ISSN0373-580X
Bol.Soc.Argent. Bot. 37 (3-4): 181
-
191. 2002SECRETORY
STRUCTURESINTAGETES
MINUTA(ASTERACEAE,
HELENIEAE)
P. M.SIMON13,L. KATINAS12,and A. M.ARAMBARRI2
Summary: Tagetes minuta is an important worldwide resource due to itsagrochemical and
pharmacological properties.Despiteof the great number of chemical studieson this species, the secretory structures arescarcelystudied.Ananatomicalsurveyofall organsof T.minutawas carried out.Three types of secretory structurescoexist in T. minuta:(1)cavitiesinfoliarblade and involucral
phyllaries;(2)ductsinroot, stem,petioles, midvein,capitula peduncle, corollas,andstyles; and(3) glandular trichomeson stem, leaves,phyllariesofthe involucre, and corollas. Ducts havean uniseriate orbiseriate epithelium, generally surroundedby aparenchyma sheath. Secretory cavities have a
multilayeredepithelium,and lack a parenchyma sheath. There is a lack of continuity between ducts and cavities.
Key words: Asteraceae, Helenieae, Tagetes minuta, secretory structures.
Resumen: Estructurassecretorasen Tagetesminuta (Asteraceae,Helenieae). Tagetes minutacons¬
tituyeun importante recurso a nivel mundial debido a suspropiedadesagroquímicasyfarmacológicas.
Sibiense han realizado numerosostrabajos químicossobreesta especie,las estructuras secretoras han sido poco estudiadas. Un examen anatómico de todos losórganosde T.minutademuestra'que
existen trestipos deestructurassecretoras:(1) Cavidades en segmentos foliares y filados del involu¬ cro; (2) conductos en raíz, taílo,pecíolo,vena media, pedúnculo del'capítulo, corolasyestilos; y (3) tricomas glandularesen tallo,hojas,pedúnculos, filados ycorolas. Losconductos tienen epitelio uniseriado o biseriado y están generalmente rodeados de vainaparenquimática. Las cavidadestienen epitelio
multiseriadoy no poseen, vaina parenquimática. No existe continuidad entreconductosy cavidades. Palabras clave: Asteraceae, Helenieae, Tagetesminuta, estructuras secretoras.
externaland internalstructures(Cutler,1969; Esau, 1976) is confusing since individual structures Secretory structures involve a wide variety of sometimes transcendparticular categories (Cutler, elements suchascavities, ducts, individual cells, and 1969). Forexample,someauthors consider glandsas
trichomes. Asecretorycavity (glandor sac)isa more internalstructures(e.g.. Cutler, 1969)whereas others
or less isodiametric internal space or lumen, consider themasexternal (e.g., Esau,1976). surrounded byanepithelium ofsecretorycells(Fahn,
1979).When thespaces areelongated they constitute secretorycanals(orducts) (Esau, 1976). In otherca¬
ses, the epidermal cells give rise to glandular trichomes of various degrees of complexity, which release the secretion between the cell wall and the cuticle.Lerstenand Curtis (1989)concludedthat there isnoqualitative difference between ducts and
cavities,and that thesetermsmerely identify thetwo extremesofarangeof reservoirs. Inaddition, the traditional classification of these structures into
INTRODUCTION
Lerstenand Curtis areamongmodem authors who have contributedmost to theknowledge of secretorystructuresin Asteraceae,e.g.,in Solidago and Conyza (Lersten & Curtis, 1987, 1989),in
Eupatorium (Curtis & Lersten, 1986;Lersten & Curtis, 1986), and in Ambrosia (Lersten & Curtis, 1988), belonging tothe tribes Astereae, Eupatorieae and Heliantheae, respectively. On the other hand,
secretorystructuresingeneraofthetribe Heleniae havenotbeen extensively studied.
