www.analesdepediatria.org
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Evaluation of liver function tests in the paediatric patient 夽
Víctor Fernández Ventureira
a,∗, Ignacio Ros Arnal
a,
Gerardo Rodríguez Martínez
b, Beatriz García Rodríguez
c, Ruth García Romero
a, Eduardo Ubalde Sainz
aaUnidaddeGastroenterologíayNutriciónPediátrica,HospitalUniversitarioMiguelServet,Zaragoza,Spain
bHospitalClínicoUniversitarioLozanoBlesa,UniversidaddeZaragoza,IISAragón,Zaragoza,Spain
cServiciodeBioquímicaClínica,HospitalUniversitarioMiguelServet,Zaragoza,Spain
Received6March2020;accepted4June2020 Availableonline20May2021
KEYWORDS Liver;
Liverfunction;
Asymptomatichyper- transaminasaemia;
Alanine
aminotransferase enzyme
Abstract
Introduction:Althoughchangesinliverfunctiontestscanbenon-specificinnumerousclinical conditions,theycanbethefirstsignofapotentiallyseriousdiseaseinanasymptomaticpatient.
Materialandmethods: Retrospectivecohortstudy,performedbyreviewingtherecordsofchil- drenofareferencehospitalcentrallaboratorywithalanine aminotransferaseenzyme(ALT) elevationduringa6-monthaleatoryperiod.
Results:572bloodtestswithserum ALTelevation correspondingto403patients havebeen assessedduringtheperiodstudied.98patients wereexcludedforpresentingabnormalliver testbeforethestudyperiodofcomorbiditythatcouldproduceALTelevation.Theremaining 305patients,22.6%werediagnosedwithamedicalconditionduringthefirstbloodtestthat explainedtheALTelevation,althoughonly33.3%ofthemwerefollowedupuntilverifyingtheir normalisation.Finalstudy sample consistsof236 patients withabnormal liver test without apparentliverdisease.Adequatefollow-upwasfoundonlyin29%ofthem.Fromthisgroup,9 patients(13%)werediagnosedwithliverdisease.Therestofthesampleswerenotproperly monitored.InpatientswithhigherserumALTlevels,follow-upwasearlyandmoreappropriate.
Conclusions:Inourarea,mostchildrenwithoutapparent liverdiseasearenoproperlymon- itored.Therefore,anopportunitytodiagnosisandtreatapotentialliverdiseasewaslostin agreat number ofchildren. All children with unexplained hypertransaminasaemiamust be studied.
©2021Asociaci´onEspa˜noladePediatr´ıa.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/
4.0/).
夽 Pleasecitethisarticleas:FernándezVentureiraV,RosArnalI,RodríguezMartínezG,GarcíaRodríguezB,GarcíaRomeroR,UbaldeSainz E.Evaluacióndelseguimientodeni˜nosconhallazgodehipertransaminasemia.AnPediatr(Barc).2021;94:359---365.
∗Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress:[email protected](V.FernándezVentureira).
2341-2879/©2021Asociaci´onEspa˜noladePediatr´ıa.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
PALABRASCLAVE Hígado;
Funciónhepática;
Hipertransaminasemia asintomática;
Enzimaalanino aminotransferasa
Evaluacióndelseguimientodeni˜nosconhallazgodehipertransaminasemia
Resumen
Introducción: Lasalteracionesdelperfilhepáticoconstituyenunhechoinespecíficopropiode numerosascondicionesclínicas.Sinembargo,puedeimplicarlaprimeramanifestacióndeuna patologíapotencialmentegraveenunpacienteasintomático.
Materialymétodos:Estudioobservacionalretrospectivoqueincluyetodaslasanalíticassan- guíneasconelevacióndealaninoaminotransferasa(ALT)enpacientespediátricossolicitadas enunsectorsanitarioenunperíodode6meses.
Resultados: Seregistraron572analíticascorrespondientesa403pacientes.Seexcluyeron98 pacientesconhipertransaminasemiayaconocidaocomorbilidad.Delos305restantes,el22,6%
sediagnosticarondepatologíaasociadaahipertransaminasemia,ydeestos,secomprobónor- malizaciónenel33,3%.Delos236pacientesconhipertransaminasemiasinjustificarserealizó unseguimientoenel29%,encontrandopatologíahepáticaen9pacientes(13%delgrupo).En elrestodelamuestranosecomprobóanalíticamentelaevolucióndelastransaminasasnila presenciadeposiblepatologíahepática.Los pacientesconcifras máselevadassecontrolan mejoryantesquelosquepresentancifrasmásbajas.
