• No se han encontrado resultados

Evaluation of liver function tests in the paediatric patient 夽

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Evaluation of liver function tests in the paediatric patient 夽"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

www.analesdepediatria.org

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of liver function tests in the paediatric patient

Víctor Fernández Ventureira

a,

, Ignacio Ros Arnal

a

,

Gerardo Rodríguez Martínez

b

, Beatriz García Rodríguez

c

, Ruth García Romero

a

, Eduardo Ubalde Sainz

a

aUnidaddeGastroenterologíayNutriciónPediátrica,HospitalUniversitarioMiguelServet,Zaragoza,Spain

bHospitalClínicoUniversitarioLozanoBlesa,UniversidaddeZaragoza,IISAragón,Zaragoza,Spain

cServiciodeBioquímicaClínica,HospitalUniversitarioMiguelServet,Zaragoza,Spain

Received6March2020;accepted4June2020 Availableonline20May2021

KEYWORDS Liver;

Liverfunction;

Asymptomatichyper- transaminasaemia;

Alanine

aminotransferase enzyme

Abstract

Introduction:Althoughchangesinliverfunctiontestscanbenon-specificinnumerousclinical conditions,theycanbethefirstsignofapotentiallyseriousdiseaseinanasymptomaticpatient.

Materialandmethods: Retrospectivecohortstudy,performedbyreviewingtherecordsofchil- drenofareferencehospitalcentrallaboratorywithalanine aminotransferaseenzyme(ALT) elevationduringa6-monthaleatoryperiod.

Results:572bloodtestswithserum ALTelevation correspondingto403patients havebeen assessedduringtheperiodstudied.98patients wereexcludedforpresentingabnormalliver testbeforethestudyperiodofcomorbiditythatcouldproduceALTelevation.Theremaining 305patients,22.6%werediagnosedwithamedicalconditionduringthefirstbloodtestthat explainedtheALTelevation,althoughonly33.3%ofthemwerefollowedupuntilverifyingtheir normalisation.Finalstudy sample consistsof236 patients withabnormal liver test without apparentliverdisease.Adequatefollow-upwasfoundonlyin29%ofthem.Fromthisgroup,9 patients(13%)werediagnosedwithliverdisease.Therestofthesampleswerenotproperly monitored.InpatientswithhigherserumALTlevels,follow-upwasearlyandmoreappropriate.

Conclusions:Inourarea,mostchildrenwithoutapparent liverdiseasearenoproperlymon- itored.Therefore,anopportunitytodiagnosisandtreatapotentialliverdiseasewaslostin agreat number ofchildren. All children with unexplained hypertransaminasaemiamust be studied.

©2021Asociaci´onEspa˜noladePediatr´ıa.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/

4.0/).

Pleasecitethisarticleas:FernándezVentureiraV,RosArnalI,RodríguezMartínezG,GarcíaRodríguezB,GarcíaRomeroR,UbaldeSainz E.Evaluacióndelseguimientodeni˜nosconhallazgodehipertransaminasemia.AnPediatr(Barc).2021;94:359---365.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:[email protected](V.FernándezVentureira).

2341-2879/©2021Asociaci´onEspa˜noladePediatr´ıa.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

PALABRASCLAVE Hígado;

Funciónhepática;

Hipertransaminasemia asintomática;

Enzimaalanino aminotransferasa

Evaluacióndelseguimientodeni˜nosconhallazgodehipertransaminasemia

Resumen

Introducción: Lasalteracionesdelperfilhepáticoconstituyenunhechoinespecíficopropiode numerosascondicionesclínicas.Sinembargo,puedeimplicarlaprimeramanifestacióndeuna patologíapotencialmentegraveenunpacienteasintomático.

Materialymétodos:Estudioobservacionalretrospectivoqueincluyetodaslasanalíticassan- guíneasconelevacióndealaninoaminotransferasa(ALT)enpacientespediátricossolicitadas enunsectorsanitarioenunperíodode6meses.

Resultados: Seregistraron572analíticascorrespondientesa403pacientes.Seexcluyeron98 pacientesconhipertransaminasemiayaconocidaocomorbilidad.Delos305restantes,el22,6%

sediagnosticarondepatologíaasociadaahipertransaminasemia,ydeestos,secomprobónor- malizaciónenel33,3%.Delos236pacientesconhipertransaminasemiasinjustificarserealizó unseguimientoenel29%,encontrandopatologíahepáticaen9pacientes(13%delgrupo).En elrestodelamuestranosecomprobóanalíticamentelaevolucióndelastransaminasasnila presenciadeposiblepatologíahepática.Los pacientesconcifras máselevadassecontrolan mejoryantesquelosquepresentancifrasmásbajas.