The subtribe Pectidinae (Robinson,1981) isone of themosteasilyrecognized oftheHelenieae,mainly byits conspicuous, large,secretorycavities in leaves andinvolucralphyllaries. ThegenusTagetesL., with , 55 species (Soulé,1996),constitutes, together with Pectis,oneofthelargestgeneraof Pectidinae.It includes the popular TagetesminutaL.,commonly knownas“chinchilla” and “Mexican marigold”,
DivisiónPlantas Vasculares,Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n,1900La Plata. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Morfología Vegetal,Facultad deCiencias Agrariasy Fo¬ restales, Casillade Correo 3>, 1900 La Plata.E-mail:
Corresponding
authorBol.
distributed in thetemperategrasslandsandmontane herbarium (see Appendix 1) and livingspecimens.
regionsofsouthernSouth America,including Peru,
Bolivia,Paraguay, Chile andArgentina.Itsaffinity for reconstitutedinboilingwater.Whole foliarsegments
disturbedsites hasallowedT.minutatocolonizemany andphyllarieswerecleared accordingtoStrittmatter areasaround the world suchasEurope,Asia,Africa, (1973). The midregion of plantorgans wereisolated Madagascar,India,Australia andHawaii(Soulé, 1993). and freehandcut transversely.Transverse serial Tagetesminuta is aneconomically important sectionsinwhole organs suchas florets and fruits worldwideresourceinmanycountries duetoits oilwith were also made. Some sectionswere stained with agrochemical andpharmacological properties.The Safranin while therestwere leftunstained. Material insecticidal activity offloral, foliar,androotextractsof T. wasalso fixed in formalin-acetic'acid-alcoholand minutaagainst cropspestssuchasweevils (Sriharanet processed by the usual techniques of paraffin
al.,1994; Weaveretal.,1994),mosquitoes(Perichetal., infiltration.Transverseserial sectionswere cut 10-1994, 1995;Maradufuetal.,1978),nematodes(Kumaret 15pmthickand stainedwithCresylviolet.
al.,1998; Zumarán etal., 1994), fungi(Bii etal., 2000),
Samples from herbarium specimens were
Light microscope observations and drawings bacteria (Hethelyietal.,1986),and viruses (Hudson, were carriedouton aLeitz SMLux microscope
1990)arewidelyrecognized.Variousmedicinalproperties equippedwitha camera lucida. Selected light anduseas acondiment and in the essential oil industry microscope imageswere transferred electronically (as“Tagetesoil”)arefully demonstrated andexploited fromthemicroscopetothecomputerusing the Photo (Neher,1968;Martijenae/«/., 1998;Craveirocía/., 1988). Express version 1.0 software, and then sized,
'Due
totheeconomic valueofT.minutamany processedandorganizedintoplates withCorelDraw chemical studies have beenperformed (e.g., Kaplan, 9, Corel Photo-Paint10and MicrosoftPowerPoint 1960;Lilipov,1997;Israilev&Seeligmann, 1983, 1985; computerprograms. Leaf and phyllary tissueswere Maradufu etal., 1978; Font Quer, 1981; Russinetal., prepared for scánning electron microscopy by 1988). The species is richinmany secondary sputter-coating with gold/paladium, and examined compounds, including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, andphotographedwithaJeolJSM-T100 Scanning flavonoids, thiophenes, and aromatics. Differences in ElectronMicroscope.
the oil activity between organs of T.minuta,suchas
between leaves and florets,havebeendocumented(Bii “ducts” for the elongated internal secretory structures,and “secretory cavities” for themore or Wefollow Fahn (1979) in theuseofterms,i.e.,
etal.,2000).
Secretory cavities, ducts andsecretorycells have less isodiametrical secretory structures. Both been reportedinthegenusTagetes (VanTieghem, 1872; structures aredefinedasincluding the epithelium Thouvenin, 1884;Leblois, 1887;Col, 1903;Metcalfe & and lumen.Allsecretorystructuresaredescribed in Chalk, 1950), focusingonTageteserecta(Thouvenin, transection,exceptwhenindicated.
1884)and T.patula (Van Tieghem, 1872). Untilnow, secretory structureshave been scarcely analyzed in T.
minuta.Adevelopmentalstudy in T.minutaby Del
RESULTS
Fueyo (1986) identified glands (=secretorycavities) inleaves andphyllaries,andsecretoryducts in petiole,
andmidvein,interpreting themasschizogenous. The the vascular cylinder (Fig. 1A, 2A). Cortex ducts: presence of thesestructuresinroots,capitulapeduncle, Fourtosix,ranging from 10pmto25 pmdiam., situated florets, and fruits,onthe other hand, hasneverbeen amongthe endodermis and the parenchyma cells of
investigated.