Conclusiones: Ennuestraárea,lamayoríadelosni˜nossinenfermedadhepáticaaparentecon hallazgodeALTelevadanosonadecuadamentecontrolados.Estohacequesepierdaunaopor- tunidadúnicadediagnosticarytratarprecozmenteunaenfermedadhepáticapotencialenun grannúmerodeni˜nos.Todoni˜noconhipertransaminasemiainexplicadadebeserestudiado.
© 2021 Asociaci´onEspa˜nola de Pediatr´ıa. Publicado porElsevier Espa˜na, S.L.U. Este es un art´ıculoOpenAccessbajolalicenciaCCBY-NC-ND(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Abnormalitiesintheliverpanelareamongthemostfrequent changes detected inclinical practiceat both the hospital andprimarycarelevels.Routineperformanceofliverpanels hasevincedanincreaseintheincidenceofabnormalserum levelsofliverenzymes,eitherasachancefindinginasymp- tomaticpatientsorinthecontextofmildsymptoms.1,2
The elevation of liver enzymesis a nonspecific finding presentinmanyclinicalconditions.However,itcanalsobe thefirstmanifestationofpotentiallysevereliverdiseasein anapparentlyhealthypatientorasecondarymanifestation ofaseriousextrahepaticdisease.1,3,4
Theunderlyingcausesofliverenzymeelevationarehet- erogeneousanddifferbroadlydependingonthepopulation.
Althoughinadultsitismostfrequentlyassociatedwiththe use of alcohol or drugs, inthe paediatric population itis predominantlyassociatedwithtransientinfectiousdiseases (localorsystemic,viralorbacterial).2,3,5,6
The lack of universal reference valuesin children and theirdependenceonvariousfactors(stageofdevelopment, sex, age, etc.)have prompted theperformance in recent yearsofmultiplestudiesthatattempttoestablishthresh- olds that vary between publications. On the other hand, thereare noestablished clinicalguidelines for the evalu- ationandfollow-upofhypertransaminasaemiainpaediatric practice.7---18
Nevertheless,itis remarkablethat,despitetheconsid- erablesignificanceofthiscondition,thegeneraltendency at presentis toperforman insufficientfollow-up ofthese patients, globally and in our region in particular. There- fore,theaimofourstudywastoanalysethefollow-upof
patientswithhypertransaminasaemiaandwithoutapparent liverdisease, which hasnot been addressed previously in thepaediatricliterature.
Material and methods
Weconducted a retrospective, observationaland descrip- tivestudy.Weselectedasampleofpatientsaged3months to15years fromthecatchment population corresponding toHealthDistrict II of the city of Zaragoza,Spain, which includes45379childrenaged0---14years.
For the purpose of patient selection, we chose the enzymealanineaminotransferase(ALT,previouslyGPT)due toitshigherspecificityforabnormalliverfunction,including everychildwithserumlevelsexceedingpredefinedthresh- oldsfor sexandage. Weestablishedthe referencevalues basedonthoseproposedbyLamireauetal.18in2014,which inturntookintoaccountthestudiesconductedbyEngland etal.10in2009andbySchwimmeretal.11in2010,defining theupperlimitsofnormal(ULNs)for3agegroups:
• 3monthsto18months:60IU/Linboysand55IU/Lingirls.
• 18monthsto12years:40IU/Linboysand35IU/Lingirls.
• 12yearsto15years:26IU/Linboysand22IU/Lingirls.
Weincludedallpatientsinthecatchmentpopulationof theselectedhealthdistrictwithelevationofALTpastthe established thresholds withthe test ordered for any rea- sonat thehospitalor inprimarycare levelsin a6-month period(January1---June30,2016).Weexcludedallpatients withapre-existingdiseaseortreatmentplanthatjustified 360
serumelevationofALTandpatients withelevationof ALT detected prior tothe period under study. Thus, the final sample includedallpatients inthecatchment areaof the paediatricservicesofahealthdistrictwithhypertransami- nasaemiaintheabsenceofapparentliverdisease.Wemade aseparateevaluationandanalysisofpatientsin whoman aetiological diagnosis was made with the tests or levels requestedinthefirstbloodtestorder.
We wereabletoselectpatientsthroughtheevaluation ofallbloodtestsperformedbytheDepartmentofClinical BiochemistryoftheHospitalUniversitarioMiguelServet in Zaragoza(Spain),whichistaskedwithperformingallblood testsorderedinthehealthdistrict.ThelevelsofALTwere measured withaBeckmanAU5800clinicalchemistryanal- yser(pyridoxal-5-phosphatemethod).
