and comprehension of intersentential pronominal reference in early child Bulgarian: An experimental study. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 48, 171–202. Kuijper, S. (2016). Communication abilities in children with ASD and ADHD. Production,

Li, W.D. (1996). Second language acquisition of topic-comment structures in Mandarin

Chinese. PhD dissertatie, Universiteit van Alberta. Verkregen via:

http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/hkul/3849845.

Loveland, K. (1984). Learning about points of view: Spatial perspective and the acquisition of ‘I/you’. The Journal of Child Language 11, 535-556.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, vol. 1-2. Cambridge University Press.

Maienhorn, C., Von Heusinger, K. and Portner, P. (2012). Semantics: An international

handbook of natural language meaning. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin; Boston.

Mak, W.M. and Sanders, T.J.M. (2013). The role of causality in discourse processing: Effects of expectation and coherence relations. Language and cognitive processes 28(9), 1414-1437. Martin, I. and McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunctions? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language

85(3), 451-466.

Nation K., Clarke, P., Wright, B. and Williams C. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

36(7), 911–919.

Nilsen, E.S., Mangal, L. and MacDonald, K. (2013). Referential communication in children with ADHD: Challenges in the role of the listener. Journal of speech language and hearing research 56(2), 590-604.

Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., and Parkin, A.J. (1986) On the nature of the difference between skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading 9 (2), 80-91.

O’Connor, I. and Klein, P. (2004). Explorations of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of

Autism and Developmental Disorders 34(2), 115–127.

Oshima-Takane, Y. (1992). Analysis of pronominal errors: A case study. Journal of Child

Plaisted, J. (1999). Hierarchical attention shifting in children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 29, 29-47.

Randi, J., Newman, T. and Grigorenko, E.L. (2010). Teaching children with autism to read for meaning: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of autism and developmental disorders

40(7), 890-902.

Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica

27, 53-94.

Rohde, H. (2008). Coherence-Driven Effects in Sentence and Discourse Processing. PhD. Dissertatie, University of California, San Diego.

Rullmann, H. (2001). Dutch Demonstrative Pronouns in Discourse. Presentatie bij de zevende jaarlijkse Germanische Taalkunde conferentie, Banff, Alberta, Canada.

Schaeffer, J. (2003). Pragmatics and SLI. In: Levy, Y and Schaeffer, J. (eds.), Language

competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment, 1-29.

Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schaerlaekens, A.M. (1987). De taalverwerving van het kind. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen. Schiff-Myers, N.B. (1983). From pronoun reversals to correct pronoun usage: A case study of a normally developing child. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 48, 385–94.

Siewierska, A. (2004). Person. Cambridge University Press.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Strawson, P.F. (1974). Self, mind and body. In: Strawson, P.F. (ed.), Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. Methuen & Co. Ltd.

Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). Exploring the relationship between theory of mind and social- communicative functioning in children with autism. In: Repacholi, B. en Slaughter, V. (eds.),

Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development, 197-212. New York: Psychology press.

Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In: Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before Speech: The Beginning of

Interpersonal Communication (321–348). Cambridge University Press.

Van Kampen, N.J. (2010a). Anaforische middelen voor topicverschuiving. Nederlandse taalkunde 15, 189-210.

Van Kampen, N.J. (2010b). Topicverschuiving dankzij expliciete topicstelling. Nederlandse taalkunde 15, 213-215.

Ward, G., Birner, B.J. and Kaiser, E. (2014). Pragmatics and information structure. In:

Huang, Y. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics. DOI:

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.10.

Wittek, A. and Tomasello, M. (2002). German children’s productivity with tense morphology in the perfekt. Journal of Child Language 29, 567-590.