In thispaperweexamine theocurrence,structure periderm inrootswith secondary growth.Uniseriate
and distribution ofsecretory structuresinroot,stem, epithelium, with 5-6epithelialcells. Parenchyma
leaves,capitulapeduncle,involucre,florets, and fruits sheath is absent. Vascular cylinder ducts: Tento12, 15 pm to 40 pmdiam., situated inthephloem.
Uniseriate epithelium, with 5-7 epithelial cells. Parenchymasheath isabsent.
Root.Ducts aredistributed in thecortexand in
thecortexinrootswith primary growth,orin the
of T.minuta.
MATERIAL
AND METHODS
Roots,stems,leaves,capitulapeduncle,phyllaries Stem.Ducts: Twelveto 20,ca.30 pmdiam., oftheinvolucre,floretsand fruitswereobtained from alternatingwith thephloem andassociatedwith
P.M.Simoneta!., Secretorystructuresin Tagetes minuta(Asteraceae)
m
r
.•''iff)
\
n
.
m
p
if
*i
-¡rf
¿B
V
%
%
•:3
Mi1
P
V
É5
c
D
A
/
£
r
’j
h.
EH
F
_
5T
r
£*
i
>2
-ÍQÇ
F
CUP*
r';AWi
‘ v,’
E
Fig. 1. Lightmicrographsofcrosssectioninorgansof Tagetesminutashowing thesecretory structures(arrows). A:root
showingtwosecretoryducts,onein theperiderm andoneinthe phloem; B: enlarged' view ofstemshowingthecortexwhere
thesecretoryductsare found; C:secretoryduct instem cortex,associated with sclerenchymatissue;D:biseriate capitate
glandulartrichome instem.E: transitionareabetween the foliar blade and the petioleshowingducts (arrow)andonecavity; F: enlarged view of the foliarsecretorycavity. A, E, F: Simon 1078 (LP); B-D:Simon 20 (LP). Scale bars: 200 pm on A,B,
Bol.
corresponds to the capitate hairs or “biseriate capitateglandular hair” ofRamayya (1962), andare verywidelydistributedinAsteraceae.
schlerenchymatissue,inthe corticalparenchyma(Fig. IB).Uniseriate epithelium(Fig. 1C), with 6-10epithelial cells, surrounded by a parenchyma sheath. Trichomes (Fig. ID, 2B)L Differentiatedinto stalk and
head,70-200 pmlong.Stalkbiseriate (occasionally uniseriate); uniforminbreadth; oblongorbarrel¬
shaped;contentstranslucent; 4-7-celledineachrow; with cells suboppOsiteoropposite;
cell
walls thinorthick;outerwallsstraightorslightlyconvex,smooth; a1-2-cellularbaseimbedded among the epidermal
cells;cells of the basal tiers usually broader than longor isodiametrical. Head sharply or slightly demarcated fromthe stalk;roundedinshape;shorter than the stalk; contents dense, generally more notorious inthe terminal tier; 2-4-tiered, cells
isodiametrical,ofvariousshapes;cellwalls thinor
thick;outerwalls smooth. This typeoftrichome
Leaf
petiole. Ducts: Threetofive, rangingfrom35 pmto50pmdiam.,situated abaxially inthepetiole,
between the vascularbundles,in theparenchyma
(Fig. IE, 3A).Uniseriatetobiseriateepithelium,with 5-12epithelial cells,surrounded byaparenchyma
sheath(Fig. 3B). Occasionally, cavitiesare present
intransitionalareasbetweenpetioleand blade(Fig. IF).Trichomes: Similartothestemtrichomes.
Leaf
midvein.Ducts:Threetofive,ranging from 20 pmto50pmdiam. (Fig. 3C). Ductsareseenat various stages of development (Fig. 3D). Developedducts withuniseriatetobiseriateepithelium,
A
B
sv
ff5>
c
*D
Fig.2.Secretory structuresinTagetesminuta(arrows). A:secretoryducts intheroot cortex(above) andphloem(below)
showingthe uniseriateepithelium;B: biseriatecapitate glandular hairsin differentviews;C:secretorycavityinaninvolucral
phyllary showingthe multiseriate epithelium;D,secretoryduct in the style incontact withperiphericvascular and central . stigmatoidtissue. A: Simon 1078 (LP);B: Simon20(LP); C:Ringuelet185(LP); D:Mangieri11 (LP). Scalebars: 100 pm.