Forthe selectedpatients,we collectedinformationon everybloodtestperformedthereafterandanalysedbyany of the biochemistry departments of the health system of Aragonbyreviewingtheelectronichealthrecords,withthe main goal of assessing the persistence of hypertransami- nasaemia, in additiontoassessingother variables suchas cytolysis, cholestasis, liver function and investigation of potentialaetiologies.
Wedefinedadequatefollow-upasperformanceofaddi- tionalbloodtestsuntilabnormallevelsnormalised,or the underlying cause was identified. We defined inadequate follow-up as lack of follow-up testing in the 12 months that followed the initial finding. Clinical practice guide- linesevenrecommendanadditionalfollow-uptestafterthe levelsnormaliseinpatientswithunexplainedhypertransam- inasaemia,asthelevelscouldfluctuate.3,4Inourstudy,we didnotconsiderabsenceof anewtestafterresolution of elevationinadequatefollow-up.
Weperformed thestatistical analysiswiththesoftware SPSSversion20.0,usingthechisquaretest,Studentttest andanalysisofvarianceanddefiningstatisticalsignificance asap-valueoflessthan0.05.
The studywasapprovedbytheClinicalResearchEthics CommitteeofAragon(CEICA).
Results
Weanalysed572panelswithelevationofALTserumlevels corresponding to403 patients aged 3 months to15 years andperformed in the periodunderstudy.Theyamounted to 8.4% of all ALT tests and 2.9% of all tests analysed by the Departmentof Biochemistry during thesame time period. We excluded 83 patients that had a pre-existing conditionorreceivingtreatmentthatcouldaccountforthe elevation (chemotherapy, neuromuscular disease, chronic liverdisease,immediatepostoperativeperiod,paracetamol poisoning, etc.)and 15asymptomatic patientsundergoing evaluationforhypertransaminasaemiadetectedbeforethe studyperiod.Thus,in305patientstherewasnoapparent causeofhypertransaminasaemia.In69ofthemaprobable aetiological diagnosis couldbemade basedonthe results ofthebloodtestsofadditionaldiagnostictestsperformed atthesametime(infectiousmononucleosisin62.3%,post- infectiousacutemyositisin20.3%,coeliacdiseasein2.9%, etc.).
Clinicalguidelinesrecommendafollow-uptestinthese patients once the episode of intercurrent disease has resolvedtoconfirmnormalisationofthelevels,astheiden- tifieddisease maybe masking an underlyingcondition. In oursample, we found that in thegroup of patientsgiven adiagnosisof acutediseasethatcouldexplaintheaetiol- ogy,normalisationoftheenzymelevelswasonlyobserved followingresolutionofthediseasein33.3%.
Thus, we identified 236 patients without elevation of ALTbeforetheperiodunderstudyandwithoutanapparent healthcondition ortherapeuticintervention priortoor at thetimeoftestingthatcouldjustifyit.Theanalysisincluded thissubsetofpatients.
Of these patients, 47.5% were female (112 patients), and the age distribution was 3.4% aged 3---18 months (8 patients),58.5%aged18monthsto12years(138patients) and38.1%aged12---15years(90patients). Thetestswere orderedatthelevelofprimarycarelevelin55.9%ofcases (132patients),hospital-basedoutpatientcarein33.1%(78 patients),paediatricemergencycarein6.8%(16patients) andinpatientcarein4.2%(10patients).
TheinitiallevelofALTwaslessthantwicetheestablished ULNin75.8%(179patients),betweentwiceand5timesthe ULNin20.3%(48patients)andgreaterthan5timestheULN in3.8%(9patients).
The reason/complaint that led to ordering the initial blood panel was digestive/gastrointestinal in 27.5% (65 patients), acute infection in 16.9% (40 patients), or rou- tine testing that led to an incidental finding in 9.7% (23 patients), preoperative testing with incidental finding in 5.9%(14patients)andotherin39.8%(94patients).
Inoursample,24.57%ofthepatients(58patients)were intreatmentwithadrugprescribedbythepaediatricianin thedaysthatprecededthecollectionofthefirstbloodsam- ple.Themostfrequentdrugsbeingusedwereanti-infective drugs,chieflyoralamoxicillin(18patients),oralamoxicillin- clavulanicacid(12patients)andoralpenicillin(5patients).
Wewereunabletoobtaindataonover-the-countermedica- tion(paracetamol,NSAIDs,coughmedicine,homoeopathic remedies,etc.).
