DIGITAL UNIVERSITY 2010 WHITE PAPER

(1)

Annual Members`Meeting

Berlin, Germany, December 2

^nd

2008

DIGITAL UNIVERSITY 2010 WHITE PAPER

FRANCISCO JOSÉ GARCÍA PEÑALVO

TECHNOLOGICAL & ACADEMIC COMMITTEE MEMBER

Updat ed Se pt em be r 2015

(2)

2

Summary

1.  Introduction

2.  Digital University 2010 White Paper 3.  Digital University 2010 Reference

Model

4.  Conclusions

(3)

1. INTRODUCTION

(4)

4

Digital Era

•  In the beggining of the 21 ^th Century we are in a digital society first stage

•  We are in a trasformation time

•  Risks must be managed

–  Day by day operation

–  Change resistance

(5)

New rules

•  Services are the business center

•  Flexibility

•  Distance and time difference are not relevant

•  Information and knowledge will be

where activity requires them

(6)

6

Motivation

•  Higher Education must be adequate and integrated with the digital world

•  A higher education organization should offer its services through telematic media, in

order to

–   Be a higher education and research leader –  Speed up its operating processes

–  Remove every accesibility barrier

(7)

Context

•  Economic and politic connotations

–  Digital economic based on knowledge

•  Legal connotations

–  European and local country laws and guidelines

•  Academic connotations

–  European space for higher education

(8)

2. DU 2010 WHITE PAPER

8

(9)

Presentation

•  Digital University 2010 White Paper

§  Presented at the Salamanca University, October 2

^nd

2008

§  Made by

§  Alcalá University, Carlos III University, Castilla-La Mancha University, Rey Juan Carlos University, La Rioja University, Salamanca University, Seville

University & Valladolid University

§  Banco Santander, Telefónica, Universia & OCU

(10)

10

What is the DU2010 White Paper?

The Digital University 2010 White Paper is the result of a collective discussion between universities and enterprises about

the technological transformation that Spanish (European) University must tackle due to the goals and challenges from the

European Space for Higher Education

(11)

DU2010 White Paper Structure

UNIVERSITY MISSIONS

F U N C T I O N A L A R E A S TEACHING

RESEARCH THIRD MISSION

MANAGEMENT ECONOMICAL-‐FINANCIAL AND

HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT

T R A N S V E R S A L S V I E W

S

INFORMATION & SERVICES ACCESS

IST MANAGEMENT & GOVERNMENT KNOW HOW & KNOWLEDGE

MANAGEMENT

INTEGRATED DASHBOARD &

QUALITY

(12)

12

Chapter Structure

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

FUNCTIONAL IMPACTS

TECHNOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS BEST PRACTICES SUMMARY

(13)

Academic & Technological Committee

Chairman: Mario Piattini Velthius UCLM Technology and Information Systems Full Professor

Ángel Sánchez Temprano UAH Computer Science Director

José Manuel Torralba Castelló UC3M Materials Science & Enginnering Full Professor

José Luís Moraga Alcázar UCLM Manager

Eugenio Fernández Vicente URJC Computer Science Director

Eliseo Vergara González UR Infrastructure & New Technologies Vice-chancellorship Francisco José García Peñalvo USAL Technological Innovation Vice-chancellorship

Juan Camarillo Casado USE Digital University Director

Rubén Lorenzo Toledo UVa Telecommunication Dean

Alfredo Albáizar Fernández Santander Santander Universidades Director

Antonio Castillo Holgado Telefónica Competitive Intelligence General Subdirector

David Álvarez Ramos OCU OCU Group Technology Director

Project Leader: Jaime Laviña Orueta Freelance Consultor

Technical Coordination: Laura Mengual Pavón OCU Group Studies, Planification & Quality Director

(14)

14

3. DIGITAL UNIVERSITY 2010

REFERENCE MODEL

(15)

General Strategy

•  Internationalization and integration in the higher education commun spaces

•  More connection with the working mechanism

•  Improvement of the knowledge transfer channels

•  Searching of the academic and research excellence

•  Achievement of high quality levels

•  Performance of the European current legistlation

•  Full transparency, accountability and optimizing the management of public and private funds

