• No se han encontrado resultados

Iden%fica%on  and  energy  calibra%on  of   hadronically  decaying  tau  leptons  with  the   ATLAS  experiment.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "Iden%fica%on  and  energy  calibra%on  of   hadronically  decaying  tau  leptons  with  the   ATLAS  experiment."

Copied!
24
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Iden%fica%on  and  energy  calibra%on  of   hadronically  decaying  tau  leptons  with  the  

ATLAS  experiment.    

Almut  Pingel  

Niels  Bohr  Ins3tute  

 

on  behalf  of  the  ALTAS  collabora3on  

 

ICHEP,  Valencia  (Spain)   3  July  2014  

(2)

Physics  with  Taus  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   2  

[GeV]

mT

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Events / 20 GeV

1 10 102

103

104

105

Selection H+

Heavy Data 2012 True

misID Jet

Uncertainty

= 250 GeV ( x 10)

H+

m

max

) = 50, MSSM mh

tan(

Ldt = 19.5 fb-1

= 8 TeV s

ATLASPreliminary

ln(1+S/B) w. Events / 10 GeV

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

[GeV]

mMMC

60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

w. Data-Bkg.

0 10

µ=1) ( (125) H

µ=1) ( (110) H

=1) µ ( (150) H

Data

=1) µ ( (125) H Z Others Fakes Uncert.

ATLAS Preliminary VBF+Boosted H

L dt = 20.3 fb-1

= 8 TeV s

[GeV]

mZ’

500 1000 1500 2000

) [pb]Z’(BR×) Z’pp(

10-3

10-2

10-1

1

ATLAS Preliminary

L dt = 19.5 fb-1 s = 8 TeV channel

had had

Expected limit

± 1 Expected

± 2 Expected Observed limit Z’SSM

th. uncert.

Z’SSM

Higgs  à  ττ   Charged  Higgs  search   Z’  à  ττ  search  

SM  physics:  Zàττ  ,  Rbar,  tau  polariza3on  in  Wàτν,  …   Beyond  SM:  SUSY  searches,  charged  Higgs,  Z’,  …  

 See  backup  for  documenta3on  of  performance  and  physics  results    

(3)

Hadronic  Tau  Decays  in  ATLAS  

29 May 2012 Almut Pingel (NBI) - Atlas Weekly 2

Tau Object

Tau Identification (tau ID)

discrimination against QCD

jets

Muon Veto

suppression of muon fakes additional to muon overlap removal Electron Veto

suppression of electron fakes

additional to electron overlap

removal

Tau Energy Scale (TES)

calibration of energy, eta

tag&probe analyses

tests and measurements of efficiencies and TES, using Wtaunu, Ztautau and ttbar

events from data Tau Reconstruction

seeded by jets, track and vertex association,

calculation of

identification variables

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   3  

Trigger  

Reconstruc3on  

Discrimina3on   against  electrons  

Discrimina3on   against  muons  

Energy   calibra3on   T&P  

measurements   Discrimina3on  

against  QCD  jets  

(4)

Tau  Lepton  

•  mτ  =  1.777  GeV  

•  Most  taus  decay  inside  beam  pipe  

•  Hadronic  decays:  65%  

–  Mainly  charged  +  neutral  pions   –  1  or  3  tracks  

–  Energy  deposits  in  EM  and  HAD   calorimeters  

•  Main  background:  QCD  jets  

•  Reconstruc3on:  

–  Seeded  by  an3-­‐kT  jets  (R  <  0.4)   –  Tracks:  pT  >  1  GeV,  dR  <  0.2  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   4  

(5)

Hadronic  Tau  Decay  Characteris3cs  

core

fcorr

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Sample Fraction / 0.02

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

0.16 Z,Z’ ττ, W τν Data 2012 (jets)

= 8 TeV s

-1, L dt = 740 pb

> 15 GeV

pT

1-prong,

ATLASPreliminary

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   5  

•  Isola3on    

•  Lateral  shape  

–  Narrow  energy  deposi3on  

–  Small  track  to  jet  axis  distance    

•  Leading  track  momentum  frac3on  

•  Secondary  vertex  

•  Invariant  mass  

•  π0  informa3on  

•  Longitudinal  shower  shape  

•  Transi3on  radia3on  in  TRT  

Centrality  frac3on   τ  

(6)

Tau  Iden3fica3on  

NVtx

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Signal Efficiency

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

TauBDT loose TauBDT medium TauBDT tight 1 Prong

| < 2.5 > 15 GeV, |

pT

= 8TeV s

Simulation 2012, ATLASPreliminary

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   6  

•  Boosted  Decision  Trees  (BDTs)    