Inadditiontoliverfunctiontests,other measurements or diagnostic tests were ordered for investigation of the aetiologyofhypertransaminasaemia,suchasthyroidfunc- tiontests(48.3%,114patients),markersofcoeliacdisease (27.1%, 64 patients), serum immunoglobulins (22.5%, 53 patients), serological tests (17.8%, 42 patients), abdomi- nalultrasound(11%,26patients),autoantibodies(6.4%,15 patients),ceruloplasmin(4.2%,10patients),serumcopper (3.8%,9patients),alfa-1antitrypsin(3%,7patients),total serum protein (2.5%, 6 patients), reducing substances in urine(0.8%,2 patients),copper in urine(0.4%,1 patient) orDopplerultrasound(0.4%,1patient).
Ofthesepatients,34.3%underwentfollow-uptesting(81 patients),whichrevealedpersistenceofabnormallevelsin 46.8%(37patients).However,in66.5%(157patients)testing wasnotperformedagaininthe12monthsthatfollowedthe abnormalresult.
Whenitcametothetimeelapseduntillaboratorytests were performed for follow-up in patients for who it was requested,itwasof30daysoflessin40.7%(33patients)and greaterthan30daysin59.2%(48patients),withameanof 70.6days(median,46days).Thetimeelapsedtofollow-up
Adequate followup: 23:
Adequate followup: 69
No follow-up testing: 155 :
Normalization: 58 Liver disease: 9
Persistent elevation: 2 1 followup with blood
tests: 9 572 blood tests
403 patients
Exclusion criteria:
-Pre-existing disease/treatment: 83 -Previous hypertransaminasaemia: 15
305 patients
Diagnosis with the first round of testing: 69 patients
No diagnosis with the first round of testing: 236 patients
Inadequate followup: 46
Normalization: 23
Inadequate followup: 167
2 followups with blood tests: 3
Figure1 Descriptionofpatientselectionandfollow-up.
testing wassignificantly shorter in patients with ALT lev- elsgreaterthantwicetheULN(79.9+66.2days)compared topatientswithlevelslessthantwicetheULN(55.7+63.9 days)andalsoininpatients(75.03+77.3days)comparedto outpatients(66.7+60.3days)(P<.05).
Overall, the follow-up after detection of unexplained hypertransaminasaemiawasnotadequatein70.8%ofcases (167patients).Thus,inoursample,adequatefollow-upwas onlyperformedin29.2%delospatients(Fig.1).
When we analysedthevariables thatcouldexplainthe adequacyorinadequacyofthefollow-up,wedidnotfindan associationbetweenthisvariableandage,sex,thesourceof theorderorthehistoryofpharmacologicaltreatment,but wedidfindanassociationwiththeinitialdegreeofelevation ofALT(Table1).
Inthegroupofpatientswithadequatefollow-up,13%(9 patients)receivedadiagnosisthatexplainedtheelevation ofserumtransaminases.Fourreceivedadiagnosis ofnon- alcoholicfattyliverdisease,2of autoimmunehepatitis,1 ofhepatorenalpolycysticdisease,1ofliverhaemangioma and 1 of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. On the other hand, when it came to patients with persistent transam- inase elevation, in 2 it was not possible to determine the causeof hypertransaminasaemia during the follow-up despite anexhaustive evaluation(includinga normalliver biopsy)(Table2).
Twothirdsofthepatientsthatreceivedafinaldiagnosis ofliverdiseasehadinitiallevelsofALTlessthantwicethe establishedULN,andwe didnotfindinitiallevelsgreater than5timestheULNinanyofthepatients.
Discussion
Serumelevationofliverenzymesisanincreasinglyfrequent incidental findingin blood tests ordered in asymptomatic patientsor inthecontextof mildsymptoms inthepaedi- atricpopulation.3,4 This elevationis a nonspecific feature found in numerous conditions, but it may also be the initialclinicalmanifestationofpotentiallyseriousprogres- sive liver disease. Therefore, it is important to monitor these levels to confirm normalisation or to carry out a broaderevaluationtoestablishtheaetiologyoftheeleva- tion.Theaimofourstudywastoanalysethefollow-upin currentclinicalpracticeofpaediatricpatientswithhyper- transaminasaemia in our region. To do so, we selected a 6-monthperiodbackenoughintimetohaveallowedacom- prehensive investigation of hypertransaminasaemia to be completed.
Normal serum liver enzyme levels have not been specifically established in the paediatric population. The thresholdsestablishedinstudiesonthesubjectvarywidely,
Table1 Variablesunderstudyinthesampleatthetimeofinitialbloodtesting,overallandintheadequateandinadequate follow-upgroups.