•  Change of the educative methodology paradigm

(16)

16

A new environment for University

•  Globalization and internacionalization

ESPACIO COMÚN CANADÁ, EEUU, MÉXICO

ESPACIO IBEROAMERICANO DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR

ESPACIO COMÚN ASIA PACÍFICO

(AUSTRALIA, NUEVA ZELANDA, INDIA, SINGAPUR, CHINA ESPACIO EUROPEO DE

EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR (EEES)

ESPACIO COMÚN DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR DE AMÉRICA LATINA, EL CARIBE

Y UE (ALCUE) ESPACIO COMÚN

CANADÁ, EEUU, MÉXICO

ESPACIO IBEROAMERICANO DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR

ESPACIO COMÚN ASIA PACÍFICO

(AUSTRALIA, NUEVA ZELANDA, INDIA, SINGAPUR, CHINA ESPACIO EUROPEO DE

EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR (EEES)

ESPACIO COMÚN DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR DE AMÉRICA LATINA, EL CARIBE

Y UE (ALCUE)

European Space for Higher Education (ESHE) Common Space for Canada,

USA, Mexico

Iberoamerican Space for Higher Education

Common Area in Higher Education Latin America and The Caribbean – The European

Union (ALCUE)

Common Area Asia-Pacific (Australia, New Zealand, India, Singapore, China)

(17)

Technology

•   Technology is a fundamental key in the 21 ^st Century University

–  Web & Web 2.0

–  Service Oriented Computing (SOC) &

Business Process Management System (BPMS)

–  Document management & XML

–  Workflow Management Systems (WFMS) –  Datawarehouses & datamining

–  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

http://www.wordle.net/

(18)

18

DU2010 Model

Strategic Direction & IST Government

(19)

DU2010 Model

(20)

20

DU2010 Model

La Universidad Digital de 2010

IST MANAGEMENT

Continuity Management

……

Software Configuration Management

Availability Management Problem Management

Security Management Capacity Management

ERP

Academic Managament Economic Managament CRM

Human Resources Management LMS/CMS ……

Research Management

BUSINESS SERVICES

Teaching Teacher/Student

interaction Contents eLearning

Research Extension Economic & HR Management

Knowledge Management Academic & Research Mng.

ERP Telematic Services

……

Integrated Dashboard & Quality Student Relationship Mng. (SRM)

Prospective Students, Enterprises, Current Students, Faculty, Staff, Leadership, Society, Alumni, Institutions, Foundations, Centres, Administration, Visitors…

INTER-‐ FACES

Web Portal

INTEROPERABILITY WITH ORGANIZATIONS & SERVICES

Multi-‐channel Helpdesk ……

. . .

Collaboration Virtual Communities Publication Service

. . .

Transfer Spaces Cooperative Spaces Electronic Spreading

. . .

Teacher/Student interaction Contents eLearning

. . .

Requests Consultations

Processing . . .

Academic Organization Portfolio R&D Infrastructures

. . .

Repositories & web publication LRC / Library Data analysis

. . .

Tracking and assessment Decision Making

Measurement . . .

Employment bureau

Recruitment Graduate tracking

. . . Virtual Campus

Strategic Direction Portal

Other Web Portals

CHANNELS

Student card

Digital TV ……

SMS IP Telephony

eMail

(21)

4. CONCLUSIONS

(22)

22

Conclusions

•  A University new model is being constructed. Some keys

–   Technology is not an expense, it is a distinctive element

–  Lifelong learning

–   Education goes beyond of the classroom limits –   University rivals in a globalized

–  University must be a partnership of the Society

(23)

Conclusions

“The growth of Knowledge Society depends of

new knowledge creation, the transmission of this knowledge through education and training and also knowledge spreading through the IST”

(European Commission)

Redesign of functions and tasks, change in aptitudes and education

Improvement of the efficiency and the

externalization possibility

(24)

24

Conclusions In line with the

organization's vision

Investment in IST infrastructure

Strong implication of the University leadership

Better IST

government

(25)

Conclusions

(26)

26

Conclusions

(27)

References

•  Berlanga, A. J., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Sloep, P. B. (2010). Towards

eLearning 2.0 University. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(3), 199-201.

doi:10.1080/10494820.2010.500498

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2005). Estado actual de los sistemas E-Learning. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 6(2)

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in E-Learning: Experiences and Methodologies. Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science Reference (formerly Idea Group Reference).