•  Separately  for  jets  (tau  ID)  and  electrons  (e-­‐veto)  

•  Separately  for  1-­‐prong  and  3-­‐prong  taus  

•  Minimum  tau  pT  :  15  GeV  

•  Pile-­‐up  corrected  input  variables  à  pile-­‐up  robust  

Signal Efficiency

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Inverse Background Efficiency

1 10 102

103

104

TauBDT Summer 2012 TauBDT Winter 2013

1 Prong

| < 2.5 > 15 GeV, |

pT

= 8 TeV s

Data+Simulation 2012, Preliminary ATLAS

Signal  eff.  vs  number  of  ver3ces   Background  rejec3on  vs  signal  eff.  

(7)

Tau  Energy  Scale  (TES)  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   7  

•  Energy  scales  for  taus:    

 EM  scale  à  LC  scale  à  TES  

•  TES:  compensate  differences  of   reconstructed  and  true  visible   energy  (MC  based)  

–  Specific  hadron  mix  

–  Energy  loss  on  the  way   –  Pile-­‐up  contribu3ons  

•  Specific  for  number  of  tracks  =1   and  >1,  different  η-­‐regions  

Momentum  resolu3on   Energy  response  

(8)

Performance  Measurements  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   8  8  

•  Z  à  τe/μ  τhad  tag-­‐and-­‐probe   analysis  on  2012  data  

•  Requirements  on  

–  visible  mass  mvis(e/μ,  τhad-­‐vis)   –  missing  ET  (direc3on,  

transverse  mass)  

 to  suppress  Z  à  ll,    W  à  lν  

(9)

Performance  Measurements  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   9  

track

Nc+c

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Events

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 22000 24000

ATLAS Preliminary = 8 TeV s

-1, L dt = 8.5 fb

channel, BDT Medium ID

µ had

Z

Data 2012 Fit 1-prong multi-prong electrons jets

9  

track

Nc+c

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Events

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

35000 ATLAS Preliminary

= 8 TeV s

-1, L dt = 8.5 fb

channel, Before ID

µ had

Z

Data 2012 Fit

) (Z electrons jets

Medium  tau  ID  

No  tau  ID  

•  Z  à  τe/μ  τhad  tag-­‐and-­‐probe   analysis  on  2012  data  

•  Requirements  on  

–  visible  mass  mvis(e/μ,  τhad-­‐vis)   –  missing  ET  (direc3on,  

transverse  mass)  

 to  suppress  Z  à  ll,    W  à  lν  

•  Data-­‐driven  background  

es3ma3on  for  jet  background:  

Template  fit  of  extended  track   mul3plicity  

(10)

Performance  Measurement:  tau  ID  

Tau ID BDT Score 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Events

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Events

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000

20000 Data 2012

(OS-SS) Z

W+jets (Data driven) ll (OS-SS)

* Z/

Top (OS-SS) Other (OS-SS) Same Sign Stat. Unc.

L dt = 20 fb-1

= 8 TeV s

Preliminary ATLAS

(full sim.) Z

Tau ID BDT Score

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Data/MC 0.6

0.81 1.21.4

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   10  

Loose Medium Tight

Scale Factor

0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2

1.3 ATLAS Preliminary = 8 TeV s

-1, L dt = 8.5-14.3 fb

Data 2012 BDT ID, Inclusive

channel

µhad

Z

channel

e had

Z

channel W had

+jets channel t had

t

combination

had

Z lep

•  Data/MC  correc3on  factors:  

–  Combina3on  of  Z  à  τμ  τhad  and       Z  à  τe  τhad  results  

–  No  pT  dependence,  small  η   dependence  (barrel/end-­‐cap)   –  Uncertain3es:  (2  –  6)%  

•  Cross  check:  W  à  τν  and  Rbar:                    

Consistent  results  in  all  channels  

•  Outlook:  “Con3nuous”  Data/MC   correc3on  factors  

à  explore  full  BDT  score  in  physics        analysis      

 

(11)

Performance  Measurement:  TES  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   11  

•  (a):  Deconvolu3on  method   –  Single  par3cle  response  

–  Low  pileup  data  taking,  MC  

•  (b):  Z  à  τμ  τhad  tag-­‐and-­‐probe   –  Invariant  mass  distribu3on   –  2012  data  

•  Uncertain3es  on  total  TES  (a),     Data/MC  differences  (a,b)  

•  Uncertain3es:  (2  –  4)%,  depending   on  η,  ET,  number  of  tracks  

[GeV]

mvis

20 40 60 80 100 120

Events / 3 GeV

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Events / 3 GeV

0 2000 4000 6000 8000

10000 Data 2012

(OS-SS) Z

(OS-SS) ll

* Z/

+jets (OS-SS) W

Top (OS-SS) Other (OS-SS) Same Sign Stat. Unc.

