• No se han encontrado resultados

Table 1. Mean and SD values, across all subjects participating in the experiment, of the parameters selected to describe the angle curves of the foot joints during normal walking.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Table 1. Mean and SD values, across all subjects participating in the experiment, of the parameters selected to describe the angle curves of the foot joints during normal walking."

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Table 1. Mean and SD values, across all subjects participating in the experiment, of the parameters selected to describe the angle curves of the foot joints during normal

walking.

Motion Joint Parameters Mean SD

DF/PF

Ankle

Initial contact angle (º) -0.73 3.47

PF angle peak (º) -9.85 3.30

Time PF angle peak (%) 21.00 3.66

DF angle peak (º) 4.08 3.23

Time DF angle peak (%) 72.64 6.87 Final contact angle (º) -15.33 4.97

Angle range (º) 20.17 4.44

MT

Initial contact angle (º) -1.83 1.82

DF angle peak (º) 7.60 1.81

Time DF angle peak (%) 78.58 3.52 Final contact angle (º) -5.57 2.77

Angle range (º) 13.39 2.61

MP

Initial contact angle (º) 17.40 5.57

DF angle peak (º) 32.67 3.46

Time DF angle peak (%) 94.34 3.60

PF angle peak (º) 0.61 1.21

Final contact angle (º) 26.88 7.96

Angle range (º) 32.03 3.65

AB/AD

Ankle

Initial contact angle (º) -1.94 2.30

AB angle peak (º) 0.90 2.45

Time AB angle peak (%) 36.34 12.56

AD angle peak (º) -6.75 2.55

Time AD angle peak (%) 90.67 4.96 Final contact angle (º) -3.87 3.26

Angle range (º) 8.02 1.75

MT

Initial contact angle (º) -3.05 1.88

AB angle peak (º) 2.43 1.02

Final contact angle (º) -6.35 2.91

Angle range (º) 9.54 2.33

MP

Initial contact angle (º) 4.58 2.95

AD angle peak (º) -3.81 1.67

Time AD angle peak (%) 72.83 12.22 Final contact angle (º) 3.67 3.67

Angle range (º) 9.35 3.13

IN/EV

Ankle

Initial contact angle (º) 5.30 2.51

IN angle peak (º) 7.65 2.68

Time IN angle peak (%) 93.82 3.82

EV angle peak (º) -2.01 1.48

Time EV angle peak (%) 44.50 15.02 Final contact angle (º) 6.02 2.93

Angle range (º) 10.11 2.12

MT

Initial contact angle (º) 0.86 2.37 1st IN angle peak (º) 2.08 2.06 Time 1st IN angle peak (%) 14.17 8.72 2nd IN angle peak (º) 1.64 1.90 Time 2nd IN angle peak (%) 87.36 10.54

(2)

EV angle peak (º) -2.20 1.77 Final contact angle (º) 0.34 1.95

Angle range (º) 4.80 1.51

MP

Initial contact angle (º) 2.11 3.89 1st EV angle peak (º) -5.62 3.63 Time 1st EV angle peak (º) 33.76 10.98 2nd EV angle peak (º) -7.61 3.30 Time 2nd EV angle peak (º) 80.92 15.77 Final contact angle (º) -1.86 5.14

Angle range (º) 12.35 3.96

(3)

Table 2. Mean and SD values, across all subjects participating in the experiment, of the parameters selected to describe the moment curves of the foot joints during normal walking.

Motion Joint Parameters Mean SD

DF/PF

Ankle

DF moment peak (N·m/kg) 1.24 0.08 Time DF moment peak (%) 75.39 2.41 Moment range (N·m/kg) 1.26 0.08 MT

DF moment peak (N·m/kg) 0.97 0.07 Time DF moment peak (%) 76.98 2.30 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.97 0.08 MP

DF moment peak (N·m/kg) 0.14 0.34 Time DF moment peak (%) 84.32 1.46 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.14 0.03

AB/AD

Ankle

AD moment peak (N·m/kg) -0.06 0.05 Time AD moment peak (%) 75.38 21.23 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.11 0.04 MT

AD moment peak (N·m/kg) -0.09 0.03 Time AD moment peak (%) 87.42 2.18 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.11 0.03 MP

AB moment peak (N·m/kg) 0.02 0.01 Time AB moment peak (%) 84.84 5.58 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.03 0.01

