Development AID at a Glance Statistics by Region Europe
12
0
0
Texto completo
(2) 5.1. ODA TO EUROPE - SUMMARY. 5.1.1. Top 10 ODA receipts by recipient USD million, net disbursements in 2010. 5.1.3. Trends in ODA. 1. Turkey. 1 049. 18%. 2. Serbia. 651. 11%. 3. Ukraine. 624. 11%. 4. Kosovo. 591. 10%. 5. Bosnia-Herzegovina. 492. 9%. 6. Moldova. 468. 8%. 7. Albania. 338. 6%. 8. Macedonia, FYR. 178. 3%. 9. Croatia. 149. 3%. 10. Belarus. 137. 2%. Other recipients. 1 106. 19%. Total. 5 782. 100%. 2009 ODA net disbursements (2009 USD million) ODA commitments (2009 USD million) Population (thousands) Net ODA per capita (USD). 2010. 5 731. % change. 5 831. 1.7%. 6 093. 7 659. 25.7%. 154 175 37.2. 154 864 37.3. 0.4% ―. 5.1.4. ODA by income group USD million, 2010, net disbursements 5.1.2. Top 10 ODA donors USD million, net disbursements in 2010 1. EU Institutions. 2. Japan. 3 4. 1 028. 1 990. 34%. 638. 11%. Germany. 509. 9%. United States. 497. 9%. 5. France. 233. 4%. 6. IDA. 188. 3%. 7. Sweden. 175. 3%. 8. Austria. 154. 3%. 9. Switzerland. 151. 3%. 10. Turkey. 140. 2%. Other donors. 1 106. 19%. Total. 5 782. 100%. Least Developed Countries Other Low Income. 2 691. Lower Middle Income Upper Middle Income Unspecified. 2 063. 5.1.5. Sectors in 2010 commitments. 37%. 0%. 10% Social. 20% Economic. 28%. 30% Production. 40% Multisector. 50%. 9%. 60%. General Programme Aid. 70% Debt. 17%. 80%. 3% 1 4%. 90%. Humanitarian. 100% Others. 2.
(3) 5.1.6. Net ODA receipts per person in 2010 in USD Oceania. 5.1.7. Net ODA and population of aid recipient countries by region in 2010. 221 63. Af rica. Africa Asia America Europe Oceania Aid unspecified by region All ODA recipients. 47. Europe. 37. All developing countries. 24. America. 19. Asia. 10 0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. 60. USD. Net ODA USD million 47 932 36 711 10 812 5 782 2 019 27 831 131 087. Population million 1 021 3 778 584 155 9 --5 547. 5.1.8. Regional shares of total net ODA As a percentage of total ODA. % 45 Af rica. 40 35. Asia. 30 25. America 20 15. Europe. 10 5. Oceania. 2010. 2008. 2006. 2004. 2002. 2000. 1998. 1996. 1994. 1992. 1990. 0. 3.
(4) 5.2. ODA TO EUROPE BY DONOR AND RECIPIENT 5.2.1. Top 10 DAC donor countries to Europe USD million, net bilateral disbursements. a) Top 10 donors by amount 2008. 2009. 2010. 3-year average. b) Top 10 donors by share of aid to Europe % of DAC countries. 2008. 2009. 2010. 3-year average. Europe as % of each donor's aid 2008-2010. 1 Germany 2 United States. 446 396. 535 561. 509 497. 497 485. 17% 16%. 1 Greece 2 Austria. 130 163. 123 148. 89 154. 114 155. 53% 23%. 3 Japan. 342. 310. 638. 430. 14%. 3 Switzerland. 135. 136. 151. 141. 15%. 4 France. 435. 297. 233. 322. 11%. 4 Sweden. 162. 188. 175. 175. 10%. 5 Sweden. 162. 188. 175. 175. 6%. 5 Japan. 342. 310. 638. 430. 8%. 6 Spain. 206. 205. 94. 168. 6%. 6 Germany. 446. 535. 509. 497. 8%. 7 Austria. 163. 148. 154. 155. 5%. 7 Luxembourg. 16. 16. 19. 17. 7%. 8 Switzerland. 135. 136. 151. 141. 5%. 8 Portugal. 34. 18. 17. 23. 7%. 9 Greece. 130. 123. 89. 114. 4%. 9 Italy. 70. 51. 64. 62. 6%. 10 Norway. 112. 103. 111. 109. 4%. 10 Norway. 112. 103. 111. 109. 6%. 454. 364. 355. 391. 13%. Other DAC countries. 1 371. 1 342. 1 079. 1 264. 3%. 2 982. 2 971. 3 006. 2 986. 100%. Total DAC countries. 2 982. 2 971. 3 006. 2 986. 5%. Other DAC countries Total DAC countries. 5.2.2. DAC donor countries’ aid to Europe USD billion, values shown for 2010, net bilateral disbursements 2008. 2009. 2010. 1.0. 0.8 0.64. 0.6. 0.51 0.50. 0.4 0.23. 0.2. 0.0. 0.18. 0.09 0.15 0.15. 0.09 0.11. 0.06. 0.06 0.06 0.05. 0.04 0.03. 0.02 0.02 0.02. 0.00. 0.00. 0.00. -0.2. 4.