Conclusiones: Ennuestraárea,lamayoríadelosni˜nossinenfermedadhepáticaaparentecon hallazgodeALTelevadanosonadecuadamentecontrolados.Estohacequesepierdaunaopor- tunidadúnicadediagnosticarytratarprecozmenteunaenfermedadhepáticapotencialenun grannúmerodeni˜nos.Todoni˜noconhipertransaminasemiainexplicadadebeserestudiado.

© 2021 Asociaci´onEspa˜nola de Pediatr´ıa. Publicado porElsevier Espa˜na, S.L.U. Este es un art´ıculoOpenAccessbajolalicenciaCCBY-NC-ND(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Abnormalitiesintheliverpanelareamongthemostfrequent changes detected inclinical practiceat both the hospital andprimarycarelevels.Routineperformanceofliverpanels hasevincedanincreaseintheincidenceofabnormalserum levelsofliverenzymes,eitherasachancefindinginasymp- tomaticpatientsorinthecontextofmildsymptoms.1,2

The elevation of liver enzymesis a nonspecific finding presentinmanyclinicalconditions.However,itcanalsobe thefirstmanifestationofpotentiallysevereliverdiseasein anapparentlyhealthypatientorasecondarymanifestation ofaseriousextrahepaticdisease.1,3,4

Theunderlyingcausesofliverenzymeelevationarehet- erogeneousanddifferbroadlydependingonthepopulation.

Althoughinadultsitismostfrequentlyassociatedwiththe use of alcohol or drugs, inthe paediatric population itis predominantlyassociatedwithtransientinfectiousdiseases (localorsystemic,viralorbacterial).2,3,5,6

The lack of universal reference valuesin children and theirdependenceonvariousfactors(stageofdevelopment, sex, age, etc.)have prompted theperformance in recent yearsofmultiplestudiesthatattempttoestablishthresh- olds that vary between publications. On the other hand, thereare noestablished clinicalguidelines for the evalu- ationandfollow-upofhypertransaminasaemiainpaediatric practice.7---18

Nevertheless,itis remarkablethat,despitetheconsid- erablesignificanceofthiscondition,thegeneraltendency at presentis toperforman insufficientfollow-up ofthese patients, globally and in our region in particular. There- fore,theaimofourstudywastoanalysethefollow-upof

patientswithhypertransaminasaemiaandwithoutapparent liverdisease, which hasnot been addressed previously in thepaediatricliterature.

Material and methods

Weconducted a retrospective, observationaland descrip- tivestudy.Weselectedasampleofpatientsaged3months to15years fromthecatchment population corresponding toHealthDistrict II of the city of Zaragoza,Spain, which includes45379childrenaged0---14years.

For the purpose of patient selection, we chose the enzymealanineaminotransferase(ALT,previouslyGPT)due toitshigherspecificityforabnormalliverfunction,including everychildwithserumlevelsexceedingpredefinedthresh- oldsfor sexandage. Weestablishedthe referencevalues basedonthoseproposedbyLamireauetal.18in2014,which inturntookintoaccountthestudiesconductedbyEngland etal.10in2009andbySchwimmeretal.11in2010,defining theupperlimitsofnormal(ULNs)for3agegroups:

• 3monthsto18months:60IU/Linboysand55IU/Lingirls.

• 18monthsto12years:40IU/Linboysand35IU/Lingirls.

• 12yearsto15years:26IU/Linboysand22IU/Lingirls.

Weincludedallpatientsinthecatchmentpopulationof theselectedhealthdistrictwithelevationofALTpastthe established thresholds withthe test ordered for any rea- sonat thehospitalor inprimarycare levelsin a6-month period(January1---June30,2016).Weexcludedallpatients withapre-existingdiseaseortreatmentplanthatjustified 360

(3)

serumelevationofALTandpatients withelevationof ALT detected prior tothe period under study. Thus, the final sample includedallpatients inthecatchment areaof the paediatricservicesofahealthdistrictwithhypertransami- nasaemiaintheabsenceofapparentliverdisease.Wemade aseparateevaluationandanalysisofpatientsin whoman aetiological diagnosis was made with the tests or levels requestedinthefirstbloodtestorder.

We wereabletoselectpatientsthroughtheevaluation ofallbloodtestsperformedbytheDepartmentofClinical BiochemistryoftheHospitalUniversitarioMiguelServet in Zaragoza(Spain),whichistaskedwithperformingallblood testsorderedinthehealthdistrict.ThelevelsofALTwere measured withaBeckmanAU5800clinicalchemistryanal- yser(pyridoxal-5-phosphatemethod).