P. M.Simoneta!., Secretory structuresin Tagetesminuta (Asteraceae)
Leaf
blade. Cavities. Surface view: Leaves in with3-5epithelialcells,surroundedbyaparenchymasheath(Fig. 3E).Trichomes: Three-5-celled, oblong, T. minuta are pinnatisect, constituted by 8-20 segments; the secretorycavities areconspicuous, similartothestemtrichomes.
—
===£
'
a
>’ Km
i-mt
m
trJ
'il
r
/
§1®
/f
„x
• lA.
X %%
ft
m
©
a
\*4 o
1
*
/C’
4
XV
MB
y
x
\
%
X
YÍ V A
V
j
T
f
U
i\
>
v
tf
t
f
a.
E|
V ,1
D
r
X,
gsr
\
f
*
/
/
%
»
t
ft
Mi
aã
V
Vi &
Vi
4/ Vv
r
i
bt.-<
‘Vh
1
**
V si
í
If
F Ej
f-r
Fig. 3.Lightmicrographs of cross section in organs of Tagetesminutashowing thesecretory structures(arrows). A: enlarged view of the petiole showingtwosecretory ductsatboth sides of one small vascularbundle;B:detail of one petiolesecretory
duct showing the biseriateepitheliumand the surroundingparenchymasheath;C: enlargedview of the midveinshowingthe
areabetween the vascular bundles where thesecretoryductsatdifferentstagesof developmentarefound; D:secretoryduct of the midveinindevelopmentstage;E:maturesecretoryductofthe midvein showing biseriateepitheliumandthe surrounding parenchyma sheath. F: enlarged view of thecapitulapeduncle showing theareabetweenthe vascular bundles where the
Bol.Soc. Argent.Bot.37 (3-4)
large,pellucid,bulgingabove the surface of the thephloem,inthe parenchyma(Fig. 3F).Uniseriate
segments,rounded-elliptictolinearinshape,ten to epithelium,with 6-8epithelialcells,surrounded bya 15 per segment. They occurintworegions,the parenchyma sheath. Trichomes:Eight-10-celled,
slightlylargercavities (ca. 1mmlong.)arefound oblong,similartothestemtrichomes. alongthe blade margin, and the smallerones(0.1-0.3
mmlong.) areclustered ingroups about midway
between themarginand the midvein. Despite their InvolucreinT.minutais constitutedbyasingleseries differencesinposition andsize,thesecretorycavities of3-4connatephyllaries.Likeintheleaves,thesecretory are identical instructure. Transection: There is cavitiesareconspicuous,large,pellucid,
bulging
above commonlyone secretorycavityineach halfofthe thesurface ofthe phyllaries (Fig. 4A), lineartooblong segment,atthe level ofboth,palisade and spongy inshape, 0.2-2mmlong.,twotofiveperphyllary.Theymesophyll, or just at the levelof the spongy aredistributed in thecenterofthe phyllary,nearthe mesophyll,nearthe margin,paralleltothemidvein, margin,and also inthejunctionareabetweentwo
They range from 170 pmto 350 pm long. The phyllaries.Transection: One to fiveinthe whole
epitheliumis multilayered (insomepreparationsthe involucretransection, rangingfrom 50pm to230 pm border of the cavities appears disintegrated) (cfr.Fig. long.,attheleveloftheparenchymatissue (mesophyll), IF). Parenchymasheathnotseen. Trichomes:Two- oroccupyingthe whole phyllarytransection,fromthe 3-celled, sparse,similartothestemtrichomes.
Phyllaries
of
theinvolucre.Cavities. Surface view:externaltothe internalepidermis.Epitheliumsimilarto those of the cavities in leaf blade. Parenchyma sheath Capitulapeduncle.Ducts:Tento15,ca.30 pm is absent (Fig. 2C,4B, C). Trichomes:Four-10-celled,
diam. alternating with the vascularbundles,next to oblong,similartothestemtrichomes.
