Visión del evaluador
Carmen Plasencia, Ph.D.
Madrid, 18th February 2019
2
Receipt of proposals Receipt of
proposals Individual evaluation Individual
evaluation Consensus group Consensus
group Panel Review Panel Review Finalisation Finalisation Evaluators
Individual Evaluation Reports (remotely)
Consensus Report (in Brussels)
Panel report Evaluation Summary
Report Panel ranked list Eligibility check
Allocation of proposals to evaluators
Final ranked list
Proceso de evaluación
• Composición panel de evaluadores:
• Nº evaluadores
• Expertos área científica y otras como aspectos negocio
• procedencia (académico, empresarial);
• nacionalidad;
• experiencia en evaluación
• Evaluadores siguen EC instrucciones (criterios)
• También tienen sus metodologías para evaluar las propuestas
• Generalmente son exigentes
¿Es un proceso subjetivo?
Localizar propuestas innovadoras y de impacto
Estructura de la propuesta
• Part A : Administrative Form
• Summary
• Budget
• Palabras clave
• Ressubmission
• Ethical aspects
• Part B:
• Technical Annex 1-3
• Technical Annex 4-5
• Ethical Annex
• Other annexes
! TODAS las partes de la propuesta son importantes !
Estructura Part B
1. Aspectos formales: Primera Impresión cuenta !!!
• Leerse guidelines. Cumplirlas: EC check them!
• Page limits: No estamos obligados a leer exceso de páginas!!
• Tamaño de la letra (respetar 11 incluso en figuras!)
• Incluir imágenes, tablas... Tampoco inundar!
¿Menos es más?
2. Aspectos generales
• Ajustarse al topic: Challenge, Scope, Impact
• Coherente y razonada : Explicar la historia
• Concisa (Why?, what? how? To whom?).
• Detallada: debe contener información relevante
• No machacar!
• Responde a la pregunta en el apartado que toca
• Clara en objetivos y los mismos se pueden trazar en el proyecto
• TRL realista y razonado
6
The proposal fails to address the criterion or cannot be assessed due to missing or incomplete information.
Poor. The criterion is inadequately addressed or there are serious inherent weaknesses.
Fair. The proposal broadly addresses the criterion but there are significant weaknesses.
Good. The proposal addresses the criterion well but with a number of shortcomings.
Very Good. The proposal addresses the criterion very well but with a small number of shortcomings.
Excellent. The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion; any shortcomings are minor.
0
1
2
3
4
5
¿ Primera impresión ?
•Clarity and pertinence of the objectives
•Soundness of the concept, and credibility of the proposed methodology
•Extent that proposed work is beyond the state of the art, and demonstrates innovation potential (e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches, new products, services or business and organisational models)
•Appropriate consideration of interdisciplinary approaches and , where relevant, use of stakeholder knowledge.
•Clarity and pertinence of the objectives
•Soundness of the concept, and credibility of the proposed methodology
•Extent that proposed work is beyond the state of the art, and demonstrates innovation potential (e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches, new products, services or business and organisational models)
•Appropriate consideration of interdisciplinary approaches and , where relevant, use of stakeholder knowledge.
Ex ce lle nc e
• The expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant topic
• Any substantial impacts not mentioned in the WP, that would enhance innovation capacity; create new market opportunities, strengthen competitiveness and growth of companies, address issues related to climate change or the environment, or bring other important benefits for society
• Quality of proposed measures to exploit and disseminate project results (including IPR, manage data research where relevant);communicate the project activities to different target audiences
Im pa ct Im pa ct
• The expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant topic
• Any substantial impacts not mentioned in the WP, that would enhance innovation capacity; create new market opportunities, strengthen competitiveness and growth of companies, address issues related to climate change or the environment, or bring other important benefits for society
• Quality of proposed measures to exploit and disseminate project results (including IPR, manage data research where relevant);communicate the project activities to different target audiences
• The expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant topic
• Any substantial impacts not mentioned in the WP, that would enhance innovation capacity; create new market opportunities, strengthen competitiveness and growth of companies, address issues related to climate change or the environment, or bring other important benefits for society
• Quality of proposed measures to exploit and disseminate project results (including IPR, manage data research where relevant);communicate the project activities to different target audiences
Im pa ct
• Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including extent to which resources assigned in work packages are in line with objectives/deliverables
• Appropriateness of management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management
• Complementarity of the participants which the consortium as a whole brings together expertise
• Appropriateness of allocation of tasks, ensuring that al participants have a valid role and adequate resources in the project to fulfill that role
Im pl emen ta tion Im pl emen ta tion
• Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including extent to which resources assigned in work packages are in line with objectives/deliverables• Appropriateness of management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management
• Complementarity of the participants which the consortium as a whole brings together expertise
• Appropriateness of allocation of tasks, ensuring that al participants have a valid role and adequate resources in the project to fulfill that role
• Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including extent to which resources assigned in work packages are in line with objectives/deliverables
• Appropriateness of management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management
• Complementarity of the participants which the consortium as a whole brings together expertise
• Appropriateness of allocation of tasks, ensuring that al participants have a valid role and adequate resources in the project to fulfill that role
