• No se han encontrado resultados

Involutivity of the Hamilton-Cartan equations of a second-order Lagrangian admitting a first-order Hamiltonian formalism

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Involutivity of the Hamilton-Cartan equations of a second-order Lagrangian admitting a first-order Hamiltonian formalism"

Copied!
25
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Involutivity of the Hamilton-Cartan equations of a

second-order Lagrangian admitting a …rst-order

Hamiltonian formalism

Jaime Muñoz-Masqué, CSIC , Spain M. Eugenia Rosado, ETSAM, UPM, Spain

July 2012

(2)

Introduction

p: E !N …bred manifold,v volume form on N

Λ=Lv,L2C∞(J2E), second-order Lagrangian density onp: E !N.

Hamilton-Cartan equations ofΛ

Generally there is no equivalence between Euler-Lagrange equations and Hamilton-Cartan equations because the Poincaré-Cartan form of a Lagrangian on J2E is generally de…ned on J3E.

Problem: To classify second-order Lagrangians whose Poincaré-Cartan form is projectable ontoJ2E or even toJ1E.

In this case, we study the involutivity of the Hamilton-Cartan equations.

(3)

Preliminaries

Jet bundles

N oriented connected smooth manifold,n =dimN.

p: E !N …bred manifold over N.

Let pk: JkE !N be the k-jet bundle of p, with natural projections

phk: JkE !JhE, k h.

Coordinates induced by (xi,yα), 1 i n, 1 α m=dimE dimN onJ2E:

(xi,yα,yα i ,y(αij)),

where

yα

i (jx2s) =

(yα s)

∂xi (x), y

α

(ij)(j

2 xs) =

2(yα s) ∂xi∂xj (x).

(4)

Preliminaries

Poincaré-Cartan form

The Poincaré-Cartan form attached toΛis de…ned to be the ordinary

n-form onJ3E given by

ΘΛ = (p23) θ2^ωΛ+Λ,

where θ2 is the second-order structure form onJ2E

and ωΛ is the Legendre form ofΛ, 8

> < > :

θ2 = dyα ykαdxk

∂yα + dy

α

h y(αhk)dx

k

∂yα h ,

ωΛ = ( 1)i 1Li0α vi dyα+ ( 1)i 1Lijαvi dyjα,

vi =dx1^ ^dxci^ ^dxn and the exterior product is taken with respect to the pairing induced by duality, V(p1) J1E V (p1)!R.

(5)

Preliminaries

Poincaré-Cartan form

In coordinates ΘΛ is given by ΘΛ= ( 1)i 1 Liα0dy

α+Lih αdy

α

h ^vi + L yiαLi0α y α

(hi)L

ih α v where 8 > > < > > :

Lijα = 21δij ∂L ∂yα

(ij)

,

Li0α = L yiα

1 2 δijDj

L y(αij) .

Dj denoting the “total derivative” with respect toxj, i.e.,

Dj =

∂xj +

jIj=0

m

α=1

yα I+(j)

∂yα

I .

(6)

Preliminaries

Projecting ontoJ2E

It is known that the Poincaré-Cartan form of a second-order Lagrangian is projectable onto J2E if and only if the following system of PDEs holds:

1 2 δib

2L

∂yacβ ∂yibα

+21δia

2L

∂ybcβ ∂yα ia

+ 21δic

2L

∂yabβ ∂yα ic

=0,

for all indices 1 a b c n,α,β=1,. . .,m.

R. Durán Díaz, J. Muñoz Masqué, Second-order Lagrangians admiting a second-order Hamilton-Cartan formalism, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.33 (2000), 6003–6016.

(7)

Projecting onto

J

1

E

p2

1:J2E !J1E admits an a¢ ne bundle structure modelled over

W2 = (p1) S2T N (p10) V(p)!J1E.

Theorem

ΘΛ projects onto J1E if and only if

L=Lijαyα

(ij)+L0, L

ji α =L

ij α 2C

(J1E),L

0 2C∞(J1E),

0=2∂L hi β

∂yα a

∂Laiα

∂yhβ

∂Lahα

∂yiβ ,

∂Lih β ∂yα a = ∂L ia α

∂yhβ

,

a,h,i =1,. . .,n, andα,β=1,. . .,m. Hence, there exists Li 2C∞(J1E) such that locally,

Lihα = ∂L

i ∂yα h and ∂L h ∂yα i = ∂L i ∂yα h .

(8)

Hamiltonian formalism (1)

For Λ=Lv,L2C∞(J2E)we have:

Λ =Eα(L)θα^v+ ( 1) i

η2i(L)^vi,

where η2i(L)is the 2-contact 2-form given by,

η2i(L) =

∂Li0α ∂yβθ

α

^θβ+ ∂L

i0 α

∂yjβ ∂Lijβ

∂yα

!

