• No se han encontrado resultados

p7_m.pdf.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "p7_m.pdf.pdf"

Copied!
26
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

GENERATING MACROECONOMIC

SCENARIOS USING STATISTICAL

COPULAS

Enrique M. Quilis

Macroeconomic Research Department

(2)

DISCLAIMER

Any views expressed herein are my own and

(3)

INDEX

What is a macroeconomic scenario?

How do we generate a macroeconomic

scenario?

Application: simulating 2014 GDP growth. Application: simulating 2014 GDP growth.

Calibration.

Monte Carlo simulation.

Stress testing.

(4)

DEFINITION

What is a macroeconomic scenario?

A quantitative statement about the future rate of

growth of key macroeconomic aggregates.

Ideally, it should contain measures of the

uncertainty around those rates.

The individual scenarios can be plugged into

(5)

DEFINITION

Mean Std. Dev.

Households consumption C 0.2 0.4

Government consumption G -2.2 0.7

Fixed capital formation I -0.8 1.0

2014 Rate of growth Variable

Fixed capital formation I -0.8 1.0

(6)

GENERATION

How do you think macro scenarios come to live?

There are several methodologies that can be used in

a complementary way.

Here we propose the use of Monte Carlo simulation of Here we propose the use of Monte Carlo simulation of

a multivariate model.

The multivariate model is a Gaussian copula model

(7)

GENERATION: Marginals

Marginal pdfs (after

normalization):

) 1 ( x ) 1 ( x x 100 X − − − × =

Z=[C G I X M]

(8)

GENERATION: Copula function

C, G, I, X and M are not

independent, they covariate

model: Gaussian copula, key

parameter: correlation matrix =

parameter: correlation matrix =

R.

Origin of the model: valuation of

(9)

GENERATION: Monte Carlo simulation

1. Setting model parameters (calibration). 2. Simulating the multivariate standardized

gaussian distribution. Correlation matrix: R.

3. Deriving the implied uniforms linked to the 3. Deriving the implied uniforms linked to the

cdf (grades).

4. Computing the marginals according to their

univariate specification.

5. Generating GDP results: Y=wZ, w=weights

(10)

APPLICATION: 2014 GDP growth

Simulation of the GDP growth in 2014.

The simulation is based on consistent

scenarios for C, G, I, X and M. GDP will

be derived bottom-up.

The model is calibrated using the panel of

private forecasters compiled by FUNCAS

private forecasters compiled by FUNCAS

(November, 2013).

Numerical results are provided via Monte

Carlo simulation of the copula model.

Stress tests allow us to check the

(11)

APPLICATION: Calibration, FUNCAS panel

4 6 8

(12)

APPLICATION: Calibration

Calibration of the Beta parameters, after

suitable normalization on the simplex [0,1].

Min Max p q Mean Variance

Original panel Beta parameters Implied moments Normalized panel

Min Max p q Mean Variance

C -0.60 0.90 1.73 1.45 0.54 0.06

G -3.30 -0.70 1.24 1.60 0.44 0.06

I -2.50 1.70 1.36 2.10 0.39 0.05

X 4.50 7.10 1.03 1.13 0.48 0.08

(13)

APPLICATION: Calibration

The correlation matrix is calibrated using the

historical database of the REMS model.

We have used rates of growth from 1981 to

2012 (annual time series).

C G I X M

C 1.00 0.57 0.91 0.11 0.86

G 0.57 1.00 0.44 -0.28 0.37

I 0.91 0.44 1.00 0.11 0.88

X 0.11 -0.28 0.11 1.00 0.26

(14)

APPLICATION: Calibration

The GDP growth is derived as a weighted

average of the individual rates of growth.

The contributions are set according to their

weight on 2013 nominal GDP.

2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

C 0.59 0.59 0.59

G 0.21 0.20 0.20

I 0.21 0.20 0.18

X 0.31 0.33 0.34

(15)

APPLICATION: Monte Carlo simulation

We assume that the contribution of the

changes in stocks to GDP growth is zero.

We run a Monte Carlo simulation of the

copula model (n=5000 draws).

Each simulation defines a consistent scenario

for the growth of C, G, I, X, M and, by aggregation, of Y (GDP).

Each scenario can be plugged into a system

(16)

APPLICATION: Results

5 -4 -2 0 G -1 0 1 C

0 2 4

4 6 8

-5 0 5

-4 -2 0

-1 0 1

(17)

APPLICATION: Results

400 600 800 1000 1200

Mean

Std.