(5) 5.2.3. ODA to Europe by DAC donor USD million, 2009 prices and exchange rates, average annual net bilateral disbursements. 1970-79 Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Norway Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom United States Total DAC countries EU Institutions. 0 12 12 13 2 0 46 417 20 33 20 0 13 6 5 85 171 854 126. 1980-89 1 48 14 5 ( 0) 1 74 438 71 108 0 13 0 14 1 3 5 42 252 1 088 97. 1990-99 11 151 4 26 3 21 108 446 25 5 229 145 2 5 158 0 111 1 26 90 57 81 264 1 968 607. 2000-10 6 143 16 75 40 29 279 444 131 8 99 193 17 16 166 0 166 16 148 146 146 135 635 3 052 1 722. 2000-10. 2000-10. % of DAC countries. Europe as % of each donor's aid. 0% 5% 1% 2% 1% 1% 9% 15% 4% 0% 3% 6% 1% 1% 5% 0% 5% 1% 5% 5% 5% 4% 21% 100% ---. 0% 19% 1% 3% 3% 6% 5% 7% 62% 1% 7% 3% 5% 7% 6% 0% 9% 5% 6% 9% 16% 3% 4% 5% 18%. 5.2.4. ODA to Europe by largest bilateral donors since 1970 USD billion, 2009 prices and exchange rates, 3-year average net bilateral disbursements. 1.0 Germany. 0.8 United States. 0.6 Japan. 0.4 France. 0.2 Italy. 2005. 2000. 1995. 1990. 1985. 1980. 1975. 1970. 0.0. 5.
(6) 5.2.5. Top 10 multilateral donors to Europe USD million, net disbursements 2008. 1 EU Institutions 2 IDA. 1 791 110. 2009. 2 292 81. 2010. 1 990 188. 3-year average 2 024 127. % of all multilaterals 83.9% 5.2%. 3 Global Fund. 59. 50. 84. 64. 2.7%. 4 IMF (Concessional Trust Funds). 16. -21. 101. 32. 1.3%. 5 UNHCR. 28. 21. 10. 20. 0.8%. 6 GEF. 19. 28. 10. 19. 0.8%. 7 UNTA. 56. -. -. 19. 0.8%. 8 WHO. -. 21. 25. 15. 0.6%. 9 UNDP. 14. 14. 12. 14. 0.6%. 10 IAEA. 14. 11. 15. 13. 0.5%. 68. 58. 71. 66. 2.7%. 2 176. 2 555. 2 506. 2 412. 100%. Other multilaterals Total multilaterals. 5.2.6. ODA to Europe by largest multilateral donors since 1970 USD billion, 2009 prices and exchange rates, 3-year average net disbursements. 2.0. EU institutions. 1.6 IDA. 1.2. UNHCR. 0.8. 0.4 WFP. 2005. 2000. 1995. 1990. 1985. 1980. 1975. 1970. 0.0. 6.
(7) 5.2.7. Top 10 ODA recipients in Europe USD million, receipts from all donors, net ODA receipts 2008 1 Turkey 2 Serbia. 2009. 2010. 3-year average. % of all recipients. 1 116 973. 1 362 614. 1 049 651. 1 176 746. 21% 13%. 3 Ukraine. 618. 666. 624. 636. 11%. 4 Bosnia-Herzegovina. 467. 414. 492. 458. 8%. 5 Kosovo. -. 781. 591. 458. 8%. 6 Albania. 363. 357. 338. 353. 6%. 7 Moldova. 298. 244. 468. 336. 6%. 8 Macedonia, FYR. 205. 192. 178. 192. 3%. 9 Croatia. 242. 169. 149. 186. 3%. 10 Belarus. 110. 98. 137. 115. 2%. 986. 834. 1 106. 975. 17%. 5 377. 5 731. 5 782. 5 630. 100%. Other recipients Total ODA recipients. 5.2.8. Top 10 ODA recipients in Europe with their share of net debt relief grants USD billion, net ODA receipts. 2008. 2009. 2010. Net debt relief grants. 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0. 7.