Forthe selectedpatients,we collectedinformationon everybloodtestperformedthereafterandanalysedbyany of the biochemistry departments of the health system of Aragonbyreviewingtheelectronichealthrecords,withthe main goal of assessing the persistence of hypertransami- nasaemia, in additiontoassessingother variables suchas cytolysis, cholestasis, liver function and investigation of potentialaetiologies.

Wedefinedadequatefollow-upasperformanceofaddi- tionalbloodtestsuntilabnormallevelsnormalised,or the underlying cause was identified. We defined inadequate follow-up as lack of follow-up testing in the 12 months that followed the initial finding. Clinical practice guide- linesevenrecommendanadditionalfollow-uptestafterthe levelsnormaliseinpatientswithunexplainedhypertransam- inasaemia,asthelevelscouldfluctuate.3,4Inourstudy,we didnotconsiderabsenceof anewtestafterresolution of elevationinadequatefollow-up.

Weperformed thestatistical analysiswiththesoftware SPSSversion20.0,usingthechisquaretest,Studentttest andanalysisofvarianceanddefiningstatisticalsignificance asap-valueoflessthan0.05.

The studywasapprovedbytheClinicalResearchEthics CommitteeofAragon(CEICA).

Results

Weanalysed572panelswithelevationofALTserumlevels corresponding to403 patients aged 3 months to15 years andperformed in the periodunderstudy.Theyamounted to 8.4% of all ALT tests and 2.9% of all tests analysed by the Departmentof Biochemistry during thesame time period. We excluded 83 patients that had a pre-existing conditionorreceivingtreatmentthatcouldaccountforthe elevation (chemotherapy, neuromuscular disease, chronic liverdisease,immediatepostoperativeperiod,paracetamol poisoning, etc.)and 15asymptomatic patientsundergoing evaluationforhypertransaminasaemiadetectedbeforethe studyperiod.Thus,in305patientstherewasnoapparent causeofhypertransaminasaemia.In69ofthemaprobable aetiological diagnosis couldbemade basedonthe results ofthebloodtestsofadditionaldiagnostictestsperformed atthesametime(infectiousmononucleosisin62.3%,post- infectiousacutemyositisin20.3%,coeliacdiseasein2.9%, etc.).

Clinicalguidelinesrecommendafollow-uptestinthese patients once the episode of intercurrent disease has resolvedtoconfirmnormalisationofthelevels,astheiden- tifieddisease maybe masking an underlyingcondition. In oursample, we found that in thegroup of patientsgiven adiagnosisof acutediseasethatcouldexplaintheaetiol- ogy,normalisationoftheenzymelevelswasonlyobserved followingresolutionofthediseasein33.3%.

Thus, we identified 236 patients without elevation of ALTbeforetheperiodunderstudyandwithoutanapparent healthcondition ortherapeuticintervention priortoor at thetimeoftestingthatcouldjustifyit.Theanalysisincluded thissubsetofpatients.

Of these patients, 47.5% were female (112 patients), and the age distribution was 3.4% aged 3---18 months (8 patients),58.5%aged18monthsto12years(138patients) and38.1%aged12---15years(90patients). Thetestswere orderedatthelevelofprimarycarelevelin55.9%ofcases (132patients),hospital-basedoutpatientcarein33.1%(78 patients),paediatricemergencycarein6.8%(16patients) andinpatientcarein4.2%(10patients).

TheinitiallevelofALTwaslessthantwicetheestablished ULNin75.8%(179patients),betweentwiceand5timesthe ULNin20.3%(48patients)andgreaterthan5timestheULN in3.8%(9patients).

The reason/complaint that led to ordering the initial blood panel was digestive/gastrointestinal in 27.5% (65 patients), acute infection in 16.9% (40 patients), or rou- tine testing that led to an incidental finding in 9.7% (23 patients), preoperative testing with incidental finding in 5.9%(14patients)andotherin39.8%(94patients).

Inoursample,24.57%ofthepatients(58patients)were intreatmentwithadrugprescribedbythepaediatricianin thedaysthatprecededthecollectionofthefirstbloodsam- ple.Themostfrequentdrugsbeingusedwereanti-infective drugs,chieflyoralamoxicillin(18patients),oralamoxicillin- clavulanicacid(12patients)andoralpenicillin(5patients).

Wewereunabletoobtaindataonover-the-countermedica- tion(paracetamol,NSAIDs,coughmedicine,homoeopathic remedies,etc.).