Inadequatefollow-up Adequatefollow-up Total P
Ageinyears(mean±SD) 9.48±4.75 8.16±4.95 9.9±4.84 .057
Useofmedication(%) 21.6% 31.9% 24.6% .099
Female(%) 48.5% 44.9% 47.5% .361
ALT<2×ULN(%) 80.8% 63.8% 75.8%(oftotalsample) .01
ALT>2×ULN(%) 18% 26.1% 20.3%(oftotalsample)
ALT>5×ULN(%) 1.2% 10.1% 3.8%(oftotalsample)
Settinga(PC/HBC) 74.2%/66.3% 25.8%/33.7% 55.9%/44.1% .197
HBC,hospital-basedcare(outpatientcare,emergencycareandinpatientcare);PC,primarycare;SD,standarddeviation;ULN,upper limitofnormal.
a Setting:settingwheretheinitialbloodtestswereordered.
Table2 Patientswithadiagnosisthatexplainedhypertransaminasaemiaorunexplainedhypertransaminasaemiadespiteafull aetiologicalinvestigation.
Diagnosis Age InitialALT
elevation(×ULN)
Reasonforordering Setting Non-alcoholicfattyliver
disease
14years <2 Hypopituitarism
follow-up
Endocrinologyclinic Non-alcoholicfattyliver
disease
9years 2---5 Thalassemia
follow-up
Primarycare Non-alcoholicfattyliver
disease
13years <2 Nonspecificobesity Endocrinologyclinic Non-alcoholicfattyliver
disease
11years <2 Abdominalpain Emergency
department
Autoimmunehepatitis 2years 2---5 Suspectedcoeliac
disease
Gastrointestinalclinic
Autoimmunehepatitis 20months <2 Vomiting Primarycare
Hepatichaemangioma 13years <2 Jointpain Rheumatologyclinic
Hepatorenalpolycystic disease
20months 2---5 Weightfaltering Primarycare
Hepaticfocalnodular hyperplasia
11years <2 Abdominalpain Primarycare
Unexplained
hypertransaminasaemia
6months 2---5 Follow-upof
operated omphalocele
Neonatalcare
Unexplained
hypertransaminasaemia
20months >5 Prolongeddiarrhoea Primarycare
although most proposeadjustments basedonsexand age amongother possiblefactors (ethnicity,countryof origin, laboratory etc.).7---27 Thus, we believe it is necessary to establishuniversalthresholdstodefinetheneedforfollow- upordiagnosticevaluationadjustedfordifferentvariables, suchasageandsex.
In our study we used the thresholds established by Lamireauetal.,18 whotookintoaccountthestudiesprevi- ouslyconductedbyEnglandetal.10andSchwimmeretal.11 Weestablishedanagerangeforthesampleof3monthsto 15years,excludingtheneonatalperiodandconcludingat theagelimitusedtodefineeligibilityforpaediatricservices inthehospitalwherethestudywasconducted.Wedivided thesampleinto3agegroupsbasedonthecriteriaappliedin thecitedstudies:3---18months,18monthsto12yearsand 12---15years.
In our sample, we found a slight predominance of the malesex, which wasconsistent with other studies in the literature.10,13,28---30
Among the multiple reasons for ordering liver func- tiontests, themost frequent overall are acuteinfectious diseases,asreportedininternationalpublications,29,30espe- ciallyinpatientswithacutepharyngotonsillitis.Asforthe settingfromwhichtestingisordered,weoughttohighlight theroleofprimarycareinitsinterpretationandinitialfol- low-up, most frequently of a chance finding in otherwise healthypatientswithnonspecificsymptomsorduringarou- tinecheckupinasymptomaticpatients.1,29,30
The times that must elapsebetween follow-uplabora- torytestsvarydependingontheconsultedguidelines.3,4,31 Inoursample,themeantimeelapsedtothefirstfollow-up testwas70.6days,andthistimewassignificantlyshorter
inpatientswithsevereALTelevationandininpatientscom- paredtooutpatients,probablybecausemorebloodtestsare performedoverallinhospitalisedpatients.
We found that 24.5% of patients received some form of pharmacological treatment in the days preceding the initial blood test, usually with an anti-infective agent (chieflyoralamoxicillin,oralamoxicillin-clavulanicacidor oral penicillin), which was consistent with the previous literature.3,32,33Oneofthelimitationsofourstudywasthat wecouldnotobtain exhaustivedataonthedrugsusedby patients(suchasparacetamol,ibuprofen,mucolyticagents, etc., which can be purchased without a prescription) or their dosage and durationof treatment, which would not bedocumentedinthehealthrecordsofthepatient,orthe useofnaturalornonpharmacologicaltreatmentspotentially associatedwithtransaminaseelevation.