θα^θjβ+

j k

∂Li0α

∂y(βjk)θ

α

^θ(βjk)

+

i k l

∂Li0 α

∂y(βjkl)θ

α^

θ(βjkl)+∂L

ij α

∂ykβθ

α j ^θ

β

k +

k l

∂Lijα

∂y(βkl)θ

α j ^θ

β

(kl).

Hence the Hamilton-Cartan equations also characterize critical sections for Λ; i.e., for every p3-vertical vector …eld X onJ3E,

s is an extremal forΛ()(j3s) (iXdΘΛ) =0.

(9)

Hamiltonian formalism (2)

IfL2C∞(J2E)whose Poincaré-Cartan form projects onto J1E, then letting 8 > > < > > :

pαi =Li0α ∂L

i

∂yα, 1 α m, 1 i n,

H =L0 yiαLi0α

∂Li

∂xi, Hamiltonian function of L one obtains,

Λ = ( 1)i 1dpαi ^dyα

^vi +dH^v. Furthermore, ifd10(piα): V(p

1

0)!R are linearly independent, then

s: N!E is an extremal forΛ if and only if it satis…es:

8 > > > < > > > :

0= (p

i α j

1s)

∂xi

∂H

∂yα j

1s, 1

α m,

0= (y

α s)

∂xi +

∂H ∂pi α

j1s, 1 α m, 1 i n.

(10)

Regularity

Theorem

If Λ=Lv is a second-order Lagrangian on E such that,

its Poincaré-Cartan form ΘΛ projects onto J1E ,

the linear forms d10(piα): V(p 1

0)!R,1 α m,1 i n, are

linearly independent,

then every solution to its H-C equations, is holonomic.

Idea If the linear formsd10(piα)are linearly independent hence

∂piα

∂yhβ !

is non-singular

and (s1) i/yα

hdΘΛ =0 implies s

1=j1s with s =p1 0 s1.

(11)

Goal

Let L2 C∞(J2E) whose Poincaré-Cartan form projects ontoJ1E. Let p0: E0 !N be the bundle de…ned as follows: p0 =p1,E0 =J1E. Let RL1 J1E0 be the …rst-order di¤erential system de…ned by the solutions to the Hamilton-Cartan equations of Λ=Lv.

We study the involutivity of RL1 J1E0.

According to the regularity, for every (local) solutions1 to RL1 one has

s1=j1s, where the section of p:E !N de…ned bys =p01 s1 is called the zero-order section attached to s1.

(12)

Involutivity

The morphism of PDE’s

We consider the morphism of …bred manifolds over E0

ϕL:J1E0 !BN = (p0) m+mn(^nT N),

jx1s17 ! s1(x); ϕαL(jx1s1)v 1

α m, ϕ i α L(j

1 xs1)v

1 i n 1 α m

de…ned by,

8 < :

ϕαL(jx1s1)v = (s1) i/yαdΘΛ (x),

ϕiα L(jx1s1)v = (s1) i/piαdΘΛ (x).

(13)

Involutivity

Hamilton-Cartan equations

One has RL1=kerϕL, where the morphism ϕL: J1E0 !BN is given in local coordinates by (

ϕαL = pαi,i +Hyα,

ϕiα L =y,αi +Hpi α. where (xi,yα,pi

α)is a …bred coordinate system for p0: E0 !N, and (xi,yα,pi

α;y α

,j,pαi,j)be the induced coordinate system on J1E0.

(14)

Involutivity

Quasi-linearity

The mapping ϕL: J1E0 !BN is quasi-linear as there exists a vector-bundle morphism, the symbol of ϕL,

σL: (p0) T N V(p0)!BN,

such that,

ϕL(jx1s¯1) =σL(χ1) +ϕL(jx1s1),

8χ1 2TxN Ve0(p0),8jx1s12 J1E0, with jx1s1+χ1 =jx1s¯1, ¯

s1(x) =s1(x) =e0.

If χ1= (dxj)x ftjα(χ1)(/∂yα)e0+tijα(χ1)(/∂piα)e0g, then

( yα

,j(jx1s¯1) =tjα(χ1) +y,αj(jx1s1),

pi α,j(j

1

xs¯1) =tijα(χ1) +piα,j(j 1 xs1).

(15)

Involutivity

Symbol

As Hyα,Hpi α 2C

(E0)ands¯1(x) =s1(x) =e0, we have

Hyα(jx1s¯1) =Hyα(jx1s1), Hpi α(j

1

xs¯1) =Hpi α(j

1 xs1).