IN/EV

Ankle

IN moment peak (N·m/kg) 0.05 0.03 Time IN moment peak (%) 89.70 2.72 EV moment peak (N·m/kg) -0.21 0.06 Time EV moment peak (%) 51.84 8.30 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.27 0.05

MT

IN moment peak (N·m/kg) 0.07 0.03 Time IN moment peak (%) 85.84 2.95 EV moment peak (N·m/kg) -0.11 0.05 Time EV moment peak (%) 49.61 8.26 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.18 0.04 MP

EV moment peak (N·m/kg) -0.10 0.04 Time EV moment peak (%) 83.16 1.50 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.11 0.05

(4)

Table 3. Mean and SD values, across subjects of each gait pattern, for the parameters describing the angle curves that were significantly affected by the gait pattern.

Motion Joint Parameters Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

DF/PF

Ankle Time PF angle peak (%) 23.17 2.40 19.67 3.75 17.7 2.87 Angle range (º) 18.61 3.90 25.25 5.54 21.28 3.91 MT Time DF angle peak (%) 80.56 2.00 78.87 3.41 75.12 3.07 MP Time DF angle peak (%) 96.67 1.62 93.47 3.76 90.64 2.89 Final contact angle (º) 31.44 4.45 22.68 7.51 20.40 8.05

AB/AD

Ankle Time AB angle peak (%) 37.41 11.08 52.40 13.16 29.70 10.71 Final contact angle (º) -5.21 2.49 -3.30 5.59 -1.76 2.79 MP

Initial contact angle (º) 4.08 2.54 9.19 1.98 4.06 2.81 Time AD angle peak (%) 79.35 6.47 74.27 5.49 61.32 13.12 Angle range (º) 8.66 2.39 13.90 2.22 9.15 3.54 IN/EV

Ankle Time IN angle peak (%) 95.12 3.37 94.27 4.22 91.48 3.66 Final contact angle (º) 7.10 2.38 6.25 3.94 4.12 2.80 MT Time 1st IN angle peak (%) 18.17 10.27 3.80 3.41 10.48 4.04 MP 1st EV angle peak (º) -4.42 3.16 -2.78 2.22 -8.50 3.01

(5)

Table 4. Mean and SD values, across subjects of each gait pattern, for the parameters describing the moment curves that were significantly affected by the gait pattern.

Motion Joint Parameters Group 1 Group 2 Group 3

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD DF/PF Ankle DF moment peak (N·m/kg) 1.27 0.06 1.24 0.11 1.18 0.07

Time DF moment peak (%) 76.69 1.39 75.33 1.53 73.20 2.49 MT Time DF moment peak (%) 78.14 1.44 77.00 0.69 75.00 2.51

AB/AD

Ankle Time AD moment peak (%) 85.18 9.75 27.73 11.03 73.02 17.67 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.11 0.04 0.18 0.02 0.11 0.04 MT AD moment peak (N·m/kg) -0.10 0.03 -0.04 0.03 -0.09 0.03 Time AD moment peak (%) 87.97 1.68 89.73 0.50 85.78 2.23 MP AB moment peak (N·m/kg) 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.01 Moment range (N·m/kg) 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.01 IN/EV Ankle Time IN moment peak (%) 90.83 2.07 90.67 1.67 87.5 2.75 MT Time IN moment peak (%) 87.08 2.70 84.47 1.40 84.16 2.81

Referencias

Documento similar

Astrometric and photometric star cata- logues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission.

In the previous sections we have shown how astronomical alignments and solar hierophanies – with a common interest in the solstices − were substantiated in the

While Russian nostalgia for the late-socialism of the Brezhnev era began only after the clear-cut rupture of 1991, nostalgia for the 1970s seems to have emerged in Algeria

For instance, (i) in finite unified theories the universality predicts that the lightest supersymmetric particle is a charged particle, namely the superpartner of the τ -lepton,

The concept of breakdown probability profile is useful to describe the break- down properties of any estimate obtained through resampling, not just the bagged median or the

Number of samples (N), range, mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) of the quality parameters for the different training and

Government policy varies between nations and this guidance sets out the need for balanced decision-making about ways of working, and the ongoing safety considerations

No obstante, como esta enfermedad afecta a cada persona de manera diferente, no todas las opciones de cuidado y tratamiento pueden ser apropiadas para cada individuo.. La forma