In our study, adequate follow-up of hypertransami- nasaemia was performed in less than one third of the patients, anda liverdisease thatexplained theabnormal findings wasidentified in 13% of them. It is possible that someofthepatientsunderwentfollow-uptestinginprivate healthcarefacilitiesorinadifferentautonomouscommu- nity in Spain, although it is fair to assume that if initial testing was performed in a public health care facility in Aragon,thefollow-upwouldalsobeperformedinthepublic healthcaresystemofthisautonomouscommunity.
In our sample, wedid notfind an association between adequatefollow-upandage,sex,settingwheretestingwas ordered or the history of pharmacologicaltreatment, but wefoundagreaterfrequencyoffollow-upinpatientswith higherinitialelevationsofALT,whichsuggeststhatthereisa tendencytounderestimatethesignificanceofmildelevation ofALTasapotentialmarkerofliverdisease.
The obviousconcernraisedbythesefindingsisthepos- sible presence of liver disease in paediatric patients that werenotfollowedupduetotheabsenceornonspecificity oftheirclinicalmanifestationsandthatmaypresent later withprogressiveliverinvolvement,inwhomanopportunity ofdiagnosishasbeenlost.
The lowfrequency offollow-upin oursamplecouldbe due to the lack of agreement between different guide- linesasregardsfollow-upoftransaminaseelevationinthe paediatricpopulation,30,18,28,35---38 inadditiontothelack of consensusonthecut-offpointsusedtointerprettransam- inaselevelsor the potentialmisconceptionin healthcare professionalsthatliverdiseasecanberuledoutinpatients withmildliverenzyme elevation,whichis clearlyrefuted bythefindingsofourstudy.
Other case series in the adult population have found higherproportions of adequate follow-up.Forexample, a study published in 201934 that analysed the follow-up of hypertransaminasaemia in a sample of adults found that liver function tests had been repeated within a year in 68%ofpatientswithabnormalresultsandwithin2yearsin 80%,andthatfollow-uptestingwasnotperformedfollow- ingthe initialtest resultsinonly 11.7%of thesepatients.
Itisalsoimportanttoconsiderthatintheadultpopulation thereareadditionalfactorsthat couldgiverisetohyper- transaminasaemiaintheabsenceofdisease,mainlyalcohol consumption,whichisnotalwaysdisclosedbypatients,35,36 andwhich,withexceptionsintheadolescentpopulation,is notatplayinthepaediatricpopulation.
Ourstudydemonstratesthatliverdiseasedoesnotalways manifest withsubstantial transaminase elevation, as two thirdsof thepatientsinoursamplein whoaliverdisease wasidentifiedhadelevated ALTlevelslessthantwicethe ULN.Inthisregard,effortstoimprovecareshouldfocuson ensuringadequatefollow-upofasymptomaticpatientswith mildtransaminaseelevation.
Although many clinical practice guidelines have been published on the subject for the adult population, and several for the paediatric population,3,18---20,35---38 the care protocolsappliedinchildrenand/oradolescentsvarywidely intheappliedcut-offpointsandtheapproachestomanage- ment.Ourintentinconductingthisstudywastounderscore theimportanceoffollow-upineverysinglechildwithhyper- transaminasaemia, independently of age, the degree of liverenzymeelevationortheexposuretopharmacological treatment,ideally followinga standardisedcare protocol.
Needless to say, health care professionals must be made awareoftheimportanceofsuchfollow-up.
Inconclusion,inourhealthcareareaandintheperiod under study, the follow-up of most children with eleva- tion of ALT in the absence of apparent liver disease was inadequate, especially in those with mild elevation. This constitutesamissedopportunityfortheearlydiagnosisand treatmentofpotentialliverdiseaseinalargenumberofchil- dren.Allchildrenwithunexplainedhypertransaminasaemia should undergo evaluation with application of consensus- basedthresholdsandwithastandardisedapproach.
Conflicts of interest
Theauthorshavenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.
References
1.CortésL,MontoroMA.Datosdelaboratorio:pruebashepáticas alteradas.In:MontoroMA,GarcíaPagánJC,editors.Gastroen- terología y Hepatología. Problemas comunes en la práctica clínica.2.aediciónMadrid:Jarpyo;2012.p.701---22.
2.IorioR,Sepe A,GiannattasioA,CirilloF,VegnenteA.Hyper- transaminasemia in childhood as a marker of genetic liver disorders.JGastroenterol.2005;40:820---6.