Inadditiontoliverfunctiontests,other measurements or diagnostic tests were ordered for investigation of the aetiologyofhypertransaminasaemia,suchasthyroidfunc- tiontests(48.3%,114patients),markersofcoeliacdisease (27.1%, 64 patients), serum immunoglobulins (22.5%, 53 patients), serological tests (17.8%, 42 patients), abdomi- nalultrasound(11%,26patients),autoantibodies(6.4%,15 patients),ceruloplasmin(4.2%,10patients),serumcopper (3.8%,9patients),alfa-1antitrypsin(3%,7patients),total serum protein (2.5%, 6 patients), reducing substances in urine(0.8%,2 patients),copper in urine(0.4%,1 patient) orDopplerultrasound(0.4%,1patient).

Ofthesepatients,34.3%underwentfollow-uptesting(81 patients),whichrevealedpersistenceofabnormallevelsin 46.8%(37patients).However,in66.5%(157patients)testing wasnotperformedagaininthe12monthsthatfollowedthe abnormalresult.

Whenitcametothetimeelapseduntillaboratorytests were performed for follow-up in patients for who it was requested,itwasof30daysoflessin40.7%(33patients)and greaterthan30daysin59.2%(48patients),withameanof 70.6days(median,46days).Thetimeelapsedtofollow-up

(4)

Adequate followup: 23:

Adequate followup: 69

No follow-up testing: 155 :

Normalization: 58 Liver disease: 9

Persistent elevation: 2 1 followup with blood

tests: 9 572 blood tests

403 patients

Exclusion criteria:

-Pre-existing disease/treatment: 83 -Previous hypertransaminasaemia: 15

305 patients

Diagnosis with the first round of testing: 69 patients

No diagnosis with the first round of testing: 236 patients

Inadequate followup: 46

Normalization: 23

Inadequate followup: 167

2 followups with blood tests: 3

Figure1 Descriptionofpatientselectionandfollow-up.

testing wassignificantly shorter in patients with ALT lev- elsgreaterthantwicetheULN(79.9+66.2days)compared topatientswithlevelslessthantwicetheULN(55.7+63.9 days)andalsoininpatients(75.03+77.3days)comparedto outpatients(66.7+60.3days)(P<.05).

Overall, the follow-up after detection of unexplained hypertransaminasaemiawasnotadequatein70.8%ofcases (167patients).Thus,inoursample,adequatefollow-upwas onlyperformedin29.2%delospatients(Fig.1).

When we analysedthevariables thatcouldexplainthe adequacyorinadequacyofthefollow-up,wedidnotfindan associationbetweenthisvariableandage,sex,thesourceof theorderorthehistoryofpharmacologicaltreatment,but wedidfindanassociationwiththeinitialdegreeofelevation ofALT(Table1).

Inthegroupofpatientswithadequatefollow-up,13%(9 patients)receivedadiagnosisthatexplainedtheelevation ofserumtransaminases.Fourreceivedadiagnosis ofnon- alcoholicfattyliverdisease,2of autoimmunehepatitis,1 ofhepatorenalpolycysticdisease,1ofliverhaemangioma and 1 of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. On the other hand, when it came to patients with persistent transam- inase elevation, in 2 it was not possible to determine the causeof hypertransaminasaemia during the follow-up despite anexhaustive evaluation(includinga normalliver biopsy)(Table2).

Twothirdsofthepatientsthatreceivedafinaldiagnosis ofliverdiseasehadinitiallevelsofALTlessthantwicethe establishedULN,andwe didnotfindinitiallevelsgreater than5timestheULNinanyofthepatients.

Discussion

Serumelevationofliverenzymesisanincreasinglyfrequent incidental findingin blood tests ordered in asymptomatic patientsor inthecontextof mildsymptoms inthepaedi- atricpopulation.3,4 This elevationis a nonspecific feature found in numerous conditions, but it may also be the initialclinicalmanifestationofpotentiallyseriousprogres- sive liver disease. Therefore, it is important to monitor these levels to confirm normalisation or to carry out a broaderevaluationtoestablishtheaetiologyoftheeleva- tion.Theaimofourstudywastoanalysethefollow-upin currentclinicalpracticeofpaediatricpatientswithhyper- transaminasaemia in our region. To do so, we selected a 6-monthperiodbackenoughintimetohaveallowedacom- prehensive investigation of hypertransaminasaemia to be completed.

Normal serum liver enzyme levels have not been specifically established in the paediatric population. The thresholdsestablishedinstudiesonthesubjectvarywidely,

(5)

Table1 Variablesunderstudyinthesampleatthetimeofinitialbloodtesting,overallandintheadequateandinadequate follow-upgroups.