Therefore

(

ϕαL = piα,i+Hyα,

ϕiα L =y,αi +Hpi α,

=) u

α

σL = ∑nh=1thhα ,

uiα σL =tiα,

(uα,ui

α)being the standard coordinates induced by the volume form in

BN = m+mn(^nT N). Hence g1 = kerσL

= fχ1 2TxN Ve0(p0):∑nh=1thhα (χ1) =0,tiα(χ1) =0g.

(16)

Involutivity

Formal integrability

R. Bryant, S. S. Chern, R. Gardner, H. Goldschmidt, and P. Gri¢ ths, Exterior di¤erential systems, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., Volume 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1991.

The PDEs system RL1 J1(E0) isformally integrable if8k 0,

pk1+k: RL1+k !RLk

are surjective, RL1+k J1+k(E0)being thek-prolongation ofRL1.

Theorem

If the following conditions are satis…ed:

1 g2 =ker(σL)

1 is a vector bundle over RL1, where (σL)1 is the

…rst-prolongation of the symbol of R1 L,

2 p1

0: RL1 !E0 is surjective,

3 there exists a quasi-regular basis for Tx for g1 =kerσL at u2P, then, the PDEs system R1

L is formally integrable.

(17)

Involutivity

First prolongation

The …rst prolongation of ϕL is de…ned by, prol1(ϕL):J2(E0)!J1BN,

prol1(ϕL)(jx2s1) =jx1(ϕ j1s1).

In coordinates one has,

8 > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > :

uα prol

1(ϕL) =ϕαL = piα,i+Hyα,

uαi prol1(ϕL) = ϕiα L =y,αi +Hpi α,

uα

r prol1(ϕL) = piα,ir+Hxryα+y,βrHyαyβ+p j β,rHyαpj

β ,

ui

α,r prol1(ϕL) =y,αir +Hxrpi α+y

β

,rHyβpi α+p

j β,rHpi

αp j β ,

(uα,ui α,u

α

r,uiα,r)being the induced coordinates on J1BN.

(18)

Involutivity

First prolongation of the symbol

As ϕL:J1(E0)!BN is quasi-linear: σk(ϕL) =σ(prolk(ϕL)),8k 0. Hence 8χ2 2S2TxN Ve0(p0),8jx2s12 J2E0, we have:

σ1(ϕL): (p0) S2T N V(p0)!(p0) T N BN,

σ1(ϕL)(χ2) =prol1(ϕL)(χ2+jx2s1) prol1(ϕL)(j 2 xs1).

If χ2= ∑j k(dxj)x (dxk)x

n tα

jk(χ2)(/∂yα)e0+tijkα (χ2)(/∂pαi)e0

o

,

then (

urβ σ1(ϕL) = ∑na=1(1+δar)taarβ ,

uiβ,r σ1(ϕL) = (1+δir)tirβ.

(19)

Involutivity

Quasi-regular basis (1)

Let (X1,. . .,Xn)be a basis of TxN, with dual basis(w1,. . .,wn)and let

SkTx,

fX1,...,Xjg be the subspace ofS kT

x generated by the symmetric productswi1 wik, with j +1 i

1 ik n. For every

e0 2E0 with p0(e0) =x, we set gk,e0,fX1,...,Xjg =gk,e0\(SkTx,

fX1,...,Xjg Ve0(p

0)), k =1,2.

The basis (X1,. . .,Xn)is quasi-regular for g1 ate0 if

dimg2,e0 =dimg1,e0+ n 1

j=1

dimg1,e0,fX1,...,Xjg.

(20)

Involutivity

Quasi-regular basis (2)

As

g1= nχ1 2TxN Ve0(p0):

n h=1t

α

hh(χ1) =0,tiα(χ1) =0

o

,

g2= nχ2 2S2TxN Ve0(p0):

na=1(1+δar)taarβ (χ2) =0,tirβ(χ2) =0

o

,

we conclude

dimg1,e0=m(n2 1), dimg2,e0= 12mn(n2+n 2), dimg1,e0,fX1,...,Xjg=m(n

2 jn 1). Hence

n 1

j=1

dimg1,e0,(X1,...,Xj) = 1

2m(n 1)(n

2 2) =dimg

2,e0 dimg1,e0,

thus proving that RL1 is involutive.

(21)

Involutivity

Theorem

IfΛ=Lv is a second-order density on p:E !N whose P-C form projects onto J1E and satis…es the regularity condition, then R1

L is involutive.

If both p: E !N and Λ are of class Cω, then given

ξ 2(RL1)x0, there

exists a Cω section s of p de…ned on an open neighbourhood U of x 0 in N

such that, i) j1 x0(j

1s) =ξ, and ii) j1

x(j1s)2 RL1,8x 2U.