(8) 5.2.9. ODA to Europe by recipient country USD million, 2009 prices and exchange rates, net ODA receipts. 2000-10 Share(%) 7.2 1.0 13.1 3.1 2.3 5.3 0.1 4.3 0.8 27.2 0.7 12.2 5.6. Albania Belarus Bosnia-Herzegovina Croatia Cyprus Gibraltar Kosovo Macedonia, FYR Malta Moldova Montenegro Serbia Slovenia Turkey Ukraine States Ex-Yugoslavia Europe, regional Europe total. 1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-10 Annual averages 3 371 395 52 0 762 713 59 172 106 78 32 22 27 1 125 109 288 116 51 42 6 30 234 46 172 1 488 50 39 681 945 651 667 303. 2007. 2008 2009 Annual amounts 317 354 357 85 103 98 614 451 414 169 235 169 781 211 201 192 274 289 244 109 101 75 873 943 614 845 1 119 1 362 431 600 666. 2010 344 136 490 155 597 176 471 78 667 1 044 625. 4.7 12.4. 90 168. 22 296. 944 228. 255 680. 56 517. 49 806. 17 742. 18 1 031. 100.0. 1 182. 1 422. 3 450. 5 464. 4 500. 5 251. 5 731. 5 831. 5.2.10. Trends in aid to largest European recipients since 1970 USD billion, 2009 prices and exchange rates, 3-year average net ODA receipts. Albania. 2.0. Serbia. 2.5 2.0. 1.5. 1.5. 1.0. 1.0. 0.5. 0.5 1995. 2000. 2005. 1995. 2000. 2005. 1990. 1985. 1980. 1975. 2005. 1995. 1990. 1985. 1980. 1975. 1970. 2000. Turkey. Bosnia-Herzegovina. 2.0. 1970. 0.0. 0.0. 3.0 2.5. 1.5. 2.0. 1.0. 1.5 1.0. 0.5. 0.5 1990. 1985. 1980. 1975. 0.0 1970. 2005. 2000. 1995. 1990. 1985. 1980. 1975. 1970. 0.0. 8.
(9) 5.3. ODA TO EUROPE BY SECTOR 5.3.1. ODA to Europe by sector since 1990 As a percentage of total ODA to Europe, 3-year average commitments. % 50. SOCIAL. ECONOMIC. 40 PRODUCTION. 30. MULTISECTOR. GENERAL PROGRAMME AID. 20. DEBT. HUMANITARIAN. 10. OTHERS. 2009. 2008. 2007. 2006. 2005. 2004. 2003. 2002. 2001. 2000. 1999. 1998. 1997. 1996. 1995. 1994. 1993. 1992. 1991. 1990. 0. 5.3.2. ODA to 5 largest recipients in Europe by sector in 2010 As a percentage of total ODA committed for each country SOCIAL. ECONOMIC. PRODUCTION. MULTISECTOR. GENERAL PROGRAMME AID. DEBT. HUMANITARIAN. OTHERS. Bosnia-Herzegovina Kosovo Serbia Turkey Ukraine 20%. 1. 29. 59. 0%. 24. 16. 38. 22. 40%. 60%. 2. 11. 11. 33. 44. 10. 3. 8. 76. 6. 4. 35. 54. 80%. 10. 100%. 9.