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2008). Docencia. In J. Laviña Orueta & L. Mengual Pavón (Eds.), Libro Blanco de la Universidad Digital 2010 (pp. 29-61).

Barcelona, España: Ariel.

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2011). La Universidad de la próxima década: La Universidad Digital. In C. Suárez-Guerrero & F. J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.), Universidad y Desarrollo Social de la Web (pp. 181-197). Washington DC, USA: Editandum.

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J., García de Figuerola, C., & Merlo, J. A. (2010). Open

(28)

28

References

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J., García de Figuerola, C., & Merlo, J. A. (2010). Open knowledge: Challenges and facts. Online Information Review, 34(4), 520-539.

doi: 10.1108/14684521011072963

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Rivera, S., M. (2009). Digital University 2010. In J. R.

Canay, J. Franco, & P. J. Rey (Eds.), EUNIS 2009. IT: Key of the European Space of Knowledge. (Santiago de Compostela, Spain, June 23rd - 26th,

2009) (pp. 32). Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Publicacións.

•  García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane Pardo, A. M. (2015). Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1), 119-144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144

•  Laviña Orueta, J., & Mengual Pavón, L. (2008). Libro Blanco de la Universidad Digital 2010. Barcelona, España: Ariel.

•  Llorens, F. (2011). La biblioteca universitaria como difusor de la innovación educativa. Estrategia y política institucional de la Universidad de Alicante.

Arbor, 187(Extra_3), 89-100.

•  Llorens, F. (2014). Campus virtuales: De gestores de contenidos a gestores de metodologías. RED, Revista de Educación a Distancia, 42, 1-12.

(29)

References

•  López, C., García-Peñalvo, F., & Pernías, P. (2005). Desarrollo de Repositorios de Objetos de Aprendizaje a través de la Reutilización de los Metadatos de una Colección Digital: De Dublin Core a IMS. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, IV(Número monográfico II). Retrieved from

http://www.um.es/ead/red/M2

•  Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Vintage Publishing.

•  Piattini Velthuis, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Laviña Orueta, J. (2008). Libro Blanco UD 2010. In J. Á. Velázquez Iturbide, F. J. García-Peñalvo, & A. B. Gil González (Eds.), Actas del X Simposio Internacional de Informática Educativa - SIIE’08 (Salamanca, España, 1-3 de Octubre de 2008). Salamanca, Spain:

Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.

•  Ramírez Montoya, M. S. (2015). Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la

Sociedad del Conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica.

Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 103-118. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161103118

(30)

30

References

•  Suárez Guerrero, C., & García Peñalvo, F. J. (Eds.). (2011). Universidad y Desarrollo Social de la Web. Washington DC, USA: Editandum.

•  Toffler, A., Toffler, H. (2006) La Revolución de la Riqueza. Barcelona: Debate

•  Uceda, J., Barro, S., Llorens, F., Franco, J., Fernández, A., Fernández, S., Rodeiro, D., Ruzo, E., Canay, J. R. (2008) Las TIC en el Sistema Universitario Español (2008): Evolución. UNIVERSITIC 2008. Madrid: Conferencia de

Rectores de las Universidades Españolas (CRUE)

(31)

Annual Members`Meeting

Berlin, Germany, December 2

^nd

2008

DIGITAL UNIVERSITY 2010 WHITE PAPER

FRANCISCO JOSÉ GARCÍA PEÑALVO

TECHNOLOGICAL & ACADEMIC COMMITTEE MEMBER

DIGITAL UNIVERSITY 2010 WHITE PAPER

Annual Members`Meeting

Berlin, Germany, December 2

2008

DIGITAL UNIVERSITY 2010 WHITE PAPER

FRANCISCO JOSÉ GARCÍA PEÑALVO

Updat ed Se pt em be r 2015

Summary

1. Introduction

2. Digital University 2010 White Paper 3. Digital University 2010 Reference

Model

4. Conclusions

1. INTRODUCTION

Digital Era

• In the beggining of the 21 th Century we are in a digital society first stage

• We are in a trasformation time

• Risks must be managed

– Day by day operation

– Change resistance

New rules

• Services are the business center

• Flexibility

• Distance and time difference are not relevant

• Information and knowledge will be

where activity requires them

Motivation

• Higher Education must be adequate and integrated with the digital world

• A higher education organization should offer its services through telematic media, in