Inadequatefollow-up Adequatefollow-up Total P

Ageinyears(mean±SD) 9.48±4.75 8.16±4.95 9.9±4.84 .057

Useofmedication(%) 21.6% 31.9% 24.6% .099

Female(%) 48.5% 44.9% 47.5% .361

ALT<2×ULN(%) 80.8% 63.8% 75.8%(oftotalsample) .01

ALT>2×ULN(%) 18% 26.1% 20.3%(oftotalsample)

ALT>5×ULN(%) 1.2% 10.1% 3.8%(oftotalsample)

Settinga(PC/HBC) 74.2%/66.3% 25.8%/33.7% 55.9%/44.1% .197

HBC,hospital-basedcare(outpatientcare,emergencycareandinpatientcare);PC,primarycare;SD,standarddeviation;ULN,upper limitofnormal.

a Setting:settingwheretheinitialbloodtestswereordered.

Table2 Patientswithadiagnosisthatexplainedhypertransaminasaemiaorunexplainedhypertransaminasaemiadespiteafull aetiologicalinvestigation.

Diagnosis Age InitialALT

elevation(×ULN)

Reasonforordering Setting Non-alcoholicfattyliver

disease

14years <2 Hypopituitarism

follow-up

Endocrinologyclinic Non-alcoholicfattyliver

disease

9years 2---5 Thalassemia

follow-up

Primarycare Non-alcoholicfattyliver

disease

13years <2 Nonspecificobesity Endocrinologyclinic Non-alcoholicfattyliver

disease

11years <2 Abdominalpain Emergency

department

Autoimmunehepatitis 2years 2---5 Suspectedcoeliac

disease

Gastrointestinalclinic

Autoimmunehepatitis 20months <2 Vomiting Primarycare

Hepatichaemangioma 13years <2 Jointpain Rheumatologyclinic

Hepatorenalpolycystic disease

20months 2---5 Weightfaltering Primarycare

Hepaticfocalnodular hyperplasia

11years <2 Abdominalpain Primarycare

Unexplained

hypertransaminasaemia

6months 2---5 Follow-upof

operated omphalocele

Neonatalcare

Unexplained

hypertransaminasaemia

20months >5 Prolongeddiarrhoea Primarycare

although most proposeadjustments basedonsexand age amongother possiblefactors (ethnicity,countryof origin, laboratory etc.).7---27 Thus, we believe it is necessary to establishuniversalthresholdstodefinetheneedforfollow- upordiagnosticevaluationadjustedfordifferentvariables, suchasageandsex.

In our study we used the thresholds established by Lamireauetal.,18 whotookintoaccountthestudiesprevi- ouslyconductedbyEnglandetal.10andSchwimmeretal.11 Weestablishedanagerangeforthesampleof3monthsto 15years,excludingtheneonatalperiodandconcludingat theagelimitusedtodefineeligibilityforpaediatricservices inthehospitalwherethestudywasconducted.Wedivided thesampleinto3agegroupsbasedonthecriteriaappliedin thecitedstudies:3---18months,18monthsto12yearsand 12---15years.

In our sample, we found a slight predominance of the malesex, which wasconsistent with other studies in the literature.10,13,28---30

Among the multiple reasons for ordering liver func- tiontests, themost frequent overall are acuteinfectious diseases,asreportedininternationalpublications,29,30espe- ciallyinpatientswithacutepharyngotonsillitis.Asforthe settingfromwhichtestingisordered,weoughttohighlight theroleofprimarycareinitsinterpretationandinitialfol- low-up, most frequently of a chance finding in otherwise healthypatientswithnonspecificsymptomsorduringarou- tinecheckupinasymptomaticpatients.1,29,30

The times that must elapsebetween follow-uplabora- torytestsvarydependingontheconsultedguidelines.3,4,31 Inoursample,themeantimeelapsedtothefirstfollow-up testwas70.6days,andthistimewassignificantlyshorter

(6)

inpatientswithsevereALTelevationandininpatientscom- paredtooutpatients,probablybecausemorebloodtestsare performedoverallinhospitalisedpatients.

We found that 24.5% of patients received some form of pharmacological treatment in the days preceding the initial blood test, usually with an anti-infective agent (chieflyoralamoxicillin,oralamoxicillin-clavulanicacidor oral penicillin), which was consistent with the previous literature.3,32,33Oneofthelimitationsofourstudywasthat wecouldnotobtain exhaustivedataonthedrugsusedby patients(suchasparacetamol,ibuprofen,mucolyticagents, etc., which can be purchased without a prescription) or their dosage and durationof treatment, which would not bedocumentedinthehealthrecordsofthepatient,orthe useofnaturalornonpharmacologicaltreatmentspotentially associatedwithtransaminaseelevation.