Ldt = 20.3 fb-1

= 8 TeV s

Preliminary ATLAS

(full sim.) Z

[GeV]

mvis

20 40 60 80 100 120

Data/MC 0.6

0.81 1.2 1.4

Invariant  mass     TES  Uncertainty  

(12)

Summary  

•  BDTs  for  discrimina3on  of  hadronic  tau  decays  from               jets  and  electrons  

•  Tau  energy  scale  to  restore  the  true  visible  energy    

•  Performance  measurements  on  data  for  valida3on   –  MC/Data  scale  factors  around  1  

–  Uncertain3es  <  6%  (ID)  and  <  4%  (TES)  

•  All  algorithms  /  measurements  are  stable  with  changing   pile-­‐up  condi3ons!  

 

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   12  

(13)

Summary  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   13  

Thank  you   J  

à  Visit  also  the  poster  on  “Iden3fica3on  of  hadronically  decaying   tau  leptons  with  the  ATLAS  experiment”  by  Dirk  Duschinger!    

•  BDTs  for  discrimina3on  of  hadronic  tau  decays  from               jets  and  electrons  

•  Tau  energy  scale  to  restore  the  true  visible  energy    

•  Performance  measurements  on  data  for  valida3on   –  Data/MC  correc3on  factors  around  1  

–  Uncertain3es  <  6%  (ID)  and  <  4%  (TES)  

•  All  algorithms  /  measurements  are  stable  with  changing   pile-­‐up  condi3ons!  

(14)

       

BACKUP  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   14  

(15)

Tau  Performance  

•  Tau  Iden3fica3on:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2013-­‐064,   hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1562839    

•  Tau  energy  scale:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2013-­‐044,   hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1544036  

•  Tau  trigger:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2013-­‐006,   hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1510157    

•  hRps://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/

TauPublicCollisionPlots    

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   15  

(16)

Physics  with  Taus  (CONF  notes)  

•  Higgs  à ττ:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2013-­‐108,   hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1632191    

•  Charged  Higgs:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2013-­‐090,   hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1595533    

•  Z  prime:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2013-­‐066,  hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1562841    

•  SUSY  with  taus:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2013-­‐026,   hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1525882    

•  Rbar:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2012-­‐032,                           hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1432198    

•  Tau  polariza3on  in  W  à  τν  events,  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2012-­‐009,   hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1428549    

•  Z  à  ττ:  ATLAS-­‐CONF-­‐2012-­‐006,  hRps://cds.cern.ch/record/1426991    

Complete  list:  hRps://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/CONFnotes    

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   16  

(17)

Physics  with  Taus  (published)  

•  SUSY  with  taus:  Phys.LeR.  B723  (2013)  15-­‐32,   hRp://arxiv.org/abs/1212.1272    

•  ttbar:  Eur.  Phys.  J.  C,  73  3  (2013)  2328,     hRp://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.7205v2.pdf    

•  Z  prime:  Phys.  LeR.  B  719  (2013)  242-­‐260,     hRp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6604    

•  More  SUSY  with  taus:  Eur.Phys.J.  C72  (2012)  2215,   hRp://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1314    

•  SM  Higgs:  JHEP  (2012)  070,  hRp://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5971    

•  More  Rbar  with  taus:  Phys.  LeR.  B  717  (2012)  89-­‐108,   hRp://arxiv.org/abs/1205.2067    

Complete  list:  hRps://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/Publica3ons    

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   17  

(18)

Electron  Veto  

•  Signal  eff.  (taus)  vs  background  efficiency  (electrons)  

•  Candidates  pass  loose  BDT  tau  ID  and  are  not   overlapping  with  3ght  electrons  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   18  

Signal efficiency 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Background efficiency

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

| < 0.80 |

0.00

| < 1.37 |

0.80

| < 1.52 |

1.37

| < 2.00 |

1.52

| < 2.47 |

2.00

ATLAS Preliminary Simulation

= 8 TeV s

TauID electron veto Winter 2013

(19)

Muon  Veto  

•  Cut-­‐based  veto  

•  Candidates  not  overlapping  with   reconstructed  muons  

•  Muons  fake  taus  by  failing  muon   reconstruc3on  

–  Inefficient  detector  regions   –  Low  momentum  muons  

–  Significant  energy  loss  in  HAD   calorimeter  

 