«
£2
•j v
A B
33
EWLM
©
r
f
lit
S3.
K
*8
©
Fig.4. A-B: SEM micrographsofsecretorycavities inTagetesminuta.A:secretory cavityinthe externalsurface ofa phyllary ofthe involucre; B: crosstransection«ofa secretorycavityinaphyllary ofthe involucre. C-D: lightmicrographsof
crosssection inorgansofTagetesminutashowingthesecretory structures(arrows). C:phyllary oftheinvolucre showingone
secretorycavity bulgingabove the externalsurface;D:corollawithasecretoryduct adaxialtothe vascularbundle, A,B:
P.M. Simon et at., Secretory structuresin Tagetes minuta(Asteraceae)
\—
1
©
/
P
—
/
J
VI
7
sdC!
V
O O
v
sd
f
t
°0?
Isd
scav
•:i:
,
ky\-*
\\
h
scav
L--P5
if
•4r
>
O
O
V sdA St
.
1H-
i—i—i—imMir
°
?AA
Sd0
o
St
if
<ÿ sd-;
sd
&
=2»(LSSy
/ sd/
Delineó:V.H.Calvetti
Ik
'i.Fig. 5. Diagrammatic overview of Tagetesmiijutawith the organs in transection, showing the ocurrence andpositionof the
secretory structures.Frombottomtotop: root, stem,petiole, midvein, blade,capitulapeduncle, capitulum.c=corolla; p=
Floralorgans.Secretory structures arepresent (1872),the corticalducts in therootsof Asteraceae in corolla and style, but they areabsent from the appearasmerely
intercellular
spaces formed in close connection with the endodermis. Tetley (1925) Corolla. Ducts:Fourtosix percorolla,ranging classified the ducts inroots of Asteraceae as from20 pmto30 pmdiam.,adaxially situated and endodermal (situatedinthecortex, closeto thealignedtothe vascular bundles,adjacenttothe xylem. endodermis),and non-endodermal (usually found in Uniseriate epithelium, with 4-6 epithelial cells, thesecondary phloem).Thisauthor suggested that surrounded by aparenchyma sheath (Fig. 4D). infacttheendodermal ductsarebordered by four
Trichomes:Distributedontheexternal epidermis,5- cellswhich,intransversesections, look exactlythe
9-celled,linear-oblong,similartothestemtrichomes. same astherestofthe endodermal andcorticalcells. Style. Ducts: One,rangingfrom 15pm to20 pm Theseductsmayremainborderedbythese four cells
diam.,situatedinternallytothe vascular tissue andin orinsomecasesbecome surrounded bythin-walled
contactwithacentralmassofcells withcollenchymatous epithelial-likecells.Inaddition,the formationof walls that would correspondtothestigmatoidtissue epithelial-likecells surrounding the non-endodermal (Esau, 1976).Uniseriateepithelium,with4-6epithelial ducts is ofcommon ocurrence(Tetley, 1925). Our examinations in T.minutaagree with Tetley’s (1925)
observations,showingendodermal (in the cortical Ductsandcavities connection. Serialtransverse parenchyma,orintheperiderm) andnon-endodermal sections and clearedsegmentsand phyllaries show (in the phloem) rootducts, bothtypesbordered by that there isnocontinuitybetweensecretoryducts epithelial cells (Fig. 2A).
and
cavities'
which results from the.absence ofanytypeofinterconnections between them. androecium and ovary (and thus fruit).
cells. Parenchyma sheath is absent (Fig. 2D).
Rootductsarethe onlystructuresin T.minuta that areboth,extravascular and imbeddedinthe vascular tissue (Fig. 1A). In therestofthe organs secretory structures areextravascular wich,in the caseofthe leaves, coincides with other genera of the tribe Helenieae such asPectis and Flaveria
DISCUSSION
Threetypesofsecretory structurescoexistinT (Petenatti &Del Vito, 20Ó0).Ductsincorollas of T. minutaaredistributed adaxialtothe vascular bundles minuta(Fig. 5): (1)secretorycavities infoliarblade
and involucralphyllaries;(2)secretoryducts inroot, (Pig- 4D), andarecontinuous from the base of the stem,petioles,midvein,capitulapeduncle, corollas, corolla tubetotheapexofthe limb. Discontinuity of and styles; and (3) biseriatevesicular glandular thesecretory ducts in florets of other genera of
trichomeson stem,leaves,peduncles, phyllariesof Asteraceae, such as Grindelia, is an unusual feature(Giraux & Susplugas, 1935). Ductsinstyles
theinvolucre,and corollas.