(10) 5.3.3. ODA to Europe by donor and sector in 2010. Percentage of multilateral finance. Sweden. Switzerland. United Kingdom. United States. Total DAC countries. EU institutions. World Bank (IDA). Total multilaterals. 61.6. Spain. 17.9. Portugal. 18.7. Norway. 8.6. New Zealand. -. Netherlands. 69.3. Luxembourg. 40.9. Korea. 23.8. Japan. 0.5. 50.5. Italy. 12.2. 56.0. Ireland. 58.6. Greece. 31.9. Germany. Canada. 74.9. France. Belgium. -. Finland. Austria. SOCIAL. Denmark. Australia. As a percentage of total bilateral commitments. 100. 22.9. 5.7. 99.0. 62.4. 87.4. -. 83.7. 99.9. 2.2. 55.0. 64.9. 92.2. 37.3. 38.0. 34.5. 67.5. 36.6. -. 5.1. 1.3. 3.8. 21.3. 5.4. -. 24.6. 0.4. 1.2. 0.5. 2.6. 13.6. 1.5. 10.9. 2.5. 0.8. 2.2. Education. -. 49.4. of which: Basic education. -. 0.0. -. 0.5. -. 1.7. 0.9. 0.0. 3.0. -. 0.5. 0.0. 0.0. 0.3. -. -. 0.5. -. 0.7. 0.0. 0.1. 0.0. 1.0. 0.4. 0.2. -. 0.2. Health. -. 7.7. -. 44.8. -. 0.5. 0.1. 0.2. 2.7. 7.6. 4.2. 1.9. 94.5. 15.7. -. -. 0.3. -. 0.1. 0.0. 3.9. -. 1.1. 2.5. 3.5. -. 4.6. -. -. 0.0. 0.1. 1.6. 7.6. 0.6. 0.3. 0.1. 9.1. -. -. 0.3. -. 0.1. 0.0. 1.7. -. 1.1. 1.1. 3.2. -. 3.7. -. 1.4. 0.5. 0.6. -. 2.4. -. 1.2. of which: Basic health. -. 0.0. -. 44.8. Population and reproductive health. -. 0.4. -. 0.1. 2.9. -. 0.0. 0.2. -. -. 0.1. 0.1. -. 5.5. 0.0. -. -. -. -. 0.5. 0.8. Water supply and sanitation. -. 0.1. -. 0.0. -. 0.1. 0.4. 13.7. -. -. 0.3. 1.6. 0.0. 3.6. 0.3. -. 1.3. -. 0.1. 2.7. 10.0. 15.2. 0.3. 4.6. 1.3. Government and civil society. -. 15.7. 17.2. 11.9. 50.2. 41.2. 4.5. 7.1. 0.1. 6.2. 0.5. 0.5. 11.5. 81.2. -. 51.2. 99.1. 0.3. 40.9. 47.1. 47.9. 32.7. 17.7. 25.2. 32.1. 23.4. Other social infrastr. and services. -. 1.6. 2.5. 1.2. 2.9. 0.2. 0.2. 1.8. 4.9. -. 6.9. 0.4. 0.1. 4.8. 0.5. -. 6.3. 0.3. 0.6. 10.3. 0.3. 15.5. 0.3. 1.8. 1.3. 34.7. 2.8. 10.6. 47.8. 1.5. 0.3. 6.9. 1.2. 51.4. 20.2. -. 0.7. 92.1. 0.7. 5.9. 0.0. -. 4.4. 0.1. 56.0. 15.3. 18.8. 1.5. 36.6. 40.6. 13.6. 9.8. 13.1. 20.2. -. 0.4. 91.1. 0.7. -. -. -. 0.1. -. 54.6. 0.1. 0.1. 14.5. 20.1. 8.9. 4.9. 8.2. 92.4. ECONOMIC. -. Transport, communications. -. -. -. -. -. 0.1. 0.6. 0.8. -. 0.0. -. 0.8. 0.6. 40.8. -. -. 0.2. 0.6. 0.0. -. -. -. 3.4. -. 1.4. 10.6. 7.1. 0.2. 14.6. 15.0. 4.2. 3.4. 4.0. 5.9. 0.0. -. 1.0. 0.1. 0.0. 4.7. 11.6. 1.1. 7.5. 5.5. 0.4. 1.6. 0.9. -. Energy. -. 1.3. Banking, business and other services. -. 9.3. 47.8. 1.5. 0.3. 6.0. 0.0. 9.9. -. -. 0.1. 0.4. -. PRODUCTION. -. 2.2. 2.4. 1.4. 41.1. 13.7. 0.2. 2.2. 0.3. -. 64.0. 1.2. 0.1. 12.2. 0.1. -. 4.0. -. 0.1. 7.0. 1.2. 0.0. 14.4. 6.2. 14.8. 5.2. 13.2. Agriculture, forestry and fishing. -. 1.0. -. 0.9. 40.2. 11.5. 0.2. 0.4. 0.3. -. 7.5. 0.7. 0.1. 12.2. 0.1. -. 2.2. -. 0.1. 3.2. 0.8. -. 12.7. 3.9. 12.2. 1.7. 10.7. Industry, mining and construction. -. 0.4. -. 0.5. 0.9. 2.1. 0.0. 0.5. -. -. 54.6. 0.4. 0.0. -. -. -. 0.6. -. 0.0. 3.7. 0.4. -. 1.2. 1.7. 2.4. -. 2.1. Trade and tourism. -. 0.8. 2.4. 0.0. -. 0.1. 0.0. 1.4. -. -. 1.9. 0.1. -. -. -. -. 1.2. -. 0.0. 0.0. -. 0.0. 0.5. 0.6. 0.2. 3.5. 0.4. 10.9. 12.6. 14.1. -. 17.1. 29.5. 5.3. 3.8. -. 9.0. 0.7. 0.1. 1.7. 1.1. -. 7.3. -. 41.4. 22.2. 7.3. 6.2. 5.5. 10.1. 27.4. 11.3. 24.7. 11.4. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. 0.1. 4.0. -. 7.0. MULTISECTOR. 100. GENERAL PROGRAMME AID. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. 0.2. -. -. -. DEBT. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. HUMANITARIAN. -. 