In our study, adequate follow-up of hypertransami- nasaemia was performed in less than one third of the patients, anda liverdisease thatexplained theabnormal findings wasidentified in 13% of them. It is possible that someofthepatientsunderwentfollow-uptestinginprivate healthcarefacilitiesorinadifferentautonomouscommu- nity in Spain, although it is fair to assume that if initial testing was performed in a public health care facility in Aragon,thefollow-upwouldalsobeperformedinthepublic healthcaresystemofthisautonomouscommunity.

In our sample, wedid notfind an association between adequatefollow-upandage,sex,settingwheretestingwas ordered or the history of pharmacologicaltreatment, but wefoundagreaterfrequencyoffollow-upinpatientswith higherinitialelevationsofALT,whichsuggeststhatthereisa tendencytounderestimatethesignificanceofmildelevation ofALTasapotentialmarkerofliverdisease.

The obviousconcernraisedbythesefindingsisthepos- sible presence of liver disease in paediatric patients that werenotfollowedupduetotheabsenceornonspecificity oftheirclinicalmanifestationsandthatmaypresent later withprogressiveliverinvolvement,inwhomanopportunity ofdiagnosishasbeenlost.

The lowfrequency offollow-upin oursamplecouldbe due to the lack of agreement between different guide- linesasregardsfollow-upoftransaminaseelevationinthe paediatricpopulation,30,18,28,35---38 inadditiontothelack of consensusonthecut-offpointsusedtointerprettransam- inaselevelsor the potentialmisconceptionin healthcare professionalsthatliverdiseasecanberuledoutinpatients withmildliverenzyme elevation,whichis clearlyrefuted bythefindingsofourstudy.

Other case series in the adult population have found higherproportions of adequate follow-up.Forexample, a study published in 201934 that analysed the follow-up of hypertransaminasaemia in a sample of adults found that liver function tests had been repeated within a year in 68%ofpatientswithabnormalresultsandwithin2yearsin 80%,andthatfollow-uptestingwasnotperformedfollow- ingthe initialtest resultsinonly 11.7%of thesepatients.

Itisalsoimportanttoconsiderthatintheadultpopulation thereareadditionalfactorsthat couldgiverisetohyper- transaminasaemiaintheabsenceofdisease,mainlyalcohol consumption,whichisnotalwaysdisclosedbypatients,35,36 andwhich,withexceptionsintheadolescentpopulation,is notatplayinthepaediatricpopulation.

Ourstudydemonstratesthatliverdiseasedoesnotalways manifest withsubstantial transaminase elevation, as two thirdsof thepatientsinoursamplein whoaliverdisease wasidentifiedhadelevated ALTlevelslessthantwicethe ULN.Inthisregard,effortstoimprovecareshouldfocuson ensuringadequatefollow-upofasymptomaticpatientswith mildtransaminaseelevation.

Although many clinical practice guidelines have been published on the subject for the adult population, and several for the paediatric population,3,18---20,35---38 the care protocolsappliedinchildrenand/oradolescentsvarywidely intheappliedcut-offpointsandtheapproachestomanage- ment.Ourintentinconductingthisstudywastounderscore theimportanceoffollow-upineverysinglechildwithhyper- transaminasaemia, independently of age, the degree of liverenzymeelevationortheexposuretopharmacological treatment,ideally followinga standardisedcare protocol.

Needless to say, health care professionals must be made awareoftheimportanceofsuchfollow-up.

Inconclusion,inourhealthcareareaandintheperiod under study, the follow-up of most children with eleva- tion of ALT in the absence of apparent liver disease was inadequate, especially in those with mild elevation. This constitutesamissedopportunityfortheearlydiagnosisand treatmentofpotentialliverdiseaseinalargenumberofchil- dren.Allchildrenwithunexplainedhypertransaminasaemia should undergo evaluation with application of consensus- basedthresholdsandwithastandardisedapproach.

Conflicts of interest

Theauthorshavenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.

References

1.CortésL,MontoroMA.Datosdelaboratorio:pruebashepáticas alteradas.In:MontoroMA,GarcíaPagánJC,editors.Gastroen- terología y Hepatología. Problemas comunes en la práctica clínica.2.aediciónMadrid:Jarpyo;2012.p.701---22.

2.IorioR,Sepe A,GiannattasioA,CirilloF,VegnenteA.Hyper- transaminasemia in childhood as a marker of genetic liver disorders.JGastroenterol.2005;40:820---6.

3.MoltóLL,Alba˜nilMR.Aumentoaisladodetransaminasas:aprox- imacióndiagnóstica.FormActPediatrAtenPrim.2013;6:35---42.

