• No se han encontrado resultados

ATLAS Top Mass reconstruction in ttbar events (lepton+jets channel)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "ATLAS Top Mass reconstruction in ttbar events (lepton+jets channel)"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Carlos Escobar Ibañez Vicente Lacuesta Miquel Maria Moreno Llácer Regina Moles-Valls

Andreas Wildauer

ATLAS Top Mass reconstruction in ttbar

events (lepton+jets channel)

(2)


Top
Mass
Physics
Mo-va-ons


o 
Top
quark
mass
is
a
fundamental
parameter
of
the
SM
par-cle
physics
 o 
Top
quark
was
discovered
by
CDF
&
D0
in
1995.




Top Physics field was opened !!

o 
Top
proper-es:


o 
Charge=
(2/3)e
,

Spin
=
1/2
 o 
Large
mass
(mtop
>
35mboQom)


o 
Present
world
average
value,
measured
by
CDF

 



&
D0
with
Lint=5.8T‐1
,
is:


mtop
=
(173.2
±
0.56stat
±
0.76syst)
GeV


 (arXiv:1107.5255v1
[hep‐ex]
26
Jul
2011


TOP
QUARK
MASS
INTERESTING
FIELDS:



• 
Top
quark
mass
is
an
important
parameter
to
the

 

EW
precision
measurement:


• 
Large
contribu-ons
in
radia-ve
correc-ons:


• 
Constraint
the
Higgs
Boson
Mass


• 
Increase
the
sensi-vity
to
physics
beyond
SM


(3)


Top
Quark
at
LHC


90%
at
LHC
 Gluon‐gluon
fusion


10%
at
LHC


Quark‐AnVQuark
scaXering


Top
quark
Produc/on



o Top
quark
is
produced
predominantly
in
pairs:


o 
LHC
at
√s
=
7TeV







σtop=
165+11‐16
pb
(theore-cal
NLO+NNLO)
 o 
Precision
measurements
and
new
searches


Top
quark
Decay



o 
Top
quark
decays
take
place
almost

 



exclusively

t





W+b


Dileptonic

 (11%)


• 
2
leptons


• 
2
neutrinos


• 
2bbar



Semileptonic

 (44%)


• 
1
lepton


• 
1
neutrino


• 
2
light
jets


• 
2bbar


FullHadronic

 (44%)


• 
4
light
jets


• 
2bbar


b‐jet
always
hadronize




W
decay?


TRIG




lep+Etmiss





lep+Etmiss





mulV‐jets

(4)


Top
Mass
Analysis
in
ATLAS
(lepton+jets)


The
most
precise
top
mass
measurements
can
be
achieved
using
semi‐leptonic
channel:

B‐jet


ETmiss

Muon


Electron:
Energy
deposits
in
EM
calorimeter
with
 associated
well
reconstructed
track
in
the
ID

 Muon:
Track
segments
different
layers
of
muon
 chambers
matched
with
ID
track


Jets: An-‐kt4
algorithms
is
used
star-ng
from
 energy
cluster
of
adjacent
calorimeters
jets.


Calibra-on
is
done
using
EM+HAD
calorimeter
 informa-on.
B‐jet
tagger
used
ID
in
forma-on
too


Trigger:
Trigger
is
based
on
signatures
of
electron
 muons
and
jets,
as
well
as
missing
transverse
 energy.


Full
Detector
Working
!!!


(5)


Top
Mass
Analysis
in
ATLAS
(lepton+jets)


The
main
methodology
used
to
determine
mtop
at
hadron
collider
consists
of
measuring
 the
invariant
mass
of
the
decay
products
of
the
top‐quark
candidate
(mtopreco)
and


deducing
top
mass
using
different
methods.


EVENT
SELECTION:


o 
Single
electron
or
muon
trigger
fired
 o 
Only
one
reconstructed
lepton:


• electron:
pT>25GeV



• muon:
pT>30GeV
 o 
Transverse
energy:


• electron:
Etmiss>35GeV

&
mT(W)>25GeV


• muon:
ETmiss>20GeV

&
ETmiss+mT(W)>60GeV
 o
At
least
4
jets
with
pT>25GeV
|η|<2.5


o
One
of
these
jets
tagged
as
b‐jet
(SV0>5.85)


Background:


o 
The
background
is
under
control


(6)

Top
hadronic
mass
reconstrucVon:


o 
How
the
jet
associaVon
is
done?