Atthispoint,wecanestablishmorepreciselya
(Pig-
2D)areonlyseenin theareaofthe staminal filamentsandnot atthe level of anthers or the distinction betweensecretoryducts and cavities inT.minuta.Besides their different distribution in the apical appendages.
This studyprovided the firstcomprehensive
plant,asremarkedabove,thesecretorycavitiesare „
wide (90-300 pm diam.),bulgingabovethe organ’s anatomicaldescription of thesecretory structures surfacè (Fig. 4A). In transection they have a of Tagetesminuta,mainlythose aspectsrelated multilayeredepithelium(Fig. 2C), lackaparenchyma to the secretory ducts. It was clarified or.
sheath,andarefather separated from
the
vascular established the presence andpositionofsecretory ducts in differentplant organs,the anatomicaltissue byparenchymaor sclerenchyma. Ducts,on
the otherhand,areless wide (10-50 pm diam.), and aspects of ducts were elucidated, and clear neverbulgeabove the organs surface. Intransection,
theyhaveauniseriateorbiseriateepithelium (Figs.
1C, 3B, E),aresurrounded byaparenchymasheath, demonstrated differences in theanatomy,size,and orthe sheat is absent, andarerelativelyclosetothe distribution of secretory structures of an economicallyimportant and still promisingspecies
Someadditionalremarkscanbemadewithrespect ’°f Asteraceae that can helpto anchor the great
tothe duct characteristics inrootsand the location amountofchemicalinformationabout Tagetesmi¬
nutato sites andstructures.
differences between ducts and cavities were established. In summary, this study has
vascular tissue.
P.M.Simonet at., Secretory structuresinTagetes minuta (Asteraceae) ISRAILEV, R. L. A. & P. SEELIGMANN. 1983. Distribu¬ ciónde los flavonoides foliaresen tresespeciesde Tagetes (Compositae)ysu significadoquimiosistemático.Lilloa 36: 5-14.
ISRAILEV, R. L. A. & P. SEELIGMANN. 1985. Los flavonoidesfloralesentresespecies de Tagetes. Lilloa 36: 187-190.
KAPLAN, L. 1960. Historical and ethnobotanicalaspects
ofdomesticationin Tagetes. Econ. Bot.14:200-202. KUMAR, A., F. V. DUNKEL & -S.SR1HÀRAN. 1998.
Effectiveness ofrootexudatesofthe Mexican marigold, Tagetesminuta, forthemanagement ofthe sugarbeet
cystnematode,Heterodera schachtii. Abstractofthe Annual MeetingofEntomologicalSocietyofAmerica, Las Vegas,Nevada.
LEBLOIS, A. 1887. Recherches sur I’origine et le développement des canaux sècrèteurs etdespoches
sècrètrices. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. 7e série,6: 247-330. LERSTEN, N. R. & J. D. CURTIS. 1986. Tubular cavitiesin
white snakeroot Eupatoriumrugosum(Asteraceae). Amen J.Bot.73: 1016-1021.
LERSTEN, N. R. & J. D. CURTIS. 1987. Internalsecretoryspaces
inAsteraceae.A review and originalobservationsonConyza
canadensis (tribeAstereae).LaCellule74:179-196. LERSTEN, N. R. &J. D. CURTIS. 1988. Secretory reservoirs
(ducts) oftwokindsin giantragweed (Ambrosiatrífida; Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 75:1313-1323.
LERSTEN, N. R. &J.D. CURTIS. 1989.Foliar oil reservoir
anatomy and distribution in Solidago canadensis
(Asteraceae,tribe Astereae). Nordic J. Bot. 9: 281-287. MARADUFU,A.,R. LUBEGA &F. DORN. 1978. Isolation of (5 E)-ocimone: A mosquito larvicide from Tagetes
minuta.Lloydia 41: 181-182.