Analytically, given scalars λα, λiα,λjα,λiα,j such that,

0=λiα,i Hyα(e00), 0=λαi +Hpi

α(e 0 0),

where e00 2Ex00 with coordinates yα(e0) =

λα,pαi(e0) =λiα, then there

exists a solution s1:U !E0 to the H-C equations de…ned on a neighbourhood of x0 such that,yα(jx10s

1) =

λα,piα(jx10s

1) =

λiα, yα

,j(jx10s

1) =

λαj,pαi,j(jx10s

1) =

λiα,j.

(22)

Applications to General Relativity

Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian

pM:M !N bundle of pseudo-Riemannian metrics of a given signature

(n+,n ),n++n =n.

(xi,yjk)coordinate system, whereyjk =ykj are de…ned by,

gx =yij(gx)(dxi)x (dxj)x, 8gx 2(pM) 1(U).

The E-H Lagrangian density is given by

(ΛEH)j2

xg =g

ij(x)(Rg)h

ihj(x)vg(x) =LEH(jx2g)vx,

v is the standard volume form,

Rg is the curvature tensor of the Levi-Civita connectionΓg ofg,

vg denotes the Riemannian volume form attached to g. Hence,

LEH j2g =ρ(yij g)(Rg)hihj,

where ρ= q

( 1)n det((y

ab)na,b=1).

(23)

Applications to General Relativity

Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian (local expression)

In local coordinates:

LEH =ρ yacybd yabycd yab,cd+L0,

where

L0 = 2ρ

r sk

l

Fkl,i;rs,jykl,iyrs,j, Fkl,i;rs,j 2C∞(M).

Hence LEH is an a¢ ne function and its P-C form projects onto J1M. We have:

pkli =

r s

2L0

∂yrs,j∂ykl,i

(LEH)ijkl

∂yrs

(LEH)ijrs

∂ykl

! yrs,j,

H=

k lr

s 1 2

2L0

∂yrs,j∂ykl,i

+ (LEH)

ij kl

∂yrs

!

yrs,jykl,i.

(24)

Applications to General Relativity

Theorem

The Hamilton-Cartan equations become

8 > > < > > :

0= (p

i kl j1s)

∂xi

∂H ∂ykl

j1s, 1 k l n,

0= (ykl s)

∂xi +

∂H ∂pikl j

1s, 1 i n, 1 k l n.

Theorem We have

(i) The E-H Lagrangian satis…es the regularity condition.

(ii) Given symmetric scalars γijk =γkji , i,j,k =1,. . .,n, there exists a Ricci-‡at (pseudo-)Riemannian metric of signature(n ,n+)de…ned on a neighbourhood of x0 2N such that, gij(x0) =δij,

(Γg)i

jk(x0) =γijk, for all i,j,k.

(25)

R. L. Bryant, S. S. Chern, R. B. Gardner, H. L. Goldschmidt, P. A. Gri¢ ths, Exterior di¤erential systems, Mathematical Sciences

Research Institute Publications, 18, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.

R. Durán Díaz, J. Muñoz Masqué, Second-order Lagrangians admitting a second-order Hamilton-Cartan formalism, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33(2000), 6003–6016.

Pedro L. García, J. Muñoz Masqué, Le problème de la régularité dans le calcul des variations du second ordre, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 301 Série I (1985), 639–642.

H. Goldschmidt, S. Sternberg, The Hamilton-Cartan formalism in the calculus of variations, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble)23 (1973), no. 1, 203–267.

J. Muñoz Masqué, An axiomatic characterization of the

Poincaré-Cartan form for second-order variational problems, Lecture Notes in Math. 1139, Springer-Verlag 1985, pp. 74–84.

D. J. Saunders, M. Crampin,On the Legendre map in higher-order …eld theories, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.23 (1990), 3169–3182.

Referencias

Documento similar

The arbitrary and differential nature of the linguistic sign and the non-correspondence of language and reality is the linguistic basis for the structuralist idea that all meaning

Our results here also indicate that the orders of integration are higher than 1 but smaller than 2 and thus, the standard approach of taking first differences does not lead to

In the “big picture” perspective of the recent years that we have described in Brazil, Spain, Portugal and Puerto Rico there are some similarities and important differences,

First (a,d), second (b,e) and third (c,f) columns correspond to the first-, second- and third-order EMHPM, respectively. 69 Figure 4.6 Representation of the first-order

First and foremost, we developed a theoretical framework identifying seven first-order factors that can be explained by a single second-order factor in the context of online

The main goal of this work is to extend the Hamilton-Jacobi theory to different geometric frameworks (reduction, Poisson, almost-Poisson, presymplectic...) and obtain new ways,

The second case is a non-trivial generalization of the formalism consisting in substituting the structure group U(1) of phase invariance by a bigger group T (to account for

Remarkable among the former are the economic results or contribution of the second-order co-operative to the objectives of the first-order co-operatives, the trust inspired in