• 

Jet
triplet
with
high
pT
and
at
least
1
b‐jet


• 

ΔR
constraint
between
two
light
jets



• 
W
mass
window
cut
to
improve
the
purity
of
the
 


jet
triplet


o 
 Agreement
 Data/MC
 is
 important
 to
 understand
 the
 combinatorial
background



o 
Precise
knowledge
of
the
Jet
Energy
Scale
is
needed
to
 forbid
possible
ships
in
the
mtopreco:


• 
In‐situ
calibra-on



o 
Op-miza-on
of
the
es-mator
to
limit
systema-c
errors



Top
Mass
Analysis
in
ATLAS
(lepton+jets)


Muon
channel


MW
cut
=
±
30


Muon
channel


(7)


Top
Mass
Analysis
in
ATLAS
(lepton+jets)


Top
leptonic
mass
reconstrucVon:


o 
Difficult
challenge
comes
from
the
kinema-c
of
the
neutrino
 o ETmiss
comes
from
undetected
neutrino:
ETmiss
=
pTν


o 
pzν
chosed
using
W
boson
mass
 o 
b‐jet
asignment


o 
How
the
b‐jet
associaVon
is
done?


• 
Jet
triplet
with
high
pT





(usually
pTmax
method
used)


• ΔR
distance
between
b‐jet
and
W
bosson





(closer
b‐jet)

Muon
channel


(8)


Top
Mass
Analysis
in
ATLAS
(lepton+jets)


o 
Last
ATLAS
top
mass
results:


o 
2‐dimensional
template
analysis

 o Lint=
0.7T‐1


Electron
Channel


Muon
Channel


o 
Systema-c
errors



(electron)


mtop
=
(173.9
±
1.2stat
±
3.1syst)
GeV





 (muon)






mtop
=
(175.9
±
1.0stat
±
2.7syst)
GeV


(9)

o 
ATLAS
has
rediscover
and
re‐measured
the
top
quark
mass


• 
2010
with
a
Lint=35.3pb‐1
:

(electron)


mtop
=
(173.8
±
6.7stat
±
4.8syst)
GeV






 (muon)






mtop
=
(166.7
±
5.0stat
±
5.0syst)
GeV



• 2011
with
a
Lint=0.7T‐1
:


(electron)


mtop
=
(173.9
±
1.2stat
±
3.1syst)
GeV





 (muon)






mtop
=
(175.9
±
1.0stat
±
2.7syst)
GeV



Summary
of
the
Top
Mass
Analysis
in
ATLAS



mtop=
(175
±
0.9stat
±
2.7syst)
GeV


The
uncertainty
of
the
results
is
domi‐


nated
by
the
systema-c
uncertain-es:


• 
JES
Uncertainty
for
b‐jets
and
light‐jets


• 
Ini-al
and
final
state
radia-on


• 
Some
aspects
of
the
MC
modelling
 Sta-s-c
is
increasing


(10)


Backup


Referencias

Documento similar

miss /m miss in the soft The distributions of ET eff in the soft single-lepton signal regions, of ET miss dimuon signal region, of mincl eff ET in the binned hard single-lepton

SIGNAL AND BACKGROUND MODELING The efficiency for selecting lepton þ jets signal events and the corresponding kinematic distributions are modeled using a simulated tt event

Expected and observed 95% CL limits on the s-channel production cross section times branching fraction for H + → tb as a function of the charged Higgs boson mass, in the (a)

(Because the muon spectrum is used as a control sample for obtaining the single-lepton background in both the e and µ channels, as discussed in section 3, the combined

One of the dominant uncertainties affecting recon- structed physics objects is the jet energy scale (JES) uncertainty, especially for large-radius jets [60,66], which has an effect

Distributions in differential probability for ratios of the jet mass of groomed jets to their corresponding ungroomed values, for both dijet data and pythia6 (tune Z2) MC

- tt+1-jet differential cross section - tt+1-jet normalized differential cross section: Mass dependence enchanced in certain regions of the phase space Cancelation and reduction of

E.Shabalina - Search for Higgs in association with top - ICHEP 2014 03/07/2014 Background composition tt+jets - dominant background is both channels >95% in 3 b-jet regions ‣ tt+bb