3.MoltóLL,Alba˜nilMR.Aumentoaisladodetransaminasas:aprox- imacióndiagnóstica.FormActPediatrAtenPrim.2013;6:35---42.
4.BlesaBavieraLC,VegasÁlvarezAM,Alba˜nilBallesterosMR.Guía dealgoritmosenpediatríadeatenciónprimaria.Hipertransam- inasemia.AEPap.2016.Availableatalgoritmos.aepap.org.
5.Remacha EF. Ictericia y/o hipertransaminasemia. Actitud diagnóstico-terapéutica.PediatrIntegral.2003;7:187---98.
6.SociedadEspa˜noladeGastroenterología,HepatologíayNutri- ciónPediátricaCodo˜nerFranchP,SimóJordaR.Hepatitisvirales agudas. In: Ribes Koninckx C, editor. Tratamiento en gas- troenterología,hepatologíaynutriciónpediátrica.4.aedición Madrid:Ergon;2016.p.401---14.
7.AgrawalS,DhimanRK,LimdiJK.Evaluationofabnormalliver functiontests.PostgradMedJ.2016;92:223---34.
8.LawrenceS,FriedmanMD.Approachtothepatientwithabnor- mal liver biochemical and function tests. Walthman (MA):
UpToDate; 2018. Available at: http://www.uptodate.com/
[accessed27.01.19].
9.Li X, Wang D, YangC,Zhou Q, Zhuoga SL, Wang LQ,et al.
Establishmentofage-andgender-specificpediatricreference
intervalsforliverfunctiontestsinhealthyHanchildren.World JPediatr.2018;14:151---9.
10.EnglandK,ThorneC,PembreyL,TovoPA,NewellML.Age-and sex-relatedreferencerangesofalanineaminotransferaselev- elsin children: Europeanpaediatric HCVnetwork. JPediatr GastroenterolNutr.2009;49:71---7.
11.SchwimmerJB,DunnW,NormanGJ,PardeePE,MiddletonMS, KerkarN,etal.SAFETYstudy:Alanineaminotransferasecutoff valuesaresettoohighforreliabledetectionofpediatricchronic liverdisease.Gastroenterology.2010;138:1357---64.
12.ColantonioDA,KyriakopoulouL, Chan MK,DalyCH, BrincD, VennerAA,etal.Closingthegapsinpediatriclaboratoryrefe- renceintervals:aCALIPERdatabaseof40biochemicalmarkers inahealthyandmultiethnicpopulationofchildren.ClinChem.
2012;58:854---68.
13.Bussler S, Vogel M, Pietzner D, Harms K, Buzek T, Penke M, et al. New pediatric percentiles of liver enzyme serum levels(alanineaminotransferase,aspartateaminotransferase,
␥-glutamyltransferase):effectsofage,sex,bodymassindex, andpubertalstage.Hepatology.2018;68:1319---30.
14.VosMB,AbramsSH,BarlowSE,CaprioS,Daniels SR,KohliR, etal.NASPGHANClinicalPracticeGuidelinefortheDiagnosis andTreatmentofNonalcoholicFattyLiverDiseaseinChildren:
RecommendationsfromtheExpertCommitteeonNAFLD(ECON) andtheNorthAmericanSocietyofPediatricGastroenterology HepatologyandNutrition(NASPGHAN).JPediatrGastroenterol Nutr.2017;64:319---34.
15.ParkerML,AdeliK,LévyE,DelvinE.Areuniversalupperrefe- rencelimitsforalanineaminotransferase(ALT)appropriatefor assessingpediatricliverinjury?ClinBiochem.2018;53:55---7.
16.LarssonA, Ridefelt P. Pediatricreference intervals for liver markersderivedfromhealthycommunity-basedsubjectswill improvediagnosticinterpretationinchildrenandadolescents.
JLabPrecisMed.2018;3:2.
17.HigginsV,Adeli K.Advancesinpediatricreferenceintervals:
fromdiscretetocontinuous.JLabPrecisMed.2018;3:3.
18.LamireauT,McLinV,NobiliV,VajroP.Apracticalapproachtothe childwithabnormallivertests.ClinResHepatolGastroenterol.
2014;38:259---62.
19.ShawJL,CohenA,KonforteD,Binesh-MarvastiT,ColantonioDA, AdeliK. Validityof establishingpediatric referenceintervals basedonhospitalpatientdata:acomparisonofthemodified HoffmannapproachtoCALIPERreferenceintervalsobtainedin healthychildren.ClinBiochem.2014;47:166---72.
20.AbouelHassanM,StoianovA,AraújoPA,SadeghiehT,KhunChan M,ChenY,etal.CLSI-basedtransferenceofCALIPERpediatric referenceintervalstoBeckmanCoulterAUbiochemicalassays.