MARTIJENA, J. D., D. A. GARCIA, R. H.MARÍN,M. A. PERILLO& J. P. ZYGADLO. 1998. Anxiogenic-like
and antidepressant-like effects of the essential oil from Tagetesminuta.Fitoterapia 69: 161-164.
METCALFE, C.R.& L. CHALK. 1950. Anatomyofthe Dicotyledons. 2. Oxford Clarendon Press.
NEHER,R. T. 1968. The ethnobotany of Tagetes. Econ.
Bot. 22: 317-325.
PERICH, M„ K. E.TREDWAY,C. WELLS &W. BERTSCH. 1994.ToxicityofextractsfromthegenusTagetesagainst adult and larvalstatesofAedesaegyptiandAnopheles stephensi(Diptera, Culicidae). Med. Entomol. 3L 833. PERICH,M., C. WELLS, W. BERTSCH&K.E. TREDWAY.
1995. Isolation of the insecticidal components of Tagetes minuta(Compositae)againstmosquito larvae andadults. Journalofthe American mosquito Control Association 11: 307-3 10.
PETENATTI, E. M. & L. A. DEL VITTO. 2000.Estructu¬ ra Kranz en las especies argentinas de Flaveria. (Asteraceae-Helenieae). Kurtziana 28: 251-257. RAMAYYA, N. 1962. Studies in the trichomes of some
Compositae.I.Generalstructure.Bull. Bot. Surv. India 4: 177-188.
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
WearegratefultoJorge V. Crisci, SusanaE. Freire, Richard Keating, andtwoanonymousreviewers for usefulcommentsuponthemanuscript. Special thanks aregiventoJohn Curtis for his valuablecomments
and suggestions. Víctor H. Calvetti is also acknowledged for the drawing of figure 5, and
curators ofherbaria LP and LPAG for loan of specimens. This workwassupported(L.K.)by Con¬ sejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientíficasyTéc¬ nicas (CONICET), Argentina, and the National Geographic Society (Grant5776-96).
lK
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BII, C.C., G. M. SIBOE & R. K. MIBEY. 2000. Plant essential oils with promising antifungal activity. Review of
aromaticand medicinal plants 6: 392.
COL, M. A. 1903. Recherchessurl’appareil sécréteur in¬
ternedes Composées. These, Université de Paris,Ecole Supérieure dePharmacie,J.Mersch Imprimeur, Paris. CRAVEIRO, C. C., F. J. A. MATOS, M. I. L. MACHADO &
J.W. ALENCAR. 1988. Essential oils of Tagetesminuta
fromBrazil.Perfum.Flavor. 13: 35-36.
CURTIS, J. D. & N. R. LERSTEN.1986. Development of bicellular foliar secretorycavitiesinwhite snakeroot, Eupatorium rugosum'(Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot.73: 79-86.
.CUTLER, E. G. 1969. Plant Anatomy: Experiment and Interpretation. 1. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, London.
DEL FUEYO, G. M. 1986. Ontogenia de las glándulas foliares
e involúcralesde Tagetesminuta(Compositae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 24: 403-410.
ESAU,K. 1976. Anatomía Vegetal. Ediciones Omega, S. A., Barcelona,España.
FAHN, A. 1979. Secretorytissues inplants. Academic Press
Inc.,London.
FILIPOV, A. 1997.Lafarmacopea naturalenlossistemas terapéuticos delos indígenasPilagá.Parodiana 10: 35-74. FONTQUER,P.1981. Plantas Medicinales:ElDioscórides renovado. Editorial Labor, S. A., Barcelona, España. GIRAUX, J. & J. SUSPLUGAS. 1935.Morphologieexterne
etétude anatomique du Grindeliarobusta Nutt.Bull. Sci.Pharmacol. 41/42: 1-18.
HETHELYI, E., B. DANOS & P. TETENYI. 1986. GC-MS
analysisofthe essential oils of four Tagetes species and the anti-microbial activity of Tagetesminuta.Flav. Fragr.J.1:169-173.
HUDSON,J.B. 1990. Antiviral compoundsfromplants. CRC Press, Inc.,Boca Raton, Florida.