4.BlesaBavieraLC,VegasÁlvarezAM,Alba˜nilBallesterosMR.Guía dealgoritmosenpediatríadeatenciónprimaria.Hipertransam- inasemia.AEPap.2016.Availableatalgoritmos.aepap.org.

5.Remacha EF. Ictericia y/o hipertransaminasemia. Actitud diagnóstico-terapéutica.PediatrIntegral.2003;7:187---98.

6.SociedadEspa˜noladeGastroenterología,HepatologíayNutri- ciónPediátricaCodo˜nerFranchP,SimóJordaR.Hepatitisvirales agudas. In: Ribes Koninckx C, editor. Tratamiento en gas- troenterología,hepatologíaynutriciónpediátrica.4.aedición Madrid:Ergon;2016.p.401---14.

7.AgrawalS,DhimanRK,LimdiJK.Evaluationofabnormalliver functiontests.PostgradMedJ.2016;92:223---34.

8.LawrenceS,FriedmanMD.Approachtothepatientwithabnor- mal liver biochemical and function tests. Walthman (MA):

UpToDate; 2018. Available at: http://www.uptodate.com/

[accessed27.01.19].

9.Li X, Wang D, YangC,Zhou Q, Zhuoga SL, Wang LQ,et al.

Establishmentofage-andgender-specificpediatricreference

(7)

intervalsforliverfunctiontestsinhealthyHanchildren.World JPediatr.2018;14:151---9.

10.EnglandK,ThorneC,PembreyL,TovoPA,NewellML.Age-and sex-relatedreferencerangesofalanineaminotransferaselev- elsin children: Europeanpaediatric HCVnetwork. JPediatr GastroenterolNutr.2009;49:71---7.

11.SchwimmerJB,DunnW,NormanGJ,PardeePE,MiddletonMS, KerkarN,etal.SAFETYstudy:Alanineaminotransferasecutoff valuesaresettoohighforreliabledetectionofpediatricchronic liverdisease.Gastroenterology.2010;138:1357---64.

12.ColantonioDA,KyriakopoulouL, Chan MK,DalyCH, BrincD, VennerAA,etal.Closingthegapsinpediatriclaboratoryrefe- renceintervals:aCALIPERdatabaseof40biochemicalmarkers inahealthyandmultiethnicpopulationofchildren.ClinChem.

2012;58:854---68.

13.Bussler S, Vogel M, Pietzner D, Harms K, Buzek T, Penke M, et al. New pediatric percentiles of liver enzyme serum levels(alanineaminotransferase,aspartateaminotransferase,

␥-glutamyltransferase):effectsofage,sex,bodymassindex, andpubertalstage.Hepatology.2018;68:1319---30.

14.VosMB,AbramsSH,BarlowSE,CaprioS,Daniels SR,KohliR, etal.NASPGHANClinicalPracticeGuidelinefortheDiagnosis andTreatmentofNonalcoholicFattyLiverDiseaseinChildren:

RecommendationsfromtheExpertCommitteeonNAFLD(ECON) andtheNorthAmericanSocietyofPediatricGastroenterology HepatologyandNutrition(NASPGHAN).JPediatrGastroenterol Nutr.2017;64:319---34.

15.ParkerML,AdeliK,LévyE,DelvinE.Areuniversalupperrefe- rencelimitsforalanineaminotransferase(ALT)appropriatefor assessingpediatricliverinjury?ClinBiochem.2018;53:55---7.

16.LarssonA, Ridefelt P. Pediatricreference intervals for liver markersderivedfromhealthycommunity-basedsubjectswill improvediagnosticinterpretationinchildrenandadolescents.

JLabPrecisMed.2018;3:2.

17.HigginsV,Adeli K.Advancesinpediatricreferenceintervals:

fromdiscretetocontinuous.JLabPrecisMed.2018;3:3.

18.LamireauT,McLinV,NobiliV,VajroP.Apracticalapproachtothe childwithabnormallivertests.ClinResHepatolGastroenterol.

2014;38:259---62.

19.ShawJL,CohenA,KonforteD,Binesh-MarvastiT,ColantonioDA, AdeliK. Validityof establishingpediatric referenceintervals basedonhospitalpatientdata:acomparisonofthemodified HoffmannapproachtoCALIPERreferenceintervalsobtainedin healthychildren.ClinBiochem.2014;47:166---72.

20.AbouelHassanM,StoianovA,AraújoPA,SadeghiehT,KhunChan M,ChenY,etal.CLSI-basedtransferenceofCALIPERpediatric referenceintervalstoBeckmanCoulterAUbiochemicalassays.