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   19  

fEM

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Fraction of reconstructed taus

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

True muons True taus ATLASPreliminary 2012 Simulation

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Fraction of reconstructed taus

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18

True muons True taus ATLASPreliminary

2012 Simulation

(20)

Performance  Measurement:  Trigger  

Efficiency

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Data 2012 MC Z

Data stat. error MC stat. error Data sys. error

L dt = 20.3 fb-1

= 8 TeV s

Preliminary ATLAS

all-prong µ had

Z

20 GeV tau trigger

[GeV]

Offline tau pT

0 20 40 60 80 100

MC/Data

0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2

Stat. (Data) Stat. (MC) Sys.

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   20  

•  Z  à  τμ  τhad    events  

•  Efficiency  wrt.  offline  iden3fied   taus  (BDT  medium)  

•  20  GeV  tau  trigger  

–  Plateau:    pT  >  35  GeV  

•  Uncertainty:  (2  –  8)%  

•  Combined  triggers  to  achieve   low  pT  thresholds  

–  Higgs  à  ττ  :  Di-­‐tau  trigger   –  Charged  Higgs:  tau  +  ETmiss  

Number of primary vertices

0 5 10 15 20 25

Efficiency

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

L1 L1 + L2 L1 + L2 + EF L dt = 20.3 fb-1

= 8 TeV s

Preliminary ATLAS

µ had

Z all-prong 20 GeV tau trigger

Trigger  efficiency  vs  nVtx  and  pT  

(21)

Performance  Measurement:  Tau  ID  

•  m

T

 =  Sqrt(  2  ·∙  p

T

(lep)  ·∙  E

Tmiss

 ·∙  (  1  −  cos  ∆φ(lep,  E

Tmiss

)  )    

•  No  addi3onal  leptons  in  event  

•  42  GeV  <  m

vis

 (lep,  tau)  <  82  GeV  

•  cos  ∆φ(lep,  E

Tmiss

)  +  cos  ∆φ(tau,  E

Tmiss

)  >  −0.15    

•  OS  charge  (lep,  tau)  

•  m

T

 <  50  GeV  

•  ∆φ(tau,  lep)  >  2.4    

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   21  

|

|

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Scale Factor

0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05

1.1 1.15

1.2

ATLAS Preliminary = 8 TeV s

-1, L dt = 8.5-10.5 fb

Data 2012

BDT Medium ID, Inclusive

channel

µ had

Z

channel

e had

Z

Combination (binned) Combination (overall)

(22)

Extended  Track  Mul3plicity  

Tracks  are  added  to  the  core  tracks  if  they  sa3sfy:  

•  0.2  <  dR(track,  tau  axis)  <  0.6    

•  pT(track)  >  500  MeV    

•  pT(core  track)  /  pT  (track)  ·∙  dR(core  track,  track)    <    0.4                       for  at  least  one  of  the  core  tracks  

Core  tracks  sa3sfy:  

•  pT(track)  >  1  GeV,    dR(track,  tau  axis)  <  0.2    

General  track  requirements  (distances  wrt  tau  vertex):  

•  #  pixel  hits  ≥  2,  #  pixel  +  SCT  hits  ≥  7      

•  |d0|  ≤  1.0  mm  (transverse  distance  of  closest  approach)  

•  |z0  ·∙  sin  θ|  ≤  1.5  mm  (longitudinal  distance  of  closest  appr.)  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   22  

(23)

ATLAS  detector  

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   23  

ATLAS  Collabora3on,  The  ATLAS  Experiment  at  the  CERN  Large  Hadron  Collider,  JINST  3  (2008)  S08003  

(24)

Outlook  

Many  studies  ongoing:  

•  Refine  reconstruc3on  of  decay  products  (tracks,  neutral   pions,  tau  decay  substructure)  

•  Improve  energy  and  posi3on  resolu3on  

•  BeRer  reject  jets,  electrons,  muons  

•  Update  iden3fica3on  at  trigger  level  

•  Provide  “con3nuous”  MC/Data  correc3on  factors  

à  explore  full  BDT  score  in  physics  analysis  (instead  of  pre-­‐

defined  working  points)    

3  July  2014   Almut  Pingel  (NBI)  -­‐  ICHEP2014   24  

Referencias

Documento similar

University at Albany, Albany, NY, United States Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada 3 a Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara; b Department

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, Canada Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom 172 Waseda University,

Also at Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX, United States of America p Also at Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ilia State University, Tbilisi,

High Energy Physics Institute, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Department of Physics, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel 158 Raymond and Beverly