Deviation 2.5 25 50 75 97.5 0 0.7

0.73 0.34 0.08 0.49 0.74 0.96 1.39 0.01 0.47 Probability of growth lower than: Percentiles

-0.50 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

200

(18)

APPLICATION: Results

Mean Std. Dev.

Households consumption C 0.2 0.4

Government consumption G -2.2 0.7

Fixed capital formation I -0.8 1.0

2014 Rate of growth Variable

Fixed capital formation I -0.8 1.0

(19)

APPLICATION: STRESS TESTS

Stress test 1: Increased correlation between

C and X and between X and M.

Stress test 2: X evolves according to an

extreme value (EV) distribution (instead of a beta). The EV distribution is calibrated to

beta). The EV distribution is calibrated to yield only growth values lower than 5%.

Stress test 3: Combining previous stressed

(20)

APPLICATION: STRESS TESTS

Stress test 1: Increased (doubled)

correlation between C and X and between X and M. X is now more coupled to C and M.

Variable

Variable C G I X M

Variable C G I X M

Households consumption C 1.00 0.57 0.91 0.22 0.86

Government consumption G 0.57 1.00 0.44 -0.28 0.37 Gross capital formation I 0.91 0.44 1.00 0.11 0.88 Exports of goods and services X 0.22 -0.28 0.11 1.00 0.52

(21)

APPLICATION: STRESS TESTS

Stress test 2: X evolves according to an

extreme value (EV) distribution (instead of a beta). The EV distribution is calibrated to

yield only growth values lower than 5%.

This simulation tries to quantify the exposure

This simulation tries to quantify the exposure

of GDP to X’s tail risk.

Variable Threshold Location Scale

X 5% 0.1300 0.0441

(22)

APPLICATION: STRESS TESTS

1 1.5 G D P G ro w th

Base (a) X: Increased correlation (b) X: tail risk (a) + (b)

(23)

APPLICATION: STRESS TESTS

Mean

Std.

Deviation 2.5 25 50 75 97.5 0 0.7

Probability of growth lower than: Percentiles

Simulation

Base 0.73 0.34 0.08 0.49 0.74 0.96 1.39 0.01 0.47

(a) Increased correlation 0.73 0.30 0.14 0.52 0.72 0.93 1.35 0.01 0.47

(b) Tail risk 0.40 0.28 -0.09 0.19 0.40 0.61 0.94 0.08 0.83

(a) and (b) 0.40 0.27 -0.09 0.19 0.40 0.61 0.92 0.07 0.84

(24)

MACRO SCENARIOS: CONCLUSIONS

The generation of macroeconomic scenarios

by means of the Monte Carlo simulation of a copula model suitably calibrated is explicit, objective and flexible, all of them atractive features to communicate and share with the final users of those scenarios.

The methodology can also encompass a wide

variety of stress tests that quantify its robustness to alternative hypothesis.

The results can be easily plugged in other

(25)

REFERENCES

Li, D. X. (2000) “On Default Correlation:

A Copula Function Approach”,

Journal of

Fixed Income,

vol. 9, p. 43—54.

Martin, R. (2004)

Credit Portfolio

Martin, R. (2004)

Credit Portfolio

Modeling Handbook

, Credit Suisse First

Boston.

Meucci, A., (2005)

Risk and Asset

(26)

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!!

Enrique M. Quilis

Macroeconomic Research Department

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. Spain.

Referencias

Documento similar

We seek to characterize the transport in a time-dependent flow by identifying coherent structures in phase space, in particular, hyperbolic points and the associated unstable and

PET scanners simulation with Monte Carlo methods also allows the optimization of system design for new scanners, the study of singled-out factors affecting image quality and

Different quantities were compared between data and Monte Carlo to test the validity of the Monte Carlo description of the data for events with large E / after the pre-selection cuts

In the previous sections we have shown how astronomical alignments and solar hierophanies – with a common interest in the solstices − were substantiated in the

One might expect that there is a smooth transition between a small sample regime, in which finite size effects such as those observed in sums of heavy-tailed random variables,

In the preparation of this report, the Venice Commission has relied on the comments of its rapporteurs; its recently adopted Report on Respect for Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule

The draft amendments do not operate any more a distinction between different states of emergency; they repeal articles 120, 121and 122 and make it possible for the President to

H I is the incident wave height, T z is the mean wave period, Ir is the Iribarren number or surf similarity parameter, h is the water depth at the toe of the structure, Ru is the