ClinBiochem.2015;48:1151---9.

21.Poustchi H, George J, Esmaili S, Esna-Ashari F, Ardalan G, SepanlouSG,et al.Genderdifferencesinhealthyrangesfor serum alanine aminotransferase levels in adolescence. PLoS ONE.2011;6:e21178.

22.HilstedL, RustadP,AksglædeL, SørensenK,Juul A.Recom- mendedNordicpaediatricreferenceintervalsfor21common biochemicalproperties.ScandJClinLabInvest.2013;73:1---9.

23.Rödöö P, Ridefelt P, Aldrimer M, Niklasson F, Gustafsson J, HellbergD.Population-basedpediatricreferenceintervalsfor HbA1c,bilirubin,albumin,CRP,myoglobinandserumenzymes.

ScandJClinLabInvest.2013;73:361---7.

24.DehghaniSM,ErjaeeA,HaghighatM,HadiImaniehM,AhmadiR.

UpperlimitsofnormalaminotransferasesinchildrenofSouth- ernIran.JComprPed.2014;5:e15274.

25.BugeacN,PachtA,MandelH,IancuT,TamirA,SrugoI,etal.The significanceofisolatedelevationofserumaminotransferasesin infantsandyoungchildren.ArchDisChild.2007;92:1109---12.

26.WedemeyerH, HofmannWP, Lueth S,Malinski P,Thimme R, TackeF,etal.ALTscreeningforchronicliverdiseases:scruti- nizingtheevidence.ZGastroenterol.2010;48:46---55.

27.IoannouGN,BoykoEJ,LeeSP.Theprevalenceandpredictorsof elevatedserumaminotransferaseactivityintheUnitedStates in1999---2002.AmJGastroenterol.2006;101:76---82.

28.VajroP,MaddalunoS,VeropalumboC.Persistenthypertransam- inasemiainasymptomaticchildren:astepwiseapproach.World JGastroenterol.2013;19:2740---51.

29.JangM,OhMS,OhSC,KangKS.Distributionofdiseasescausing liverfunctiontestabnormalityinchildrenandnaturalrecov- ery time of the abnormal liver function. JKorean Med Sci.

2016;31:1784---9.

30.Serdaro˘gluF,KocaT,DereciS,Akc¸amM.Theetiologyofhyper- transaminasemia in Turkish children. Bosn J Basic Med Sci.

2016;16:151---6.

31.González Jiménez D, Santos Rodríguez PM. Hipertransami- nasemiaenpediatría.BolPediatr.2013;53:137---45.

32.SociedadEspa˜noladeGastroenterología,HepatologíayNutri- ción PediátricaZurita Molina A, de la Rubia Fernández L.

Hepatitis medicamentosaytóxica.In:Ribes KoninckxC,edi- tor.Tratamientoengastroenterología,hepatologíaynutrición pediátrica.4.aediciónMadrid:Ergon;2016.p.459---68.

33.Ocete Hita E, Martín García JA, Giménez Sánchez F, Flores González,AbrilMolinaA,SalmerónEscobarJ,etal.Hepatotox- icidadporfármacosoproductosnaturalesenni˜nos.AnPediatr.

2013;78:248---59.

34.SchreinerAD,MoranWP,ZhangJ,KirklandEB,HeincelmanME, O’SchumannS,etal.Evaluationoflivertestabnormalitiesina patient-centeredmedicalhome:dolivertestpatternsmatter?

JInvestigMed.2018;66:1118---23.

35.ForteaJI,RodríguezdeLopeC,ÁlvarezS,CrespoGraciaJ.Pro- tocolodiagnósticodelaelevaciónagudadelastransaminasas enelpacienteinmunocompetente.Medicine.2016;12:529---35.

36.Ruiz-BuenoP,CuadradoLavínA,ÁlvarezS,CrespoGarcíaJ.Pro- tocolodiagnósticodelaelevacióncrónicadelastransaminasas.

Medicine.2008;10:592---6.

37.Alba˜nil R, Caraba˜no I, Galiano MJ, Guerra ME, Man- zanares J, Medina E, et al. Hipertransaminasemia. Guías ConjuntasdePatologíaDigestivaPediátricaAtenciónPrimaria- Especializada; 2008.Available at:http://www.ampap.es/wp- content/uploads/2014/05/Hipertransaminasemia2008.pdf 38.Giannini EG,TestaR, Savarino V.Liver enzymealteration: a

guideforclinicians.CMAJ.2005;172:367---79.

Referencias

Documento similar

In this paper, we study the evolution of the revisions, period by period, until reaching the final estimate, with the objective of analyzing the impact of any economic event on