order to

– Be a higher education and research leader – Speed up its operating processes

– Remove every accesibility barrier

Context

• Economic and politic connotations

– Digital economic based on knowledge

• Legal connotations

– European and local country laws and guidelines

• Academic connotations

– European space for higher education

2. DU 2010 WHITE PAPER

Presentation

• Digital University 2010 White Paper

§ Presented at the Salamanca University, October 2

2008

§ Made by

§ Alcalá University, Carlos III University, Castilla-La Mancha University, Rey Juan Carlos University, La Rioja University, Salamanca University, Seville

University & Valladolid University

§ Banco Santander, Telefónica, Universia & OCU

What is the DU2010 White Paper?

The Digital University 2010 White Paper is the result of a collective discussion between universities and enterprises about

the technological transformation that Spanish (European) University must tackle due to the goals and challenges from the

European Space for Higher Education

DU2010 White Paper Structure

Chapter Structure

Academic & Technological Committee

3. DIGITAL UNIVERSITY 2010

REFERENCE MODEL

General Strategy

• Internationalization and integration in the higher education commun spaces

• More connection with the working mechanism

• Improvement of the knowledge transfer channels

• Searching of the academic and research excellence

• Achievement of high quality levels

• Performance of the European current legistlation

• Full transparency, accountability and optimizing the management of public and private funds

• Change of the educative methodology paradigm

A new environment for University

• Globalization and internacionalization

Technology

• Technology is a fundamental key in the 21 st Century University

– Web & Web 2.0

– Service Oriented Computing (SOC) &

Business Process Management System (BPMS)

– Document management & XML

– Workflow Management Systems (WFMS) – Datawarehouses & datamining

– Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

DU2010 Model

Strategic Direction & IST Government

DU2010 Model

DU2010 Model

4. CONCLUSIONS

1.  Introduction

2.  Digital University 2010 White Paper 3.  Digital University 2010 Reference

4.  Conclusions

•  In the beggining of the 21 ^th Century we are in a digital society first stage

•  We are in a trasformation time

•  Risks must be managed

–  Day by day operation

–  Change resistance

•  Services are the business center

•  Flexibility

•  Distance and time difference are not relevant

•  Information and knowledge will be

•  Higher Education must be adequate and integrated with the digital world

•  A higher education organization should offer its services through telematic media, in

–   Be a higher education and research leader –  Speed up its operating processes

–  Remove every accesibility barrier

•  Economic and politic connotations

–  Digital economic based on knowledge

•  Legal connotations

–  European and local country laws and guidelines

•  Academic connotations

–  European space for higher education

•  Digital University 2010 White Paper

§  Presented at the Salamanca University, October 2

§  Made by

§  Alcalá University, Carlos III University, Castilla-La Mancha University, Rey Juan Carlos University, La Rioja University, Salamanca University, Seville

§  Banco Santander, Telefónica, Universia & OCU

•  Internationalization and integration in the higher education commun spaces

•  More connection with the working mechanism

•  Improvement of the knowledge transfer channels

•  Searching of the academic and research excellence

•  Achievement of high quality levels

•  Performance of the European current legistlation

•  Full transparency, accountability and optimizing the management of public and private funds

•  Change of the educative methodology paradigm

•  Globalization and internacionalization

•   Technology is a fundamental key in the 21 ^st Century University

–  Web & Web 2.0

–  Service Oriented Computing (SOC) &

–  Document management & XML

–  Workflow Management Systems (WFMS) –  Datawarehouses & datamining

–  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

•  A University new model is being constructed. Some keys

–   Technology is not an expense, it is a distinctive element

–  Lifelong learning

–   Education goes beyond of the classroom limits –   University rivals in a globalized

–  University must be a partnership of the Society