ClinBiochem.2015;48:1151---9.
21.Poustchi H, George J, Esmaili S, Esna-Ashari F, Ardalan G, SepanlouSG,et al.Genderdifferencesinhealthyrangesfor serum alanine aminotransferase levels in adolescence. PLoS ONE.2011;6:e21178.
22.HilstedL, RustadP,AksglædeL, SørensenK,Juul A.Recom- mendedNordicpaediatricreferenceintervalsfor21common biochemicalproperties.ScandJClinLabInvest.2013;73:1---9.
23.Rödöö P, Ridefelt P, Aldrimer M, Niklasson F, Gustafsson J, HellbergD.Population-basedpediatricreferenceintervalsfor HbA1c,bilirubin,albumin,CRP,myoglobinandserumenzymes.
ScandJClinLabInvest.2013;73:361---7.
24.DehghaniSM,ErjaeeA,HaghighatM,HadiImaniehM,AhmadiR.
UpperlimitsofnormalaminotransferasesinchildrenofSouth- ernIran.JComprPed.2014;5:e15274.
25.BugeacN,PachtA,MandelH,IancuT,TamirA,SrugoI,etal.The significanceofisolatedelevationofserumaminotransferasesin infantsandyoungchildren.ArchDisChild.2007;92:1109---12.
26.WedemeyerH, HofmannWP, Lueth S,Malinski P,Thimme R, TackeF,etal.ALTscreeningforchronicliverdiseases:scruti- nizingtheevidence.ZGastroenterol.2010;48:46---55.
27.IoannouGN,BoykoEJ,LeeSP.Theprevalenceandpredictorsof elevatedserumaminotransferaseactivityintheUnitedStates in1999---2002.AmJGastroenterol.2006;101:76---82.
28.VajroP,MaddalunoS,VeropalumboC.Persistenthypertransam- inasemiainasymptomaticchildren:astepwiseapproach.World JGastroenterol.2013;19:2740---51.
29.JangM,OhMS,OhSC,KangKS.Distributionofdiseasescausing liverfunctiontestabnormalityinchildrenandnaturalrecov- ery time of the abnormal liver function. JKorean Med Sci.
2016;31:1784---9.
30.Serdaro˘gluF,KocaT,DereciS,Akc¸amM.Theetiologyofhyper- transaminasemia in Turkish children. Bosn J Basic Med Sci.
2016;16:151---6.
31.González Jiménez D, Santos Rodríguez PM. Hipertransami- nasemiaenpediatría.BolPediatr.2013;53:137---45.
32.SociedadEspa˜noladeGastroenterología,HepatologíayNutri- ción PediátricaZurita Molina A, de la Rubia Fernández L.
Hepatitis medicamentosaytóxica.In:Ribes KoninckxC,edi- tor.Tratamientoengastroenterología,hepatologíaynutrición pediátrica.4.aediciónMadrid:Ergon;2016.p.459---68.
33.Ocete Hita E, Martín García JA, Giménez Sánchez F, Flores González,AbrilMolinaA,SalmerónEscobarJ,etal.Hepatotox- icidadporfármacosoproductosnaturalesenni˜nos.AnPediatr.
2013;78:248---59.
34.SchreinerAD,MoranWP,ZhangJ,KirklandEB,HeincelmanME, O’SchumannS,etal.Evaluationoflivertestabnormalitiesina patient-centeredmedicalhome:dolivertestpatternsmatter?
JInvestigMed.2018;66:1118---23.
35.ForteaJI,RodríguezdeLopeC,ÁlvarezS,CrespoGraciaJ.Pro- tocolodiagnósticodelaelevaciónagudadelastransaminasas enelpacienteinmunocompetente.Medicine.2016;12:529---35.
36.Ruiz-BuenoP,CuadradoLavínA,ÁlvarezS,CrespoGarcíaJ.Pro- tocolodiagnósticodelaelevacióncrónicadelastransaminasas.
Medicine.2008;10:592---6.
37.Alba˜nil R, Caraba˜no I, Galiano MJ, Guerra ME, Man- zanares J, Medina E, et al. Hipertransaminasemia. Guías ConjuntasdePatologíaDigestivaPediátricaAtenciónPrimaria- Especializada; 2008.Available at:http://www.ampap.es/wp- content/uploads/2014/05/Hipertransaminasemia2008.pdf 38.Giannini EG,TestaR, Savarino V.Liver enzymealteration: a
guideforclinicians.CMAJ.2005;172:367---79.