1.2. 2.2. 6.5. 0.2. 0.3. 0.1. 0.2. 1.5. -. 1.5. 0.3. -. 3.2. 0.0. -. 0.1. -. 0.0. 0.4. 0.9. 0.2. 6.2. 1.8. 0.0. 6.2. 0.4. OTHERS. -. 0.2. 3.1. 17.8. 2.5. 11.5. 45.2. 0.0. 4.9. -. 1.7. -. -. 14.6. -. -. 0.4. 0.0. 0.2. 0.2. 6.9. -. 0.0. 3.4. 5.7. -. 4.9. TOTAL. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. -. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. 100. Food aid (emergency and develop. aid). -. 0.1. 0.1. 3.7. -. -. -. -. 0.0. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. 0.0. -. -. 0.1. -. -. 0.0. 10.
(11) 5.3.4. Analysis of social sector ODA to Europe by donor As a percentage of total sector-allocable commitments for each donor in 2010. Education. %. Health. Population Programmes. Water Supply & Sanitation. Government & Civil Society. Other Social. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0. 5.3.5. Analysis of social sector ODA to Europe since 1990 As a percentage of total sector-allocable ODA, 3-year average commitments. %. 35. Education. 30 Health. 25 20. Population Programmes. 15. Water Supply & Sanitation. 10. Government & Civil Society. 5. Other Social. 2009. 2008. 2007. 2006. 2005. 2004. 2003. 2002. 2001. 2000. 1999. 1998. 1997. 1996. 1995. 1994. 1993. 1992. 1991. 1990. 0. 11.
(12) 5.3.6. Analysis of economic and production sector ODA to Europe by donor As a percentage of total sector-allocable commitments for donor in 2010 Transport / Communications. Energy. Banking / Business Services. Agriculture / Forestry / Fishing. Industry / Mining / Construction. Trade / Tourism. % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0. 5.3.7. Analysis of economic and production sector ODA to Europe since 1990 As a percentage of total sector-allocable ODA, 3-year average commitments. % 35 Transport / Communications. 30. Energy. 25 20. Banking / Business services. 15. Agriculture / Forestry / Fishing. 10. Industry / Mining / Construction. 5. Trade / Tourism. 2009. 2008. 2007. 2006. 2005. 2004. 2003. 2002. 2001. 2000. 1999. 1998. 1997. 1996. 1995. 1994. 1993. 1992. 1991. 1990. 0. 12.
(13)
Documento similar
All in all, the lower protection against poverty given by education seems related to a higher proportion of part-time jobs among the most educated women, rather than a bias in
Fuente: OECD Health Statistics, Health at a Glance 2014 y Encuesta de Morbilidad Hospitalaria-INE..
By contrast, other countries are not parties to a single bilateral or multilateral international treaty generally applicable to recognition or enforcement of foreign judgments.
Accordingly, Chilean copper exports are determined by the Chilean peso-US$ exchange rate, the development of world copper prices in the stock exchanges (e.g., London Metal
As noted above, Al Qaeda Central requires three key sets of elements to be able to carry out continuous attacks in the United States and Western Europe: 1) a
In sum, the works of the Convention were not the result of a constituent moment and a broad debate throughout the continent, and neither did it com- ply with the formal
the effect of NO donors was only abolished by the adenosine A 1 receptors antagonist; 2) in tail arteries, noradrenaline release was increased by NO donors and it was reduced by
de se convertir en chaux par la calcination- L a formation de ces pierres nous paroît due, en grande partie , au détritus des coquillages : Tidentité des