STRITTMATTER, C. G. DIZEO DE. 1973. Nueva técnica dediafanización.Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 15: 126-129. TETLEY, U. 1925. Thesecretory systemofroots ofthe
Compositae. NewPhytol. 24: 138-162.
THOUVENIN, M. 1884. Contributional’étude anatomique
desrocinesdelafamilledes Composées.Thése,Nancy,
France.
VAN TIEGHEM, P. 1872. Premier memoire sur Tappareil
sécréteur des plantes. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., 5esérie, 16: 96-147.
WEAVER, D.K., C. D. WELLS, F. V. DUNKEL, S. E. SING & S. SRIHARAN.1994.Insecticidal activity offloral, foliar,
androot extractsof Tagetesminuta(Asterales, Asteraceae)
againstadult Mexican bean weevils (Coleóptera: Bruchidae). J. Econ.Entomol. 87: 1718-1725.
ZUMARÁN,G., E.LÓPEZ,A. MORALES &M. DELGA¬ DO.1994. Empleo del huacatay (Tagetes minuta) como plantaantagónicaenelcontrol de Ditylenchusdipsaci
enel cultivo deajo.Compendios del III Congreso del Perúde Nematología,p.28.Arequipa, Perú.
ROBINSON, H.1981. A revision of the tribal and subtribal limits oftheHeliantheae (Asteraceae). Smithsonian Contr. Bot. 51: 1-102.
RUSSIN, W. A., T. F. UCHYTIL, G. FEISTNER & R. D. DURBIN. 1988.Developmentalchangesincontentof foliarsecretorycavities of Tagetes erecta(Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1787-1793.
SOULÉ,J.A. 1993. Tagetesminuta: Apotentialnewherb from South America. In: JANICK, J. & J. E. SIMON (eds.),New Crops, pp. 649-654. Wiley, New York.
SOULÉ,J.A. 1996. Infragenericsystematicsof Tagetes. In: HIND, D. J. N. & H. J. BEENTJE (eds.), Compositae: Systematics, pp. 435-443. Proceedings of the International Compositae Conference, Kew, 1994. (HIND,D. J. N., Editor-in-Chief), vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew.
SRIHARAN, S., A. WRIGHT,P.SINGH, F. V.DUNKEL, D. C.RICHARDS, W. BERTSCH & C. WELLS. 1994. Insecticidalactivityof floralandroot extractsofTagetes
minutaand Tagetespatula(marigold)against the mexican
beanweevil (Zabrotes subfasciatus),a nontargetfish (Gambusia affmis), and thepredatorywarehouse pirate bug (Xylocoris flavipes). In: WEIGMANN, D. L. (ed.), New directions in pesticide research, development,
management, and policy, pp. 542-556. Proc. Fourth
National ConferenceonPesticides,Blacksburg, Virginia.
Recibido el 22 Julio de 2002, aceptado el 12 deSeptiembre
P. M. Simon etal.,Secretorystructures in Tagetes minuta(Asteraceae)
Appendix 1. Collection data (country,province, locality,date ofcollection,collector andnumber,and herbarium abbreviation) ofthe anatomicallyexamined specimens analyzedof Tagetesminuta.
ARGENTINA.Prov.BuenosAires.LaPlata,1995,Ringuelet 185 (LPAG),V-1995,Arambarri156(LPAG), 22-IV-1931,Finasteras.n.(LP);PuntaLara, 6-IV-1966,Rossis.n.(LPAG); Berisso,balnearioBagliardi, 1996,
Bayón 318 (LPAG). Prov. Chaco. Dpto. Nueve deJulio,Las Breñas, 16-XI-1998, Simon 20 (LP).Prov. Misiones.Caá-Guazú,IX-1940,Mangieri11(LP).
BOLIVIA.Dpto. Tarija,Cainguá, 15 kmNde VillaMontes, 4-VI-1971,Krapovickasetal.s.n.(LP);Dpto. Santa Cruz,vicinityofabandoned old JardínBotánico,alongRio Pirai and roadsidesonW side of Santa Cruz, 17° 47' S,63° 13'W,8-VII-1987,Nee35074(LP).
PARAGUAY.Dpto. Cordillera,Altos Colonia Bernal Cué, 18-VI-1973, Schininis.n.(LP).